UFC Fight Night: Condit Vs Kampmann 2 (August 28,2013)

**Thor4140** · 08-26-13, 08:05 PM

Originally posted by Vaughany

lol because it's pointless, .

**Ron_Paul_2012** · 08-26-13, 08:08 PM

Originally posted by Beelzebubzy

Should I parlay Tavares with everything?

The time to parlay Tavares was back when he was -400. There is always a chance that he could get tapped out by Bubba. A very small chance but a chance none the less. There are no locks in MMA just ask King Mo.

**Ron_Paul_2012** · 08-26-13, 08:12 PM

Still can not decide Hioki vs Elkins.

**brokenbrain** · 08-26-13, 08:43 PM

Originally posted by mirinquads

^I like it.

I hope you got the Not the distance at plus money tho, else I wouldnt play that line

Like i said - I got in on the lines abit late

Meloncan at +180
Perez at -137
Condit/Kampmann inside the distance at +130

GL y'all

**sideloaded** · 08-26-13, 09:51 PM

Just to go back on this for a sec.

Gabe posts this August 25,

Originally posted by gabe

Doesn't bring the juice down on both fighters, smartass (you're half a retard, actually.) What it does is bring down the amount of money you're risking.

You were looking for other forums so you can move on from here lol but you're the most active user here now

THEN ON THE VERY SAME DAY PUBLISHES THIS ON MMAODDSBREAKER http://www.mmaoddsbreaker.com/news/u...ustin-edwards/

Gabe’s Recommended Play: Brandon Thatch -200 for a MAX BET. My second MAX BET of the night. (“max bet” is the maximum amount your book limits you to or the maximum amount you limit yourself to per-one-fight.) If you parlay Thatch -200 with my other recommended max bet Brad Tavares -460, you will cut the juice from -200 down to -121. That is a play I like very much and am HEAVY on. So far, I am 3-0 with recommended max bets for MMA Odds Breaker; after Wednesday night, I hope to be 5-0 when these two favorites cash.

Does a different person run this Gabe account?????????????

**Vaughany** · 08-27-13, 03:07 AM

Originally posted by sideloaded

Just to go back on this for a sec.

Gabe posts this August 25,

THEN ON THE VERY SAME DAY PUBLISHES THIS ON MMAODDSBREAKER http://www.mmaoddsbreaker.com/news/u...ustin-edwards/

Does a different person run this Gabe account?????????????

Funniest thing is Luca just did a "Ranting Fury" thing were he tried to explain how parlays work and dispel some of the myths! Then two of his cronies go and do the exact thing that he was explaining is wrong! Site is more confused than scooby-doo! http://www.mmaoddsbreaker.com/news/r...-fury-parlays/

**plekz** · 08-27-13, 03:30 AM

Still trying to figure out what source or method he used to deduct that Cerrone has improved his TDD a great deal since coming to the UFC. That's some VOODOO right there.

-----

Also listening to his 10 minute rant, dude sounds like the most confused phuck in history, tip for the future maybe write shit down and work out a flow before he just goes on a mic and throw the shit out there in a rambling fashion.

**hougigo** · 08-27-13, 04:06 AM

What do you guys got on the Prelims?
Trujillo vs Bowling?
I'm feeling bowling here

**Vaughany** · 08-27-13, 09:21 AM

NCAA NBK!

**Vaughany** · 08-27-13, 10:18 AM

**Vaughany** · 08-27-13, 10:25 AM

lol Perez looks constantly scared and surprised when he speaks!

**Vaughany** · 08-27-13, 10:39 AM

This one is good! Cerrone sounds like he is hating life and would rather be doing anything else than speaking to this dude, while the radio guy who clearly has a massive man-crush on Cerrone couldnt be more over the top and excitable...

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 11:31 AM

reminds me of the blood stain lane video. Where he said multiple fighters have had fans ask if they would fuk their wives or gf's. No doubt they were going ask to give a blowie to the fighter to fluff him up. MMA fans, who are these fake media types truly are disgusting. They would love to toss some of these fighters salads. Degen shit right there.

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 11:33 AM

MMA fandom has a very homo erotic undertone to it. If you goto the weigh ins.

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 01:37 PM

money coming back on Erik. I dont see Mizugaki putting up a stellar performance. May even get stopped. I dont trust his chin at all at this age.

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 01:41 PM

Big move at Pinny on Erik. Erik has some vicious power for a small guy. Dont see this going Mizugaki's way at all.

**Ron_Paul_2012** · 08-27-13, 01:46 PM

Originally posted by sideloaded

money coming back on Erik. I dont see Mizugaki putting up a stellar performance. May even get stopped. I dont trust his chin at all at this age.

He is only 29.

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 01:49 PM

Originally posted by Ron_Paul_2012

He is only 29.

that is old for lighter weight guys. Look at Erik. He is only 23.

Shogun is 31 and shot to complete shit.

