John Morrison 2010 NBA

[chilidog]

I boldly declared to you that we would 100% for sure win the [C] bet
with Orlando a few days ago, and once again, I didn't let you down!

We're on the tail of a gigantic winning streak coming up!

Go to the link below to see our upcoming system bet(s):

[GGPLAYER]

Yeah, although no email from jm yet. He might still be trying to shake off that last [C] bet loss.

Why is JM's email so important to make your bet? If you already committed to the A and B bet why would'nt you just put in the C bet? What if that email never comes? Does the series just end with 2 loses? Really not trying to be a wise guy here. I'm honestly curious.

[GGPLAYER]

Ok I set up my own thread.

post the link so everyone click over to it.

[GGPLAYER]

I think it was. I didn't play it but i've checked lines and opening spread was +10 at several bookies.

Well do you bet the opening line or the closing line? Something tells me if the line closed better than it opened JM would say that was the one to play. Either way this series is still alive.

[DustyDiamond]

What is the V1 record?

[dukipl]

What is the V1 record?

17 wins and 2 losses
the 2 losses are: phoenix [a bet] vs. miami
and detroit [a,b,c bets]

[dukipl]

LA Clippers are the v1 play tonight but I dont play on the team that is the worst in the NBA! So I skip it.
we have also a v2 play on Cleveland [c bet] vs. Miami
GL ALL

[ghislaine]

so Wilba, JM Disciple and chili, bauerranch and JW Cash...
do You all agree that at the moment when it comes to cappers ( not systems, obviously following JM )
SJ55 is the best one around ???

He seems to be growing his legions everytime I pop in the thread...

and yup, You are right about the sports picks buffet...

So, do You think anyone comes even close to Sweet Jones` results ??

[bauerranch]

Actually Ghislaine I just started following him so I will let you know in a couple of days

[ghislaine]

cool !

[soldier1047]

Looking good stanley. Pressure off huh? LOL

[Stanley77]

17 wins and 2 losses
the 2 losses are: phoenix [a bet] vs. miami
and detroit [a,b,c bets]

To me, I wouldn't count those series losses as losses. The Phoenix Suns series should've been a 4-game progression. They covered on the D bet. As for the Detroit Pistons series, it should've been a pass because they have another 3-game series within a month after that series. The same goes with the Minnesota Timberwolves series from last month and the Cleveland Cavaliers series from last week.

[Wilba]

To me, I wouldn't count those series losses as losses. The Phoenix Suns series should've been a 4-game progression. They covered on the D bet. As for the Detroit Pistons series, it should've been a pass because they have another 3-game series within a month after that series. The same goes with the Minnesota Timberwolves series from last month and the Cleveland Cavaliers series from last week.

ya well if you play a 4 game progression, clearly you will lose a lot less series! But you also are risking 68 units / series as opposed to 18.5. So risking 18.5 means you risk 1/4 as much approximately, which means you can afford to lose 4 x as many series as a 4 game chase to still break even with a 68 unit chase.

[Wilba]

What an awesome day!!! I love this system. The C's are pure gold. Neither ever looked even remotely close to losing.

Thats why they are the only thing I would EVER put more than 10% of my roll on. You can't ignore that strike rate yeeee hah!

Well done to all that played them today. Nice bank roll boost.

[imotiv8]

Good job to all who made money

[lawalahmed]

I'm still on my promise, i will gladly throw all my points to anybody that can help me edit John Morrison web page to change that cunning 11 - 0 record for this season(V1) to 10 - 1(real record)....i believe there should be some black Hat hacker(s) in this forum???Please used your skill before this greedy guy fool thousands of people again.....

[shermanator]

yay easy cover for minny.

[J.M. Disciple]

so Wilba, JM Disciple and chili, bauerranch and JW Cash...
do You all agree that at the moment when it comes to cappers ( not systems, obviously following JM )
SJ55 is the best one around ???

He seems to be growing his legions everytime I pop in the thread...

and yup, You are right about the sports picks buffet...

So, do You think anyone comes even close to Sweet Jones` results ??

