dan's thread

[Dexter]

looks like we have some work to do on the balt RL - we may be the only 2 on the planet that played balt. lol

but its cool...just 1x for me

[Dexter]

yankees play the world champs and tor faces the best pitcher in baseball so i thought it was time to play the dogs a little more on this one.. also fla plays the american league champs next hence a play on ariz.

who/when?

[danrman]

cubs-stlouis-over
cubs

[danrman]

who/when?

my fault dex i meant boston goes up against santana of the mets.. not tor..

[Dexter]

my fault dex i meant boston goes up against santana of the mets.. not tor..

ok...so many pitching changes lately i thought my site was wrong

[danrman]

took a brutle beat tailing ck on the 1st half of the laker game that was the difference in basically a break even or a big day.. it should have happened but the soft ass lakers gave up a 14-2 run in the final 2 and 1/2 minutes including a bucket w/ .6 secs to lose the bet.. was definitely helped out by both showtimes hockey bets and some late west coast baseball from the angels.. sorry i didnt get around to list my west coast bets but i had my hands full w/ the laker game at halftime which was around the same time.. still down for the week so here's how today shook out:
winners:
twins-medium +104
pitts-medium -1 1/2-hockey+170 tailing showtime
pitts-medium win in regulation -112 tailing showtime
angels-medium +110 tailing ck
arizona-medium -121
nuggets-small +5 1/2
nuggets-2nd half small +4
giants-small -133
giants-angels parlay small
colo-det-minn-laa 4 team parlay small
reverse parlay nyy-boston-st.louis small
cinn-phila over 10 +102 small


loserrzzzz:
tex-medium
cinn-small
cubs-medium
balt-small
tor-small
balt rl-medium
tor rl-medium
st. louis over-small
boston over-small
ariz over-small
reverse-seattle-sd parlay small
st. louis-over parlay small
lakers 1st half-3 "heavy" tailing ck

[danrman]

im generally looking at the american league for fri but im also looking at fla.,ariz.,houston.. the teams these teams face all take on pitchers that have winning records against them the next day on sat.. just a little point to take into consideration when capping these games.. i was told by a professional baseball player long ago (tito landrum-member of st.louis and balt. world championship team) that there are 2 kinds of baseball players.. pitchers and hitters.. i know duh but hear me out.. they dont necessarily work together.. for example when the hitters are going to face a dominant pitcher the next day they tend to at times underperform in the game before.. i met tito when i was around 15 yrs old 29 yrs ago when he was debuting for the arkansas travelers (AA TEXAS LEAGUE).. nick leyva was also part of that organization at the time and just 3 years later he had worked his way up to the managerial position for ark. and if you know baseball he was the 3rd base coach w/ toronto when they won the title i believe and is back w/ them now after being in mil. for a while.. nick was so cool to me when i was a kid.. at the AA games in jackson,ms (affliliate of the nym at the time) when the ark. travelers came to visit he always had 2 passes for me to get in free to the game.. i was the only kid pulling against the home team and they got a kick out of it.. i still have bats and balls signed from them to this day.. i met them all one day on camera day.. all the kids were w/ the home team and i wasnt getting any time w/ any players.. i looked across the field and said to myself "i can go over there and have the whole team to myself" and so i did.. i never pulled for the home team again.. i love those ark. travelers (affiliate of the st. louis cards of course) and alot of them went on to the majors like tito.. i went on to also do this w/ all the visiting teams that came to my town.. of course everyone thought.. who is that crazy kid pulling against the home team.. made me quite a fav. of the visiting squad.. p.s.. nick leyva was the first person to ever give me a beer..lol

[Pair of 5s Sir]

Where is the charted record Dan? Your record is your crediblitly. I would love to follow your threads, but I can't make heads or tails out of anything. No units, no cash flow, no pct., no record, a whole lot of small, medium, and large. With all due respect, this would work if I was ordering a pizza. Get it right, so us legit guys can give you a shot. Your thoughts.

