Milwaukee blew a good lead, but then again, Washington had a 6 run 7th. Not bad overall so far.
Comment
SkivChef
SBR Wise Guy
10-19-09
730
#5533
as a life long cub fan........................
Comment
oklahoma
SBR Wise Guy
11-22-10
602
#5534
brewers open as dogs so no -1.5 rl bet as of now unless we take the alternate.
Comment
knugen
SBR MVP
12-09-09
2612
#5535
À really nice night ... Thx wallco
Comment
oklahoma
SBR Wise Guy
11-22-10
602
#5536
now that all games are done..great picks wallco
Comment
1gamer
SBR Wise Guy
02-09-11
723
#5537
CASH PLU$$$ tonite Nicely done buddy!
Comment
peeiempee
SBR MVP
01-21-09
2750
#5538
Nice nite, just need to clear that Brewers/Cubs Runline and we'll be good
Comment
Wallco99
SBR Hall of Famer
01-01-11
7261
#5539
Wallco MLB PLU$$$ 2011 System to date: 94-6 System profit/loss: +26.41 units (finished series) Since my first post: +6.14 units (79-6) (fin. series) Current open series: 1 (-3.00 units)
(6/14/11) Colorado (M/L) (B) – Win (6/14/11) Colorado (-1½) (B) – Win (6/14/11) Chicago Cubs (-1½) (B) – Loss (6/14/11) Philadelphia (M/L) (A) – Win (6/14/11) Philadelphia (-1½) (A) – Win (6/14/11) Washington (M/L) (A) – Win (6/14/11) San Francisco (M/L) (A) – Win
(A) 49-48
(B) 20-25 (C) 12-13
(D) 7-6
Games for (6/15/11): Milwaukee @ Chicago Cubs (-1½)(C) (8:05 pm EDT)
** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM. System backtest can be found in post #3446.
Comment
bauerranch
SBR Wise Guy
08-01-10
611
#5540
Sorry I was traveling and missed the good night yesterday- Congrats
Sports betting and handicapping forum: discuss picks, odds, and predictions for upcoming games and results on latest bets.
6/15
SD *OVER* - 15:10 EST (C bet)
Cincy *OVER* - 15:10 EST (A bet)
Texas *OVER* - 19:05 EST (A bet)
Cleveland *OVER* - 19:05 EST (C bet)
SL *UNDER* - 19:05 EST (A bet)
Boston *OVER* - 19:10 EST (A bet)
Milwaukee *UNDER* - 20:05 EST (A bet)
Oakland *UNDER* - 22:05 EST (B bet)
Record: 5-1
+1.25 units
3 series pending
**Plays are on the game totals, not team totals
Best of luck on all your plays today
Comment
mikey360
SBR Sharp
08-06-08
388
#5542
Great night Wallco, completely cleared up my A&B Line last night, very nice.
Comment
pagodo
SBR Wise Guy
05-09-11
669
#5543
Brilliant stuff, Wallco!
Comment
thelimit0310
SBR MVP
01-24-11
1233
#5544
Great night last night only 1 JM series and 1 Wallco series to clear up. I'm still down from the 4 D bet losses, hopped on board before I could get any profit to absorb them, but the system itself is back up and recovered and that's great. Awesome job Wallco and Hagball!
Comment
IceBet
SBR Hustler
04-14-11
66
#5545
Originally posted by Wallco99
Games for (6/15/11): Milwaukee @ Chicago Cubs (-1½)(C) (8:05 pm EDT)
** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM. System backtest can be found in post #3446.
Hey Wallco,
Didn't I just read a discussion that Cubs have never won more than 2 straight all season? So far they won the A & B bet, so why the C bet?
I trust in your system and will play as you post but just a thought.
