on3's MLB 2012 Opening Game system thread 194-8 last year +60 units

**J.M. Disciple** · 05-27-12, 07:53 PM

Originally posted by 1gamer

Your insight and opinions add much value to these forums JMD. BOL to you...

Thank you... Im not sure I really help in MLB though lol. Just the noob with labby discussion. Other then that its a growing experience for myself still.

**J.M. Disciple** · 05-27-12, 08:25 PM

System record 50-4-0; 12-0-0; 1-0-0
Units -21.5; +12; +5
1 unit = $20

5/26

#55 -- colorado @ CIN -140 (B)
#56 -- washington @ ATL +108 (B)
#57 -- houston @ LAD -118 (B)
#58 -- tampa bay @ BOS -118 (B) -- play 5/2

Game 1 win = 30-28; 8-5
Game 2 win = 18-6; 4-0; 1-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

78-78-75-80
90-88-85-95
55-52-56-54

Labby Line (filter)

x-10-40-x

CIN to win 90
ATL bet 88
BOS to win 85
LAD to win 95

________________________________________ ____________________

Trying to figure this out ON3 but i think the system should be less then -16.5 units based on the numbers you posted.

95+90+85 (-88 Not including the juice) = $182 roughly 9 units in profit on the day. You went from -21.5 to -16.5 with a +9 unit day....

**gofightingirish** · 05-27-12, 10:23 PM

fukkin sux....another c bet loss....

**ChiLLx** · 05-27-12, 10:33 PM

How long since our last C bet win?

**jturn49** · 05-27-12, 10:45 PM

Livan freaking hernandez

**KennyM10** · 05-28-12, 12:15 AM

Hilarious another series loss. Time to toss this crap in the garbage.

**airattackers** · 05-28-12, 01:44 AM

@kennyM10..get the hell out of here..

**bobk16** · 05-28-12, 06:22 AM

ATL should've never been a qualifying favorite in the A game...

**jturn49** · 05-28-12, 07:38 AM

Explain please. Why not?

**COYLO** · 05-28-12, 07:43 AM

nobody make's us take the plays, if you play it and it looses man the fuk up. as for atl lastnite a blind man saw that coming

**ifiwaspresident** · 05-28-12, 09:49 AM

Like I said in my previous post, I work within the framework of the system but exercise a little self-determination. I saw the pitching matchup in Game 2 of the ATL chase, and reversed the bet against ATL. It was successful and cleared. In the series starting today, I have changed up a little as well. On the NYM series, I have reversed and will chase PHI because the rotation participating in the series for NYM is 354 and PHI is 342. I have doubled up my starting units on the LAA and ATL series because both home teams have 124 starters going against opponents' 345 starters. For CLE and TEX I have played it according to Hoyle. We will see.

**stevex** · 05-28-12, 10:50 AM

Update...

**eric14tsui** · 05-28-12, 11:27 AM

Tex might be the only one qualified.

**stevex** · 05-28-12, 11:34 AM

.....?

**tuneman** · 05-28-12, 11:47 AM

Hey guys, I don't post much and I am down this year following but I have made money every year following this method. It's been a little rough this year though. Just sayin'.

**on3** · 05-28-12, 11:56 AM

...ATL was just dreadful that series. only one today, TEX. and thanks JMD for the unit correction.

System record 53-5-0; 13-0-0; 2-0-0
Units -21; +13; +10
1 unit = $20

5/28

#59 -- seattle @ TEX -200/+100 (A) -- o/u 10 -- play 5/2 if (A) loses -- play RL

Game 1 win = 30-28; 8-5
Game 2 win = 21-7; 5-0; 2-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

98-98-100-100
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

Labby Line (filter)

10-10-10-10

TEX to win 100

TEX to win 20

**J.M. Disciple** · 05-28-12, 12:19 PM

on3,

texas is not RL play at -200? would advise people to play -1 at least.............

