Donald Trump To Run For President in 2016!!!!!!!!

[mcdonae101]

There is no scenario in which I see a Trump presidency even against Hillary. Dude can't even reach 50% of the votes in any state, even with an over hyped primary (which has no correlation to the general election). Kasich and maybe Cruz are the only ones that can beat Hillary.

It's pretty hard to get 50% when there are 4 people in the race

[Otters27]

What is the Delegate count right now? Did Trump officially win Missou?

[jordanft19]

Yes I understand that, but on the other side when Mitt Romney was running for president in 2012, he won many primaries by 50%+ against a race with the same amount of people (Winning a combined total of 52.13% of the vote) and lost the election in the end (his background in Bain Capital where he was making millions of dollars putting Americans out of work and sending their jobs to China, in 2004 while he was Governor of Mass., he signed an anti-assault rifle ban into law. Gun owners never forget or forgive such a large mistake) did not help his chances in the General. Not every Republican who has won the primary by 50%+ has won an election (Like if on the Dems side the candidate also wins by 50%+ or in a third party example in '96 when Bob Dole won over 50%, but lost the presidency to Bill Clinton) but pretty much every Republican (Nixon being the most recent exception in '68, but on the Dem side Eugene McCarthy had a similar looking scenario only winning 38.73% so it wasn't surprising) who didn't capture 50% of the primary votes lost the election big time. It shows a lot of conflict among Republican voters that do not want Trump as their nominee. Not a good sign at all. This is a $hit ton of writing and sounds confusing as hell by the way I write, so bear with me lol. Put it simply (If Republican presidential candidate wins primary 50%+ and Dem presidential candidate doesn't win 50% = Republican President (unless there is a mindf*ck third party scenario), (If Democratic presidential candidate wins primary 50%+ and Republican presidential candidate doesn't win 50% = Democratic President (unless there is a mindf*ck third party scenario), and (If both presidential candidates on the Dem and Republican side don't win 50% or win 50%+, then the more sane person in the eyes of the Americans wins)

It's pretty hard to get 50% when there are 4 people in the race.

[DwightShrute]

What is the Delegate count right now? Did Trump officially win Missou?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=republican+delegate+count

[JIBBBY]

Presidential primaries

Last updated Mar 16, 2016 at 9:55 AM PT

Delegates won

1,237 needed for nomination · 1,103 available
<svg class="_gfj" height="193"><line x1="0" x2="9999" y1="19" y2="19" stroke="#f2f2f2"></line><line x1="0" x2="9999" y1="44" y2="44" stroke="#f2f2f2"></line><line x1="0" x2="9999" y1="70" y2="70" stroke="#f2f2f2"></line><line x1="0" x2="9999" y1="96" y2="96" stroke="#f2f2f2"></line><line x1="0" x2="9999" stroke="#d6d6d6" y1="122" y2="122"></line></svg>

<svg width="322" height="193" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><svg><rect fill="#a52714" height="77" width="56" x="28" y="46" rx="2" ry="2"></rect><rect fill="#a52714" height="48" width="56" x="124" y="75" rx="2" ry="2"></rect><rect fill="#a52714" height="18" width="56" x="220" y="105" rx="2" ry="2"></rect></svg><svg><rect fill="#d23f31" height="77" rx="2" ry="2" width="56" x="28" y="46"></rect><rect fill="#d23f31" height="48" rx="2" ry="2" width="56" x="124" y="75"></rect><rect fill="#d23f31" height="18" rx="2" ry="2" width="56" x="220" y="105"></rect></svg><svg><rect width="286" x="18" fill="#fff" height="4" y="122"></rect></svg><svg><line x1="18" x2="306" stroke="#d6d6d6" y1="122" y2="122"></line></svg><svg><clipPath id="cp0"><circle cx="56" cy="148" r="15"></circle></clipPath><rect x="35" fill="#FFFFFF" height="52" width="42" y="132"></rect><image clip-path="url(#cp0)" x="40" height="32" width="32" y="132"></image><clipPath id="cp1"><circle cx="152" cy="148" r="15"></circle></clipPath><rect x="131" fill="#FFFFFF" height="52" width="42" y="132"></rect><image clip-path="url(#cp1)" x="136" height="32" width="32" y="132"></image><clipPath id="cp2"><circle cx="248" cy="148" r="15"></circle></clipPath><rect x="227" fill="#FFFFFF" height="52" width="42" y="132"></rect><image clip-path="url(#cp2)" x="232" height="32" width="32" y="132"></image></svg><svg><rect x="34" y="24" fill="#fff" height="16" width="44"></rect><rect x="130" y="53" fill="#fff" height="16" width="44"></rect><rect x="226" y="83" fill="#fff" height="16" width="44"></rect></svg><svg><text class="_pxi" x="56" y="182">Trump</text><text class="_pxi" x="152" y="182">Cruz</text><text class="_pxi" x="248" y="182">Kasich</text></svg><svg><text class="_uRi" x="56" y="38">646</text><text class="_uRi" x="152" y="67">397</text><text class="_uRi" x="248" y="97">142</text></svg></svg>

Dropped out: Bush, Carson, Christie, Fiorina... More

[mcdonae101]

Missouri and Illinois haven't been added into that

[swordsandtequila]

I can't wait when it's 1 on 1 Trump VS Hillary. First debate... Trump will mention... "She should be in Prison for what she did." Once the US people get that in their heads.... fukking Hillary won't even have a leg to stand on. Game, Set, Match.