[danrman]

Where is the charted record Dan? Your record is your crediblitly. I would love to follow your threads, but I can't make heads or tails out of anything. No units, no cash flow, no pct., no record, a whole lot of small, medium, and large. With all due respect, this would work if I was ordering a pizza. Get it right, so us legit guys can give you a shot. Your thoughts.

i'll tally up the record of the small bets which are just opinions,the medium and the large bets.. i'll give the prices of the winners but im not going into alot of detail and if that means you dont want to give me any credit or think im legit thats ok w/ me.. 90% of my plays are dogs... if its 100 based system i guess large or big would be 4,medium would be 2 and small 1 but i really dont have time to figure in all the parlays and reverse parlays and how many partial units it would be or cash flow and all these other stats that you want.. i have a job that takes alot of work in stockbroking thats sometimes 12 hours a day and this is recreation for me.. theres also no need to make a snide remark refering to me as ordering a pizza.. im not beholden to you.. im not trying to gain acceptance from you.. if i dont meet your requiements for gods sake do us both a favor and ignore me elsewise i would advise you to pay attention to my large bet categorie.. i usually dont pull the trigger w/ that unless its something really solid and i can tell ya right now its 12-4.. i believe thats 75%.. why dont you go jump on ck.. he doesnt give a detailed record of all his picks and all those other stats you want to require of me and everybody loves him just fine... peace bra

[Pair of 5s Sir]

I am not inclined to criticize on someone's thread. What happened was, is that you came over to my thread and invited me to come over to your thread, stating that you enjoyed my selections and that my selection philosophy was similar to yours. I came over to your thread after the personal invitation. As I was looking around I wanted to find out what your selection criteria was, and your success rate. After not finding the information, I posted on your thread asking if you could oblige me and others. You said you would start doing that. I mean no ill will Dan. For someone who claims that they don't have time to post your success/credibilty record, should posters take the time to decipher that information on their own. As you know, there are many SBR posters that claim all sorts of crap, your record is everything. SBR provides an easy to use spreadsheet that assists with the record posting. It is my and others opinion that guys who do not post records in some form or fashion are not worth following.

Dan, you have great potential, if you only would demonstrate a performance record. If not, you will only be grouped in with the other hucksters out there.

Remember, no ill will. Perhaps others will chime in with their thoughts. If you want to answer my post I respect that, if not, I respect that too. I am not a basher, just a capper trying to share my picks.

[Dexter]

I am not inclined to criticize on someone's thread. What happened was, is that you came over to my thread and invited me to come over to your thread, stating that you enjoyed my selections and that my selection philosophy was similar to yours. I came over to your thread after the personal invitation. As I was looking around I wanted to find out what your selection criteria was, and your success rate. After not finding the information, I posted on your thread asking if you could oblige me and others. You said you would start doing that. I mean no ill will Dan. For someone who claims that they don't have time to post your success/credibilty record, should posters take the time to decipher that information on their own. As you know, there are many SBR posters that claim all sorts of crap, your record is everything. SBR provides an easy to use spreadsheet that assists with the record posting. It is my and others opinion that guys who do not post records in some form or fashion are not worth following.

Dan, you have great potential, if you only would demonstrate a performance record. If not, you will only be grouped in with the other hucksters out there.

Remember, no ill will. Perhaps others will chime in with their thoughts. If you want to answer my post I respect that, if not, I respect that too. I am not a basher, just a capper trying to share my picks.

i hear what you're saying pair of 5s about record keeping etc etc...esp for guys who create their own thread and are sort of looking for a following. i myself will never want to create my own thread, because i would rather keep my stuff on the down low. i am a recreational gambler, but have done pretty well the past few seasons through weighted gambling and proper money mgmt. do i hit 60% of my plays? no way....i am not a bs artist even though i dont keep a spreadsheet or document my record in my signature each day. i dont want people to tail me for 2 main reasons:

