John Morrison 2011 MLB

[RAK]

There are two systems in this thread Wallcos system and the JM system. Hagball has been posting the JM system he already said he would post the play Monday when the RPI is updated

I'm curious and a little confused; I see a lot of picks on here that don't meet the JM system criteria and are still posted here? Is this a JM only thread? The next possible action with JM will be May 2, LAA vs Boston (as long as Boston doesn't have a huge RPI increase). Anyway, not that it really matters, I was just curious if I was missing something here. Also, how would you use labby with JM?

[teecee]

jm plays will, and have been offered here. also, wallco runs his system out of this thread and hagball offers his plays as well. if you were with us during the nba season, you would know that the jm thread can be a host to a multitude of systems. a one-stop shop, if you will. i cannot help you with the labby question, but maybe someone else will.

[dallaswynn]

TY, didn't know if I was lost.

[socrates01]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 35-0
System profit/loss: +47.42 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +27.15 units (20-0) (fin. series)
Current open series: 4 (-4.15 units)

(4/29/11) Minnesota (M/L) (A) –Loss
(4/29/11) Minnesota (-1½) (A) – Loss
(4/29/11) Detroit (M/L (A) – Loss
(4/29/11) Detroit (-1½) (A) – Loss
(4/29/11) L.A. Angels (M/L) (A) - Win

(A) 21-18
(B) 8-6
(C) 2-4
(D) 4-0


Next games:
(4/30/11) Detroit @ Cleveland (B) 6:05 start – M/L bet
(4/30/11) Detroit @ Cleveland (B) 6:05 start – R/L bet
(4/30/11) Minnesota @ Kansas City (B) 7:10 start – M/L bet
(4/30/11) Minnesota @ Kansas City (B) 7:10 start – R/L bet


**All lines and standings are based on final lines on ScoresandOdds.com. Actual plays for these games will be highlighted BLUE when they become official. Official plays will not change once they are marked “official”. Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “official” appears next to the game. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, then buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed as (-1½), not the other team.

Sorry fellas, I'm new to this....quick question: are the B bets above official even though they don't have the *? I see next games highlighted in blue and just wanted to double check, thanks.

[hagball52]

what's the DPS system?

Believe me all I'm not trying to make this thread any more complicated than it already is. The DPS (Double Play System) was brought up and discussed earlier in this thread a few weeks ago. It hasn't received any attention as of late. I was just wondering if it had it's own thread. I regret bringing it up now with all the new faces around here. If anyone knows of a thread for it please post.

[knugen]

Sorry fellas, I'm new to this....quick question: are the B bets above official even though they don't have the *? I see next games highlighted in blue and just wanted to double check, thanks.

common dude, plz read the whole post, it says "Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “official” appears next to the game.", can it be more clear????

[alexknyc]

Sorry fellas, I'm new to this....quick question: are the B bets above official even though they don't have the *? I see next games highlighted in blue and just wanted to double check, thanks.

They're not official until they say *OFFICIAL*

[Wallco99]

Sorry fellas, I'm new to this....quick question: are the B bets above official even though they don't have the *? I see next games highlighted in blue and just wanted to double check, thanks.

NO! You can't really be taking it that literally, can you. If you are, is "Next games" underlined as well. Isn't that the description below?

[clamchowder]

Sorry fellas, I'm new to this....quick question: are the B bets above official even though they don't have the *? I see next games highlighted in blue and just wanted to double check, thanks.

No games are official yet to my understanding. Just wait, they will become official. The game itself will be highlighted in blue when it becomes official, not the header "next game".

[socrates01]

NO!

Thanks! Guess the "new games" in blue threw me off. Got it....Good luck

[socrates01]

No games are official yet to my understanding. Just wait, they will become official. The game itself will be highlighted in blue when it becomes official, not the header "next game".

Will do, thanks man.

[Wallco99]

I give up, someone tell me how you want it worded. I thought it was clear before, and I thought it was extra clear this way. And in case anyone was wondering, all of those games are P.M., I thought that would be assumed, but I can assume nothing anymore.

[knugen]

wallco , the way you did it in last post is perfect, dont care about the one that dont read the post.... let them bet on the wrong team if they want...

[hagball52]

I give up, someone tell me how you want it worded. I thought it was clear before, and I thought it was extra clear this way. And in case anyone was wondering, all of those games are P.M., I thought that would be assumed, but I can assume nothing anymore.

[socrates01]

I give up, someone tell me how you want it worded. I thought it was clear before, and I thought it was extra clear this way. And in case anyone was wondering, all of those games are P.M., I thought that would be assumed, but I can assume nothing anymore.

No worries, don't change shit....you're good. I got it...thanks for your work.

[oklahoma]

another vote to keep your posts the same way youve been doing them wallco. you cant get it much clearer unless you personally called us up and told us the plays.

[ghislaine]

I guess I have a half a brain, haha, any way You done it thus far, I was never confused...

Thanks Wallco, wow, You do have the patience of a Saint !!

[soldier1047]

Would twitter be helpful? There would be less clutter.

[nick86]

What's the average winning rate of the swept team winning in the rematch per season according to this system? I know a pro gambler who says it is 80% but from what I've read here the 2010 season was very bad. Your thoughts?

[dallaswynn]

Last year under JM, the season was 49-1. However, this is after you apply the filters.

[teecee]

just for clarification, yesterday's comments had nothing to do with not knowing what plays are to be made. i went ahead and made the play that lost on my own, and it's my own fault i was impatient.

i simply wanted to know the reasoning behind such a drastic change in a play.

from: cubs m/l and -1.5
to: d'backs m/l and -1.5

obviously, i won't get any explanation in regard to this, and that is fine.

i know i shouldn't lock anything until i see "official," and that was never the debate.

no one really seemed to grasp that my biggest question was why there was such a change.

