1. 10-03-13 02:18 AM #36
    ghislaine
    ghislaine's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-14-10
    Posts: 1,131
    Betpoints: 1281

    I labby all my bets. Works for me. Close around 16 lines a week for 3k hitting sometimes abysmal 48%
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-12-13 08:05 AM #37
    brainick
    brainick's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 01-27-11
    Posts: 138
    Betpoints: 589

    Row of numbers is better system than Martingale. Also you can combine it about your stakes.

    Being selective and betting %5-7-10 is the best. No chase. No ache.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-12-13 06:00 PM #38
    CrazyCarl
    CrazyCarl's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-09-11
    Posts: 1,437
    Betpoints: 2162

    If you're going to use Martingale, which I don't really recommend, use it with good picks rather than 45% crusher picks.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-13-13 09:22 AM #39
    Snowman76
    Snowman76's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-23-12
    Posts: 72
    Betpoints: 2040

    Crusher i think says something like "if we ever do lose 4 in a row which has happened only like twice in 14 years" full of shit, they just did it 2 weekes ago on football AND soccer, 5 in a row losses on both. so screw them, they went 1-3 yesterday, only won soccer, which my book cut me off of, and funny story last week i went 15-2-1. Bookie wouldnt call me back all week, finally got ahold of him, paid me a large sum on friday and cut me off, thanks bookie because i went 4-10 yesterday but didnt bet hahahaha
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-13-13 09:31 AM #40
    manny24
    pay Bobby
    manny24's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-22-07
    Posts: 20,088
    Betpoints: 649

    snowman gets it
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-13-13 07:53 PM #41
    Ironman07
    Ironman07's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 05-16-10
    Posts: 615
    Betpoints: 7984

    On the standard -110 line you are risking almost 15 units on each chase loss. . so if your unit is 100 you better have enough for at least 4 system losses to feel comfortable. the r/W is horrible although soccer has been the almost all the profit they have had.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-14-13 02:32 PM #42
    Riceboi
    Riceboi's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-03-11
    Posts: 857
    Betpoints: 32

    Quote Originally Posted by DrStale View Post
    Yeah I dont see the difference either. Seems like standard martingale, which is always successful. That's why everyone makes easy money betting on sports.

    omg you are so pro
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-14-13 10:06 PM #43
    bettingstation
    bettingstation's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 03-25-13
    Posts: 1,084
    Betpoints: 1201

    well its like poker.... if badluck happen in the system... thats it boom... before i play black jack and use this system and i am up around 800 dollars theb badluck comes in... boom to zero...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-15-13 07:20 PM #44
    the1outlaw
    the1outlaw's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 09-25-13
    Posts: 83
    Betpoints: 805

    Why not just fade Lang using this system? I think I will start doing this...no way Lang hits 4 winners in a row more than once or twice in a year.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-15-13 11:05 PM #45
    Snowman76
    Snowman76's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 02-23-12
    Posts: 72
    Betpoints: 2040

    Quote Originally Posted by brainick View Post
    Row of numbers is better system than Martingale. Also you can combine it about your stakes.

    Being selective and betting %5-7-10 is the best. No chase. No ache.


    Row of numbers is a different way of saying labby, can someone share the row of numbers you use, or set of example labby numbers? is 1 2 2 1 a common set??
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-15-13 11:16 PM #46
    Sam Odom
    Sam Odom's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 10-30-05
    Posts: 58,063
    Betpoints: 37

    Common?

    Perhaps: 112233
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-15-13 11:23 PM #47
    yak merchant
    yak merchant's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-04-10
    Posts: 109
    Betpoints: 6170

    Quote Originally Posted by bettingstation View Post
    well its like poker.... if badluck happen in the system... thats it boom... before i play black jack and use this system and i am up around 800 dollars theb badluck comes in... boom to zero...
    First rule of Think Tank Fight Club is there is no such thing as luck. Only probabilities and variance. If you think "boom to zero" in blackjack is caused by "badluck" and not by inherent house advantage there will be a lot more
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-16-13 05:30 PM #48
    ghislaine
    ghislaine's Avatar Become A Pro!
    Join Date: 11-14-10
    Posts: 1,131
    Betpoints: 1281

    Quote Originally Posted by DustyDiamond View Post
    Anyone labby Crusher?
    I labby al my bets, every time. I start with two boxes with 4 x 10- 10- 10- 10. Every time I complete the sheet its 320$. No stress as biggest bet this year was 160$ which I admit I split. My volume is ~10 bets per day averaging 51% winners. Takes me 2-4 days to close a sheet. Just never get stressed and really focus on closing lines, boxes and my sheet. Walk in the park
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
First 12
Top
« Previous Thread | Players Talk | Next Thread »