1) they turn on you when things go bad
2) i dont want to influence my decisons knowing i can be losing money for someone elses mortgage etc...

i do realize there are people who tail me, as i have gotten thank you pm's when ive been hot, and thankfully no bashing pm's when cold

my main reason for posting my plays each day is to really light a fire under myself, knowing that a lot of people view ck's thread. i know that since i began posting here, i have taken my sports gambling much more seriously and have become better b/c of this place. im a sports phreak, so i simply love to discuss games, and while i dont tail anyone (other then ck's heavy plays) i do enjoy reading others startegies which may help me in future bets.

one thing as far as the spreadhseet - cant it be manipulated after games are over? to me, it serves no purpose if thats the case. i think if you want accurate record keeping, its best to post your games before start time, and NEVER edit that post. thats what i do, so my plays are documented if someone wants to follow, but you never see me talk much about my win% etc. im not here for fame, just fortune with that said, i will likely start posting my updated record (esp now with my autobets) say once a month just to again - light a fire under myself. its tough when you work full time to really put that extra effort into reseraching games that is very crucial. posting here makes me do that.

[kotzwell88]

well played dex...

[Pair of 5s Sir]

i hear what you're saying pair of 5s about record keeping etc etc...esp for guys who create their own thread and are sort of looking for a following. i myself will never want to create my own thread, because i would rather keep my stuff on the down low. i am a recreational gambler, but have done pretty well the past few seasons through weighted gambling and proper money mgmt. do i hit 60% of my plays? no way....i am not a bs artist even though i dont keep a spreadsheet or document my record in my signature each day. i dont want people to tail me for 2 main reasons:

1) they turn on you when things go bad
2) i dont want to influence my decisons knowing i can be losing money for someone elses mortgage etc...

i do realize there are people who tail me, as i have gotten thank you pm's when ive been hot, and thankfully no bashing pm's when cold

my main reason for posting my plays each day is to really light a fire under myself, knowing that a lot of people view ck's thread. i know that since i began posting here, i have taken my sports gambling much more seriously and have become better b/c of this place. im a sports phreak, so i simply love to discuss games, and while i dont tail anyone (other then ck's heavy plays) i do enjoy reading others startegies which may help me in future bets.

one thing as far as the spreadhseet - cant it be manipulated after games are over? to me, it serves no purpose if thats the case. i think if you want accurate record keeping, its best to post your games before start time, and NEVER edit that post. thats what i do, so my plays are documented if someone wants to follow, but you never see me talk much about my win% etc. im not here for fame, just fortune with that said, i will likely start posting my updated record (esp now with my autobets) say once a month just to again - light a fire under myself. its tough when you work full time to really put that extra effort into reseraching games that is very crucial. posting here makes me do that.

who is dex, I was talking to dan.

[danrman]

I am not inclined to criticize on someone's thread. What happened was, is that you came over to my thread and invited me to come over to your thread, stating that you enjoyed my selections and that my selection philosophy was similar to yours. I came over to your thread after the personal invitation. As I was looking around I wanted to find out what your selection criteria was, and your success rate. After not finding the information, I posted on your thread asking if you could oblige me and others. You said you would start doing that. I mean no ill will Dan. For someone who claims that they don't have time to post your success/credibilty record, should posters take the time to decipher that information on their own. As you know, there are many SBR posters that claim all sorts of crap, your record is everything. SBR provides an easy to use spreadsheet that assists with the record posting. It is my and others opinion that guys who do not post records in some form or fashion are not worth following.

Dan, you have great potential, if you only would demonstrate a performance record. If not, you will only be grouped in with the other hucksters out there.

