RLM System Plays

[Night-Tripper]

Here is what I have for the first day of this tread and tracking RLM plays:

RLM PLAYS 1/21/12

Purdue +8 L
Wake Forest +1 W
Rutgers +9.5 W
ALB +10 W
TENN +2.5 W
TEX TCH +5.5 L
ILL CHI +5.5 W
ND +9.5 W
STAN +4 L
RI +14 P
MISS +2 W
NEB +11.5 L
FRE ST +9.5 L
USC +9 L
Cavs +7.5 L
Hornets+5.5 W
nets +7.5 L

17 plays

8-8-1

Night games killed the day.

Yeah... apologize for such a cr@ppy day yesterday. Juicing out ain't bad, but winning is so much nicer.

Also apologize for the lateness of my first post of the day... was kinda irritated when I realized I had forgotten to bring my laptop with me. So, in order to be surprised, I have yet to read the suggested plays that were made today by y'all. Although I forgot to bring my laptop with me... I have been calling my wife throughout the day to have her find the games with 3,000 bets, at least 63% on one team and a static or RLM. (Seriously.. I gave her instructions over the phone and she can now guess which teams I'm going to ask her to place a bet on... that's how easy this is.)

Anyway, these were my plays for today:

NC State
South Florida
Canisius
Niagra
Virginia Tech
Pacers

Playoff games that I handicapped instead of using RLM:
Ravens +7
Ravens +255
49ers

Okay... now I can see how my hoops plays matched what y'all came up with.

[wiseguy007]

Yeah been a tough day so far.

2:00pm 849 Wisconsin Green Bay Phoenix OPEN +2.5 now 2.5 L

3:35pm 803 Toronto Raptors OPEN +9.5 now +8.5 L

3:00pm 301 Baltimore Ravens OPEN +9 now +7 BUT only 61% on NE W

1-2

6:00pm 855 Virginia Tech Hokies OPEN +8 now +8 W

2-2 NOW ON THE DAY

[wiseguy007]

Yeah... apologize for such a cr@ppy day yesterday. Juicing out ain't bad, but winning is so much nicer.

Also apologize for the lateness of my first post of the day... was kinda irritated when I realized I had forgotten to bring my laptop with me. So, in order to be surprised, I have yet to read the suggested plays that were made today by y'all. Although I forgot to bring my laptop with me... I have been calling my wife throughout the day to have her find the games with 3,000 bets, at least 63% on one team and a static or RLM. (Seriously.. I gave her instructions over the phone and she can now guess which teams I'm going to ask her to place a bet on... that's how easy this is.)

Anyway, these were my plays for today:

NC State
South Florida
Canisius
Niagra
Virginia Tech
Pacers

Playoff games that I handicapped instead of using RLM:
Ravens +7
Ravens +255
49ers

Okay... now I can see how my hoops plays matched what y'all came up with.

I have a few questions:

NC State +2.5 Why this game? 61% on NC ST

South Florida Was not 63%

Canisius Was not 63%

Niagra Was not 63%

Why did you not pay Wis Green Bay?

[Night-Tripper]

I have a few questions:

NC State +2.5 Why this game? 61% on NC ST

South Florida Was not 63%

Canisius Was not 63%

Niagra Was not 63%

Why did you not pay Wis Green Bay?

Well... all I had to go by was what my wife was telling me, because unless I bring my laptop to work, I cannot get to the site because it's blocked. According to her... Miami was the 61% favorite, not NC State. However, I just checked freesports and saw that you were right. So, all I can assume is, that either she was giving me the wrong side as the betting favorite or there was a huge shift in betting from the time I talked to her and placed my bet to the closing line. All I know is that I had nothing to rely on but her and according to her, the plays met all three criteria. (Obviously, I was one lucky individual and now I know why I didn't see y'all mention four of the games I played.) Then again, she never mentioned Wisconsin-Green Bay. Having seen that she kinda missed the boat, I will make sure that I never leave without my laptop.



