Wallco NHL GOLD (+453 units in 6 years)

[miss_sbets]

These were underdogs so more likely than not they got an average of +120.
Regardless, business as usual. All fun and games, until a C bet comes around... Let's win tomorrow!

[cadetduke]

People who can't read and took ML for both games must be super happy now.

People who can't read? The line for the Ducks/Rangers changed and the Ducks were the favorites in the morning. So anyone who bet the ML on that game made their bets early in the day.

[Wallco99]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2013-14 System to date: 30-0 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +30.00 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-13.49 units)

(11/4/13):
#32 Anaheim (+1½) v1 (A) - Win
#33 Winnipeg (+1½) v1 (A) - Win

v1 Fades
(A) 21-5
(B) 3-0
(C) 0-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 6-1
(B) 0-1
(C) 0-0
Losses: None



Games for (11/5/13):
#26 Philadelphia @Carolina(+1½) v2 (C) (7:35 pm EST)
#27 Vancouver(+1½) @ Phoenix v1 (B) (9:05 pm EST)
#29 Resumes v1 (B) on 11/6/13
#20 Ottawa @ Columbus (M/L) v2 (A) (7:05 pm EST)


Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules and backtest can be found in posts #2446 & #2447.

[Icey bets]

Isn't Columbus a (B) bet?

[igziabeher]

Isn't Columbus a (B) bet?

(A) bet I think

[Icey bets]

What's the reason that the sharks bet wouldn't continue today?

[djmano]

Not likely, they probably bet to win only 1 unit as usual.

why would they make any other bet than to win 1 unit?

[igziabeher]

What's the reason that the sharks bet wouldn't continue today?

It was a bet against Phoenix I think. So Vancouver is a (B) bet against Phoenix tonight.

[KC Needs Hockey]

GL everyone on C bet today as of right now I have odds for Carolina @ -315 needing to win 8.5 units so the bet if placed now is only 26.77 units for a C bet that is not really uncommonly high.

[Grinder12000]

Well, if you call top 1% not uncommonly high. LOL. But all have been winners above 20

[Grinder12000]

Game #20 was a win in post 2727.

[ridersonthestorm]

(A) bet I think

Looks like confusion has crept in already. As far as I recall, Columbus were played as an A bet to fade 3x winners Penguins, they lost, therefore it's Rangers next as B bet vs Penguins.

Columbus DO qualify as A bet for v2, as they have lost 3x in a row by BOTH ATS and S/U.

[ridersonthestorm]

#20 Ottawa @ Columbus (M/L) v2 (C) (7:05 pm EST)

It's an A bet for v2 me thinks.

[joseberk]

It's an A bet for v2 me thinks.

Yea it is an A bet. Wow this C bet is 32 units, I've never been so nervous before

[ridersonthestorm]

Yea it is an A bet. Wow this C bet is 32 units, I've never been so nervous before

Won't you be tempted to play ML to risk 3x times less amount?

[joseberk]

Won't you be tempted to play ML to risk 3x times less amount?

Yea, too bad I already placed my bet. Statistically this system seems to work, but it doesn't statistically account for the cost of the xanax I'm going to need to place these 30 unit bets

[ridersonthestorm]

Yea, too bad I already placed my bet. Statistically this system seems to work, but it doesn't statistically account for the cost of the xanax I'm going to need to place these 30 unit bets

LOL, to be 90% sure, better place Carolina +2,5 bet. Just a 100+ units to win (for these series overall) a whopping single.

[Wallco99]

What's the reason that the sharks bet wouldn't continue today?

Post #2447

[Wallco99]

Wallco NHL GOLD
2013-14 System to date: 30-0 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +30.00 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 3 (-13.49 units)

(11/4/13):
#32 Anaheim (+1½) v1 (A) - Win
#33 Winnipeg (+1½) v1 (A) - Win

v1 Fades
(A) 21-5
(B) 3-0
(C) 0-0
Losses: None

v2 Plays
(A) 6-1
(B) 0-1
(C) 0-0
Losses: None



Games for (11/5/13):
#26 Philadelphia @Carolina (+1½) v2 (C) (7:35 pm EST)
#27 Vancouver (+1½) @ Phoenix v1 (B) (9:05 pm EST)
#29 Resumes v1 (B) on 11/6/13
#34 Ottawa @ Columbus (M/L) v2 (A) (7:05 pm EST)


