John Morrison 2011 MLB

[balazsk]

If you follow JM's WNBA picks, here is the first. Bet A was a lost...
Bet on: Atlanta Dream
Bet [A] 06/11/11 Sat @ San Antonio
Bet [B] 06/14/11 Tue @ New York
Bet [C] 06/17/11 Fri @ Minnesota

This means that you would make the [A] wager for the road team
on the date that the game is played. Remember to bet on the
spread and buy 3 points. Or, if your team is a favorite of more
than 3 points, then bet on the Money Line.

If your [A] bet happens to lose on the first day, then you would
make a [B] bet for the same team again on their next game when they
play, and a [C] bet on their last play if necessary.

[DDT]

Does anyone actually watch the WNBA?

[19th Hole]

Hagball,
Thank you for posting JM. The following information was posted by you....
Am I to take it that you strictly post JM's system plays and Wallco99 posts his own system plays?
They are seperate stand alone systems.
Thank you for your time and energy.
Sincerely,
19th Hole
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 10-1 (v1)
(A) 7-4
(B) 2-2
(C) 1-1
V2 plays 1-0
V3 system 1-1
Unofficial series 6-0

Next Plays

Official
(6/14/2011) Detroit (.515)v Cleveland (.511) M/L (A) (6/15 (B) & 6/16 (C) if necessary)
(6/14/2011) Arizona (.505)v San Francisco (.516) M/L (A) (6/15 (B) & 6/16 (C) if necessary)

Upcoming Plays
(6/17/2011) Oakland v San Francisco

Notes: I'm going to go a stick an icepick in my eye. It'll make me feel better after Morrison's latest email. Unfortunately he didn't take me off his list. But he did not accept the NYY (C) bet loss either. He just disqualified it because of the Red Sox being top 2 in the rpi. We will keep it scored as a LOSS on this page. I did fire off an email to him but he's probably wiping his butt with it. On another note today's plays look good for both series. Yesterday there were actually 3 possible sweeps because of the continuation of the DET/TAM series awhile back from a rain out. That one became a future play:
TAM v DET (8/22) Mark it down.
Morrison never ceases to blow me away with his audacity. God, I hope I read in the news someday where he's met some ill fortune. GL all today.

P.S. Arizona is a slight favorite at this time but the line could shift throughout the day so you all know what that means.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


[COLOR=#000000 !important]Here's an update JM System Plays.
4/25 MIL v CIN Win [b] 4/26 O
5/02 LAA @ BOS Win [C] 5/04 O
5/03 SEA v TEX Win [A] U
5/06 TAM @ BAL Win [A] O
5/09 NYM @ COL Win [A] O
5/09 CHW @ LAA Win [A] U
5/13 SEA @ CLE Win [A] U
5/13 BAL @ TAM Win [b] 5/14 O
5/23 BOS @ CLE Win [b] 5/24 U
5/23 MIL v WAS Win [A] O
5/30 SEA v BAL Win [A] O
5/30 WAS v PHI Win [A] U
6/02 MIN @ KAN Win [A] U
6/03 CHW v DET Win [A] O
6/06 BAL v OAK Win [A] O
6/07 NYY v BOS Loss [C] 6/09 O
6/09 DET V SEA Win [A] O
6/14 DET v CLE
6/14 ARI v SFO
6/17 OAK v SFO
7/01 CIN v CLE
7/01 SDG @ SEA
7/04 STL v CIN
7/04 MIN v TAM
7/14 KAN @ MIN
7/14 COL v MIL
7/14 BAL v CLE
7/21 MIN v DET
7/22 OAK @ NYY
7/22 CHC v HOU
7/22 SDG @ PHI
7/29 FLA @ ATL
7/29 CHC @ STL
7/29 BOS @ CHW
7/29 KAN v CLE
8/02 KAN v BAL
8/05 NYY @ BOS
8/05 CLE @ TEX
8/08 HOU @ ARI
8/12 SFO @ FLA
8/12 PIT @ MIL
8/12 ARI v NYM
8/15 OAK v BAL
8/15 SFO @ ATL
8/22 BOS @ TEX
8/26 OAK @ BOS
9/09 PIT v FLA
9/12 HOU v PHI
9/23 FLA @ MIL


V3 System Plays
5/10 LAA v CHW Win [A]
6/03 KAN v MIN Loss [C] 6/05

The team on the left is the one to bet on. This is a running account on the JM MLB plays. It is every play and does not show R/L or M/L. The O stands for Official and the U for Unofficial. It’s just my personal updateable list. I’ll post it from time to time just so all of you can keep up. The JM MLB System page will have the scores broken down. Hope this helps.
Last edited by hagball52; 06-10-11 at 10:22 AM..

