"It may be true that you can't fool all the people all the time, but you can fool enough of them to rule a large country" - Will Durant
-
Comment -
-
lol do you even understand what you're talking about? Of course not but your grasping at straws so you have to try and change the argument. But, you're still stuck in a hole.
again, winning what?
lol throwing out there "it is called a profit" doesn't fit the question I'm asking putz. Shows you have no idea what is being discussed. Or you do and are trying to weasel out as usual.
No one is debating line movement and what it means in that context. No one is denying he made a "good" bet you putz lol
with the conversation before this he clearly implies the line movement means hillary is going to win or that she is even the real "favorite" and that is not what line movement means rookie... you lose again d2bets.Last edited by brooks85; 03-16-16, 03:29 PM.Comment -
As stated above, no fan of Hillary. And doubtful.
WTF are you on about? Your statement couldn't be further from the truth, unless the numbnuts below is involved. Keep banging the drum.
You broke me?
Because I don't spend endless hours arguing with a presumed know-it-all, who's mastered the art of deflection and/or condescension? Now who's delusional? (How's that TMS?) Thanks for the chuckle, carry on.
Comment -
According to this YAHOO FINANCE News Story...
GOP Official claims "The primary voters (the people) don't choose our candidate. We do."
All these wealthy people are dramatic sore fukking cry baby losers.
If this happens... you bet your a$$ there will be riots everywhere.Comment -
I got you replying like an upset little child don't I? And that is all you can do now.As stated above, no fan of Hillary. And doubtful.
WTF are you on about? Your statement couldn't be further from the truth, unless the numbnuts below is involved. Keep banging the drum.
You broke me? Because I don't spend endless hours arguing with a presumed know-it-all, who's mastered the art of deflection and/or condescension? Now who's delusional? (How's that TMS?) Thanks for the chuckle, carry on.
I wish I remembered what it was, did you support obama? I've lost count how many people I've wrecked on that topic here. They just start blending together.Comment -
[IMG]https://****************************/hphotos-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/1175713_1125681574197131_397775419237250 5125_n.jpg?oh=e2ad6e62a54ee1da547a28ee18 daa21e&oe=579107AC[/IMG]Comment -
lol here we go again. d2bets showing he has no idea how to handicap
hillary goes to michigan... but.. the market said I was going to win!
I am glad you bet though, someone has to lose money.
here you go d2bets lol
-200 event coming up, something happens that causes bettors to hit the other side and now the event is -115 on one site and +105 on another. Event day comes and as it is about to happen whatever it was that caused people to bet the other side is made clear that it will not be an issue. Minutes before the event starts a friend leans over and ask you, who is the favorite?
What is your answer?Last edited by brooks85; 03-16-16, 04:15 PM.Comment -
Fiscally conservative, liberal (in the true sense of the word, not the bastardized term of today) when it comes to personal freedoms. Not a communist at all. But we're not a capitalist country either, in the true sense of the word.
I don't care if you're gay, gay and want to get married, want to smoke a joint or stick a needle in your arm. None of my business. One would think the party of small government would embrace that principle.
Trump is disruptive in the sense he has the old boy republicans scrambling, that's about it. The rest is noise. The closest thing we've seen to anti-establishment in my lifetime (granted, may be longer than yours) is the likes of Nader and Perot, we know how that went.
Comment -
I'm more anti-establishment than Trump - and I have about the same chance Sanders has of getting the nomination. The only reason Sanders got where he has is a) Hillary bullied every last viable Democratic candidate besides herself from even running and b) she is an atrocious candidate.
Trump personally is huge business - but he is independent. Maybe a Trump administration would be naturally friendly to hotels, casinos, and golf courses; maybe Trump will be excessively harsh on hotels, casinos, and golf courses not carrying the Trump brand - who knows? Not much risk there. It's a rhetorical question, but who has Obama helped more, Goldman Sachs or the middle class? Yet both contributed huge to put him in the White House, Trump would be a welcome break from that corrosive cycle.Comment -
[IMG]https://****************************/hphotos-xaf1/v/t1.0-9/67872_1552114625088923_78514643395849294 6_n.jpg?oh=5c8adab3cc3d4d7b57602968a9996 30d&oe=57882F26[/IMG]Comment -
Trump supporters are just like him. Arrogant, ignorant, violent.
If you are against him, you are dumb, moron, idiot etc etc.
They have no argument whatsoever. They can't create two sentences together. They can't write a paragraph without blaming and cursing.
All they can do is being rude, cursing and having low standards. Thank god there are many high standard people in this country.Comment -
Comment -
If not riots, I bet a lot of Trump supporters wont ever vote Republican again. I will NEVER vote for a republican again, if they pull that BS. Some people don't like Trump, so fukking what. A lot of people don't like Obama, a lot didn't like Bush, a lot didn't like Clinton. Bottom line is Trump has won the nomination fair and square and if its stolen from him that would be some epic BS. And it doesn't have shit to do with Trump. Its the idea that these super rich big shot white guys who run the party's think they should be able to override the will of the voters. That is some disgusting BS and its sickening that so many Trump haters are OK with it. Its easy to support democracy when your candidate wins, but anyone who is willing to go along with BS like this when they don't like the candidate who won is a fukking communist.Comment -
Ok d2bets, sure he wanted to run. Sure he has a massive ego. Sure his ego probably got bruised when the president mocked him. But the thing is, he did run, the people made their choice and choose him as the republican nominee. Can you say that even though you don't support him, the people have spoken and their will has to be respected ? FWIW I hated George Bush #2 but you know, he won fair and square even though I don't understand WTF the voters were thinking, still don't, but just the same I would NEVER have supported Some BS manipulation to overturn the will of the voters and give it to someone else like McCain or Kerry. Even though, personally I would have rather had either of them, that's not how its suppose to work and I wouldn't want special BS manipulation just because I don't like the outcome of the election.Comment -
AP states 1061 remain available and Trump has 673. He needs 564/1061 a little over half. 52.5%. Of the 3 remaining he has 55% of the delegates so far. Just the same, if he goes into the convention with 1150 and Cruz 650 and Kasik 380, the American people aren't buying the " well he didn't get 1237 so he didn't win". There were 16 candidates at one point, nearly impossible from the start for 1 person to get 50% +.Comment -
Thanx for posting this, I knew d2bets was wrong with saying trump needed 60% of remaining delegates. And it becomes a lot less after you throw Arizonas 58 in that trump will win. If he can keep Cruz from getting over 50% in Utah, which Kasich campaigning there will help do, then it will be longshot for trump not to reach 1237Comment