**bobk16** · 05-28-12, 08:04 PM

Atlanta had just been swept by the Reds and as a Reds fan it came in rather easy fashion and Jones played quite a bit of the Reds series. And then you have to take into consideration how well the Nats have played and you decide are they for real or not...my conclusion and it came weeks ago..,the Nats are for real...so why in the heck would Atl be a -160 or - 170 whatever it was...it was just a bad spread...the Nats pitching has been handcuffing good teams and Atlanta minus Chipper has some holes in the lineup and good pitchers take advantage of that...need I say more...Atlanta was a no play for me because I saw the line a different way...if I see a line that I don't agree with then I pass.

**Longshotz** · 05-28-12, 09:45 PM

Good stuff tonight. Got em on all lines.

Now that it's hot out this system should really kick in. I am somewhat concerned about some new strats we are seeing in many teams, but at least the money lines should come down a lot on the Detroit and Atlantas etc.

**Nino7** · 05-28-12, 11:27 PM

anyone can link the game?

**allidoiswin89** · 05-29-12, 01:06 PM

Originally posted by ifiwaspresident

Like I said in my previous post, I work within the framework of the system but exercise a little self-determination. I saw the pitching matchup in Game 2 of the ATL chase, and reversed the bet against ATL. It was successful and cleared. In the series starting today, I have changed up a little as well. On the NYM series, I have reversed and will chase PHI because the rotation participating in the series for NYM is 354 and PHI is 342. I have doubled up my starting units on the LAA and ATL series because both home teams have 124 starters going against opponents' 345 starters. For CLE and TEX I have played it according to Hoyle. We will see.

Lmao yes u work in the framework but must be nice to post after a series is over that u switched it to the other team with never mentioning that. Hey guys I have 0 losses this year because every loss u guys had, I switched on the b bet because of xyz reasons....lol ur a joke. No wonder why you attacked me without a plausible explanation...you sound like your 18 boasting your self esteem in this thread. Bol to u but absolutely no credibility which refutes anything you will say going forward.

**ifiwaspresident** · 05-29-12, 01:43 PM

Originally posted by allidoiswin89

Lmao yes u work in the framework but must be nice to post after a series is over that u switched it to the other team with never mentioning that. Hey guys I have 0 losses this year because every loss u guys had, I switched on the b bet because of xyz reasons....lol ur a joke. No wonder why you attacked me without a plausible explanation...you sound like your 18 boasting your self esteem in this thread. Bol to u but absolutely no credibility which refutes anything you will say going forward.

I mentioned one previous play, and only as an impetus to future leanings. I then mention quite specifically my intentions concerning 5 different series before they started. For posterity, 4 of those 5 went on to win and 1 of them is now chasing. You obviously uninstalled that little filter between your brain and mouth that most of the rest of us have.

I really appreciate the emotional investment you have in me, as evidenced by your continued dedication to monitoring my activities...but just so you know, I'm straight. I just don't want you to have false hopes. You must accept that nothing can come of this. It's me not you. You're too good for me, and you deserve more than I can give. But I know you're going to make some lucky fellow the happiest man in the world someday. So keep your chin up buddy, or Mr. Right could walk right in front of you and you'd miss him. BOL

**J.M. Disciple** · 05-29-12, 10:47 PM

Its a blind system, no one cares what personal bets or strategies about reversing the system anyone has. Lets get back to the system and stop arguing about pointless crap.

Whens the next bets?

**ifiwaspresident** · 05-30-12, 10:54 AM

Originally posted by J.M. Disciple

Its a blind system, no one cares what personal bets or strategies about reversing the system anyone has. Lets get back to the system and stop arguing about pointless crap.

Whens the next bets?

Point taken about arguing, but I'd be careful about dismissing discussions about other filters and ways to alter or augment this system ye glass house dweller. Moving on.

**Wallco99** · 05-30-12, 04:02 PM

Two Shay!

**J.M. Disciple** · 05-30-12, 04:56 PM

not dismissing any filter discussions, but capping an individual series is not really a filter.

JUNE 1
Rays vs Orioles
Blue Jays vs Red Sox
White Sox vs Mariners
Indians vs Twins
Tigers vs Yankees
Royals vs Athletics
Angels vs Rangers
Mets vs Cardinals
Phillies vs Marlins
Nationals vs Braves
Astros vs Reds
Brewers vs Pirates
Rockies vs Dodgers
Padres vs D-Backs
Giants vs Cubs

**SlickRick1382** · 05-30-12, 05:05 PM

Originally posted by ifiwaspresident

Point taken about arguing, but I'd be careful about dismissing discussions about other filters and ways to alter or augment this system ye glass house dweller. Moving on.

