Found this in another thread:
This is the result of 6 seasons of NHL when betting on all away underdogs closing with less than 35% of public trend.
Stats:
Number of plays: 1864
Wins: 691 (37.07%)
Losses: 1173 (62.93%)
Average odds: +180
Units: +121.69
Average # of plays per season: 309
Average units win per season: +20.33
ROI: 6.5%
Worst downswing: -30 units
Seasons details:
2005-2006: -2.88 units
2006-2007: +14.4 units
2007-2008: +51.06 units
2008-2009: +49.2 units
2009-2010: -9.74 units
2010-2011: +18.43 units
Mean: +20.08 units
Standard Deviation: 23.31 units
Bankroll growth by taking the whole ride with 1 unit = 2% : 537%
As you can see, this "method" is not stable yet based on those seasons. The SD still beats the mean. It would need more seasons of testing, but since it is close to stable, and it is quite a no-brainer, I tought that it was interesting to share.
This is the result of 6 seasons of NHL when betting on all away underdogs closing with less than 35% of public trend.
Stats:
Number of plays: 1864
Wins: 691 (37.07%)
Losses: 1173 (62.93%)
Average odds: +180
Units: +121.69
Average # of plays per season: 309
Average units win per season: +20.33
ROI: 6.5%
Worst downswing: -30 units
Seasons details:
2005-2006: -2.88 units
2006-2007: +14.4 units
2007-2008: +51.06 units
2008-2009: +49.2 units
2009-2010: -9.74 units
2010-2011: +18.43 units
Mean: +20.08 units
Standard Deviation: 23.31 units
Bankroll growth by taking the whole ride with 1 unit = 2% : 537%
As you can see, this "method" is not stable yet based on those seasons. The SD still beats the mean. It would need more seasons of testing, but since it is close to stable, and it is quite a no-brainer, I tought that it was interesting to share.