Do not place any wagers on teams unless you are sure your team is the dog or favorite. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the team we are betting on, regardless of v1 or v2. If you play the closer line games too early, you may be overpaying for a loss if you play the P/L and should have been on the M/L, or lose a game that you would have won had you been on the (+1½) instead of the M/L. We will always play the M/L on favorites and games when the line is (-110/-110) or (-105/-105), and always play the (+1½) if the team we are betting on is a dog. ALL results will be based on this principle. If it is a close line game, you may want to wait til closer to game time to place your wager so you know whether or not we are on the (+1½) or the (M/L). All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, or vice versa, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines.
System rules and backtest can be found in posts #2446 & #2447.

[skyscrapers]

I think Wallco just numbered the Columbus game wrong. Instead of #20 it should be #34.

[Wallco99]

I think Wallco just numbered the Columbus game wrong. Instead of #20 it should be #34.

I fixed that before I reposted it, must not have saved it. It was 5:00 in the morning, guess I was still sleeping.

[Wallco99]

LOL, to be 90% sure, better place Carolina +2,5 bet. Just a 100+ units to win (for these series overall) a whopping single.

There's always bingo or bridge at your local geriatric center if this is too much.

[agkil1125]

Hi..

There's always bingo or bridge at your local geriatric center if this is too much.

It's not too much for me, I just want to make sure I'm doing it right since I'm a newbie. I've been on Carolina since the A bet.

If I risked $70 to win $25 (+1.5, -280) and lost the A bet, then my B bet should have been risking $166 to win $95 (+1.5, -175), thus making my C bet tonight:

Risking $835 to win $261. (+1.5, -320)

Correct?

[ridersonthestorm]

There's always bingo or bridge at your local geriatric center if this is too much.

Well informed guy, I see. Tell me more.

[agkil1125]

Unfortunately, I don't feel like this C bet falls into the normal system. I noticed that Carolina is starting their 3rd goalie and he has been absolutely ATROCIOUS, giving up 18 goals in 5 games.

[Andy3568]

There's always bingo or bridge at your local geriatric center if this is too much.

[KC Needs Hockey]

It's not too much for me, I just want to make sure I'm doing it right since I'm a newbie. I've been on Carolina since the A bet.

If I risked $70 to win $25 (+1.5, -280) and lost the A bet, then my B bet should have been risking $166 to win $95 (+1.5, -175), thus making my C bet tonight:

Risking $835 to win $261. (+1.5, -320)

Correct?

Correct

[Andy3568]

Depending on the odds you got on all three games of the #26 series, the total risk for the series will be in the ballpark of 40 - 45 units. This is about as stressful as it gets.

[agkil1125]

Depending on the odds you got on all three games of the #26 series, the total risk for the series will be in the ballpark of 40 - 45 units. This is about as stressful as it gets.

That AND the fact that this team totally sucks, can't score, and is on a 3rd string goalie who has been atrocious.

At least they're at home.

Fingers crossed.

[Wallco99]

It's not too much for me, I just want to make sure I'm doing it right since I'm a newbie. I've been on Carolina since the A bet.

If I risked $70 to win $25 (+1.5, -280) and lost the A bet, then my B bet should have been risking $166 to win $95 (+1.5, -175), thus making my C bet tonight:

Risking $835 to win $261. (+1.5, -320)

Correct?

That looks correct.

[Greg242]

I am about to take my Xanax guys LOL!! Seriously though GL to us today!!

[ridersonthestorm]

I must confess, I'm taking the risk of ML here. Do not want risk losing huge chunk of the purse before positive income has been accelerated well enough to take the hit without blinking.

BOL, gentlemen. With current state in Carolina we'll certainly need it.

[bonhammer]

balls to the wall
-bonhammer

[Wallco99]

That's the beauty of this system. With all the paranoia of the Carolina bet, the Vancouver 8 1/2 unit bet is just an afterthought.

[ken23lau]

Should stop watching this game. Don't think I will make it till the end of this game without a heart attack.