Is it just me or was that some classic pot calling the kettle black (referring to who you quoted, not you)

**ifiwaspresident** · 05-30-12, 10:56 PM

Ah you know. It's all good as long as the repartee is even slightly witty and without malice, as I perceive it to be with JMD. Allidoistalkshit is a different story, who apparently either can't read or discern between past, present, and future tense. That thing dangling from his chin post-coitus is a participle. I'm flattered by the attention he has showered on me, but honestly he needs to stop trying to shove his square peg in my round hole. We've successfully passed the time between series. I hope you all enjoyed the show. Don't forget to try the veal and tip your waitress. On to bigger and better things...like cash. How about a round of cash for everyone. It's on the house...and by the house I mean -145 favorites. BOL to everyone, and thanks to On3 for his continued efforts as he endeavors to put more commas in our bank account balance.

**on3** · 05-31-12, 02:27 AM

System record 54-5-0; 14-0-0; 2-0-0
Units -16; +14; +10
1 unit = $20

5/31

#60 -- no plays today

Game 1 win = 31-28; 9-5
Game 2 win = 21-7; 5-0; 2-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

98-98-100-x
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

Labby Line (filter)

x-10-10-x

**J.M. Disciple** · 05-31-12, 11:33 PM

JUNE 1
Rays(-170) vs Orioles......................

Blue Jays (-127) vs Red Sox
White Sox (-134) vs Mariners
Indians (-144) vs Twins.................

Tigers (+157) vs Yankees
Royals (-145) vs Athletics............

Angels (+107) vs Rangers
Mets (-103) vs Cardinals
Phillies (-105) vs Marlins
Nationals (-164) vs Braves............

Astros (+111) vs Reds
Brewers (-142) vs Pirates.................

Rockies (-110) vs Dodgers
Padres (+109) vs D-Backs
Giants (-163) vs Cubs...................

At least 3 games tomorrow with a couple worth keeping an eye on. None of them meet the filtered plays yet, but with o/u at 8.5 on some of them gotta keep a close eye on them.

**on3** · 06-01-12, 12:36 PM

four official plays today. MIL is a fringe play. since i wont be able to update later today, if MIL o/u hits 9 (right now at 8.5 -120), it will be official AND filtered.

System record 54-5-0; 14-0-0; 2-0-0
Units -16; +14; +10
1 unit = $20

6/1

#60 -- chicago @ SF -164 (A) -- o/u 7
#61 -- baltimore @ TB -163 (A) -- o/u 7
#62 -- oakland @ KC -149 (A) -- o/u 7.5
#63 -- atlanta @ WAS -145 (A) -- o/u 7.5

Game 1 win = 31-28; 9-5
Game 2 win = 21-7; 5-0; 2-0
Game 3 win = 2-4; 0-0

Labby Line (regular)

98-98-100-x
x-92-95-x
55-72-76-98

Labby Line (filter)

x-10-10-x

SF to win 98
TB to win 98
KC to win 100
WAS to win 92

**J.M. Disciple** · 06-01-12, 03:13 PM

ON3

I see MIL at (-146) right now and it was borderline last night at -142. Should this be a play using same logic as if a line opens at -145 but drops too much it does not count as a play, but vice versa that would make this a play correct?

**J.M. Disciple** · 06-01-12, 03:14 PM

off topic:

what do you all think of BoS vs Mia today for NBA?

**Gndias** · 06-01-12, 03:24 PM

i really hope boston wins this one

**oklahoma** · 06-01-12, 03:39 PM

Originally posted by J.M. Disciple

off topic:

what do you all think of BoS vs Mia today for NBA?

Its on topic here

SBR Forum - Sports Betting Talk - Sportsbook Review Forum

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nba-basketball-betting/

Sports betting and handicapping forum: discuss picks, odds, and predictions for upcoming games and results on latest bets.