CFB 2012 (also NFL)
Collapse
X
-
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1576Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1577If you had Cincy in the Belk Bowl and South Carolina in the Outback, go buy a lottery ticket. You're red hot and so penetrating smart.Comment -
DexterBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 12-24-08
- 25829
#1578
i had duke, so i personally deserved the sc (push)....i was a little greedy and got pissed they missed the 2. it was a huge play for me, but im thankful for the push.Comment -
hondo5SBR Sharp
- 11-01-09
- 402
#15791st half under looks dead at this.point. still a quarter and a half to goComment -
SmutbucketSBR MVP
- 03-14-08
- 3996
#1580spurrier always taken care of his backers....hes not one to take FGs at the end of the game, in spurrier we trustComment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#15812012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115) - WINNER
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105) - WINNER
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
2* Syracuse TT over 33' - WINNER
2* TCU/Michigan State 1H under 20' - WINNER
2* Iowa State -1' - LOSER
2* LSU -6 - LOSER
2* Oklahoma State TT over 43 - WINNER
2* Northwestern/Mississippi State over 54 - PUSH
2* Michigan/South Carolina 1H under 23' (-105) - LOSER
2* Wisconsin/Stanford 1H under 23' (-105) LOSER
2* Wisconsin +4 (-105) - LOSER
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSER
1* Air Force/Rice over 62' (-103) - LOSER
1-3-1 -4.3u on New Years Day Bowls
10-12-1 -0.32u Bowls to date
BahComment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1582
i was watching the end of that game, and sometimes, i get frustrated when shit-stupid public plays get incredibly lucky and hit (South Carolina should've won SU but no way should they have covered), and i then get annoyed by people posting or tweeting shit like "yeah, Cincy was the right play, knew it all along" and "USC -4' [as if that program has any right to those initials] butter winner, refs can't steal that one, Big Ten sucks." i know that i should be a bigger person and not let the joy of others (regardless how blissfully ignorant) bother me, but sometimes my temper gets the better of me. it's one of the reasons that i don't often post much once games start.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1583that one was really frustrating. first three TDs and Stanford's FG were all pretty fluky (hate the early-game trick plays in bowls). that game should've had 16-20 points scored 1H (witness only 3 scored in 2H). bah. onward and upward.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1584
i am glad to hear that you hit, though, pal, didn't realize you were on South Carolina. that said, you're not the kind of guy posting dumb comments like yeah, Cocks cover, knew it all along Michigan backers are penetrating idiots, Big Ten sucks shit. i guess here's my point: luck swings both ways, and generally evens out over time, so you just have to accept that. when i get really lucky, i humbly slide to the window to cash my ticket and thank the universe for the good fortune. people who cash on plays like Cincy or South Carolina or SJSU and dance around about it and tell guys on the other side that they were morons are plain offensive. they seem to be the same guys who believe that the game was fixed when the luck swings against them.
also, bear in mind that as an Ohio State fan, Michigan is my most hated team in all of sports. i sure don't mind seeing them lose, but even if i had bet either of those games, and had i been on South Carolina -4' or Cincy -9, i'd still be annoyed by people making those sorts of comments.
anyway, enough about yesterday - Gators and/or Louisville TT under tonight?Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1585adding
2* Louisville team total under 17
2* Teaser (ties win; -115): Florida -8/Louisville/Florida under 54'
2012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115) - WINNER
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105) - WINNER
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
2* Syracuse TT over 33' - WINNER
2* TCU/Michigan State 1H under 20' - WINNER
2* Iowa State -1' - LOSER
2* LSU -6 - LOSER
2* Oklahoma State TT over 43 - WINNER
2* Northwestern/Mississippi State over 54 - PUSH
2* Michigan/South Carolina 1H under 23' (-105) - LOSER
2* Wisconsin/Stanford 1H under 23' (-105) LOSER
2* Wisconsin +4 (-105) - LOSER
2* Louisville TT under 17
2* Teaser (ties win; -115): Florida -8/Louisville/Florida under 54'
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSER
1* Air Force/Rice over 62' (-103) - LOSER
BOL to all tonight.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#15862012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115) - WINNER
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105) - WINNER
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
2* Syracuse TT over 33' - WINNER
2* TCU/Michigan State 1H under 20' - WINNER
2* Iowa State -1' - LOSER
2* LSU -6 - LOSER
2* Oklahoma State TT over 43 - WINNER
2* Northwestern/Mississippi State over 54 - PUSH
2* Michigan/South Carolina 1H under 23' (-105) - LOSER
2* Wisconsin/Stanford 1H under 23' (-105) LOSER
2* Wisconsin +4 (-105) - LOSER
2* Louisville TT under 17 - LOSER
2* Teaser (ties win; -115): Florida -8/Louisville/Florida under 54' - LOSER
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSER
1* Air Force/Rice over 62' (-103) - LOSER
10-14-1 -4.82u on Bowls to date
5-14-1 -13.82u after 5-0 +9u start. nothing has gone right in general since the end of the Music City Bowl (1-7-1 CFB, 0-2 CBB)Comment -
Rick22SBR MVP
- 01-29-09
- 2200
#1587Well - who saw that spanking coming?Comment -
SmutbucketSBR MVP
- 03-14-08
- 3996
#1589um, no offense, Smut, but Spurrier would've had no choice but to take the FG had they not gotten pretty fortunate on that long pass. if there had been more time, i agree, coaches like Urban and Spurrier will get the extra score (unlike guys like Fitzgerald) and that's why i prefer to back the prickier coaches, but they scored the TD with 11 seconds left. Spurrier was going to have no choice but to kick in the one of the next two plays if they don't get that TD.
