i cringe at all these contracts but if anyone is worth it, trout is.
no idea why baseball gives 10 year contracts to erratic 28 year olds (this is not trout)........ i think 5 year contract, at a significantly higher salary per year, works better for everyone.
has anyone walked away from later years of huge contract? i'm guessing there have been buyouts.
will trout have never done arbitration or free agency? pretty sure this is the new baseball model. arguably bad for the big market teams but of course other teams can dump their big salaries on those teams and they will still get good players. not sure they'll get the best players in their prime though (note: boston and nyy have great at developing players too)
no idea why baseball gives 10 year contracts to erratic 28 year olds (this is not trout)........ i think 5 year contract, at a significantly higher salary per year, works better for everyone.
has anyone walked away from later years of huge contract? i'm guessing there have been buyouts.
will trout have never done arbitration or free agency? pretty sure this is the new baseball model. arguably bad for the big market teams but of course other teams can dump their big salaries on those teams and they will still get good players. not sure they'll get the best players in their prime though (note: boston and nyy have great at developing players too)