...........
Two planes couldn't bring towers down, says Iran's leader
Collapse
X
-
wtfSBR Posting Legend
- 08-22-08
- 12983
#176Comment -
MikailSBR Posting Legend
- 07-19-09
- 21689
-
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19313
#178this debunks the popular mechanics article http://books.google.com/books?id=CMZ...%20job&f=false why some random magazine even holds much water anyway is beyond me.
Building 7 did not experience a normal building fire and it was severely damaged during the collapse. I thought it was pretty obvious these weren't normal fires we were dealing with.Comment -
cant call itSBR Hall of Famer
- 08-29-10
- 8817
#179There are some logical arguments here as well http://firefightersfor911truth.org/
Reading it would never hurt you. Sharing ideas is key for all of us to learn something.Comment -
Darkside MagickSBR Posting Legend
- 05-28-10
- 12638
-
BettingWizardSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-28-09
- 6522
#181It holds a lot more water than random people on the internet starting rumors that bombs were planted. A lot of these theories are unsubstantiated and just things people thought up in their heads. In other words, there isn't any evidence. Even the man that designed the buildings agreed with the article.
Building 7 did not experience a normal building fire and it was severely damaged during the collapse. I thought it was pretty obvious these weren't normal fires we were dealing with.Comment -
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19313
#182this debunks the popular mechanics article http://books.google.com/books?id=CMZ...%20job&f=false why some random magazine even holds much water anyway is beyond me.
I just used popular mechanics as one example backing me up. There are plenty of others that back me up as well, including the man that designed the building.
I have more evidence in my opinion than conspiracy theorists have in theirs.
There is no evidence of bombs. There is evidence of the support structure melting.
Anyway, we can argue minute things like buildings collapsing, planes crashing, etc. It doesn't really matter. The whole pretense that the government did this and it was an inside job is absurd considering what would have to be done to pull this off. It's impossible. Conspiracy theories can try to muddy the picture by bring up different things but the whole theory all of this crap revolves around is the government doing it and it just isn't feasible.
Why would the government do this?
I already explained how many people would have to be involved. I doubt you could secretly coordinate hundreds of thousands of people and get them all to stay quite.Comment -
BettingWizardSBR Hall of Famer
- 11-28-09
- 6522
#183you wouldn't need 100's of thousand of people
making up scenarios where you think a lot of people have to be quiet doesn't make the many flaws in the official story go awayComment -
flyingilliniSBR Aristocracy
- 12-06-06
- 41219
-
BigDofBASBR Posting Legend
- 09-30-09
- 19313
#185this debunks the popular mechanics article http://books.google.com/books?id=CMZ...%20job&f=false why some random magazine even holds much water anyway is beyond me.
Besides, my examples hold more water than random people on the internet coming up with outrageous theories in their heads without any proof.
No one saw any bombs. No one same any missiles. No one saw a plane get shot down. I could go on an on. These are all just theories people made up.Comment -
rsnnh12SBR MVP
- 09-26-10
- 3487
#186And you know this how, exactly? Aren't Mossad one of the most secretive organizations in the world? And yet they just let it known that they were all over the complex, not giving a damn about their agents being ID'd?Comment -
Darkside MagickSBR Posting Legend
- 05-28-10
- 12638
#188mossad is a two faced organization meaning yes it is secretive to the general public which is the exoteric but if you proficient in kaballah and ancient mystery religion then one can decode things through symbolism. mossad is just a arm of some other shyt.Comment -
flyingilliniSBR Aristocracy
- 12-06-06
- 41219
#189G*d Bless all Mossad and they can take out anyone they want at anytime...המוסד
המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדים
Comment -
wtfSBR Posting Legend
- 08-22-08
- 12983
#190please look at the geo political situation pre 911
the peace dividend was finally paying off, the jews needed america to start in after their neighbors who were gaining strength , they will do anything to survive , you think they give a fuk about a few americans
hahahahaComment -
White RhinoSBR Wise Guy
- 09-05-09
- 601
#191No building has ever fell like the trade centers with out implosion. It would be an engineering miracle if they fell that way with just a plane crash.Comment -
MikailSBR Posting Legend
- 07-19-09
- 21689
#192fukkin mossad. Israeli scum!Comment -
zogdogSBR Wise Guy
- 01-29-10
- 755
#193To whoever posted about the B-25 hitting the empire state building, here's a comparison:
B-25 is 40,000 pounds fully loaded. Maximum speed of 275 mph. Fuel capacity of 670 gallons. On top of that was there any reason for the plane to be fully fueled? B-25 has a 67 foot wingspan, 53 feet long.
