does anyone have this wnba system jm talks about?
John Morrison 2011 MLB
Collapse
X
-
juice050SBR Sharp
- 11-19-10
- 367
#4866Comment -
knugenSBR MVP
- 12-09-09
- 2612
#4867JM says in his email That Dallas is the team to bet on??Comment -
jolmscheidRestricted User
- 02-20-10
- 3256
#4868I really do like the idea of this JM....and I do like the idea of your UNDER Totals idea....PLEASE keep me updated on the UNDER totals system as I think it could definitely work...the only thing I worry about with the totals system and with the Top 6 Division system is how big the bets can get...what was the largest % bet you would have had to make on the Phillies in your backtesting?? I am assuming you would want to start with a max of .5% of your bankroll on each line....thanks JM for all your insight...Comment -
hagball52SBR MVP
- 09-22-10
- 3053
#4869You're right. He f*cked up. Let's all send him a nasty email and he'll probably re-post it. The play is definitely on MIA. Thanks for catching that. I've been in a hurry this morning trying to get everything updated.Comment -
h00diniRestricted User
- 09-17-09
- 659
#4870JM MLB System
2011 Official season series record 8-0 (v1)
(A) 5-3
(B) 2-1
(C) 1-0
V2 plays 1-0
V3 system 1-0 (1 series pending)
Unofficial series 6-0
V3
(6/04/2011) Kansas City (.483) v Minnesota (.452) M/L (B) Loss
Next V3 Play
(6/05/2011) Kansas City (.479) v Minnesota (.455) M/L (C)
Upcoming plays
(6/06/2011) Baltimore v Oakland
(6/07/2011) NY Yankees v Boston
(6/09/2011) Detroit v Seattle
JM NBA Official Play
(6/05/2011) Miami @ Dallas (A)
Notes: I posted the link a little bit ago about the NBA play. I presume all of you know the rules but if you don't you are supposed to buy 3 points on the team you are betting on if they are the underdog or favored up to 3 pts. At this time MIA is a 2.5 pt. dog so you should buy them up to 5.5 pts. Also on the MLB V3 play the rpi has dropped a little and has gone outside the recommended level by .001. I think KAN should get the win today but if they don't I'll mark it as a loss on the record no matter what Morrison does.Comment -
hagball52SBR MVP
- 09-22-10
- 3053
#4872JM MLB System
2011 Official season series record 8-0 (v1)
(A) 5-3
(B) 2-1
(C) 1-0
V2 plays 1-0
V3 system 1-0 (1 series pending)
Unofficial series 6-0
V3
(6/04/2011) Kansas City (.483) v Minnesota (.452) M/L (B) Loss
Next V3 Play
(6/05/2011) Kansas City (.479) v Minnesota (.455) M/L (C)
Upcoming plays
(6/06/2011) Baltimore v Oakland
(6/07/2011) NY Yankees v Boston
(6/09/2011) Detroit v Seattle
JM NBA Official Play
(6/05/2011) Miami @ Dallas (A)
Notes: I posted the link a little bit ago about the NBA play. I presume all of you know the rules but if you don't you are supposed to buy 3 points on the team you are betting on if they are the underdog or favored up to 3 pts. At this time MIA is a 2.5 pt. dog so you should buy them up to 5.5 pts. Also on the MLB V3 play the rpi has dropped a little and has gone outside the recommended level by .001. I think KAN should get the win today but if they don't I'll mark it as a loss on the record no matter what Morrison does.Comment -
jolmscheidRestricted User
- 02-20-10
- 3256
#4873Hey guys...I have heard from some that you can play the Morrison system and the anti / opposite of Morrison at the same time on their own seperate 3-Line labbys and profit from both of them...I just can't get my head around being able to profit on both when you are always playing both sides of each game...anyone care to lend some insight?Comment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4874I really do like the idea of this JM....and I do like the idea of your UNDER Totals idea....PLEASE keep me updated on the UNDER totals system as I think it could definitely work...the only thing I worry about with the totals system and with the Top 6 Division system is how big the bets can get...what was the largest % bet you would have had to make on the Phillies in your backtesting?? I am assuming you would want to start with a max of .5% of your bankroll on each line....thanks JM for all your insight...
For those of you following my labby system with Division leaders, I think i've been doing the labby slightly wrong. Even though i am very confident in my system and some find it arrogant or annoying, i apologize for that, but i'm always looking for feed back on how to improve it and i keep an open mind to other ideas of how to best run the labby.
