[747planes]

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/kgtVvxQsVfk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>...

[Bet10Heinekens]

numbers crunchers = degenerate gamblers

[ouman101]

Had to have cost somebody a ton of money

[crustyme]

what i dont understand is why brent gets reprimended for salivating over hot co-eds in the stands but not for these gambling references.

maybe the network execs are really that clueless.

[Reload]

Brent lost some coin on that one

[InTheDrink]

what i dont understand is why brent gets reprimended for salivating over hot co-eds in the stands but not for these gambling references.

maybe the network execs are really that clueless.

why do you think 90% of the audience is tuned in to watch the game?

do you really think theyre clueless or that they know what brings home the bacon

[wagerjunkie]

why do you think 90% of the audience is tuned in to watch the game?

do you really think theyre clueless or that they know what brings home the bacon

seriously.

30% of america aint up at 1030 on saturday night watching fukin northwestern ohio state just for the hell of it.

[Louisvillekid1]

so crazy

Football gambling makes the world go around...

[flyingillini]

You know damn well he has $$ on the games.

[Ra77er]

Speculating over a broadcaster is aWWWWsumme

[crustyme]

why do you think 90% of the audience is tuned in to watch the game?

do you really think theyre clueless or that they know what brings home the bacon

more like 10% gamblers and 90% horn dogs.

so what's wrong with brent pointing out the hotties? 90% of the audience is thinking the same damn thing.

[crustyme]

seriously.

30% of america aint up at 1030 on saturday night watching fukin northwestern ohio state just for the hell of it.

you are so clueless, i cant tell if youre just saying stupid shit for effect or you really are that stupid.

#4 in the nation playing at #16 (first time nw has been ranked since 2001) in prime time don't get viewers unless everyone has action riding on it?

lol

[wagerjunkie]

you are so clueless, i cant tell if youre just saying stupid shit for effect or you really are that stupid.

#4 in the nation playing at #16 (first time nw has been ranked since 2001) in prime time don't get viewers unless everyone has action riding on it?

lol

you are penetrating idiot if you think more then 70% of people are watching that game aren't watching it just because they have money on it.

public could give a shit less about Northwestern. regardless of how high they are ranked, u idiot.

most tuning into that game is cause they have money on it. its a saturday night. most people are out at bars, having parties, socializing.

not watching Northwestern for "fun"....if they are its cause they have money on it.

biggest troll bag on the planet.

[InTheDrink]

more like 10% gamblers and 90% horn dogs.

so what's wrong with brent pointing out the hotties? 90% of the audience is thinking the same damn thing.

hey man i dont think theres anything wrong with either

and id venture to say that its a hell of a lot more than 10% broseph

[crustyme]

you are penetrating idiot if you think more then 70% of people are watching that game aren't watching it just because they have money on it.

public could give a shit less about Northwestern. regardless of how high they are ranked, u idiot.

most tuning into that game is cause they have money on it. its a saturday night. most people are out at bars, having parties, socializing.

not watching Northwestern for "fun"....if they are its cause they have money on it.

biggest troll bag on the planet.

so 70% of those in the stands had money on the game?

so 4.62 million of the 6.6 million viewers had money on the game?

you know how stupid you sound?

if no one cared about this game, then why did twice as many viewers tune in over the notre dame game which was on at the same time? cause more bettors had money on ohio st-nw?

you're the biggest idiot on sbr and that's saying quite a lot for some brokedik no-life loser who post 2,370 times in just 44 days.

lol

[wagerjunkie]

so 70% of those in the stands had money on the game?

so 4.62 million of the 6.6 million viewers had money on the game?

you know how stupid you sound?

if no one cared about this game, then why did twice as many viewers tune in over the notre dame game which was on at the same time? cause more bettors had money on ohio st-nw?

you're the biggest idiot on sbr and that's saying quite a lot for some brokedik no-life loser who post 2,370 times in just 44 days.

lol

whos talking about people in the stands? who the fuk is talking about the Notre Dame game?

I am not even responding to your dumb fukin ass. your responses constantly consist of you making dumb shit up of perceived retarded things, twisting words, putting words into other peoples mouth, to support an argument that you make up on the fly.

[Ra77er]

Ya you son of a bitch, percentages are scientific and exact. pfft Number crunchers upset again.

[frostno98]

The guy does this intentionally because he's try to rub in the face of all them gamblers watching the game live.

[InTheDrink]

The guy does this intentionally because he's try to rub in the face of all them gamblers watching the game live.

most of the gamblers became winners on that play

[747planes]

what i dont understand is why brent gets reprimended for salivating over hot co-eds in the stands but not for these gambling references.

maybe the network execs are really that clueless.

whats wrong with gambling references?