767 is 300,000+ pounds depending on load, has a fuel tank of 16700 gallons (or 24,100 on some models) and can fly 530mph. 767 has a 153+ foot wingspan depending on version and is 159+ feet long. To compare the two planes is not even possible.
It's pretty simple how the towers fell. The floors that were the hottest reached somewhere around 750 degrees Celsius, which means the temperature on those floors was 1300-1400 degrees Fahrenheit. This is not hot enough to actually melt steel, but that's not necessary.
See this graph: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/me...th-d_1353.html
You can see that by 1100 degrees Fahrenheit the strength of structural steel is only about 30% of what it is at normal temperature, and the strength is rapidly decreasing.
At 800 degrees Celsius steel only has 10% of the strength it does at a normal temperature.
Even if the steel still had 20% of its original strength, there is no way it could support the weight of the floors above it. There were 19 floors above the impact zone on the north tower. The towers weighed 1 billion pounds each. Simple math says that means there were 190 million pounds of weight above the impact zone (and more on the south tower, which was hit lower). That's 190 million pounds that gravity is trying to pull down, and more on the south tower, with the steel at only 1/5th of it's normal strength.
If the strength of the steel was 20% of what it was before being impacted (and this does not account for structural damage by the impact of the 300,000+ pound plane impact), then the factor of safety would have had to exceeded 5 to 1.
Most sky scrapers are built with a factor of safety of 3 to 1. Even if the WTC was built at 5 to 1 it would have eventually fallen due to the strength of the steel being lessened by at least a factor of 5 (if only 15% of the strength remained, a factor of 6.67 would be required for the building to stand).
As for how WTC 7 fell, it was on fire as well and left to burn for days, plus the impact from the twin towers falling created, for lack of a better term, an earthquake, which could have easily damaged the structure to some degree.
Finally, for those who think the towers were rigged with explosives:
How the fukk do you explain how the explosives did not explode in the fire or the explosion of the plane? Then they just magically went off at the push of a button? And right at the impact zone? Yeah, okay...Comment -
Darkside MagickSBR Posting Legend
- 05-28-10
- 12638
#194To whoever posted about the B-25 hitting the empire state building, here's a comparison:
B-25 is 40,000 pounds fully loaded. Maximum speed of 275 mph. Fuel capacity of 670 gallons. On top of that was there any reason for the plane to be fully fueled? B-25 has a 67 foot wingspan, 53 feet long.
767 is 300,000+ pounds depending on load, has a fuel tank of 16700 gallons (or 24,100 on some models) and can fly 530mph. 767 has a 153+ foot wingspan depending on version and is 159+ feet long. To compare the two planes is not even possible.
It's pretty simple how the towers fell. The floors that were the hottest reached somewhere around 750 degrees Celsius, which means the temperature on those floors was 1300-1400 degrees Fahrenheit. This is not hot enough to actually melt steel, but that's not necessary.
See this graph: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/me...th-d_1353.html
You can see that by 1100 degrees Fahrenheit the strength of structural steel is only about 30% of what it is at normal temperature, and the strength is rapidly decreasing.
At 800 degrees Celsius steel only has 10% of the strength it does at a normal temperature.
Even if the steel still had 20% of its original strength, there is no way it could support the weight of the floors above it. There were 19 floors above the impact zone on the north tower. The towers weighed 1 billion pounds each. Simple math says that means there were 190 million pounds of weight above the impact zone (and more on the south tower, which was hit lower). That's 190 million pounds that gravity is trying to pull down, and more on the south tower, with the steel at only 1/5th of it's normal strength.
If the strength of the steel was 20% of what it was before being impacted (and this does not account for structural damage by the impact of the 300,000+ pound plane impact), then the factor of safety would have had to exceeded 5 to 1.
