yes, i am going to continue to play the jm system ,and i will tell everyone who want's to know how it's working!
John morrison 2010 mlb system
Collapse
X
-
calinalex2008SBR Rookie
- 05-30-10
- 18
#1856Comment -
thebestthereisSBR Posting Legend
- 03-01-09
- 11459
#1857the system works if follow the rpi on a pitch by pitch basis and you never, and i stress never, bet the team that loses then you are screwed.Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#1858A classical JM stupid excuse!!!
Yesterday proved to be invaluable! Although The betting series with
Pittsburgh began with them being within the .15 range of RPI
differential, that quickly changed as soon as they lost their first
game. Pittsburgh had an RPI of .459 to Houston's .477 (.18 difference)
before the [B} wager began, and an even greater deficit before the
[C] game began. We must keep in mind that under no circumstances
should a wager be made when the RPI difference between two teams is
greater than .15. Going forward, it's important to walk away from a
betting series if the RPI difference between two teams become
greater than the .15 limit during any time within the series!
For today, we have an official [A] wager on the Saint Louis Cardinals
in their game versus the Houston Astros. This betting series will be
100% within the RPI differential filter throughout the entire series,
so it is literally guaranteed for the win! Load it up!
Good luck!
John Morrison, PhDComment -
Kev the BritSBR MVP
- 10-25-09
- 2027
#1859Just received from Morrison:
"Yesterday proved to be invaluable! Although The betting series with Pittsburgh began with them being within the .15 range of RPI differential, that quickly changed as soon as they lost their first game. Pittsburgh had an RPI of .459 to Houston's .477 (.18 difference) before the [B} wager began, and an even greater deficit before the [C] game began. We must keep in mind that under no circumstances should a wager be made when the RPI difference between two teams is greater than .15. Going forward, it's important to walk away from a betting series if the RPI difference between two teams become greater than the .15 limit during any time within the series!"
Now, he knows that he sent out an e-mail yesterday, telling us all to play the C Bet:
"It's time for our gigantic payday! Let's get to it!
Go to the link below to see our upcoming system bet(s):"
W@nker
Regards
Kev the pis$$edComment -
thebestthereisSBR Posting Legend
- 03-01-09
- 11459
#1860nobody used the power of positive thinking and imagined themselves with a gigantic payday, this where the problem is. you can't win unless you believe you are going to win. no filters needed just picture yourself sleeping in a bed full of money and riches and you'll be all set.Comment -
RaRhythm24SBR Sharp
- 05-22-10
- 374
#1861nobody used the power of positive thinking and imagined themselves with a gigantic payday, this where the problem is. You can't win unless you believe you are going to win. No filters needed just picture yourself sleeping in a bed full of money and riches and you'll be all set.Comment -
Kev the BritSBR MVP
- 10-25-09
- 2027
#1862So, he has found a way to avoid stating that his system failed. He can now tell us that the system did not lose a 2nd C Bet this season, so his marketing is protected. He will now use the term, "completed series" instead of "series" so that he claim only 1 completed series lost in 6 years"Comment -
SultanSBR High Roller
- 07-08-10
- 236
#1863i dont understand, he alwas has an excuse..why didnt he write an e-mail? after de A bet
saying, "do not bet anymore because of the rpi bla bla " i dont know somenthing like that..
it sucks..Comment -
pollitoRestricted User
- 02-17-10
- 347
#1864He's cancelled access to the link he sent out yesterday confirming Pittsburgh was OK to go on the C bet, because he knows we would post it and expose him as a liar.
Personally he is a bag full of shit but this system works if you understand it's mathematical bases, and use common sense to skip the high risk series, such as Pittsburgh.Comment -
GGPLAYERSBR MVP
- 03-26-09
- 2981
#1865welcome to the world of JM. He did the same thing in the NBA after a series loss.....he makes up the rules as he goes. At the end of the day he keeps his supporters and cons new ones in and all the time he makes money. Just remember you don't have to play all series and you don't have to play all C games. His records are always tainted so don't go in on blind faith. I learned my lesson the hard way.Comment -
harrySBR Sharp
- 10-15-09
- 273
#1866Well the A B and C e-mails have been posted on another forum anyway.