SYSTEMS:
JM system
Tripple play system

Cappers:
CaJun Capper
SJ55
Sports betting professor (I just flat bet his B and C picks. no chase)

[J.M. Disciple]

SYSTEMS:
JM system
Tripple play system

Cappers:
CaJun Capper
SJ55
Sports betting professor (I just flat bet his B and C picks. no chase)

Hopefully I can add myself to the list soon.

[J.M. Disciple]

Upcoming bets:

Charlotte [B] 12/17/10 Fri @ Atlanta ... v3

Clippers [B] 12/17/10 Fri @ Detroit.... v1


Phoenix [A] 12/17 vs Dal.......v3
Utah [A] vs NOH..................v2

[dukipl]

Cleveland [c bet] covered.
PS. I would avoid to chase LAC they suck.

[MakeItRain14]

Which bet is the one to buy 3 points?

[stevex]

I guarantee the Clippers cover in 1 of the next 2 games.

[J.M. Disciple]

Which bet is the one to buy 3 points?

Always buy points using this system. GO back and read the first few pages of this thread.

[J.M. Disciple]

Cleveland [c bet] covered.
PS. I would avoid to chase LAC they suck.

Clippers show up from time to time. They have 2nd worst road record, but they do not have the worst. Just because a team sucks doesn't mean you should avoid the whole series. I will advice A bets for the most part and some B bets as i did with Minnesota, but i wont avoid a whole series espcially a C bet.

[J.M. Disciple]

Which bet is the one to buy 3 points?

You should bet around 5% of your bankroll on each B bet or 5 units to win 3 units after buying 3pts. C bets bet around 10% of your bankroll and keep following the system and you will make money.

AVOID BETTING ON THE "A" WAGERS.

[GGPLAYER]

Cleveland [c bet] covered.
PS. I would avoid to chase LAC they suck.

Again I will beat this drum........Clippers are 12-14 ATS this year and if you add the 3pts they are 15-11. The last extended road trip they had was about a month ago and they went 3-1 ATS with no points bought.

I tell you what there is a lot of discussion on what system or who to follow but for me the best is simply to skip the A bet of any version (V1,V2,V3). Wilba has outlined this many times and shown thru statistical history of the last 10 years that supports this as being incredibly profitable. But what I enjoy the most is the LACK of stress. A "C" bet is very uncomfortable even with the high success rate. There are a bevy of factors which can cause a loss. Last night for example would have been very uncomfortable and a strain on my roll to make two C bets, one B bet and two A bets. Instead the two C bet for me were actually B bets and the B bet was an A bet. I do not and will not play the A bets ever again. So 3 bets versus 5 and I don't know for how many less units put up. 3-0 vs 3-2 and tons of profit. I've been tinkering with JM plays for years and you just can't beat doing it this way.

[knugen]

So there is no bet for
Today?

[krzychu78]

JM's NBA V3 system:
12/15/2010 Minnesota @ Phoenix - V3, C bet WIN
12/15/2010 Sacramento @ New Orleans - V3, B bet - (unofficial) - WIN
12/15/2010 Charlotte @ Memphis - V3, A bet - LOSS

V3 record so far (finished series): 19-1
(A): 11-9
(B): 7-2
(C): 1-1

Next V3 plays:
12/17/2010 Charlotte @ Atlanta - V3, B bet
12/17/2010 Phoenix @ Dallas - V3, A bet

[EasyHustlin]

Again I will beat this drum........Clippers are 12-14 ATS this year and if you add the 3pts they are 15-11. The last extended road trip they had was about a month ago and they went 3-1 ATS with no points bought. I tell you what there is a lot of discussion on what system or who to follow but for me the best is simply to skip the A bet of any version (V1,V2,V3). Wilba has outlined this many times and shown thru statistical history of the last 10 years that supports this as being incredibly profitable. But what I enjoy the most is the LACK of stress. A "C" bet is very uncomfortable even with the high success rate. There are a bevy of factors which can cause a loss. Last night for example would have been very uncomfortable and a strain on my roll to make two C bets, one B bet and two A bets. Instead the two C bet for me were actually B bets and the B bet was an A bet. I do not and will not play the A bets ever again. So 3 bets versus 5 and I don't know for how many less units put up. 3-0 vs 3-2 and tons of profit. I've been tinkering with JM plays for years and you just can't beat doing it this way.

