Shut Out System

[pagodo]

UPDATE
Wednesday, 6/8

Shutouts on Tuesday (6/7):
BAL vs OAK 4-0
CLE vs MIN 1-0
SD vs COL 2-0
ATL @ FLA 1-0

---
System 1 (fade a team that has been shut out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/7)
fade Kansas City, game 2 WON
fade San Diego, game 1 LOST

Plays for 6/8:
fade San Diego, game 2
fade Florida, game 1
fade Minnesota, game 1
fade Colorado, game 1
fade Oakland, game 1


Game 1: 63-61
Game 2: 34-26
Game 3: 12-14
Game 4: 7-7
Game 5: 3-4
Game 6: 3-1

SYSTEM 1 = (122-1)


---
System 2 (tail a team that has shut another out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/7)
tail Arizona, game 2 LOST
tail Texas, game 2 LOST
tail Colorado, game 1 LOST

Plays for 6/8:
tail Arizona, game 3
tail Texas, game 3
tail Colorado, game 2
tail Baltimore, game 1
tail Cleveland, game 1
tail Atlanta, game 1
tail San Diego, game 1


Game 1: 61-63
Game 2: 33-29
Game 3: 14-13
Game 4: 3-10
Game 5: 2-8
Game 6: 4-4

SYSTEM 2 = (117-4)

---
For rules and stats on both systems, check out post #445 in this thread!
---

[pagodo]

Note that on Monday Colorado shut out San Diego and yesterday it was the other way round, so the system is fading and tailing both COL and SD. Thanks, zeusky, for pointing that out with the Royals earlier

Lots of games on the board, so get your labby lines ready and let's get 'em.
Good luck, everyone!
--

[apwmel]

Could someone explain why Oakland wasn't a system lost? They lost to the NYY last week 5-0 on tuesday and have lost 6 or 7 in a row.

[grecycle99]

Could someone explain why Oakland wasn't a system lost? They lost to the NYY last week 5-0 on tuesday and have lost 6 or 7 in a row.

You fade the team that been shutout. So you fade and the yankees won on the next game.

Great system you got here.

Thanks and GL

[cancan]

yesterday bad, better today!

[zeusky]

Good work Pagodo; lots of plays guys-- money management is the most crucial requirement here. GL all.

[packster77]

hey guys great work here new to this system i would like to start with system one if possible can you give me a example of your 6 game labby system and how it works any help would be great thanks

[pagodo]

UPDATE
Thursday, 6/9

Shutouts on Wednesday (6/8):
PHI vs LAD 2-0

---
System 1 (fade a team that has been shut out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/8)
fade San Diego, game 2 WON
fade Florida, game 1 WON
fade Minnesota, game 1 LOST
fade Colorado, game 1 LOST
fade Oakland, game 1 WON

Plays for 6/9:
fade Colorado, game 2
fade Minnesota, game 2
fade LA Dodgers, game 1
(note: COL hosts LAD in a four-game series this weekend)

Game 1: 65-63
Game 2: 35-26
Game 3: 12-14
Game 4: 7-7
Game 5: 3-4
Game 6: 3-1

SYSTEM 1 = (125-1)


---
System 2 (tail a team that has shut another out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/8)
tail Arizona, game 3 LOST
tail Texas, game 3 WON
tail Colorado, game 2 WON
tail Baltimore, game 1 WON
tail Cleveland, game 1 LOST
tail Atlanta, game 1 WON
tail San Diego, game 1 LOST

Plays for 6/9:
tail Arizona, game 4
tail San Diego, game 2
tail Philadelphia, game 1
(note: Cleveland game 2 pending)

Game 1: 63-65
Game 2: 34-29
Game 3: 15-14
Game 4: 3-10
Game 5: 2-8
Game 6: 4-4

SYSTEM 2 = (121-4)

---
For rules and stats on both systems, check out post #445 in this thread!
---

[goodone]

Good work Pagodo; lots of plays guys-- money management is the most crucial requirement here. GL all.

Very true. Btw, I like the friendly tone in this thread!

[zeusky]

I smell a Diamond-back come-back today

Thanks Pagodo as usual.

[pagodo]

hey guys great work here new to this system i would like to start with system one if possible can you give me a example of your 6 game labby system and how it works any help would be great thanks

PM-d back.

Thanks, everyone, it was a great night yesterday, shame the D-backs threw away another win, pretty much the third game in a row that they had in the bank -- but yeah with Collmenter on the mound it looks very promising

I'll be able to keep the updates going for another several days, we'll see how it goes from then on. Loving the system, with a proper bet size and proper labby lines it's just amazing.

Good luck, all!

[zeusky]

Don't worry Pagodo, between you, me and Prime1 this thread is in safe hands. I stopped posting as you had picked up the mantle well; just give us a heads up before you go on a break.