IceBet
Comment
hagball52
SBR MVP
09-22-10
3053
#5546
JM MLB System
2011 Official season series record 11-1 (v1) 1 series pending
(A) 8-5
(B) 2-2
(C) 1-1 V2 plays 1-1
V3 system 1-1 Unofficial series 6-0 Next Plays
Official (6/14/2011) Detroit (.515)v Cleveland (.511) M/L (A) Win (6/14/2011) Arizona (.505)v San Francisco (.516) M/L (A) Loss
Next Plays
Official
(6/15/2011) Arizona (.505) v San Francisco (.518) M/L (B) (6/16 (C) if necessary)
Upcoming Plays
(6/17/2011) Oakland v San Francisco
Notes: First off, notice that I recorded a loss on the V2 plays. All of us were so busy we didn't realize that the Yankees (C) bet was a V2 play because they lost the (B) bet by more than 3 runs. Here's the rules from page 1:
Similarly, you want to increase your stake on the [C] level when these 2 criteria are met:
1. The team you’re betting on is playing at home.
2. The [b] bet that you made resulted in your team losing by 3 or more runs. Luckily we didn't up our bet size. Today ARI is a slight favorite again, this time I think the line will move in their direction but monitor it anyway. Also have 2 possible sweeps today, will update in the morning. Have not received an email from JM yet but as you can see the rpi is changing. However, he did assure us that these 2 current plays would not be like the last. (LOL)
Comment
hagball52
SBR MVP
09-22-10
3053
#5547
Just got the email from Morrison. Nothing special, no "boldly declared" statements.
Good job last night Wallco. Very impressive.
Comment
h00dini
Restricted User
09-17-09
659
#5548
Good job wallco
Comment
bruce0
SBR Wise Guy
01-07-10
905
#5549
Originally posted by Wallco99
Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 6/14/11 2011 System to date: 88-6 System profit/loss: +19.73 units (finished series) Since my first post: -0.54 units (73-6) (fin. series) Current open series: 3 (-3.65 units)
Wallco your official play yesterday was for Milwaukee -1.5, not Chicago. I really hope today's play is not Cubbies for the sweep.
Comment
peeiempee
SBR MVP
01-21-09
2750
#5550
Originally posted by bruce0
Wallco your official play yesterday was for Milwaukee -1.5, not Chicago. I really hope today's play is not Cubbies for the sweep.
It's a system. Did you think Boston would sweep yankess 7 games in a row. Or Twins would sweep Royals at a 4 game home stand. That's what system plays are play with no emotion
Comment
thelimit0310
SBR MVP
01-24-11
1233
#5551
Originally posted by bruce0
Wallco your official play yesterday was for Milwaukee -1.5, not Chicago. I really hope today's play is not Cubbies for the sweep.
2 things:
1. DO NOT quote official play posts, they cause confusion when posted more than once.
2. If the play falls under criteria, then it's a play. If we took all these different factors into account we would be no better than your average gambler.
Comment
IceBet
SBR Hustler
04-14-11
66
#5552
Originally posted by thelimit0310
2 things:
1. DO NOT quote official play posts, they cause confusion when posted more than once.
2. If the play falls under criteria, then it's a play. If we took all these different factors into account we would be no better than your average gambler.
Comment
bruce0
SBR Wise Guy
01-07-10
905
#5553
Originally posted by thelimit0310
2 things:
1. DO NOT quote official play posts, they cause confusion when posted more than once.
2. If the play falls under criteria, then it's a play. If we took all these different factors into account we would be no better than your average gambler.
My question was for Wallco, who listed yesterday's loss as being on the Cubs -1.5, not you.
I deliberately cutoff the quote from yesterday and left in the date so it would not be confused with his typical plays. If someone mistakes what is clearly not a complete Wallco post for today well...
Wallco's play was in the wee hours of the morning so I want to make sure it's not a mistake like his reference to yesterday's play being on the cubs. I'm surprised no one else mentioned that. I think I have that right to ask that without catching a lecture.
