Ulver's Tennis Picks

[Ulver86]

you're hilarious tsonga

just funny how you never comment on your losers is all :shrug: - you have all these after the fact winners, but never an after the fact loser, how very strange

what happened to editing the djokovic play last week? you didnt edit it like you do all your other posts, how very, very strange

[Mendozaaaa]

2-1, not too shabby but only +1u but it'll do.

Nice line with the +6, most places I saw had +5/5.5, but good get either way.

Also man, don't go on hating here. Either go out, play some sport, meet with your mates at the pub, get some hanky panky or do something in the real world you like. Cos no-one likes an internet warrior who wastes their time! Have a good one

[Ulver86]

very nice calls again mendozaa, i dozed off before you posted though :-/

bol again for tonight

[Tsonga]

you're hilarious tsonga

just funny how you never comment on your losers is all :shrug: - you have all these after the fact winners, but never an after the fact loser, how very strange

what happened to editing the djokovic play last week? you didnt edit it like you do all your other posts, how very, very strange

nice to see your crappy memory is not limited to your own picks but to mine as well....yah - i never lose .

so you are eating popcorn while reading my posts - and then dozing off at the same time when sucking up to your love-in poster.....

just make some good picks and i won't be on you as hard...and the editing I do is to let you know the odds that come out that i have or whether or not my pick won! imagine that - not to change my picks.....

[Ulver86]

dude, you can criticize my plays all you want, im fine with that actually and prefer getting a multitude of insight into a particular play, in fact, go through all of my posts and look at them, i prefer getting different looks at a game

however, you come across as some kind of tennis gambling god and that we should all "listen to you" - when in fact, you arent

[Tsonga]

I don't need anyone to listen to me...even if you do think I am a tennis picking 'god'...your quote - not mine....I only post to give my insight and to give you a hard time if I think your picks are off....I don't mind people disagreeing - and i would expect you to tell me if you think my pick is way off as well. Equal pick bashing in a sense.

[Ulver86]

.even if you do think I am a tennis picking 'god'.

you come across as some kind of tennis gambling god and that we should all "listen to you" - when in fact, you arent

you should also learn to read

[Ulver86]

tried to do a challenge, ignore it, SBR doesnt have tennis challenges apparently, shrug

[Tsonga]

Learn to read

you should also learn to read

Its amazing how I've been able to post all these picks and read all your picks without knowing how to read

Almost as good as you've been able to read all my posts and not been able understand any sarcasm . it was you that suggested that I came across as a tennis god....

I hope you are not taking this too seriously - although I will take a challenge against you anytime...i thought we were having an unofficial one already - and its not hard to tell who is winning...although I don't expect any (reasonable) defense to this - you don't want to rehash all your picks for the past few weeks do you?

[Tsonga]

one thing I have been good at is almost every time I write about how I disagree with a pick of yours it turns out to be true....recent examples (korolev/marchenko), (monfils/mathieu), (blake/nadal), (fognini,djokovic)...not saying you should change your mind when you make a pick and I disagree....just saying there has been a lot of these times.....and I have yet to see you disagree with one of my picks.....and don't just say "its hard with all your chalk" ----please - Since your complaint I have tried to make a conscious effort to pick things at lower odds with a pretty good success rate....even though favorites do win sometimes

and you have had more than a handful of 'chalk' bets of your own lately that haven't cashed lately....but I'm not tailing you so its just fun to write about them.

Of your 5 picks you just made you managed to keep 1unit out of 5.5 (1/5 picks) 3/5 were "chalk" bets too! shocking!

I was 2/2

[Ulver86]

sarcasm on the interwebs? never...
there's a difference between reading and the ability to read, you know, you obviously know how to read, its the reading comprehension that's difficult for you, but i digress...

how quickly you forget how you mostly agreed with all of my picks except the youzhny one, still wanting to know how much you are in the hole from djokovic, you were pretty confident about him winning the tourney ----but again, you never post any units, so its' hard to understand how good/bad you're doing - i also still like how it wasnt' edited like all of your other picks, any time you win, you're sure to edit it to show off that you won, however the losers are swept under the rug as if they never occurred

im still wanting to know where your after the fact losers are, you have so many after the fact winners, surely there's an after the fact loser in there too at some point ,no?

im sure you'll have more after the fact plays for me tomorrow as always - in fact, that's your new name After the Fact

also, 2 weeks doesnt make a season

[Tsonga]

sarcasm on the interwebs? never...
there's a difference between reading and the ability to read, you know, you obviously know how to read, its the reading comprehension that's difficult for you, but i digress...O you are so hard to comprehend.

how quickly you forget how you mostly agreed with all of my picks except the youzhny one (agreeing with and making the pick yourself are 2 different things)( I made my own picks) , still wanting to know how much you are in the hole from djokovic (I am still up for the month), you were pretty confident about him winning the tourney (yes, I thought he would win - and he didn't - and I placed $ on him when he was +350 or something like that, I would have to check) ----but again, you never post any units, so its' hard to understand how good/bad you're doing - i also still like how it wasnt' edited like all of your other picks, any time you win, you're sure to edit it to show off that you won, however the losers are swept under the rug as if they never occurred (Just for you I will go back and edit my losses) (not that you do that though - but I will be the one to set the example)...

im still wanting to know where your after the fact losers are, you have so many (name some, quote some - instead of just talking crap) after the fact winners, surely there's an after the fact loser in there too at some point ,no? (here's one - I put a wager on hockey tonight - thought that the pens/panthers game would be finished in regulation and I lost) ( hockey is so unpredictable - I get mad at myself for even trying for the most part)

im sure you'll have more after the fact plays for me tomorrow as always - in fact, that's your new name After the Fact (Making names for other people - what grade level is that bringing memories of......?) I will continue to call you Ulver because that is your name here.

also, 2 weeks doesnt make a season

(Again, not willing to go over your record for your own thread I see)

[Tsonga]

Sorry to dissapoint but it doesn't look like you can edit older posts and insert the *loss part where it belongs....But hey - that's works out better for you than for me.

[Tsonga]

My pick for today is Youzhny/Kukushkin - Over 21 Games at +111

I think there is a good chance this could hit...they have never played eachother. Most $ is on Youzhny and he should win - but Kukushkin is playing well, he has won 8 of his last 10, and is 37-19 on indoor hard since october 2008. This would be a medium play for me. 0.5 units. There could be a 7-5,7-6 set here I think and that should push the total over.