His website is down, so I guess he's got out of this one as wellComment -
SultanSBR High Roller
- 07-08-10
- 236
#1867welcome to the world of JM. He did the same thing in the NBA after a series loss.....he makes up the rules as he goes. At the end of the day he keeps his supporters and cons new ones in and all the time he makes money. Just remember you don't have to play all series and you don't have to play all C games. His records are always tainted so don't go in on blind faith. I learned my lesson the hard way.
i know what he did last year with rockets, becuase i also lost that series and a lot of money...
honestly is shit becuase of his lies.. the system almost all the time works, but his lies are killing the system..Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#1868U guys gonna play tonightComment -
Kev the BritSBR MVP
- 10-25-09
- 2027
#1869jphil:in regards to the san f.(1st C) loss in mid may, could someone refresh my memory as to what the rpi might have been for each team(sd & sf)? I Was interested in who had the highest rpi, & the gap between the 2 tms. at the time.
May 11: SFO .531, SD .516
May 14: SD: .534, SFO .521
At no time did the RPI difference move into the new "Forbidden Zone"
Regards
KevComment -
InsideKingSBR Hustler
- 05-06-10
- 55
#1870More importantly is St Louis a play tonight?? Also are there any other plays going off this weekend and any possible V3 plays tomorrow? Thanks guys and F*%K JM!Comment -
harrySBR Sharp
- 10-15-09
- 273
#1871I think your right but there was a series that has been... OAK vs LAA (apparently). I think it was as well, cus that's why i didn't play itComment -
hockey1980SBR Sharp
- 04-15-10
- 365
#1872Todays play (series) is st.louis... The new guys on here, you will hear a lot of stuff on how to bet,... this that and everything else....stay with your money management!!!... do not try and re-invent the wheel,....money is made over the whole season not in one week...Comment -
Kev the BritSBR MVP
- 10-25-09
- 2027
#1873
Breaking your own rules, John?
People trust you to post picks that conform with your rules. You are quick to tell us when the RPI differential for an upcoming series is outside your rules, so why not tell us when an upcoming B or C Bet is also outside the rules? Answer: you didn't know it was outside your rules. Reason: it wasn't a system rule yesterday. Today it is a rule, but many, many, trusting folk followed your lead yesterday when they read your e-mail and they consequently lost hundreds (maybe thousands, in some cases) of $s.
The very least you can do is apologise for your crass e-mail today and admit that the existing rules were lacking in a critical area and that the New Rule From Today is "......" and, be a man, and tell us it isn't perfect. We can live with risks and honesty, but not the kind of bullshit you posted this evening.
KevComment -
thebestthereisSBR Posting Legend
- 03-01-09
- 11459
#1874st.louis gets swept in houston will be very difficult no matter whatComment -
bmoney1720SBR Hustler
- 07-07-10
- 75
#1875Wainwright is automatic against the stros recently. 8-1 with a 1.72 era. i like what i see im winning my pirates loses back on bet A!Comment -
jose21_usSBR MVP
- 05-24-10
- 3844
#1876Jose,
It's time for our gigantic payday! Let's get to it!
Go to the link below to see our upcoming system bet(s):
http://www.SportsBettingChamp.com/377099
So much for that Shit..Comment -
sportsbetwinSBR Wise Guy
- 03-07-09
- 745
#1877JM is a turd. All last year I advised my members to only use the 0.01 filter. This year I went against my better judgement and included all within 0.015.
There is still merit in his systems and the ideal thing is to go back to 0.01. This will almost avoid RPI differentials exceeding 0.015 during the course of a series.
He doesn't give a shit about his customers - he has made milllions and is now more focussed on his scamdicapper ventures.
He will continue to push SBC hard - 1 of every 2 series losses is post filtered.Comment -
darkdracosSBR Rookie
- 06-04-10
- 31
#1878At least Cards won this evening. While it may have been against most peoples better judgment, I had a good feeling about this one. I bet large and consequently profited well. I hope others did the same to make up for JM's bullcrap.Comment -
CyrilSBR High Roller
- 01-23-09
- 245
#1879He clearly said that Pittsburgh is a play, every single bet (A,B,C).
