New Baseball Power Rating System

[ShivaBowl]

Team Projected Runs for 7/30/2010
Update 07/31
MIN 2.4 WIN
MIL 1.9 LOSS No Play MIL L/2
TOR 1.1 WIN No Play >-175
STL 1.1 WIN No Play >-175
No TPR plays if -175 and over
TPR, since A.S. break, 20-16
COMP, since A.S. break, 7-3

Complimentary Selection for 7/30/2010 No Play
Take Toronto W/Marcum over Cleveland W/Sanchez NO PLAY if < -175 or > -175
Check sportrends.com for an update.

[HoulihansTX]

7/30

S/A System

Padres (No Play >-175)
Blue Jays (No Play >-175)
Texas (No Play >-171)

[Formulawiz]

ML plays today based on early lines.

PHI, CIN

The NYM were no play yesterday using SA system. Make sure you have your math signs correct. NYM proj line was -163 and act was -150. In order for mets to have been a play they would have to be less ( < ) -138 and it was not.

[HoulihansTX]

ML plays today based on early lines. PHI, CIN The NYM were no play yesterday using SA system. Make sure you have your math signs correct. NYM proj line was -163 and act was -150. In order for mets to have been a play they would have to be less ( < ) -138 and it was not.

I filtered them out.

I just listed them as a potential play, and my initial post "Mets ( No Play >-138)" showed that. I did not list them on the end of the day list.

[ShivaBowl]

HoulihansTX, Forget the Mets play yesterday, you were right no play if >-138
Bad day yesterday, on my part.
Thanks
With my numbers.
Also, TPR has been HOT.

[Formulawiz]

HoulihansTX, Forget the Mets play yesterday, you were right no play if >-138
Bad day yesterday, on my part.
Thanks

Why was it a bad day when the SA went 2-1?? There is no way I would go against COL and Jimenez.

[HoulihansTX]

Why was it a bad day when the SA went 2-1?? There is no way I would go against COL and Jimenez.

7/29 (1-2) -1.2 Units

Not going against Umbaldo is your opinion, but the system lacks that type of filter. Pitt was a play.

Though I totally agree with not playing pitt in that situation. I dont play all the games, but according to the system Pitt as a play.

[Formulawiz]

7/29 (1-2) -1.2 Units

Not going against Umbaldo is your opinion, but the system lacks that type of filter. Pitt was a play.

Though I totally agree with not playing pitt in that situation. I dont play all the games, but according to the system Pitt as a play.

WAS , NYY SF were the SA plays and they went 2-1. How do you get 1-2. Can you give me the games. I may have missed something.

Yes I agree with you PIT was a play for the record, but you cant play every game it comes up with and then go against Ubaldo. Secondly COL was on an 8 game losing streak and the line was -280. They were begging you to take PIT.

[ShivaBowl]

Team Projected Runs for 7/31/2010
Update 08/01
MIN 2.4 WIN
MIL 1.8 LOSS N/P L/3
TOR 1.1 LOSS N/P >-175
STL 1.1 WIN N/P >175
TPR, since A.S. break, 21-16
COMP, since A.S. break, 8-3

No TPR plays if -175 and over

Complimentary Selection for 7/31/2010 WIN
Take San Fran W/Zito over LA Dodgers W/Billingsley NO PLAY if > -175

[EXhoosier10]

Wow. A big 0-5 on the SA games yesterday

[HoulihansTX]

WAS , NYY SF were the SA plays and they went 2-1. How do you get 1-2. Can you give me the games. I may have missed something. Yes I agree with you PIT was a play for the record, but you cant play every game it comes up with and then go against Ubaldo. Secondly COL was on an 8 game losing streak and the line was -280. They were begging you to take PIT.

Mets (No Play >-138) (-148) No Play
Wash (No Play <+116) (+130) W
Pitt (No Play <+234) (+240) L
San Fran (No Play >-160) (-150)L

[HoulihansTX]

7/30

S/A System
Padres (No Play >-175)(-145) L
Blue Jays (No Play >-175) (-190) No Play
Texas (No Play >-171) L (+110) L

7/30 (0-2) -2.45 units

[HoulihansTX]

7/31

S/A System

Minny (No Play >-123)
Detroit (No Play <+168)
SF (No Play >-126)
CWS (No Play >-163)
ARZ (No Play <+102)
FLA (No Play <+132)

[Formulawiz]

ML system went 1-1 yesterday

Today it looks like LAA

[Izatnice]

Philadelphia and Cinncy both lost yesterday.

