Wagerweb made no adjustments to the other players, either winning or losing (and to my knowledge, didn't even make a determination of whether these players were winners or losers). I suspect that if a player were a large winner though, they would have reviewed his account.
WagerWeb looked at all the wager logs for games past-posted by the player. In all of them, he was about an average of 6 minutes later than the last bettor. The other players seen as "past-posting" were within 30 seconds or so of the kickoff. WW did not adjust these wagers, as none of these players were systematically past-posting (either in volume of wagers, time period of the past-post, or systematic advantage attained by doing so).
I fault WagerWeb somewhat, because they probably knew about the software vulnerability. They probably even gained a bit of extra volume from allowing wagers that were asked for before kickoff, but confirmed after. I don't think they had any idea what the player was doing here until he tried to bet two games at once where both had scores for the team he wanted to wager.
We have no reports of losing past-posters who couldn't get refunds (but this isn't surprising - past-posters without fail always bet the right side, and NEVER lose long-term).
WagerWeb looked at all the wager logs for games past-posted by the player. In all of them, he was about an average of 6 minutes later than the last bettor. The other players seen as "past-posting" were within 30 seconds or so of the kickoff. WW did not adjust these wagers, as none of these players were systematically past-posting (either in volume of wagers, time period of the past-post, or systematic advantage attained by doing so).
I fault WagerWeb somewhat, because they probably knew about the software vulnerability. They probably even gained a bit of extra volume from allowing wagers that were asked for before kickoff, but confirmed after. I don't think they had any idea what the player was doing here until he tried to bet two games at once where both had scores for the team he wanted to wager.
We have no reports of losing past-posters who couldn't get refunds (but this isn't surprising - past-posters without fail always bet the right side, and NEVER lose long-term).