[pagodo]

UPDATE
Friday, 6/10

Shutouts on Thursday (6/9):
ARI @ PIT 2-0
CIN @ SF 3-0

---
System 1 (fade a team that has been shut out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/9)
fade Colorado, game 2
fade Minnesota, game 2
fade LA Dodgers, game 1

Plays for 6/10:
fade Colorado, game 3
fade Minnesota, game 3
fade Pittsburgh, game 1
fade San Francisco, game 1


Game 1: 66-63
Game 2: 35-28
Game 3: 12-14
Game 4: 7-7
Game 5: 3-4
Game 6: 3-1

SYSTEM 1 = (126-1)


---
System 2 (tail a team that has shut another out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/9)
tail Arizona, game 4
tail San Diego, game 2
tail Philadelphia, game 1

Plays for 6/10:
tail Cleveland, game 2
tail Philadelphia, game 2
tail Arizona, game 1
tail Cincinnati, game 1


Game 1: 63-66
Game 2: 35-29
Game 3: 15-14
Game 4: 4-10
Game 5: 2-8
Game 6: 4-4

SYSTEM 2 = (123-4)

---
For rules and stats on both systems, check out post #445 in this thread!
---

[TheAntFather]

Good job. I will be tailing these.

[cancan]

Arizona and San Diego OK!!

[pagodo]

And another Arizona chase we got! Gotta love 'em.

Some nice plus/even money series with the Indians, the Reds and the Mets.

Take a look at the plays, choose whichever you like, remember to put proper $ management in place and good luck!

[pagodo]

UPDATE
Saturday, 6/11

Shutouts on Friday (6/10):
BAL vs TB, 7-0
MIL vs STL, 8-0

---
System 1 (fade a team that has been shut out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/10)
fade Colorado, game 3
fade Minnesota, game 3
fade Pittsburgh, game 1
fade San Francisco, game 1

Plays for 6/11:
fade Colorado, game 4
fade San Francisco, game 2
fade St Louis, game 1
fade Tampa Bay, game 1


Game 1: 67-64
Game 2: 35-28
Game 3: 13-15
Game 4: 7-7
Game 5: 3-4
Game 6: 3-1

SYSTEM 1 = (128-1)


---
System 2 (tail a team that has shut another out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/10)
tail Philadelphia, game 2
tail Cleveland, game 2
tail Arizona, game 1
tail Cincinnati, game 1

Plays for 6/11:
tail Cleveland, game 3
tail Arizona, game 2
tail Cincinnati, game 2
tail Milwaukee, game 1
tail Baltimore, game 1


Game 1: 63-68
Game 2: 36-30
Game 3: 15-14
Game 4: 4-10
Game 5: 2-8
Game 6: 4-4

SYSTEM 2 = (124-4)

---
For rules and stats on both systems, check out post #445 in this thread!
---

[zeusky]

Traveling; good work Pagodo as usual!!

[cancan]

Good luck today .

[pagodo]

Lots of handicappers are picking the Dodgers tonight, I haven't been following this series (fade Colorado), but I might just jump in. Loving my holiday, catching up now on this year's MLB and I'm having a very good feeling about this season

Thanks, everyone, good luck and see you tomorrow!

[GGPLAYER]

LAD is a nice dog play today. Almost got them last night when they put up 5 runs in the 9th! I usually jump in on these around play 4 so I'm liking this series to finish today.

[pagodo]

Brilliant night!

Nice underdog wins with the Dodgers and Reds, also slight favorites with the D-backs and Brewers.

GGPlayer it's time to get on board with the Indians tonight. A shame they didn't score yesterday, so we've got them on both sides of the system. I'll obviously stick to tailing them, but on the other hand, I think I'll be tailing NYY on the -1,5 as well.

Here's the update.

[pagodo]

UPDATE
Sunday, 6/12

Shutouts on Saturday (6/11):
NYY vs CLE, 4-0

---
System 1 (fade a team that has been shut out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/11)
fade Colorado, game 4
fade San Francisco, game 2
fade St Louis, game 1
fade Tampa Bay, game 1

Plays for 6/12:
fade Tampa Bay, game 2
fade Cleveland, game 1


Game 1: 68-65
Game 2: 36-28
Game 3: 13-15
Game 4: 8-7
Game 5: 3-4
Game 6: 3-1

SYSTEM 1 = (131-1)


---
System 2 (tail a team that has shut another out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/11)
tail Cleveland, game 3
tail Arizona, game 2
tail Cincinnati, game 2
tail Milwaukee, game 1
tail Baltimore, game 1

Plays for 6/12:
tail Cleveland, game 4
tail Baltimore, game 2
tail NY Yankees, game 1


Game 1: 64-69
Game 2: 38-30
Game 3: 15-15
Game 4: 4-10
Game 5: 2-8
Game 6: 4-4

SYSTEM 2 = (127-4)

---
For rules and stats on both systems, check out post #445 in this thread!
---

[cancan]

Have a good Sunday!! GL

[atari5200]

has anyone been following since the beginning of the season?

