I happen to think that the Seahawks have been working very hard to convince themselves that they are as strong a team as the 2013 team. Believe me, they know in their heart-of-hearts that they aren't. That is why Sherman was trying to hype the cheaters tag and Brady isn't "squeaky clean" focus on the Patriots (to try to put extra pressure on them). Unfortunately for them Lynch might have usurped that manipulation/strategy with his bizarre act.
My question for this game is this: If New England beats the Hawks- will all of the people who have been boasting about how strong Seattle's defense is then do a complete reversal and say that they weren't strong? Either they really are strong or they are not. If you know what you are seeing when you watch them play and aren't going strictly on possibly "illusory" numbers than you might be more confident in your opinions and bets (if you are a bettor).
I seem to remember an awful lot of people being on Denver to beat Seattle last year and when Denver was exposed by Seattle's great defense it had to be a complete surprise to those who really don't know what they are judging. It must have also shook their opinion of the media expertise that led them down the wrong path.