With 4 losses in a row running 1 # per line with 4 labby lines
Day 1:
5
5
5
5
day 2
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
day 3
5 5 10
5 5 10
5 5 10
5 5 10
day 4
5 5 10 15
5 5 10 15
5 5 10 15
5 5 10 15
Ending lines
5 5 10 15 20
5 5 10 15 20
5 5 10 15 20
5 5 10 15 20
*note this does not take into account juice of the sports sites.
Other way of doing this labby is starting with 2 #s per line. Instead of doing 1 full unit at the beginning of the line, split it into two ½ units.
Day 1
2.5 2.5
2.5 2.5
2.5 2.5
2.5 2.5
day 2
2.5 2.5 5
2.5 2.5 5
2.5 2.5 5
2.5 2.5 5
day 3
2.5 / 2.5 / 5 / 7.50
2.5 / 2.5 / 5 / 7.50
2.5 / 2.5 / 5 / 7.50
2.5 / 2.5 / 5 / 7.50
Day 4
2.5 / 2.5 / 5 / 7.50 /10
Ending lines
2.5 / 2.5 / 5 / 7.50 /10 / 12.5
Basically what this shows is starting with 2#s on your line will basically cut your variance in half!
With certain variations of wins and losses, it may take 1 extra game to clear your line, but I think that is well worth cutting your variance in half. Welcome to do your labby however you want, but this is how I will be doing it after today.Comment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4875Hey guys...I have heard from some that you can play the Morrison system and the anti / opposite of Morrison at the same time on their own seperate 3-Line labbys and profit from both of them...I just can't get my head around being able to profit on both when you are always playing both sides of each game...anyone care to lend some insight?
On day 1 however you will be down money thats a guarantee. By end of the road trip though it should show a profit.
I think someone tested NBA on this with a chase method and they called it like home stand or something. I believe the chase actually failed, but i could be wrong.
labby will def work though. Just have to think of it as multiple days instead of just 1 day.Comment -
JassieJamesSBR Wise Guy
- 02-03-09
- 988
#4876Great work so far with all the research and dedication. Keep it up!Comment -
jolmscheidRestricted User
- 02-20-10
- 3256
#4877I like that idea JM...the juice is what scares me on the highly favored teams...the bets could get very high after a 3, 4, 5 game losing streak...may be worth playing the -1 RL....and I would appreciate an update on your Totals system if and when your friend backtests it! Go get 'em JM..Comment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4878Also for those of you who are not familiar with the JM NBA system. Wilba was kind enough to provide some interesting stats during the regular season to help out with this system. His research was based on a 10 year back test.
A bets win 61% of the time.
B bets win around 70% of the time
C bets win around 82% of the time.
*Note!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! with A bets winning 61% of the time after buying 3pts at -170 odds minimum for the nBA you will be losing money long run on your A bets. So how do you counter this?
Basically you will have less plays, but if you bet to win 3 units on B and cover your losses + show a 3 unit profit on C wagers, then you will actually be risking the same amount and profit more even though you have less plays.Comment -
ok15533SBR High Roller
- 12-14-09
- 220
#4879John Morrison's Sports Betting Champ System Official System Pick(s)
6/5 Dallas Mavericks [A] (NBA)Unofficial System Pick(s) [doesn't pass the RPI filter]
Miami Heat
6/6 Baltimore Orioles [A] (MLB)
Oakland Athletics
6/7 New York Yankees [A] (MLB)
Boston Red Sox
NoneComment -
imotiv8SBR Wise Guy
- 12-28-09
- 892
#4880A special thanks to Wallco, Hagball, JMD, Hoodini, Honeyeater, and Dlunc3. Wallco, you have been consistent in your word and in your plays. People usually run in the face of criticism, you have not and I appreciate that. Hagball, you keep us updated and well informed. You make things very easy for everyone on the thread, thank you. JMD, just like in the NBA thread you are always positive and you summarize all of the plays for us. I see you have even created your own system, good job. Hoodini, wow what a turn around. You have shown us that it is not fair to judge a person by a few posts. I appreciate you adding your system to the thread along with all your positive contributions. Honeyeater, you have been here from the beginning posting rules and helping new people that come to the thread. Dlunc3, you stay positive no matter what and that says a lot about your character. There are a few more of you I missed, you know who you are. Youre doing a great job.