I was playing this hard everyday but tying up too much bankroll while playing other systems on separate labby lines.

this system was a pain in the ass at times but it produced the best results with the labby method, i made some good coin off it. I can tell you better chase systems out there for MLB but this one and the labby are a great match.

I''ve been back on this system for the past week and its going well. BOL shut out followers..

[GGPLAYER]

Clev just scares me. They are free falling into reality.

[zeusky]

I just have a feeling that the tail system might work out for us well after the comparartively rough start; again, it's just a feeling

[pagodo]

I decided to use a 3-strike labby (as per Icebet's spreadsheet) with this system and it's working wonders. I agree, this is simple, efficient and a perfect match for a well-thought-out labby, it's just a matter of not going too risky with the starting unit size.

I have a good feeling on the tails as well and I'm sticking to Clev, I'm absolutely loving the prices on them and after having seen bits of yesterday's game, I suspect they'll explode again soon.

GL all!

[DustyDiamond]

I decided to use a 3-strike labby (as per Icebet's spreadsheet) with this system and it's working wonders. I agree, this is simple, efficient and a perfect match for a well-thought-out labby, it's just a matter of not going too risky with the starting unit size.

I have a good feeling on the tails as well and I'm sticking to Clev, I'm absolutely loving the prices on them and after having seen bits of yesterday's game, I suspect they'll explode again soon.

GL all!

Pagodo, I went and downloaded the spreadsheets but find it a little confusing. Can you give a few examples of this three strike labby to show how it works? I'd greatly appreciate it! Thanks

[pagodo]

UPDATE
Monday, 6/13

Shutouts on Sunday (6/12):
NYM @ PIT, 7-0
WSH @ SD, 2-0
KC @ LAA, 9-0

---
System 1 (fade a team that has been shut out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/12)
fade Tampa Bay, game 2
fade Cleveland, game 1

Plays for 6/13:
fade Tampa Bay, game 3
fade Pittsburgh, game 1
fade San Diego, game 1
fade LA Angels, game 1


Game 1: 69-65
Game 2: 36-29
Game 3: 13-15
Game 4: 8-7
Game 5: 3-4
Game 6: 3-1

SYSTEM 1 = (132-1)


---
System 2 (tail a team that has shut another out, 6 game chase):

Results (6/12)
tail Cleveland, game 4
tail Baltimore, game 2
tail NY Yankees, game 1

Plays for 6/13:
tail Cleveland, game 5
tail NY Mets, game 1
(series pending: tail BAL, tail WSH, tail KC)

Game 1: 65-69
Game 2: 38-31
Game 3: 15-15
Game 4: 4-11
Game 5: 2-8
Game 6: 4-4

SYSTEM 2 = (128-4)

---
For rules and stats on both systems, check out post #445;
For a rundown on 2011 system losses, check out post #702.
---

[systemmonitor]

Good luck with this system, one of the better systems in here which I will be monitoring!

[pagodo]

Pagodo, I went and downloaded the spreadsheets but find it a little confusing. Can you give a few examples of this three strike labby to show how it works? I'd greatly appreciate it! Thanks

The basic rule of the labby is to cross off two numbers after a win and only add one after a loss; with the 3-strike you simply cross off three after a win. You're clearing lines faster, so the key is deciding on a proper starting unit size. I went with the 3-strike as I'm running lots of lines for different systems and plays and more numbers give me more flexibility with variance.

An example; starting line:
20-20-20-20-20-20
I'm betting on Game 1 and win, cross off three:
20-20-20
Next day, betting on another Game 1 (favorite, 80 to win 60) and lost:
20-20-20-80
I always distribute the loss throughout a line (or two, but never more than two), so let's say it could look like this:
40-30-30-40
And next day, betting on Game 2 to win 100.

[andywend]

A 6 game chase, LOL with 3 teams omitted (those 3 teams were probably omitted because they represented the 3 system losses).

Since its a 6 game chase, (assuming -110 per bet), you would have to win about 69 out of each 70 bets to break even.

Therefore a 285-3 record is NOT that impressive especially considering that the sample has already been tinkered with by a 3 team omission.

COMPLETELY WORTHLESS SYSTEM!!!

[pagodo]

A 6 game chase, LOL with 3 teams omitted (those 3 teams were probably omitted because they represented the 3 system losses).

Since its a 6 game chase, (assuming -110 per bet), you would have to win about 69 out of each 70 bets to break even.

Therefore a 285-3 record is NOT that impressive especially considering that the sample has already been tinkered with by a 3 team omission.

COMPLETELY WORTHLESS SYSTEM!!!

Are you sane?

Disappear, please.

[cancan]

I'd appreciate it too, very much