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 02:02 PM

I know it's dumb since Mizugaki hasnt been knocked out in 7 years but I see Erik stopping him dead in his tracks.

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 02:05 PM

**Ron_Paul_2012** · 08-27-13, 02:29 PM

Originally posted by sideloaded

I know it's dumb since Mizugaki hasnt been knocked out in 7 years but I see Erik stopping him dead in his tracks.

Well I have around 6 units on Perez in a couple of parlay's so I hope you are correct.

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 02:33 PM

Originally posted by Ron_Paul_2012

Well I have around 6 units on Perez in a couple of parlay's so I hope you are correct.

Dont see Mizugaki having a real chance in this fight at all.

MD · 08-27-13, 02:47 PM

'Capped Perez around -200. Definitely think Mizugaki has a decent chance, but Perez likely rolls through him.

**Grabaka** · 08-27-13, 03:38 PM

Originally posted by sideloaded

Dont see Mizugaki having a real chance in this fight at all.

GOYITOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! The king of beautiful!

Goyito via Urraca-rana!

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 03:42 PM

Originally posted by grabaka

goyitooooooooooooooo!!!!!! The king of beautiful!

Goyito via urraca-rana!

viva mexicali!

**Grabaka** · 08-27-13, 03:47 PM

Is he from Mexicali? I thought he was from Monterrey? Man i forgot Mexicali existed for a few years....what a shity place!

If you meant Viva Mexico then hell penetrating yeah viva Mexico!!!!

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 04:00 PM

i dont know what the hell im talking about breah!

LOL at cheal talking about needing security and the place barely has any people in there.

**Vaughany** · 08-27-13, 04:09 PM

**sideloaded** · 08-27-13, 04:18 PM

Originally posted by Vaughany

you know it's a rinky dink show when only the strikeforce girl shows up instead of arianny or britney

**gabe** · 08-27-13, 05:28 PM

Originally posted by sideloaded

Just to go back on this for a sec.

Gabe posts this August 25,

THEN ON THE VERY SAME DAY PUBLISHES THIS ON MMAODDSBREAKER http://www.mmaoddsbreaker.com/news/u...ustin-edwards/

Does a different person run this Gabe account?????????????

People who are not idiots (not you) know what that means. But for you (an idiot) I had to explain that all that does is cut the juice of the wager you are making, not the juice on the actual fighters. Jesus Christ, you are pathetic and a true moron. Go back in your troll-hole.

**NunyaBidness** · 08-27-13, 05:30 PM

Originally posted by gabe

I had to explain that all that does is cut the juice of the wager you are making, not the juice on the actual fighters.

Still no.

**gabe** · 08-27-13, 05:31 PM

P.S.- Thanks for being a fan, Sider. You too, V. The two guys that make sure to read everything I put out.

**gabe** · 08-27-13, 05:35 PM

Originally posted by NunyaBidness

Still no.

Yes. It doesn't bring the juice down on the fighters but it does bring down the amount you are risking for a bigger return. How can you deny that? Most people don't want to bet $470 to win $100 straight up and prefer to parlay it to bring down the amount they are risking. You can say "bet half that, win, then go all in on the next guy" but again most people don't want to run to the sportsbook after every fight. They like to place their bets and watch the fights. They're not sitting in front of their computer like you geeks (and me half the time lol)

**NunyaBidness** · 08-27-13, 05:39 PM

Originally posted by gabe

Yes. It doesn't bring the juice down on the fighters but it does bring down the amount you are risking for a bigger return. How can you deny that? Most people don't want to bet $470 to win $100 straight up and prefer to parlay it to bring down the amount they are risking. You can say "bet half that, win, then go all in on the next guy" but again most people don't want to run to the sportsbook after every fight. They like to place their bets and watch the fights. They're not sitting in front of their computer like you geeks (and me half the time lol)

Then maybe you should write, "Parlay x with y, because sometimes its not convenient to make TWO bets!"

You're making an implication that you are altering the available odds. Glad to see you realize thats not the case anymore, but you're doing your customers a disservice.

MD · 08-27-13, 05:40 PM

Originally posted by gabe

Yes. It doesn't bring the juice down on the fighters but it does bring down the amount you are risking for a bigger return. How can you deny that? Most people don't want to bet $470 to win $100 straight up and prefer to parlay it to bring down the amount they are risking. You can say "bet half that, win, then go all in on the next guy" but again most people don't want to run to the sportsbook after every fight. They like to place their bets and watch the fights. They're not sitting in front of their computer like you geeks (and me half the time lol)

If you parlay fighter A +100 and fighter B +100, for $100, and fighter A wins, the sum of your total wager on fighter B is now $200. $200 to win $200. That is your money, you won that wager, and now you're risking it on another wager. That's how a parlay works. If you're truly risking less for a bigger payout, then there's no reason to play anything but parlays. Besides, if both of the legs are +EV, you should have no problem betting the appropriate amount on them anyway, if you abide by proper bankroll management. Appropriate risk != lowest possible risk.