If that was the case with his newly invented rule, why didn't he said it before the B and C bet loss ? Of course, he waited to see if it wins, so he can boast himself again how cool and unbeatable he is..
The least he can do is to accept the loss and apologise to his customers, not for the loss, but for the ignorant and idiotic mail he sent today ! But this is not going to happen, knowing what kind of person he is.Comment -
MarrowhineSBR Hustler
- 07-04-10
- 75
#1880It doesn't really make sense, surely he needs to change the 0.015 to something lower in order to start any series, otherwise if the first game ever loses with an RPI near .015 then it will surely fall out again. I had assumed 0.015 was already taking into account a decreasing RPI through a series =/Comment -
harrySBR Sharp
- 10-15-09
- 273
#1881It doesn't really make sense, surely he needs to change the 0.015 to something lower in order to start any series, otherwise if the first game ever loses with an RPI near .015 then it will surely fall out again. I had assumed 0.015 was already taking into account a decreasing RPI through a series =/Comment -
GDBSBR Sharp
- 03-18-07
- 311
#1882It doesn't really make sense, surely he needs to change the 0.015 to something lower in order to start any series, otherwise if the first game ever loses with an RPI near .015 then it will surely fall out again. I had assumed 0.015 was already taking into account a decreasing RPI through a series =/Comment -
SolidDalaSBR MVP
- 12-14-09
- 1696
#1883So people should have taken the PIT A bet lose and move on JM says, so why ain't that A lose on the freaking site.. Someone with hacking skills should just shout down his site...Comment -
h00diniRestricted User
- 09-17-09
- 659
#1884your the man kev! perfectly said.Comment -
SmokyMcPotRestricted User
- 07-10-10
- 47
#1885Forget this sh!t! I once got burned pretty Big in NBA with JMs system... With 3 different versions and stuff... you can't even follow what he's doingComment -
h00diniRestricted User
- 09-17-09
- 659
#1886JM made his money scamming people. Welcome to America.Comment -
Spaniard22SBR Wise Guy
- 02-12-10
- 868
#1887Comment -
h00diniRestricted User
- 09-17-09
- 659
#1888the "chase system" or AKA "the sports betting champs system" works only as a "long term investment". money should NOT be withdrawn from your sportsbetting account for at least TWO(2) years and your "C" bet should NOT exceed 3% of your balance, i bet 2%. after 2 years, you can be pulling a nice little salary for yourself. obviously your bets will grow as your balance grows or decline if your balance dips. if you are the person who bets on this system, cash's your winnings and wait and continue for the next game, your down over 35 games in MLB with just those two losses this year.
i started using JM about two years ago, i dont listen to his BS no more, i know all the systems myself. JM is a business man now. i can tell you that with my initial $25,000.00 deposit in my sportsbook, i am now closing in to 100K in my account even with the pirates loss and pulling a small amount salary weekly.
i dont change anything, i follow the system exactly. one thing i do alter is only in MLB. my thing is this, history always repeats itself. so if a team gets swept, we take the swept team in their next series with the team that swept them, right? right! i reverse them. that my only change.
CHASE SYSTEM=LOSER
CHASE SYSTEM+MONEY MANAGEMENT+PATIENCE=RETIREMENT MONEYComment -
stickbitSBR Sharp
- 03-09-08
- 265
#1889hoodini - so your only change in all of his systems is you reverse the JM MLB system and do anti-JM - taking the team that did the sweeping to win 1 of 3 when the two teams play again?Comment -
arconiteSBR High Roller
- 05-05-09
- 141
#1890Some of the scans of the betting slips on his website go against his own system.
NBA bets: odds at -110 = not buying 3 points
MLB bets: betting RL for favorites
And his excuse on one of the NBA loss is not part of the system filter:
"he last time that we actually lost was more than a year ago in a
game of an extraordinary fluke where all 3 major superstars of the
opposing team at the time who were out for a consecutive 70 (!!)
games were ALL unexpectedly put back into the lineup at the very
last minute."
So yeah JM is a person who will even swear on his mother's name to cheat your moneyComment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code