I heard a few people state that WASH is not a play as they are the worst road team??? Those of you that are playing them are you aware of that and are you just turning a blind eye to that?
-
Comment -
Calm down, pal. I was just informing someone that the Pistons were the dogs. No need to move in an aggressive, negative direction. That being said, I appreciate your confidence.careful? +8.5 where at chief? the corner bookie in queens? geez no site has that line its +7 check the big boys it will keep u on track not corner bookies no one has the line even at +8 I think sometimes people use this forum to confuse people and put up bad info on purpose not here u wont not on my watch peace out
Comment -
cleveland 1st v3 loss
Comment -
denver loses too. not a good start tonight. need detroit and washington to step up.Comment -
I told you guys not to play teams that have 2 series within a month. That was on post #289. I had a feeling that the Cavaliers would lose the series. They had a 3-game road trip and now they have a 4-game road trip later on. They will cover that series for sure.
I find that it's a bad idea to bet on teams that are on a 3-game road trip if they have another consecutive road trip for at least 3 games within a month after that. But if they have a road trip for at least 4 games then it's best to bet on them no matter what.Comment -
no no its not epic suckage its called f uck the Cleveland team town and fans for being the biggest f ucking clowns in the league who pulls this kind of s hit? and calls it pro ball but this game though proves the reason as to why I refunded this garbage v3.0 system mos ago back when I bought it in March and in the first few weeks we lost a bet so no thank you
and for all you newbies on this thread or to John in general believe me this probably wont be the last loss in v3.0 this yr either so another words just get your money back if you happen to buy v3.0 or play it sparingly if u choose up to you but I wont be one loss and Im done I was simply waiting for the f uckup to occur and there u go we're good here folks and so is v2.0 after its first loss over a mos ago not playing it eitherComment -
no no not a problem but I do still believe people put up bulls hit posts for no reason to confuse people and new people as well but if u put something up then one person sees it thinks it gospel then goes on bitching for like 20 posts straight by saying ohhh I didnt see a +8 line anywhere blah blah I think u follow me
plus it may not matter we may get our asses handed to us and the lines are definitely meaningless then we shall see game is still playing as I write thisComment -
I'm sure this JM system works...but...I chose to play it once last year and once again this year and whaddya know, I pick a series that loses all 3 bets. Gheyness I tell ya.
Oh well, if Dallas, Detroit, and Washington can pull through, I'll be ok.
MattComment -
Hopefully no one is blowing their bank roll tonight. This is why you play more than one system, for bad stretches like this.Comment -
Loss my Denver (-1.5) vs Bobcat game 98 vs 100. V1(A)
Money Line bet in a Las Vegas casino.Comment -
Pistons and mavs bets looking good. Hope they hold outComment -
nope...detroit shit the bed too. just not a good night. going to go down a 6 pack and start again tomorrow.Comment -
And another reason why using the labby is just plain and simple the WAY to go....Comment -
Took one in the ass by 1/2 pt on the mavs game.
No dice on Detroit.
Could care less about the Laker game nowComment -
first time I went in the V3 series and it crashes=I should of know
horrible night all aroundComment -
yeah I know what u mean matt this damn labby or martingale crap talk it gets old following these systems are simple people just use no more than 2-4% of your bankroll on the A bet and go from there no need to do this silliness people keep talking about like starting with the b bets and so on just wasting these threads space most of the time and also confuses people who dont know what the hell most are saying especially if they are new to the siteComment -
jmjj. Last year when I started using JM's systems I had no idea about labby and now that I implement it instead of constantly depositing into the books I'm withdrawing. Why wouldn't I CONSTANTLY talk about something that will make people money?Comment -
true I do horribly betting the way the 2 major nba systems I use tell u to do so yeah geez what was I thinking hmmm wow CLOWNS!!!!!!!!! conversation over I can see Im getting nowhere there carry on homies do what u need to do not play it the way the system tells u to do with proper bankroll management and still profit like everyone else should and will do if they do it right theres no quick shortcuts that makes anyone more profitable with these systems LOL
Comment -
If you think of it as an investment, it's pretty easy to compare to stocks. Some folks have a lot of faith in what some market gurus predict to be the outcome of the short-term-market. Therefore, they feel comfortable posting a higher risk. However, some folks play it more cautiously and choose a more conservative route, like a mutual fund. No way is better than the other, it's just all about personality and preference. I do the Labouchere method but I have a friend who does the Martingale system. He wins big, but he loses big. I win small, but I lose small. In the end, both systems end up yielding comparable profit margins.