As far as my football plays, RLM wasn't used... I played them last Sunday night as soon as the lines came out.

[Night-Tripper]

I agree with most all of the comments and suggestions that have been made today. There were a lot of interesting suggestions. For sure, we need to be more selective.

[wiseguy007]

Well... all I had to go by was what my wife was telling me, because unless I bring my laptop to work, I cannot get to the site because it's blocked. According to her... Miami was the 61% favorite, not NC State. However, I just checked freesports and saw that you were right. So, all I can assume is, that either she was giving me the wrong side as the betting favorite or there was a huge shift in betting from the time I talked to her and placed my bet to the closing line. All I know is that I had nothing to rely on but her and according to her, the plays met all three criteria. (Obviously, I was one lucky individual and now I know why I didn't see y'all mention four of the games I played.) Then again, she never mentioned Wisconsin-Green Bay. Having seen that she kinda missed the boat, I will make sure that I never leave without my laptop.



As far as my football plays, RLM wasn't used... I played them last Sunday night as soon as the lines came out.

Thanks my friend, I was just making sure and atleast she won a few of the games.

[Night-Tripper]

Thanks my friend, I was just making sure and atleast she won a few of the games.

You're more than welcome. Believe me... after reading your comments and checking out the site, I almost pizzed on myself when I saw that those plays were nowhere close to RLM.

Anyone else here playing the Pacers tonight?

[EPote14]

I was thinking of throwing a few bucks on the pacers as well

[R19]

Looking at Pacers. Maybe someone heard 53% instead of 63%...

What does everyone have as opening line for the Miami Heat game? The RX had -10, but I have been using SBR which had -8.5. It's interesting how different the opening lines can be depending on the source.

Same thing on opening for Los Angeles Lakers. The RX has -6.5 vs. -5.5 on SBR.

[wiseguy007]

You're more than welcome. Believe me... after reading your comments and checking out the site, I almost pizzed on myself when I saw that those plays were nowhere close to RLM.

Anyone else here playing the Pacers tonight?

Yeah im going to as well and hope to finish out the day on the winning side.

[Night-Tripper]

Looking at Pacers. Maybe someone heard 53% instead of 63%...

Could have been, but I thought I had made it fool-proof by telling her to just look for the teams with a red number by it and then make sure that there was at least 3,000 bets. Of course, I now know that nothing can be made fool-proof or (natural) blonde-proof.

[wiseguy007]

Could have been, but I thought I had made it fool-proof by telling her to just look for the teams with a red number by it and then make sure that there was at least 3,000 bets. Of course, I now know that nothing can be made fool-proof or (natural) blonde-proof.

LOL

[wiseguy007]

Looking at Pacers. Maybe someone heard 53% instead of 63%...

What does everyone have as opening line for the Miami Heat game? The RX had -10, but I have been using SBR which had -8.5. It's interesting how different the opening lines can be depending on the source.

Same thing on opening for Los Angeles Lakers. The RX has -6.5 vs. -5.5 on SBR.

http://www.freesportsbet.com/consensus/NBA.html this site that we are using has -8.5 for the MIA game and -5.5 for the LAL game.

[EPote14]

my book had the heat opening at 9.5

[wiseguy007]

I think we should all use the Opening line from this site http://www.freesportsbet.com/consensus/NBA.html compared to our books.

[Night-Tripper]

I think we should all use the Opening line from this site http://www.freesportsbet.com/consensus/NBA.html compared to our books.

Agree... all of our books are liable to have differing lines as evidence by the different numbers by the books displayed by SBR. By using a common site, we'll all be looking at the same exact line.

[Night-Tripper]

Cannot believe that I stand a good chance of losing my 49er play because an imbecile couldn't field a damn punt.

[wiseguy007]

Cannot believe that I stand a good chance of losing my 49er play because an imbecile couldn't field a damn punt.

Yeah Im with u on that one I took SF ML

[wiseguy007]

He did it to us again

[Night-Tripper]

He did it to us again

I am seriously depressed... we're fukked.