Remember, no ill will. Perhaps others will chime in with their thoughts. If you want to answer my post I respect that, if not, I respect that too. I am not a basher, just a capper trying to share my picks.

i didnt say i couldnt post my record.. as a matter of fact i do total it up at the end of the week or every several days.. i was refering to you wanting cash flow,unit breakdown,percentages etc etc... i would also like to say im not doing this trying to get a bunch of people to tail me or get up a fan club or any of that stuff.. this all started when me and dexter got into it and i left another thread cause i was called a liar and other things were said that werent true.. so in response to that i started my own thread and wanted to give out my on plays and show my own legitimate credibility.. i also was getting tired of all the egos and arguing that goes on all over the sbr forum.. its too much soap opera bs and now my thread is being infected w/ this same type thing.. instead of talking about the games we are critizing each other and taking stances against each other and wasting time doing that stuff instead of focusing on THE GAMES... pair of 5s im cool w/ you.. i'll try to total my record up more for you if i continue to do this but im not going to do it the way you would like.. this is mine and if thats a pertinent factor in cred w/ you im gonna lose that one.. its pretty simple just focus on my large or best plays.. if you see that bet it.. the smalls are just opinion plays and the mediums somewhere in between... like i said before if you wanted to unit it up, i guess based on a 100 system.. large would be 4 units,medium-2 and small-1 but i dont have time to go back and figure up what a 4 unit play would be on a 175 dog etc etc... im barely finding enough time to do what ive managed to squeeze in between my real job and my real life.. peace and i love you all and want no conflict w/ anyone.. lets all get along

[Pair of 5s Sir]

i didnt say i couldnt post my record.. as a matter of fact i do total it up at the end of the week or every several days.. i was refering to you wanting cash flow,unit breakdown,percentages etc etc... i would also like to say im not doing this trying to get a bunch of people to tail me or get up a fan club or any of that stuff.. this all started when me and dexter got into it and i left another thread cause i was called a liar and other things were said that werent true.. so in response to that i started my own thread and wanted to give out my on plays and show my own legitimate credibility.. i also was getting tired of all the egos and arguing that goes on all over the sbr forum.. its too much soap opera bs and now my thread is being infected w/ this same type thing.. instead of talking about the games we are critizing each other and taking stances against each other and wasting time doing that stuff instead of focusing on THE GAMES... pair of 5s im cool w/ you.. i'll try to total my record up more for you if i continue to do this but im not going to do it the way you would like.. this is mine and if thats a pertinent factor in cred w/ you im gonna lose that one.. its pretty simple just focus on my large or best plays.. if you see that bet it.. the smalls are just opinion plays and the mediums somewhere in between... like i said before if you wanted to unit it up, i guess based on a 100 system.. large would be 4 units,medium-2 and small-1 but i dont have time to go back and figure up what a 4 unit play would be on a 175 dog etc etc... im barely finding enough time to do what ive managed to squeeze in between my real job and my real life

I hear you, no intention to bash. I just wanted to let you know how I feel. Keep cappin, knockem dead, and don't forget to be contrarian.

[Dexter]

who is dex, I was talking to dan.

didnt realize it was a private conversation on a public forum. you did not reply directly to dans post, which is why i shared my thoughts on the subject. - settle down nice guy!

[danrman]

there is some weird line movement on the colo-det game.. alot of the public on det but the line moving down.. gimme colo.. small... same thing w/ cws-pitt.. public on cws but line going down.. gimme pitt.. same thing w/ kc-st.louis.. gimme kc... going contrairian and taking under in the yankee game.... thats all for right now.. all small plays

[TodaysAction]

there is some weird line movement on the colo-det game.. alot of the public on det but the line moving down.. gimme colo.. small... same thing w/ cws-pitt.. public on cws but line going down.. gimme pitt.. same thing w/ kc-st.louis.. gimme kc... going contrairian and taking under in the yankee game.... thats all for right now.. all small plays

Might be some bigs are holding the CO line and their minions adding to it as well. Also take into account the Tigers during this home stand have yet to lose. Just my two cents on the matter. GL with your selections tonight.