[/COLOR]

[BCC585]

Does anyone actually watch the WNBA?

only gamblers. Other than that it's like watching highschool basketball.

[BCC585]

Phillies ML at -210

[h00dini]

Does anyone actually watch the WNBA?

ya, girls

[IceBet]

ICE bet would you mind enlightened me on what you are doing with your OUI system?

My understanding is that you have 2 sets of labby lines one for under and another for over. Then you do labby on both sets of lines. If so, i wonder how could you be able to accommodation 15 plays on over when most 7am game won't be graded before the 10am game start, besides usually majority of MLB game started either 7am of 8am so how did you handle games that start at the same time?

THX

PMed you. Trying not to clutter.

IceBet

[hagball52]

[quote=19th Hole;10425137]Hagball,
Thank you for posting JM. The following information was posted by you....
Am I to take it that you strictly post JM's system plays and Wallco99 posts his own system plays?
They are seperate stand alone systems.
Thank you for your time and energy.
Sincerely,
19th Hole
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes they are 2 separate stand alone systems. The accurate JM system plays will be posted here. JM will tell you he is undefeated but that's a lie.

[1gamer]

Phillies ML at -210

No thank you...

[1gamer]

I'll be parlaying Arizona and Detroit betting 2.5 units to win 4.5 units. If this parlay loses, I will simply carry the (A) loss and profit to whichever one (1) of these two (2) teams lose to the (B) bet. If both teams lose tonite, I will parlay both on the (B) bet tomorrow...so on and so on. I should recoup any losses and profit on any potential (C) bet.

[Bugs Bunny]

thanks wallco for the early plays and hagball for the JM update!

[hagball52]

Does anyone actually watch the WNBA?

No. I actually have a life.

[hagball52]

[quote=Wallco99;10423749]Wallco MLB PLU$$$
Florida @ Philadelphia (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
Florida @ Philadelphia (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)

Wallco, I presume you know Philly's got a doubleheader tomorrow. Would you have to chase it out on the same day if it goes to a (C) ?

[alexknyc]

Does anyone actually watch the WNBA?

I'd rather watch my socks go around and around in the dryer.

[venture]

JM's filters are shit, finding out the pick is a no play on the c bet or after it is over is NOT a filter. If ARI gets swept agien I think they will be over the .015 rpi filter. So in my book they are a no play.

[pagodo]

JM's filters are shit, finding out the pick is a no play on the c bet or after it is over is NOT a filter. If ARI gets swept agien I think they will be over the .015 rpi filter. So in my book they are a no play.

True, but looking at the teams' current form, pitching matchups, batting stats and some other trends, the D-backs look like a very nice investment. I'm going with them @ 0.75 unit.

Just checking on confirmations from Wallco and it looks like it might be a fantastic night. My money's already on the Phillies and the Brewers.

As per JM's e-mail today -- I'm on the mailing list as well -- it is truly the lowest of the low.

[Wilba]

in my eyes a 2 game fade chase on the Cubs is gold every time they have just won a game. Doing this is 13-6-0 on the season (13 A win, 6 B win, zero 2 game series losses)

I have gone against the Cubs this way after a win last couple seasons and it has worked really well.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 6/14/11
2011 System to date: 88-6
System profit/loss: +19.73 units (finished series)
Since my first post: -0.54 units (73-6) (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-3.65 units)

Milwaukee (-1 ½) @ Chicago Cubs (B) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Colorado (M/L) (B) *Official* (8:40 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Colorado (-1½) (B) *Official* (8:40 pm EDT)
St. Louis @ Washington (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
Florida @ Philadelphia (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
Florida @ Philadelphia (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
San Francisco (M/L) @ Arizona (A) (9:40 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[Wallco99]

[QUOTE=hagball52;10427393]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
Florida @ Philadelphia (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
Florida @ Philadelphia (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)

Wallco, I presume you know Philly's got a doubleheader tomorrow. Would you have to chase it out on the same day if it goes to a (C) ?

Yep!

[Wallco99]

in my eyes a 2 game fade chase on the Cubs is gold every time they have just won a game. Doing this is 13-6-0 on the season (13 A win, 6 B win, zero 2 game series losses)

I have gone against the Cubs this way after a win last couple seasons and it has worked really well.

Doing after each two game win streak would be undefeated. They haven't won more than two in a row all season. Pathetic.

[Wilba]

Yeah I know that's what I'm talking about. Wait for them to win 1, then do a 2 game chase/fade. 19-0 this season, but also If you look back over past seasons its been profitable too. Even though in terms of W/L they are not the worst, in terms of putting win streaks together they are by far the worst. Pathetic indeed!

[Wilba]

Yes they have been backtested and have been successful. You can stay back and watch this year and look into it next season. You will see the system perform as we go. You can play the other system who nobody knows what it is or how it works and take their word that it was backtested instead. Good luck.