Make money in your respective businesses, use 10% - 20% of that money to fund your sports investing, and you will have more money than you know what to do with.
The key of course is money management in your sports investing, I am never afraid to walk away from a potential "sure win" bet. Use your intuition. There will always be more winners.
''The house doesn't beat the player. It just gives him the opportunity to beat himself.'' ~Nick DandalosComment -
dbartinbwgcSBR Wise Guy
- 11-11-08
- 795
#4881Jm wnba
someone asked for the JMs WnBAComment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4882If im not mistake, i heard people say it is a losing system. You could probably buy it and fade it for a profit though.
same with his "champ selection plays." I think there was actually a thread on this in the past. I dont know is stats, but if you scroll back lots of pages someone posted the results where they stated
It losses like the past 6 months except for 1, so theoretically you could just fade his systems and show a profit. idk what your Roi would be though.Comment -
jolmscheidRestricted User
- 02-20-10
- 3256
#4883Also for those of you who are not familiar with the JM NBA system. Wilba was kind enough to provide some interesting stats during the regular season to help out with this system. His research was based on a 10 year back test.
A bets win 61% of the time.
B bets win around 70% of the time
C bets win around 82% of the time.
*Note!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! with A bets winning 61% of the time after buying 3pts at -170 odds minimum for the nBA you will be losing money long run on your A bets. So how do you counter this?
Basically you will have less plays, but if you bet to win 3 units on B and cover your losses + show a 3 unit profit on C wagers, then you will actually be risking the same amount and profit more even though you have less plays.Comment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4884A special thanks to Wallco, Hagball, JMD, Hoodini, Honeyeater, and Dlunc3. Wallco, you have been consistent in your word and in your plays. People usually run in the face of criticism, you have not and I appreciate that. Hagball, you keep us updated and well informed. You make things very easy for everyone on the thread, thank you. JMD, just like in the NBA thread you are always positive and you summarize all of the plays for us. I see you have even created your own system, good job. Hoodini, wow what a turn around. You have shown us that it is not fair to judge a person by a few posts. I appreciate you adding your system to the thread along with all your positive contributions. Honeyeater, you have been here from the beginning posting rules and helping new people that come to the thread. Dlunc3, you stay positive no matter what and that says a lot about your character. There are a few more of you I missed, you know who you are. Youre doing a great job.
Make money in your respective businesses, use 10% - 20% of that money to fund your sports investing, and you will have more money than you know what to do with.
The key of course is money management in your sports investing, I am never afraid to walk away from a potential "sure win" bet. Use your intuition. There will always be more winners.
''The house doesn't beat the player. It just gives him the opportunity to beat himself.'' ~Nick Dandalosi could say the same about all these guys as well. 2pts!
The ones that are positive and continue to contribute, understand its not a drag race, but a turtle race. Gotta be in it for the long hall.Comment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4886JM MLB System
2011 Official season series record 8-0 (v1)
(A) 5-3
(B) 2-1
(C) 1-0
V2 plays 1-0
V3 system 1-0 (1 series pending)
Unofficial series 6-0
V3
(6/04/2011) Kansas City (.483) v Minnesota (.452) M/L (B) Loss
Next V3 Play
(6/05/2011) Kansas City (.479) v Minnesota (.455) M/L (C)
Upcoming plays
(6/06/2011) Baltimore v Oakland
(6/07/2011) NY Yankees v Boston
(6/09/2011) Detroit v Seattle
JM NBA Official Play
(6/05/2011) Miami @ Dallas (A)
Notes: I posted the link a little bit ago about the NBA play. I presume all of you know the rules but if you don't you are supposed to buy 3 points on the team you are betting on if they are the underdog or favored up to 3 pts. At this time MIA is a 2.5 pt. dog so you should buy them up to 5.5 pts. Also on the MLB V3 play the rpi has dropped a little and has gone outside the recommended level by .001. I think KAN should get the win today but if they don't I'll mark it as a loss on the record no matter what Morrison does.