i am glad to hear that you hit, though, pal, didn't realize you were on South Carolina. that said, you're not the kind of guy posting dumb comments like yeah, Cocks cover, knew it all along Michigan backers are penetrating idiots, Big Ten sucks shit. i guess here's my point: luck swings both ways, and generally evens out over time, so you just have to accept that. when i get really lucky, i humbly slide to the window to cash my ticket and thank the universe for the good fortune. people who cash on plays like Cincy or South Carolina or SJSU and dance around about it and tell guys on the other side that they were morons are plain offensive. they seem to be the same guys who believe that the game was fixed when the luck swings against them.
also, bear in mind that as an Ohio State fan, Michigan is my most hated team in all of sports. i sure don't mind seeing them lose, but even if i had bet either of those games, and had i been on South Carolina -4' or Cincy -9, i'd still be annoyed by people making those sorts of comments.
anyway, enough about yesterday - Gators and/or Louisville TT under tonight?Comment -
MadisonSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-16-11
- 6448
#1590Which one of these is most likely to lose.
Wash/Sea U 59
Cinn + 17.5
Minn/GB O 33
Ind/Bal O 34
GB +5Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1591really want to play Fiesta Bowl under but shell-shocked after last few days. gotta think on this.Comment -
MadisonSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-16-11
- 6448
#1592Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1593
Fiesta Bowl: PASS. Lean under 74/Ducks TT under 41'/K State +8. Ducks 37-34. BOL if you play.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1594adding
2* Texas A&M/Oklahoma over 72 (-105)
2012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115) - WINNER
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105) - WINNER
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
2* Syracuse TT over 33' - WINNER
2* TCU/Michigan State 1H under 20' - WINNER
2* Iowa State -1' - LOSER
2* LSU -6 - LOSER
2* Oklahoma State TT over 43 - WINNER
2* Northwestern/Mississippi State over 54 - PUSH
2* Michigan/South Carolina 1H under 23' (-105) - LOSER
2* Wisconsin/Stanford 1H under 23' (-105) LOSER
2* Wisconsin +4 (-105) - LOSER
2* Louisville TT under 17 - LOSER
2* Teaser (ties win; -115): Florida -8/Louisville/Florida under 54' - LOSER
2* Texas A&M/Oklahoma over 72 (-105)
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSER
1* Air Force/Rice over 62' (-103) - LOSER
BOL to all tonight.Comment -
2daBankSBR Aristocracy
- 01-26-09
- 88966
#1595
i like a 6 point 3 teamer for sat, if we doing teasers...
cin+10.5
cin/hou un 49.5
pack-2
seems like a winner to me...Comment -
Rick22SBR MVP
- 01-29-09
- 2200
#1596Like the over Biff already on that one - and though I hate 2 plays on the same game - I'm totally fading Oklahoma (A&M -3)Comment -
groovybrandoneSBR Sharp
- 02-22-12
- 456
#1598agree with you biff, i have this a&m -1.5 1h, over 1h, and fuill game a&m -3 overComment -
MadisonSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-16-11
- 6448
#1600i dont think any of those lose, i suppose it conceivable skins/sea get in a shootout but honestly i like the under 46...i lean under slightly in the min/gb gm but i made the number 44 so not like i think it really low, pack outta give you 27ish i suspect minny scores at least once...already played the over 46 in indy/balt, even if it a ass kicking indy gonna score some points on balt d and i think balt get damn near 30.. think pack cover so although not a fan of teasing thru 0 i think if i had to choose id tease pack before min as there def a chance of a blowout here...
i like a 6 point 3 teamer for sat, if we doing teasers...
cin+10.5
cin/hou un 49.5
pack-2
seems like a winner to me...
Putting some serious work into this in the morning. Right now I have to go convince my wife that I love her and not you guys and the hunt for the $$$ before Tenn/Mem. Lot of work to do fast.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1601Thanks for the time Banker. My original thought was the 2 team Cinn/GB tease. I can't argue crossing zero but way less significance with home team and 13 pts getting off the 3 and 4. Essentially you are betting that GB doesn't lose by a TD.