What were the backtested results please?

Given that you have already backtested it you would save me many hours by posting the results.

I will give you all of my SBR points if you post backtested results for at least 5 years (I have about 250+ SBR points)

[Wallco99]

Doing after each two game win streak would be undefeated. They haven't won more than two in a row all season. Pathetic.

Oh sorry, I thought that said 13-6, I see now.

[IceBet]

Wow, everyone did a great job shutting everyone up. Just days ago it was like a buzz of wonderful idea and theories and now you can hear crickets.

[Wilba]

Haha yeah makes it a lot easier to follow the thread that's for sure

*chirrup chirrup*

[oklahoma]

Wow, everyone did a great job shutting everyone up. Just days ago it was like a buzz of wonderful idea and theories and now you can hear crickets.

pretty much cause wallco hasnt really had plays the last few days, and no series were lost. plays start winning and no one comments anymore. this thread will be buzzing after the next series loss.

[Wilba]

why do I get the impression that Hoodini will not be posting any backtested results?

I sincerely hope that I am wrong but somehow I don't think that he will (because I don't think he has backtested his system at all)
please prove me wrong hoodini! I am more than happy to eat humble pie if/when you post the results

cmon baby serve me up some pie I really am hungry

[Wallco99]

Wow, everyone did a great job shutting everyone up. Just days ago it was like a buzz of wonderful idea and theories and now you can hear crickets.

It was more like a buzz saw!

[Wallco99]

why do I get the impression that Hoodini will not be posting any backtested results?

I sincerely hope that I am wrong but somehow I don't think that he will (because I don't think he has backtested his system at all)
please prove me wrong hoodini! I am more than happy to eat humble pie if/when you post the results

cmon baby serve me up some pie I really am hungry

He has stated several times that no backtests were done. I don't know why he told you yes, unless he did it in the past two days. And I don't believe it can be done that fast, I tried to do it for him and it is extremely time consuming, you have to know what teams are in what place each day that there are 3 game losing streaks. Then you also need to know what each team's winning percentage is every day because he now added plays based on that. I gave up, it's his baby, let him test it. Honestly, if he did and it came back a winner as he "assumes" it is now, I would be on board. But until then it is just another theory to me. I have a desk full of these that I hope to one day test. I will watch it for 5 years and develop a confirmed backtest that way if I have to. I just can't jump into another (-money) bet system with no back tested results. I wouldn't even care if he never posted the rules. If he posted backtests and the #'s looked good and were honest, I would probably follow his plays and not care what criteria he used to generate those plays.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$ - Plays for 6/14/11
2011 System to date: 88-6
System profit/loss: +19.73 units (finished series)
Since my first post: -0.54 units (73-6) (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-3.65 units)

Milwaukee (-1 ½) @ Chicago Cubs (B) *Official* (8:05 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Colorado (M/L) (B) *Official* (8:40 pm EDT)
San Diego @ Colorado (-1½) (B) *Official* (8:40 pm EDT)
St. Louis @ Washington (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
Florida @ Philadelphia (M/L) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
Florida @ Philadelphia (-1½) (A) *Official* (7:05 pm EDT)
San Francisco (M/L) @ Arizona (A) *Official* (9:40 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

[xgame]

nice win wnba.

[Wilba]

He has stated several times that no backtests were done. I don't know why he told you yes, unless he did it in the past two days. And I don't believe it can be done that fast, I tried to do it for him and it is extremely time consuming, you have to know what teams are in what place each day that there are 3 game losing streaks. Then you also need to know what each team's winning percentage is every day because he now added plays based on that. I gave up, it's his baby, let him test it. Honestly, if he did and it came back a winner as he "assumes" it is now, I would be on board. But until then it is just another theory to me. I have a desk full of these that I hope to one day test. I will watch it for 5 years and develop a confirmed backtest that way if I have to. I just can't jump into another (-money) bet system with no back tested results. I wouldn't even care if he never posted the rules. If he posted backtests and the #'s looked good and were honest, I would probably follow his plays and not care what criteria he used to generate those plays.

Completely agree with everything that you say.

at him telling me that it was backtested

[GGPLAYER]

nice win wnba.

Wow I forgot I even bet that game till I just saw your post. Did you see the line movement on that thing? It went from +3.5 to -1.5. I guess when you have 3 days between games people get bored Nice win

[dlunc3]

hey, kinda off topic... if anyone is from the PA/NJ area, would you mind sending me a quick PM? got something i wanna run by you..

[xgame]

Wow I forgot I even bet that game till I just saw your post. Did you see the line movement on that thing? It went from +3.5 to -1.5. I guess when you have 3 days between games people get bored Nice win

I didnt know the line moved that crazy. yeah 3 days I almost forgot too.