[alexknyc]

just for clarification, yesterday's comments had nothing to do with not knowing what plays are to be made. i went ahead and made the play that lost on my own, and it's my own fault i was impatient. i simply wanted to know the reasoning behind such a drastic change in a play. from: cubs m/l and -1.5 to: d'backs m/l and -1.5 obviously, i won't get any explanation in regard to this, and that is fine. i know i shouldn't lock anything until i see "official," and that was never the debate. no one really seemed to grasp that my biggest question was why there was such a change.

I grasped it just fine. I had the same question but I also understand Wallco can't answer questions regarding the system and how it works right now.

[ghislaine]

Hey anyone have any experience tailing Jimmy Boyd ??? He gets spoken highly of and gets a lotta views for his picks. Seems to be on the right side too more often than not...
Just wondering

http://forum.sbrforum.com/service-plays/1057063-jimmy-boyd-4-30-a.html

[black666]

Maybe it would help not posting the plays until they become official.
There really is no upside in posting them earlier .. we are not supposed to bet on them anyway and we would get rid of about 300-400 posts in this thread just containing questions about if the plays are official yet or not ;-)

[teecee]

I grasped it just fine. I had the same question but I also understand Wallco can't answer questions regarding the system and how it works right now.

well, if this is going to be marketed and sold, i'd be willing to be one of hundreds to purchase the system, but i would not be willing to pay, then sit around, until someone sent me a text or email, regarding what play should be made.

[1gamer]

Maybe it would help not posting the plays until they become official. There really is no upside in posting them earlier .. we are not supposed to bet on them anyway and we would get rid of about 300-400 posts in this thread just containing questions about if the plays are official yet or not ;-)

Oh come on now...then you'd be taking all the fun out of it

[RAK]

I disagree. I think it is beneficial to post all possible plays early, that way we know there is a potential play and just check back later before game time to see if it has gone official. I dont get why people are having a hard time following or understanding Wallcos posts?

Maybe it would help not posting the plays until they become official.
There really is no upside in posting them earlier .. we are not supposed to bet on them anyway and we would get rid of about 300-400 posts in this thread just containing questions about if the plays are official yet or not ;-)

[ghislaine]

gotta agree with RAK, I like to see the plays beforehand too, did not even mind when they were in blue already.
and that one, really one switch now and everybody panics and freaks out.
If You played the wrong team, unfortunate, but nobody forced Your hand.

[1gamer]

I disagree. I think it is beneficial to post all possible plays early, that way we know there is a potential play and just check back later before game time to see if it has gone official. I dont get why people are having a hard time following or understanding Wallcos posts?

I think it's because some people can't "wrap their brains" around the idea of switching teams they thought they were going to bet on, at the last minute.

[Wallco99]

just for clarification, yesterday's comments had nothing to do with not knowing what plays are to be made. i went ahead and made the play that lost on my own, and it's my own fault i was impatient.

i simply wanted to know the reasoning behind such a drastic change in a play.

from: cubs m/l and -1.5
to: d'backs m/l and -1.5

obviously, i won't get any explanation in regard to this, and that is fine.

i know i shouldn't lock anything until i see "official," and that was never the debate.

no one really seemed to grasp that my biggest question was why there was such a change.

I don't think the big problem yesterday was you, you were pretty clear what you were saying. It was some of the other folk, which I refuse to get into again. You're good. And I may not be able to tell you why it happened, but I can tell you, it won't be the last time it will happen. Well, I guess with this new format, it will happen again, but no one will know because nothing is posted at all until it is actually "official". What changed that pick was the rules of the system.

[J.M. Disciple]

I am currently playing under multihand blackjack on betus.com it does not state how many decks are in the shoe, but i viewed some other online casinos with the same rules and they use 8 decks, which are shuffled every hand I believe.

So now i have a more appropriate PDF file with this chart in play. Hopefully labby line doesn't get too crazy today.

Thanks again ICEBet for the PDF

[mikepep21]

GL boys!

[nick86]

Last year under JM, the season was 49-1. However, this is after you apply the filters.

Sorry bro if this was true everyone who followed this system would be millionaires right now.

[Wallco99]

Maybe it would help not posting the plays until they become official.
There really is no upside in posting them earlier .. we are not supposed to bet on them anyway and we would get rid of about 300-400 posts in this thread just containing questions about if the plays are official yet or not ;-)

You're absolutely right. I was just trying to give people a heads up to how many plays there would be that night, in case they were playing this system, along with other systems, so they could know how many total games they would be betting on that day, so they could manage their money accordingly. But obviously this is not working. I think my next post will read like this:

Next Games:
There are 4 plays for (whatever date). Check back at 6:30 P.M. For any official games to be posted.


At 6:30, if two games are official and two games aren't, It will say:

Plays for (whatever date):
Team (M/L) @ Team (A) *Official*
Team (-1 1/2) @ Team (A) *Official*
* (A) Check back @ 8:30 P.M
* (A) Check back @ 8:30 P.M

[IceBet]

I am currently playing under multihand blackjack on betus.com it does not state how many decks are in the shoe, but i viewed some other online casinos with the same rules and they use 8 decks, which are shuffled every hand I believe.

So now i have a more appropriate PDF file with this chart in play. Hopefully labby line doesn't get too crazy today.

Thanks again ICEBet for the PDF

No problem JMD, glad it could help. I will take a look at Betus rules and try to filter it down even better for you.

IceBet