Lost on 6/2, 6/3, 6/4, then today is 6/5
i know it said pre V3 bet or something in the past... was i not suppose to bet on that game or was i suppose to be flat betting that one?Comment -
Andy3568SBR Wise Guy
- 01-17-10
- 615
#4887If you have been playing the current Version 3 series, Minnesota Twins @ Kansas City Royals, you have just lost an [A] and a [B] bet and have a [C] bet coming up on the Royals. However, here's something to think about:
The RPI difference between the two teams has moved to within 0.025. Now, both of JM's Version 1 and Version 3 systems say to check the RPI at the beginning of the series and play it through. However, JM has also ignored losses based on the fact that the RPI moved out of range. He did this last season for a Version 1 series where he sent out an email after a [C] loss saying that after the [A] loss, the RPI difference between the two teams was greater than 0.015 and therefore we should have stopped after the [A] loss.
Something to think about if you're having doubts about betting the Royals today.Comment -
alexySBR High Roller
- 05-23-10
- 217
#4888WALLCO: Detroit will pay very well, very very well. Gl & thanksComment -
dogs1972SBR Wise Guy
- 11-22-09
- 509
#4889JESUS FREAKING CHRIST this thread has become a fuking circus. 17 pages of wannabes posting freaking experimental systems. Post after post of bullshit. Track your own GD systems, why do you have to clog up this thread? Wallco and Hagball have been here, other than that you should fuk off and start your own thread. Sick of all this bull shit labby lines and crap.Comment -
hagball52SBR MVP
- 09-22-10
- 3053
#4890im slightly confused as usual lol. ... I had KC down as "D" bet even though im doing labby.
Lost on 6/2, 6/3, 6/4, then today is 6/5
i know it said pre V3 bet or something in the past... was i not suppose to bet on that game or was i suppose to be flat betting that one?Comment -
hagball52SBR MVP
- 09-22-10
- 3053
#4891If you have been playing the current Version 3 series, Minnesota Twins @ Kansas City Royals, you have just lost an [A] and a [b] bet and have a [C] bet coming up on the Royals. However, here's something to think about:
The RPI difference between the two teams has moved to within 0.025. Now, both of JM's Version 1 and Version 3 systems say to check the RPI at the beginning of the series and play it through. However, JM has also ignored losses based on the fact that the RPI moved out of range. He did this last season for a Version 1 series where he sent out an email after a [C] loss saying that after the [A] loss, the RPI difference between the two teams was greater than 0.015 and therefore we should have stopped after the [A] loss.
Something to think about if you're having doubts about betting the Royals today.Comment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4892JESUS FREAKING CHRIST this thread has become a fuking circus. 17 pages of wannabes posting freaking experimental systems. Post after post of bullshit. Track your own GD systems, why do you have to clog up this thread? Wallco and Hagball have been here, other than that you should fuk off and start your own thread. Sick of all this bull shit labby lines and crap.
I usually ignore people like yourself because all you do is hate on people for trying to make money and do not contribute anything to the thread yourself. You just complain when a system loses and dont say anything other wise.
Just because you do not want to make extra money with other systems, you should not complain about the systems being in this thread. If you have a reading problem, then skip all the post.
You and everyone else that complains about the thread being clogged and are only here to play Wallco's or JM plays this is what you do.
Book mark a page that has Hagball and Wallco on it. Once you have it booked marked go to that page every morning and click "view post" under their name. That way you only see the plays and you wont see all my post or any other topics on this forum that you see as "clutter."
Where you see clutter i see opportunity.
Lets take a vote on this and see who is more respected in this thread... You or me???
You talk about cluttering the thread, but when you come in here and complain; what does that do to help the thread? That is clutter in itself, so I suggest that you follow your own advice and "Fuk Off."
have a nice dayComment -
G's pksRestricted User
- 01-01-09
- 22251
#4893Hey guys...I have heard from some that you can play the Morrison system and the anti / opposite of Morrison at the same time on their own seperate 3-Line labbys and profit from both of them...I just can't get my head around being able to profit on both when you are always playing both sides of each game...anyone care to lend some insight?
Just wanted to mention to you that JM Disciple might be the person to help you with your labby line questions...maybe shoot him a pm...
Also JM...I might be contacting you down the road myself... I am working on an nba system soon and would like a little input...
Thanks ...Comment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4894For everyone who doesn't want to read all the thread.. Ill post every play right here... Just for today though and you can skip all the "clutter" as people call it in the thread.
Wallco: Detroit ML [C]
Wallco: Detroit ML [C]
JM: KC ML [C]
Crusher: FLA ML [A]
Hoodini: Phi ML [B]
Hoodini: CLE +1.5 [A]
$$$PRINTING SYstem: NYY, STL, ARI, and Phi (Labby system)
Best of Luck to everyone today.