[DaProfessor23]

you guys have overall record for these plays? or is any tracking games in a spreadsheet or something similar?

[Formulawiz]

Philadelphia and Cinncy both lost yesterday.

If your referring to the ML system your wrong.
CIN was not a play it dropped out. The 2 plays were PHI and LAA

[Formulawiz]

I followed the ML system last year and it made well over 80 units and hit well over 65%. I started using it pretty early on in conjunction with the baseball software. Peter and I were emailing back and forth and we couldnt believe it. This season I noticed that the number of plays have declined as compared to last year, especially in the second half. I called sportrends today and discussed it with them. It seems the big boys out there are not to happy about losing all that money last year and have been following the system pretty closely and adjusting. Yeah I I know some of you dont believe it but the big boys are aware of all systems out there that make money. This year in the first half of the season ML system killed them. There was one point were the ML system went 20-4 right before the all star game. Sportrends did not admit it but they will be taking this system off their website next year so the boys out there wont know how they come up with their picks. The values are out in the open for all to see. Dont forget the ML system is going into its 2nd season and its free and made me alot of money. I hope they dont remove it from their website.

[EXhoosier10]

7/30 (0-2) -2.45 units

Wasn't Pittsburgh a play? Should read 0-3 -3.45u

you guys have overall record for these plays? or is any tracking games in a spreadsheet or something similar?

Because of the hot streak of favorites that won pre-allstar break in July, the month of July has been positive for the ML.

Since the AS break,
ML....(23-19) -3.25u
TPR....(17-17) -4.6u
SA....(37-46) -11.95u

[Izatnice]

If your referring to the ML system your wrong.
CIN was not a play it dropped out. The 2 plays were PHI and LAA

Well then do not post Cincy and Philly then come back and say it went 1-1. Post the change to. I have been following this system for a while to and i do not have the same results you have. You posted the 2 plays and all the filters fit, then you come back and say that one went down. Very difficult for anyone to follow when you do it like that. You posted Philly and Cinncy they both lost, so no i am not wrong. Which doesn't matter i just want to make money could care less about right or wrong.

[HoulihansTX]

Wasn't Pittsburgh a play? Just because they were going against Ubaldo doesn't mean they aren't a play. Should read 0-3 -3.45u

You are looking at the wrong day. They played Cardinals last game. I counted the Umbaldo loss.

[HoulihansTX]

7/31

S/A System

Minny (No Play >-123) (-115) W
Detroit (No Play <+168) (+170) L
SF (No Play >-126) (-110) W
CWS (No Play >-163) (-160) No Play
ARZ (No Play <+102) (+130) L
FLA (No Play <+132) (+100) No Play
Texas (+135) W

7/31 (3-2) +1.35units

TX has been added. Tks Forumula

[Formulawiz]

Well then do not post Cincy and Philly then come back and say it went 1-1. Post the change to. I have been following this system for a while to and i do not have the same results you have. You posted the 2 plays and all the filters fit, then you come back and say that one went down. Very difficult for anyone to follow when you do it like that. You posted Philly and Cinncy they both lost, so no i am not wrong. Which doesn't matter i just want to make money could care less about right or wrong.

With all due respect, the plays are all based on early lines and its your job to go back and check the plays 15 to 20 minutes prior to start of game. Those who contribute cant be expected to sit around all day to baby sit you. You have the system and the filters so take some initiative on your own and stop blaming people.

[Formulawiz]

7/31 (2-2) 0units

You left out TEX which was a win with the SA system.

The ML had the opposite side with LAA so it went 0-1 yesterday.

ML plays later today.

[Formulawiz]

Todays plays based on early lines.