Most sky scrapers are built with a factor of safety of 3 to 1. Even if the WTC was built at 5 to 1 it would have eventually fallen due to the strength of the steel being lessened by at least a factor of 5 (if only 15% of the strength remained, a factor of 6.67 would be required for the building to stand).
As for how WTC 7 fell, it was on fire as well and left to burn for days, plus the impact from the twin towers falling created, for lack of a better term, an earthquake, which could have easily damaged the structure to some degree.
Finally, for those who think the towers were rigged with explosives:
How the fukk do you explain how the explosives did not explode in the fire or the explosion of the plane? Then they just magically went off at the push of a button? And right at the impact zone? Yeah, okay...WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11.
Comment -
eberetta1SBR MVP
- 03-27-09
- 1157
-
flyingilliniSBR Aristocracy
- 12-06-06
- 41219
#196How Mossad got Eichmann was unbelievable and nobody else in the world could of pulled that off....המוסד
המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדים
Comment -
Darkside MagickSBR Posting Legend
- 05-28-10
- 12638
#197
In 1965, three young Israeli Mossad agents on a secret mission capture and kill a notorious Nazi war criminal. Now, thirty years later, a man claiming to be the Nazi has surfaced in Ukraine and one of the former agents must go back undercover to seek out the truth.Comment -
eberetta1SBR MVP
- 03-27-09
- 1157
#198Comment -
flyingilliniSBR Aristocracy
- 12-06-06
- 41219
#199
In 1965, three young Israeli Mossad agents on a secret mission capture and kill a notorious Nazi war criminal. Now, thirty years later, a man claiming to be the Nazi has surfaced in Ukraine and one of the former agents must go back undercover to seek out the truth.המוסד
המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדים
Comment -
Darkside MagickSBR Posting Legend
- 05-28-10
- 12638
#201and again, larry silversteinn said "pull the building" meaning they had to have something in place to make it fall!Comment -
rsnnh12SBR MVP
- 09-26-10
- 3487
#202
He said pull IT, meaning the firefighting operation. Do you know what it means to pull a building? It means pulling it down with cables, not explosives! They even did this to 1 or 2 of the smaller WTC buildings during cleanup.
Anything else you need corrected?Comment -
pavyracerSBR Aristocracy
- 04-12-07
- 82837
#203No he didn't!
He said pull IT, meaning the firefighting operation. Do you know what it means to pull a building? It means pulling it down with cables, not explosives! They even did this to 1 or 2 of the smaller WTC buildings during cleanup.
Anything else you need corrected?Comment -
rsnnh12SBR MVP
- 09-26-10
- 3487
#204
Comment -
TheLockSBR Posting Legend
- 04-06-08
- 14427
#205This is such a sad thread.
We all got sucked in by some conspiracy theory monkey who wanted to ruin our day.
His drivel won and we lost.
Shame.Comment -
Raven66SBR Wise Guy
- 09-21-09
- 824
#206Also all of the Jewish employee's were not working in the WTC's on that day.Comment -
TodayIsForgottenSBR Wise Guy
- 06-19-06
- 534
#208
E.g Obama's 'long form' birth certificate. Dumbasses who believed Obama wasn't born in this country, still believe he is not because they beleive the Birth Certificate is some how fake. Even though a republican governor ( i think the govenor) in Hawaii has said he has saw the long form original himself.
My dad told me he could Teleport all across the globe with the snap of his fingers. See what I did there?Comment -
milwaukee mikeBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 08-22-07
- 26914
#209ahmadinejad is a bad, rotten dictator! the tv told me he is rotten, just like chavez, so it must be true. has nothing to do with the oil underground in iran that he won't give to us. also has nothing to do with his proximity to israel. libya, pakistan, iraq, afghanistan, all those people are evil too! and it has nothing to do with their proximity to israel or their heroin/oil...
we must show how good and decent we can be as human beings by blowing up millions more of these people! that will really show the world how great we are, and everyone will love us. doesn't matter if it costs $15 trillion or $50 trillion, it's worth it.Comment -
RonPaul2008SBR Hall of Famer
- 06-08-07
- 6741
#210He is right. However, I have a feeling he is on the same side as those who did 9/11.
What better way to turn people off to the truth then by connecting it with somebody people think is a lunatic.Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code