--JMDComment -
J.M. DiscipleSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-16-10
- 5154
#4895Just wanted to mention to you that JM Disciple might be the person to help you with your labby line questions...maybe shoot him a pm...
Also JM...I might be contacting you down the road myself... I am working on an nba system soon and would like a little input...
Thanks ...
The more systems we have the better. As long as all of them don't lose D bets on the same day lol. Not too much of a problem with a labby though.
Just shoot me a PM and ill probably start back testing it. We got a ways to go before NBA starts again though. I think its like a 4 month break or something.Comment -
thelimit0310SBR MVP
- 01-24-11
- 1233
#4896JMD, congrats on 1000 posts!!! Thanks for all your contributions!Comment -
thelimit0310SBR MVP
- 01-24-11
- 1233
#4897Hey guys...I have heard from some that you can play the Morrison system and the anti / opposite of Morrison at the same time on their own seperate 3-Line labbys and profit from both of them...I just can't get my head around being able to profit on both when you are always playing both sides of each game...anyone care to lend some insight?
Essentially on every NBA "A" bet you bet on both the JM team and the opposing team, which ever one doesn't win, you keep playing as a normal series. LABBY this system or it won't work.
As for the labby itself I would use 2 lines not 3. Playing A and C on 1 line and B on its own line. But that's preference, it's a more aggressive approach which clears faster though could make bets much more expensive than initially if a bad streak hits. There are many ways to tone down your bets however if that happens. I recently had to do it with Wallco's system, just adding 2 numbers to the end of both the lines and took some cheddar off the lines to create those numbers. Easy as pie.Last edited by thelimit0310; 06-05-11, 12:39 PM.Comment -
G's pksRestricted User
- 01-01-09
- 22251
#4898JM some are taking a second look at your posts with interest...I agree about the clutter...this started as a JM thread...which is the only consistent system here...a few added their own...and of course the fake touts came in with well here are this or that systems picks...which when posted were even worse...
Crusher I have heard of...hits well as long as you have the patience...one of his systems was poor...just cannot think which one it was right now...(it was not baseball)....
For me a successful system stops at "C" as the risk and level of games going to "C" or "D" indicate a failed system from my backtesting...which is often substanial... I look for systems that end by an "A" or "B" win with enough regularity to be on the plus side... I have scrapped more systems constantly running to c/d than you could imagine...
GL and also dbartinbwgc is someone who knows a little about systems..see he dropped you guys JM WNBA...
The help I may be looking for will be based more on the math end...based on the systems ending by the "b" game in the majority...thanks...may contact you down the road...
I had someone run all the math for me last year and any system that has 6-10 losses before I can get at least 100 wins I scrap... Just cannot remember his screen name...if i remember it will also look him up...
Also do not let the idiotic haters bother you... they lose for a reason...they are not willing to learn...well have a good one...do not want to clog up the thread...
Wish it was a little easier to see the jm picks/posts...I do enjoy watching...even though last year was a rough year for him...not sure what is being advertised...but it was not a good year for the jm system...Last edited by G's pks; 06-05-11, 12:46 PM.Comment -
mantorras77SBR Sharp
- 05-08-09
- 378
#4899If im not mistake, i heard people say it is a losing system. You could probably buy it and fade it for a profit though.
same with his "champ selection plays." I think there was actually a thread on this in the past. I dont know is stats, but if you scroll back lots of pages someone posted the results where they stated
It losses like the past 6 months except for 1, so theoretically you could just fade his systems and show a profit. idk what your Roi would be though.
Take the +5.5 UNITS with a grain of salt though as I didn't take into account what the lines would be when you have to buy 3pts on each play. It could have easily been a break even or small loss year.Last edited by mantorras77; 06-05-11, 12:52 PM.Comment -
thelimit0310SBR MVP
- 01-24-11
- 1233
#4900according to actual system (thanks to dbartinbwgc on post# 4885)...2010 JM WNBA System went 12-1 for a net of +5.5 UNITS ! Now JM claims he's only lost 2x in the last 12 WNBA seasons...I will back track it to verify his claims.
Take the +5.5 UNITS with a grain of salt though as I didn't take into account what the lines would be when you have to buy 3pts on each play. It could have easily been a break even or small loss year.Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code