However, if you wish to follow the standard John Morrison method--which definitely works great--just do the three-game-chase/Martingale method.Comment -
Uhhh, seriously? No one is saying you're doing horribly. All we're saying is that the system can be tweaked and made better. If you think the system is perfect the way it is then play it, but don't get on those of us who want to make the most out of it. Jesus you are an insecure little ****.true I do horribly betting the way the 2 major nba systems I use tell u to do so yeah geez what was I thinking hmmm wow CLOWNS!!!!!!!!! conversation over I can see Im getting nowhere there carry on homies do what u need to do not play it the way the system tells u to do with proper bankroll management and still profit like everyone else should and will do if they do it right theres no quick shortcuts that makes anyone more profitable with these systems LOLComment -
Comment -
Having a winning record has no relation whatsoever to JM series success over the last decade. If you only played teams with winning record you would half your profits. Series over last decade have been lost by teams with winning record more than those with losing (go check this if u dont believe me). The bad teams are actually the more successful ones as you get the big spreadsComment -
We are almost there....
Match with astrick if win JM count it, but if lost he give rubbish excuse and throw it away as system selection that is why is good you do your reseach as well, almost there now +16 spread...Comment -
yep I agree aroo but I guess I just dont get why people try to circumvent something that already works and make it sound like they are sooo much more of a pro and then try to rag on me calling me names like that clown easyloser or whatever his name is trying to do like I said convo is over the system is simple I dont even know why the convo is being had.........
oh yeah b/c someone got pissed b/c I try to tell people there are no shortcuts in doing a 3 game system like buying less pts and so on and then get pissed about it
just remember that rule 1 is dont argue on the internet we all may be friendly with each other on here or at least some of us are but we dont know each other nor do we care we're just on here sharing info on the same subject for the same purposes dont make it a big production of bigger stupidity than some people comments already doComment -
A win for the Wizard (+12.5) against Lakers 108-115.
Why did I listen to my freind, everybody want to play hard to
beat a champion.Comment -
Yes, rejected stone (Washington) won without buying point....Comment -
I agree wilba is funny how some peple try to put some of their "expertise" into an already proven system please dont thanks LOL the Denver team is the only winning team out there tonight ok then sounds like they need to improve on their game then uh?.....doesnt matter systems bets have no reflection on how or what or why the team plays just like us covering with Washington tonight on 2 different systems regular handicapping expertise has no place in system plays u didnt see any so called handicappers taking Washington tonight did u? nopeComment -
V3 had a very bad year in 2004/2005 which was an aberration, that aside it has actually performed JUST AS WELL as V1 over the last decade. V1 over last 5 years is 219-6, V3 over last 5 years is 252-7. So V3 over last 5 years actually MORE PROFITABLE than V1. 5 years is a quite adequate sample to give an indication of performance. As for your comments about V2 you know why!? V2 has outperformed EVERYTHING over last 5 years, it went 105-0. Thats right, not a single loss! Including the 4-1 or whatever from this year that makes it 109-1 over last 5 years. And you say that V2 is NOT worth playing. Even though V1 is 219-6 over same timespan. Hmm whats better 219-6 or 109-1???
Please don't post unfounded and ill researched comments based purely on how you are feeling after losing a bet - what you posted is completely untrue and it is misleading to (the many) people in this thread who dont know better. If you gonna post crap like that at least research it first
JMJJ please note that I agree with much of what you say and appreciate your contributions to the thread. I just think it is dangerous when people post untrue stuff about the systems which is misleading to people that don't know better. It sucks losing a series but 1 series doesnt mean that version is crapComment -
Washington [b bet] win
Next v1 plays:
denver [b bet] vs. Boston
detroit [b bet] vs. NOH
miami [a bet] vs. UtahComment
