the "chase system" or AKA "the sports betting champs system" works only as a "long term investment". money should NOT be withdrawn from your sportsbetting account for at least TWO(2) years and your "C" bet should NOT exceed 3% of your balance, i bet 2%. after 2 years, you can be pulling a nice little salary for yourself. obviously your bets will grow as your balance grows or decline if your balance dips. if you are the person who bets on this system, cash's your winnings and wait and continue for the next game, your down over 35 games in MLB with just those two losses this year. i started using JM about two years ago, i dont listen to his BS no more, i know all the systems myself. JM is a business man now. i can tell you that with my initial $25,000.00 deposit in my sportsbook, i am now closing in to 100K in my account even with the pirates loss and pulling a small amount salary weekly. i dont change anything, i follow the system exactly. one thing i do alter is only in MLB. my thing is this, history always repeats itself. so if a team gets swept, we take the swept team in their next series with the team that swept them, right? right! i reverse them. that my only change. CHASE SYSTEM=LOSER CHASE SYSTEM+MONEY MANAGEMENT+PATIENCE=RETIREMENT MONEY
So when you started at $25,000, the max your C bet would be was $750 aka 3%? This would mean that your A bet would be next to nothing?? How has your bankroll grown so fast with your C bet being so small.. doesnt really add up? i must be missing something..
Comment
bmoney1720
SBR Hustler
07-07-10
75
#1893
Can someone confirm the next official play is july 15th. CARDINALS vs dodgers and BREWERS vs Braves?
Comment
jphil
SBR Wise Guy
07-12-09
757
#1894
Originally posted by sportsbetwin
JM is a turd. All last year I advised my members to only use the 0.01 filter. This year I went against my better judgement and included all within 0.015.
There is still merit in his systems and the ideal thing is to go back to 0.01. This will almost avoid RPI differentials exceeding 0.015 during the course of a series.
He doesn't give a shit about his customers - he has made milllions and is now more focussed on his scamdicapper ventures.
He will continue to push SBC hard - 1 of every 2 series losses is post filtered.
good point! so the swept team couldn't be more than .01 lower than the team that swept, when those situations pop up. Or maybe,as kev the brit has mentioned before, just wait till ideally the swept team has a higher rpi (.02 or better), than the tm. that swept. The bigger the gap, the better the chance?, even though you'd have less plays.
Can someone confirm the next official play is july 15th. CARDINALS vs dodgers and BREWERS vs Braves?
BREWERS vs Braves is not official. There is .048 RPI difference.
Comment
Marrowhine
SBR Hustler
07-04-10
75
#1896
"Yesterday I declared to you my 100% guarantee that the St Louis
Cardinals was going to win, and boy, not only did they win, they
obliterated, humiliated, annihilated Houston by an 8-0 shutout!
, I can promise you that as long as you wager
strictly with my MLB system, and not going over the official .15
RPI differential between two teams, you're literally guaranteed to
win each and every betting series that will ever exist!
In the meantime -- I'm shocked to say that I haven't yet received
your payment for my brand new v2.0 MLB system yet !"
He's shocked!
Comment
dimon
SBR MVP
08-14-09
1159
#1897
you guys need to get together...trace this bith down and rape him/them in the a$$...just my 2 cents
Comment
jphil
SBR Wise Guy
07-12-09
757
#1898
Originally posted by dimon
you guys need to get together...trace this bith down and rape him/them in the a$$...just my 2 cents
sounds like you could handle it just fine; we're busy.
yes a complete burial, easy as pie. only 400 more straight wins to break even now. off to a good start.
Comment
jphil
SBR Wise Guy
07-12-09
757
#1907
Originally posted by Kev the Brit
jphil:
My records show:
May 11: SFO .531, SD .516
May 14: SD: .534, SFO .521
At no time did the RPI difference move into the new "Forbidden Zone"
Regards
Kev
Thanx again kev. nice e-mail to jm. When i reply to the clown, i'm gonna ask if he at least plans on updating his v1 pdf w/ his most recent change, that no one was aware of. Hope that isn't asking too much.
Going back to the orig. .010 filter, sounds so inviting right about now. Would have avoided sf & pit. losses.
And i think i'll stay away from all 4 gm. chase series for some obvious reasons.
Comment
stevex
SBR Hall of Famer
05-02-10
5122
#1908
Ok folks, get a 3 day break here with the All Star festivities in LA and I think will have a couple of plays on Thursday when baseball resumes.
stevex
Comment
ackescott
Restricted User
09-19-09
338
#1909
Originally posted by stevex
Ok folks, get a 3 day break here with the All Star festivities in LA and I think will have a couple of plays on Thursday when baseball resumes.