FLA, TOR, NYY, CWS, TEX

[EXhoosier10]

With all due respect, the plays are all based on early lines and its your job to go back and check the plays 15 to 20 minutes prior to start of game. Those who contribute cant be expected to sit around all day to baby sit you. You have the system and the filters so take some initiative on your own and stop blaming people.

I do track the system by myself. When I compare records, they are usually wrong. I ask you why, and you don't give clear responses. All of the data that I've collected has shown no real progress towards a winning system.

[ShivaBowl]

Team Projected Runs for 8/1/2010
Update 08/02
MIN 2.4 WIN N/P >-175
MIL 1.8 N/P L/4
STL 1.2 WIN N/P >-175
TOR 1.1 LOSS
BOS 1.0 WIN
No TPR Plays, If Lines are -175 & Over

TPR, since A.S. break, 22-17
COMP, since A.S. break, 9-3

Complimentary Selection for 8/1/2010 WIN
Take Chi W Sox W/Floyd over Oakland W/Gonzalez NO PLAY if < -145 or > -175

[HoulihansTX]

8/1

S/A System

ATL (No Play >-175)
Bos (No Play >-142)
NYY (No Play >-173)
CWS (No Play >-124)
KC (No Play >-175)
FLA (No Play >-135)
SF (No Play >-102)
Mets (No Play >-165)**


** D. Hudson(ARI Pitcher) doesnt have 20 IP, but the Mets(Niese) pitcher does.

[ShivaBowl]

http://shivabowl.mysbrforum.com/spreadsheet/

Its all Sportrends, ST from 06/22 on up, until the last two days,
also, I lost my spreadsheets, for most of there Comp Plays +$

[Formulawiz]

I do track the system by myself. When I compare records, they are usually wrong. I ask you why, and you don't give clear responses. All of the data that I've collected has shown no real progress towards a winning system.

Well its obvious all the data you've collected is worthless if you couldnt even come up with the correct plays the other day. If you feel there is no progress with this thread then go somewhere else. We dont need people like yourself that continually complain, when those of us put in a tremendous amount of time to help others. Look all the numbers are up on the website for you to come up with the same plays as us.

[EXhoosier10]

I'm just here to make sure that people don't come to this thread and believe all the hype you give these systems. Not one is even close to being up money since the all star break.

[ShivaBowl]

FLA.
Marlins (-130) @ Padres with a total of 6.5; J. Johnson vs. J. Garland;
Both of these starters have tremendous numbers against the other team, which brings to mind a couple questions. First, Johnson has gone 17 innings in two starts against the Padres, beating Mat Latos way back in April, and losing a 2-1 nail biter to Garland, in Florida, at the end of June. So, to some degree, this is a Rematch Game. Still, with them battling to a 3-run total, wouldn't you think that this line might have even come out at 6? I suppose Garland is never going to drive the total that low, Garland is 4-1 with a 2.01 ERA against the Marlins, and could very well pitch solidly against them, again. This game has all the makings of a pitchers' duel, and potentially a slow one.

[ShivaBowl]

I'm just here to make sure that people don't come to this thread and believe all the hype you give these systems. Not one is even close to being up money since the all star break.

http://shivabowl.mysbrforum.com/spreadsheet/

To bad I lost my spreadsheet, for the comp plays, just add + $500 to ST, Sportrends.
GL

[Formulawiz]

I'm just here to make sure that people don't come to this thread and believe all the hype you give these systems. Not one is even close to being up money since the all star break.

Unlike yourself, you dont have to worry about other people, they get it. Secondly no one is hyping up anything here, we only provide the plays. I do agree the ML system has cooled off a bit since the allstar break, but prior to that we did pretty well.
I ask, how can you keep an accurate record when your making the wrong plays and then you have the nerve to tell us our record is incorrect. You need to read previous posts and filters that have been established here instead thinking someone here will spoon feed you like a baby. Well it wont happen. I will no longer answer any of your comments, I just cant tolerate stupidity.

[SolidDala]

If your referring to the ML system your wrong.
CIN was not a play it dropped out. The 2 plays were PHI and LAA

CIN may have dropped out but you did not mention LAA until AFTER the games with is not the right thing to do. A prime example why so many seems to play this wrong, getting different records etc..There is a thin line between Ignorance and Stupidity..