So you're saying there's a guy on the 2016 ballot who believes in the constitution (Johnson), but you (and presumably the rest of the votes-with-the-crowd types) are going to wait until a Constitutionalist is on the ballot in the future? I assume he'd have to be on a major party ballot or you wouldn't vote for him then either...neither party wants someone who follows the Constitution, and the country will definitely sink before that happens. By voting for one of the two evils, you're only supporting the demise while telling yourself doing otherwise is unpopular, so you can't do it.
There aren't many forms of government which seek to impose laws based on the most popular religion...if that's the sort of thing you're looking for, the Middle East is pretty much the only place where they do that. There was nothing broad about what he said; he specifically referenced passages of the bible which contradict our modern ethics, and to which various factions of self-labeled Christians assign varying levels of importance, depending on that sects specific interpretation of what's supposed to be Gods's word. Your beliefs being a good example of this: I know we've discussed int he past, and you've excused the Old Testament stuff by saying the New Testament stuff replaces it (despite there being only words to the contrary in the Bible to support that notion). Moreover, if Obama not being the same sect of Christian as you is a disqualifier, how the hell do you vote for a guy like Trump?
Notice how you describe everything from Trump as what he "talks" about? Now stop and ask yourself how specifically he plans to accomplish what he says...he can't take action on repatriating business, or building a wall, or repealing obamacare or any of that crap; it's not in his power to do so. Furthermore, even if it was in his power, notice how he has no plan to do it? A wall isn't going to build itself, and the money for it isn't going to turn up out of nowhere...he's not going to get China to act differently by just telling them to, etc. Bottom line: when a guy talks about doing something, but has no ideas how to accomplish it and no track record of implementing anything politically, you're foolish to hire him and just hope he figures it out.
Let me ask ya something Freezer: if Clinton was polling at 80% and Trump at 20% with no shot at winning, would you still vote for him? If so, why vote for a guy who has no shot?
No thanks on voting Trump freezer...as you say, it doesn't make sense to waste a vote on a guy who not only isn't going to win but wouldn't be any better if he did
There aren't many forms of government which seek to impose laws based on the most popular religion...if that's the sort of thing you're looking for, the Middle East is pretty much the only place where they do that. There was nothing broad about what he said; he specifically referenced passages of the bible which contradict our modern ethics, and to which various factions of self-labeled Christians assign varying levels of importance, depending on that sects specific interpretation of what's supposed to be Gods's word. Your beliefs being a good example of this: I know we've discussed int he past, and you've excused the Old Testament stuff by saying the New Testament stuff replaces it (despite there being only words to the contrary in the Bible to support that notion). Moreover, if Obama not being the same sect of Christian as you is a disqualifier, how the hell do you vote for a guy like Trump?

Notice how you describe everything from Trump as what he "talks" about? Now stop and ask yourself how specifically he plans to accomplish what he says...he can't take action on repatriating business, or building a wall, or repealing obamacare or any of that crap; it's not in his power to do so. Furthermore, even if it was in his power, notice how he has no plan to do it? A wall isn't going to build itself, and the money for it isn't going to turn up out of nowhere...he's not going to get China to act differently by just telling them to, etc. Bottom line: when a guy talks about doing something, but has no ideas how to accomplish it and no track record of implementing anything politically, you're foolish to hire him and just hope he figures it out.
Let me ask ya something Freezer: if Clinton was polling at 80% and Trump at 20% with no shot at winning, would you still vote for him? If so, why vote for a guy who has no shot?
No thanks on voting Trump freezer...as you say, it doesn't make sense to waste a vote on a guy who not only isn't going to win but wouldn't be any better if he did