Comment
thelimit0310
SBR MVP
01-24-11
1233
#5554
Wallco was the one who originally said not to quote official play posts. You don't want to confuse people, I was caught off guard until I saw the date in your quote, other people may not be so cautious. Besides, if you've followed the system at all you would know the plays sometimes switch teams throughout a series. Not trying to start another argument on this thread so i'll just say nothing is set in stone until it is *Official*. The pick switching happens often. Hope that answers your question.
Comment
bruce0
SBR Wise Guy
01-07-10
905
#5555
Like I said just want make sure he's given it a second look since the previous play from yesterday was recorded inaccurately. Only wallco answered that question. I'm in the same boat as you by jumping on at the downfall so want to be especially sure.
Comment
bruce0
SBR Wise Guy
01-07-10
905
#5556
Like I said just want make sure he's given it a second look since the previous play from yesterday was recorded inaccurately. Only wallco can answere that question. No worries I'm in the same boat as you by jumping on at the downfall so want to be especially sure.
Comment
knugen
SBR MVP
12-09-09
2612
#5557
What u guys think about Arizona game, Will they stay as favs, or do u play them RL?
Comment
1gamer
SBR Wise Guy
02-09-11
723
#5558
Great a V1, V2, and V3 Loss already for JM. So much for a undefeated season.
Comment
Bugs Bunny
SBR High Roller
07-02-09
129
#5559
Originally posted by bruce0
Like I said just want make sure he's given it a second look since the previous play from yesterday was recorded inaccurately. Only wallco can answere that question. No worries I'm in the same boat as you by jumping on at the downfall so want to be especially sure.
just chill and relax guys
Comment
thelimit0310
SBR MVP
01-24-11
1233
#5560
Arizona's -1.5 line is a huge + money bet because San Fran won by 1 run yesterday. I played money line because the line was -112, easy juice to swallow if it loses. But taking -1.5 may be the best bet. Up to you all and good luck
Comment
oklahoma
SBR Wise Guy
11-22-10
602
#5561
Originally posted by thelimit0310
Arizona's -1.5 line is a huge + money bet because San Fran won by 1 run yesterday. I played money line because the line was -112, easy juice to swallow if it loses. But taking -1.5 may be the best bet. Up to you all and good luck
arizonas been swept on the runline only twice all year. in theyre giants and mets series. considering theyre one of the best runline teams out there this should be an interesting game and plus +181 odds are to good to pass up.
Comment
G's pks
Restricted User
01-01-09
22251
#5562
Maybe wallco should be the only one that quotes his plays for the record..some of you guys are causing to much confusion...starting to think you wear dresses!
To many systems...to many experts...cut the thread back down to JM and Wallco...amd for those of you that have something negative to say....I do not care...so do not clog the thread you mushes...
Comment
BCC585
SBR Wise Guy
04-27-11
603
#5563
Originally posted by G's pks
Maybe wallco should be the only one that quotes his plays for the record..some of you guys are causing to much confusion...starting to think you wear dresses!
To many systems...to many experts...cut the thread back down to JM and Wallco...amd for those of you that have something negative to say....I do not care...so do not clog the thread you mushes...
I have to agree.
Dont get me wrong guys, I really do like some of these new systems that just came in but I feel like there is so many conflicts about which one is better or drama in general.
It's like clash of the systems in here.
I think if everyone made their own thread it would be less cluttered and less drama filled.
Comment
ITSNOT
SBR Rookie
01-19-11
23
#5564
Hey wallco, havent really been following you or JM since basketball, good luck on your new system, ima start betting small on it, I see you got some losses already so hopefully this is a good time to jump in.
My question is if you have ever backtested JM system but taking the ML on dogs and RL for favs, I know you will have more losses but most plays would be + odds so maybe it would even out. This is how I plan on doing it for baseball for now.
Sorry if this has been discussed here but just way too much bs to sift through on this thread, wish it was more like the JM/Chase110 thread you guys had for basketball. Anyways thanks for the picks and all that.
Comment
simonk83
SBR Sharp
07-31-10
434
#5565
Interesting, will be keeping an eye on this thread