So when you started at $25,000, the max your C bet would be was $750 aka 3%? This would mean that your A bet would be next to nothing?? How has your bankroll grown so fast with your C bet being so small.. doesnt really add up? i must be missing something..
This would be to risk 100 for A-bets.. how this can return 75 grand in two years even if the bets increase with the roll, after a couple of losses is fiction imo
Comment
dukipl
SBR Sharp
04-08-09
376
#1913
Hi guys!
I've been away for 3 weeks and didnt play the system. I see that "polito" wrote that v1 is 16-2.Is this true?
The JM site has Current 2010 MLB season as of 07/12/2010 : 15 wins - 1 Loss
Thanks for the answer.
Comment
Cyril
SBR High Roller
01-23-09
245
#1914
Yes dukipl, we had 2 losses in v1 and 1 loss in v3... If it continues this way its not good..
Comment
mighty maron
SBR MVP
04-20-09
4215
#1915
Originally posted by dukipl
Hi guys!
I've been away for 3 weeks and didnt play the system. I see that "polito" wrote that v1 is 16-2.Is this true?
The JM site has Current 2010 MLB season as of 07/12/2010 : 15 wins - 1 Loss
Thanks for the answer.
Version 1, version 2...when is version 34 coming out?
Filters filters filters....Im agog to see if the next Houston Pitt series coming up this weekend will be on it or what arcane druid filter formula will be used to explain why it doesnt work
Comment
harry
SBR Sharp
10-15-09
273
#1916
Originally posted by pollito
It's all about statistics, just as Pittsburgh was in an extremely bad spot yesterday, St. Louis is in an extremely good situation today and for the whole series, statisticly they have almost 100% of probabilities that they will pull away at least one win in the series, that is also the case for Texas and NY Mets for the weekend, especially for Texas...Guess how many times in history the team with the best home record, hosting the team with the worst road record has lost a series? when the chances are that high the it doesn't matter If you have to pay over -200 odds for the whole series, because a win is as close as possible to be guaranteed.
It wasn't guaranteed... it just proves that nothing is a lock
Comment
jose21_us
SBR MVP
05-24-10
3844
#1917
I think version 34 is sometime in the Fall of 2015...
Comment
LarryF
SBR Wise Guy
12-11-09
949
#1918
A wacko year in baseball wagering with a wacko modification system guru. Did anyone get to vote on if the latest loss should be part of the systems yearly won/loss record? LOL!!!!!
Comment
Soxxman
SBR Rookie
07-12-10
4
#1919
OK so as of today and according to the RPI at ESPN, the only possible team that the Pirates could be in play with is the Cubs at .015 difference. Someone mentioned above that JM current MLB record is 16-2 but he weasled out of the Pittsburgh loss as his website will still show just one loss...correct? Too bad that pissed off guy at The SportsBettingChump let his website run out....simply hilarious!!
Comment
pollito
Restricted User
02-17-10
347
#1920
This week's plays are (Need to check the RPI difference to see which one is official)
7/15 Milwaukee at Atlanta (Probable v3.0 on Atlanta if Milwaukee wins the 1st. game)
7/15 Seattle at LA Angels (Probable v3.0 on LA Angels if Seattle wins the 1st. game)
7/15 St. Louis vs. LA Dodgers (.013 RPI difference)
7/16 Baltimore vs. Toronto (Probable v3.0 on Toronto if Baltimore wins the 1st. game)
7/16 Pittsburgh vs. Houston (Probable v3.0 on Houston if Pitts. wins the 1st. game)
7/16 Arizona at San Diego (Probable v3.0 on San Diego if Arizona wins the 1st. game)
So the only one that could be an official play is St. Louis depending on the RPI filter used.
Comment
pollito
Restricted User
02-17-10
347
#1921
Originally posted by harry
It wasn't guaranteed... it just proves that nothing is a lock
There's nothing I can tell you my friend, my ass still hurts!
Comment
Sultan
SBR High Roller
07-08-10
236
#1922
the rpi difference between st louis and dodgers its .23..
so why it will be an official play?
Comment
shock11
SBR Wise Guy
05-16-08
838
#1923
what a great system keep it up
Comment
harry
SBR Sharp
10-15-09
273
#1924
Originally posted by pollito
There's nothing I can tell you my friend, my ass still hurts!
Lol, just the way the season is going mate... last year seemed easy to make money, this year is proving very difficult!
Comment
pollito
Restricted User
02-17-10
347
#1925
Originally posted by Sultan
the rpi difference between st louis and dodgers its .23..