[showtime2000]

MLB plays,
TB/Flor over (Andy Sonnanstine 7.36ERA vs Nolasco 7.78 ERA, enough said)
Baltimore (CK)
Boston (Jimbo)



GLA

[danrman]

scratching kc...
adding cleve-small
atl-small
under tb-fla
under-wash-balt
houston-small
reverse parlay of tor-tex

[danrman]

tailing ck on the cavs game under and tailing dex on the cavs... also cavs-under parlay.. going small.. thanks for the input guys

[showtime2000]

Hockey play tonight,

Detroit +110 (surprised to see Detroit at plus money tonight. They've pretty much dominated almost every game these playoffs. Although i was on Chicago the first 2 games i really thought the kids would win 1 in Motown but not enough in them. Chicago would not want to get into a scoring affair tonight because that would hurt them so it probably will be a low scoring game and if that's the case i would give the edge to Detroit, experience. One thing, the books obssiovvsly want money on Chicago for them to make them only -130 in a must win. Best thing they have Chicago pl at +245 and the public is alll over that)


GLA

[danrman]

laa angels late play medium

[danrman]

also tail dex on sea small and a sea.-laa parlay and oak small w/ a reverse of ariz-sf-lad

[danrman]

pulled out some late west coast wins to pull a little above level but nothing to speak of really.. if the cavs could hold a lead then we would have had a nice night.. still down for the week and here's how it shook out:
winners:
laa+116-medium
sea-133-small-tailing dexter
ariz-small +133-wrote down oak when i meant ariz.. tomorrow is when im betting oak against haren.. stupid mistake.. its not a big factor in the outcome either way so it really doesnt matter..
seattle-laa parlay small
seattle-laa-ariz-sd parlay small
atl +154
under wash-balt small
under nyy-phila even

looserrzzzzzz:
under tb-fla small-stupid bet of the day.. what i get for being a contrairian.. see atl+154 for the other side of the contrairian attitude.. that was a nice win
houston-small
cleve-small
cleve.cavs-small tailing dexter
cleve. cavs-under-small tailing ck
cleve cavs and under parlay-small-my brilliant idea
pitt-small
colo-small
reverse parlay of tor-tex small
reverse parlay of oak-sf-lad-small

[danrman]

kc-medium early

[danrman]

houston small
phillies small

scratching tex and going w/ houston

[danrman]

uping houston to medium

[danrman]

rolling w/ these:
tor-small
cleve-small
pitt-small
mil-small
cleve-medium
fla-small
balt-over-small
penguins tailing show-small
lakers 1st half tailing ck small
lakers game-medium
lakers game under-small tailing dex

[danrman]

nym small

[showtime2000]

Puck play tonight,

Pittsburgh +110 (feeling Carolina is done and they showed it last game. Take note of all the "extra" penalties called in favor of Pit)


GLA

[danrman]

couple of reverses against these baseball picks

[danrman]

all medium-
oak
oak-over
sf
laa-lad over

[danrman]

got in the hole early in afternoon baseball but dug my way out w/ the laker win,the pitt. hockey win thanks to showtime and my west coast baseball picks.. positive day but still down for the week.. here's how it shook out
winners:
lakers +3 1/2 even money medium
lakers under 212-small -110 tailing dex
lakers +3 1/2 and under parlay-small
pitts.hockey +115 small tailing showtime
cleve +115 small
nym +185 small
balt -116 small
sf-medium -117 tailing ck
laa-lad-over 7 1/2 medium-115
oak-over 7 medium
reverse parlay-minn-cws-atl small
reverse parlay-ariz-lad small

loooserzzzzzzz:
houston-medium
kc-medium tailing ck
oak-medium
tor-small
pitt-small
mil-small
balt-over-small
fla-small
phila-small
lakers 1st half-small tailing ck

[danrman]

dont forget to join me for my driver matchup race picks tommorrow for the sprintcup.. 17 out of 21 for the year and 3-0 last week.. ever bet on a race... what a rush!!!