I'm not trying to start a flame war over this but I feel Cung was clearly winning. I don't even understand how anyone could think otherwise. You think they would give Wandy a 20-18 round for that, wtf, when you you ever seen an MMA round scored 20-18 because of a knockdown? (although it probably should be)
I like your ability to break down fights but I feel some of what is going on here is that you are trying to "sell" your pick. I don't think you are be even-handed in the areas of Wandys chin and cardio. But rather acting as if you have a "side" in a debate and bringing whatever you need to support you argument.
I could be wrong but I just get the feeling you try to poke holes in whatever counter argument comes up. You yourself aren't saying wandy is a lock or should be like -300, so obviously there are going to be serious question marks surrounding Wandy, so why pretend like they don't exist or severely downplay them?
I like your ability to break down fights but I feel some of what is going on here is that you are trying to "sell" your pick. I don't think you are be even-handed in the areas of Wandys chin and cardio. But rather acting as if you have a "side" in a debate and bringing whatever you need to support you argument.
I could be wrong but I just get the feeling you try to poke holes in whatever counter argument comes up. You yourself aren't saying wandy is a lock or should be like -300, so obviously there are going to be serious question marks surrounding Wandy, so why pretend like they don't exist or severely downplay them?