Thanks for the insight gg. Sounds like a great way to go.

Ghislaine, you may also want to check out Solamon's Road System. It's basically the opposite of JM, FADE the team on the 3 game road series. He bets each half and it's a chase, so a possibility of 6 bets. He's won every series and I don't think he's had a series go past the 4th bet. If you're like me and can't stand the stress of using a martingale system, you could use a labby and still make a solid profit.

[jphil]

Wilba: Did you mention before that your B & C stats were based on V1 only? or not.

Also, do you play all 3 versions anyway?

[panik]

V3 record so far (finished series): 19-1
(A): 11-9
(B): 7-2
(C): 1-1

Why do you have this at 19-1? Should be 19-12

[krzychu78]

Why do you have this at 19-1? Should be 19-12

Nope, it's a 3-game chase system. 19 wins, 1 loss so far.

[Wilba]

Again I will beat this drum........Clippers are 12-14 ATS this year and if you add the 3pts they are 15-11. The last extended road trip they had was about a month ago and they went 3-1 ATS with no points bought.

I tell you what there is a lot of discussion on what system or who to follow but for me the best is simply to skip the A bet of any version (V1,V2,V3). Wilba has outlined this many times and shown thru statistical history of the last 10 years that supports this as being incredibly profitable. But what I enjoy the most is the LACK of stress. A "C" bet is very uncomfortable even with the high success rate. There are a bevy of factors which can cause a loss. Last night for example would have been very uncomfortable and a strain on my roll to make two C bets, one B bet and two A bets. Instead the two C bet for me were actually B bets and the B bet was an A bet. I do not and will not play the A bets ever again. So 3 bets versus 5 and I don't know for how many less units put up. 3-0 vs 3-2 and tons of profit. I've been tinkering with JM plays for years and you just can't beat doing it this way.

Hi GG, Im so happy to hear that you and a few others are now seeing the sense in never playing the A bets. As I have said a few times, you cant beat long period statistics for proving/disproving profitability. Beyond a shadow of doubt. And what you say about hugely reducing the stress of C's is so true. (of course JW, stevex etc do this another way which also works)

Another 2 A bet losses yesterday, on top of that the vast majority of the A bets in the last week have lost also. (if someone checks the season A's to date pls post, I dont have time) If playing A bets has not lost you money already this season, very soon it will have. My gut says that after the 2 losses yesterday, they have either just crossed into the negative, or are just about to very soon.

JPHIL: i) the stats are from all version.
ii) yes i play all version, but I play V3 for 1/2, and V2 for 3/4 of what I play V1 for. As an example, if I played V1 to win 4 units, I wold play V2 for 3, and V3 for 2.

I know many times in this thread the difference between the 3 versions has been scoffed at, and the 'difference' has been said to be non exsistent. Again though, long term stats say otherwise, and long term stats are all I base my decisions on. Long term stats say V1 most reliable, followed by V2 and then V3. However all profitable long term, hence I play all 3 for the appropriate amounts..

Lets keep rolling guys, the system always has at least a few losses every year, here's to hoping we have just got them out of the way early and the rest of the way will be a sweet ride!

ps just a FYI for whoever it was tracking the double digit dogs (JM disciple I think, ps can u post link to ur new thread?)
double digit dogs went 3-0 yesterday, with or without points.
3-3 last couple days w/out buying points
5-1 last couple days w/ 3 points, and the only loss coming by 1/2 point (Wash +13.5 v Lakers, Lake show won by 14)

[hagball52]

What's unusual is the amount of A bet losses this early in the year. I think he usually hits over 80% of the A bets which would make a good system all by itself. This is my 3rd year betting the NBA system and I've not seen this many A bet losses this close together let alone all the C bets we've had this year. I think it will right itself at some point. Usually there's a lot more winning A bets than any other.