[wiseguy007]

What happen to the new ot rules, each team gets the ball unless a td is scored

[wiseguy007]

I am seriously depressed... we're fukked.

Williams really screwed us in this game.

[wiseguy007]

6:30pm 303 NYG/304 SF O/U OPEN 44 now 41 (Might be a Large UNDER play) W


3-2 NOW ON THE DAY

[Night-Tripper]

What happen to the new ot rules, each team gets the ball unless a td is scored

That's only on the first possession...

[wiseguy007]

That's only on the first possession...

That's what I was thinking after I posted that.

[crockje]

I'm a die hard niner fan was so focused on this game that I forgot to even bet the under I can not explain how devasted I am after that game

[R19]

Pacers - book it. That and 49ers under with an adjusted Lang fade position put the day in the positive.

[wiseguy007]

Recap of today 1/22/12


NCAAB

2:00pm 851 Wisconsin Milwaukee Panthers OPEN +5 now +5.5 NO PLAY

2:00pm 849 Wisconsin Green Bay Phoenix OPEN +2.5 now 2.5 L

6:00pm 855 Virginia Tech Hokies OPEN +8 now +8 W


NFL

3:00pm 301 Baltimore Ravens OPEN +9 now +7 BUT only 61% on NE W

6:30pm 303 NYG/304 SF O/U OPEN 44 now 41 (Might be a Large UNDER play) W


NBA

3:35pm 803 Toronto Raptors OPEN +9.5 now +8.5 L

9:35pm 809 Indiana Pacers OPEN +5.5 now +5.5 W

4-2 ON THE DAY

2 DAY TOTAL: 12-10-1

[Night-Tripper]

Recap of today 1/22/12


NCAAB

2:00pm 851 Wisconsin Milwaukee Panthers OPEN +5 now +5.5 NO PLAY

2:00pm 849 Wisconsin Green Bay Phoenix OPEN +2.5 now 2.5 L

6:00pm 855 Virginia Tech Hokies OPEN +8 now +8 W


NFL

3:00pm 301 Baltimore Ravens OPEN +9 now +7 BUT only 61% on NE W

6:30pm 303 NYG/304 SF O/U OPEN 44 now 41 (Might be a Large UNDER play) W


NBA

3:35pm 803 Toronto Raptors OPEN +9.5 now +8.5 L

9:35pm 809 Indiana Pacers OPEN +5.5 now +5.5 W

4-2 ON THE DAY

2 DAY TOTAL: 12-10-1

Thanks for tracking the record and keeping track of the totals.

Much appreciated

[Night-Tripper]

I'm reposting this bc I know hardly anyone saw it.

I'm sure everyone saw it.

Maybe a few were like me and chose to ignore it.

Why?

Because I think you have a hidden agenda.

[ksnooksk]

I'm sure everyone saw it. Maybe a few were like me and chose to ignore it. Why? Because I think you have a hidden agenda.

wow..ok.

I was just trying to help. But, since you want to be like this I want offer my input. BTW...I've been killing this shyt for awhile now so dont worry about me.

BOL

[chinoloco212]

just a reminder to everyone, you should NOT just tail all the RLM plays blindly, look into the plays some are alot stronger than others

[Blood Drake]

Night-Tripper,

The premise of this kind of strategy is to make plays based on what others (larger betters) are also betting on, correct? To me that seems like you are hoping that the games are fixed or that there is some injury information that is not leaving the locker room. How do you determine that the outcome that you are hoping for is based on this criteria and not just a ton of other RLM whales hitting the betting window at the same time?

I heard that it takes about a million dollars to move a point. Can anyone provide confirmation of that information?

[crockje]

just a reminder to everyone, you should NOT just tail all the RLM plays blindly, look into the plays some are alot stronger than others

Chino thanks for your imput what are some other factors we need to look at to determine if it should be a play or no play

[crockje]

good line movement on george mason game