Putting some serious work into this in the morning. Right now I have to go convince my wife that I love her and not you guys and the hunt for the $$$ before Tenn/Mem. Lot of work to do fast.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1602nother day, nother loss
2012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115) - WINNER
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105) - WINNER
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
2* Syracuse TT over 33' - WINNER
2* TCU/Michigan State 1H under 20' - WINNER
2* Iowa State -1' - LOSER
2* LSU -6 - LOSER
2* Oklahoma State TT over 43 - WINNER
2* Northwestern/Mississippi State over 54 - PUSH
2* Michigan/South Carolina 1H under 23' (-105) - LOSER
2* Wisconsin/Stanford 1H under 23' (-105) LOSER
2* Wisconsin +4 (-105) - LOSER
2* Louisville TT under 17 - LOSER
2* Teaser (ties win; -115): Florida -8/Louisville/Florida under 54' - LOSER
2* Texas A&M/Oklahoma over 72 (-105) - LOSER
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSER
1* Air Force/Rice over 62' (-103) - LOSER
10-15-1 -6.92uComment -
MadisonSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-16-11
- 6448
#1603Couple interesting observations/stats
Cinn hasn't won a playoff game since 1990 when Houston was still the Oilers. (Is this really correct).
Cinn D has allowed only 11.5 ppg over the last 8.
The playoffs is the season for the reverse back door. Theory being "when finality sets in" so doesn't desperation and sometimes teams quit. In general it is my belief that it is easier to cover a larger spread in the post season for a myriad of reasons this being one.Comment -
MadisonSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-16-11
- 6448
-
MadisonSBR Hall of Famer
- 09-16-11
- 6448
#1605FWIW I'm seeing "ice pellets" and 20's circa 9 CST. Maybe to late for effect?Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1606Couple interesting observations/stats
Cinn hasn't won a playoff game since 1990 when Houston was still the Oilers. (Is this really correct).
Cinn D has allowed only 11.5 ppg over the last 8.
The playoffs is the season for the reverse back door. Theory being "when finality sets in" so doesn't desperation and sometimes teams quit. In general it is my belief that it is easier to cover a larger spread in the post season for a myriad of reasons this being one.Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1607adding
2* Ole Miss -3 (-120)
2012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115) - WINNER
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105) - WINNER
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
2* Syracuse TT over 33' - WINNER
2* TCU/Michigan State 1H under 20' - WINNER
2* Iowa State -1' - LOSER
2* LSU -6 - LOSER
2* Oklahoma State TT over 43 - WINNER
2* Northwestern/Mississippi State over 54 - PUSH
2* Michigan/South Carolina 1H under 23' (-105) - LOSER
2* Wisconsin/Stanford 1H under 23' (-105) LOSER
2* Wisconsin +4 (-105) - LOSER
2* Louisville TT under 17 - LOSER
2* Teaser (ties win; -115): Florida -8/Louisville/Florida under 54' - LOSER
2* Texas A&M/Oklahoma over 72 (-105) - LOSER
2* Ole Miss -3 (-120)
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSER
1* Air Force/Rice over 62' (-103) - LOSERComment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#1608NFL Wildcard Weekend
2* Bengals/Texans under 43 (-102)Comment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#16092* Ole Miss -3 (-120) - WINNER
2012-13 Bowls updated card
5* Vanderbilt (4* Vandy -6.5, 1* Vandy -7 -115) - WINNER
3* BYU (2* BYU -2', 1* BYU -3 -115) - WINNER
3* UCLA (2* UCLA -2' (-105), 1* UCLA -3) - LOSER
2* Utah St -10 - WINNER
2* East Carolina/Louisiana Lafayette over 64' - WINNER
2* Washington/Boise State under 46 - LOSER
2* Cincinnati/Duke over 60' (-105) - WINNER
2* Bowling Green +7 (-102) - LOSER
2* Syracuse TT over 33' - WINNER
2* TCU/Michigan State 1H under 20' - WINNER
2* Iowa State -1' - LOSER
2* LSU -6 - LOSER
2* Oklahoma State TT over 43 - WINNER
2* Northwestern/Mississippi State over 54 - PUSH
2* Michigan/South Carolina 1H under 23' (-105) - LOSER
2* Wisconsin/Stanford 1H under 23' (-105) LOSER
2* Wisconsin +4 (-105) - LOSER
2* Louisville TT under 17 - LOSER
2* Teaser (ties win; -115): Florida -8/Louisville/Florida under 54' - LOSER
2* Texas A&M/Oklahoma over 72 (-105) - LOSER
2* Ole Miss -3 (-120)
1* Nevada +10 - WINNER
1* Nevada TT over 35' - WINNER
1* Washington/Boise State 1H under 21' (+100) - LOSER
1* Central Michigan/Western Kentucky 1H under 28' (-105) - LOSER
1* UCLA TT over 41 - LOSER
1* Air Force/Rice over 62' (-103) - LOSER
11-15-1 -4.92uComment -
BiffTFinancialSBR Posting Legend
- 01-29-09
- 22670
#16102* Bengals/Texans under 43 (-102) - WINNERComment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code