Of course Trump is licking his chops. Hillary isn't a talker. She can't "free style" like Trump.

If you believe this you're delusional.

[brooks85]

^always a good sign to be on the other side of this clown

At least I know the difference between "your" and "you're." My clients appreciate such things.

I don't know what you do (besides post drivel), but you're not qualified for anything beyond mindless government work.

lol I bet they love your ability to quote urban dictionary too like a moron, the fact you didn't even know "low" could be used as a noun and how you can't understand the word "help."

Only an idiot would believe you're a lawyer, you work for one. You're not kidding anyone. And whoever that someone "is" is overpaying you from what you have shown. Intellectually you are garbage and nothing shows this better than your urban dictionary embarrassment along with the attempted coverup. You were buried on both.

And we didn't even touch on your "media has been a lovefest for trump" or your streak of failed predictions that were so clear to anyone else who isn't a sheep. Yeah I'm sure "your" clients are just thrilled their lawyer hired a stupid(not came calling. You actually fit the definition perfectly) person to work on the case.

[DwightShrute]

Republican Turnout
2004=123,000
2008=588,000
2012=252,000
2016=780,000+
@MissouriGOP

[ByeShea]

If you believe this you're delusional.

Really not too many delusional GOPers left regarding the appeal of Trump; next up to get Trumped are overconfident Democrats.

But it's forgivable, swords - if I spent all day on Instagram making fun of Trump and ignoring the latest Missouri numbers (nice, Dwight) I'd probably be calling other people delusional too. But then again, I'm not a dumb a$s.

[Maximo]

Jump on it. I have him +4000 to be president back in June.

It's time to hedge it buddy.

[Otters27]

Missouri and Illinois haven't been added into that

so how much will he have after the final ill and mizz allocation?

[jordanft19]

Yes I understand that, but on the other side when Mitt Romney was running for president in 2012, he won many primaries by 50%+ against a race with the same amount of people (Winning a combined total of 52.13% of the vote) and lost the election in the end (his background in Bain Capital where he was making millions of dollars putting Americans out of work and sending their jobs to China, in 2004 while he was Governor of Mass., he signed an anti-assault rifle ban into law. Gun owners never forget or forgive such a large mistake) did not help his chances in the General. Not every Republican who has won the primary by 50%+ has won an election (Like if on the Dems side the candidate also wins by 50%+ or in a third party example in '96 when Bob Dole won over 50%, but lost the presidency to Bill Clinton) but pretty much every Republican (Nixon being the most recent exception in '68, but on the Dem side Eugene McCarthy had a similar looking scenario only winning 38.73% so it wasn't surprising) who didn't capture 50% of the primary votes lost the election big time. It shows a lot of conflict among Republican voters that do not want Trump as their nominee. Not a good sign at all. This is a $hit ton of writing and sounds confusing as hell by the way I write, so bear with me lol. Put it simply (If Republican presidential candidate wins primary 50%+ and Dem presidential candidate doesn't win 50% = Republican President (unless there is a mindf*ck third party scenario), (If Democratic presidential candidate wins primary 50%+ and Republican presidential candidate doesn't win 50% = Democratic President (unless there is a mindf*ck third party scenario), and (If both presidential candidates on the Dem and Republican side don't win 50% or win 50%+, then the more sane person in the eyes of the Americans wins)

Of course, one can make the case in 1976 when Carter defeated Ford despite gaining less than 50% of the primary vote, while Ford gained 50%+ of the primary vote. In this unique scenario, Reagan refused to campaign for Ford (Would be the equivalent to Bernie refusing to campaign for or endorse Hillary). I can assure you, Bernie will endorse Hillary as he will plea to the voters to stop Trump so it will not be a Ford/Carter scenario. This won't drive every Bernie supporter to throw their support to Clinton, but just enough to ensure Trump doesn't get in the White House. He already mentioned that he is more electable than Clinton against Trump but if worst comes to worst, any democrat is better than a republican. However, if bernie doesn't endorse Hillary (Next to impossible since he knows how much damage Trump would cause), this could spell trouble for her against Trump. That's the only way she can lose

[mcdonae101]

so how much will he have after the final ill and mizz allocation?

I believe around 700

[DwightShrute]

Florida · 99 delegates

Delegates	Votes
Donald Trump (won)	99	45.7% 1,076,804
Ted Cruz	0	17.1% 403,493
John Kasich	0	6.8% 159,325

Illinois · 69 delegates

Delegates	Votes
Donald Trump (won)	49	38.8% 549,590
Ted Cruz	9	30.3% 429,267
John Kasich	4	19.7% 278,647

Missouri · 52 delegates

Delegates	Votes
Donald Trump	15	40.9% 382,093
Ted Cruz	0	40.7% 380,367
John Kasich	0	9.9% 92,533

North Carolina · 72 delegates

Delegates	Votes
Donald Trump (won)	29	40.2% 458,151
Ted Cruz	27	36.8% 418,740
John Kasich	9	12.7% 144,299

Ohio · 66 delegates

Delegates	Votes
John Kasich (won)	66	46.8% 956,762
Donald Trump	0	35.6% 727,585
Ted Cruz	0	13.1% 267,592

[DwightShrute]

looks like Missouri still incomplete

[mcdonae101]

Trump should get about 30 more from Missouri and a couple more from Illinois.

[swordsandtequila]

^always a good sign to be on the other side of this clown

Fuk you, you win that title by a landslide. Start a poll; SBR knows.

Really not too many delusional GOPers left regarding the appeal of Trump; next up to get Trumped are overconfident Democrats.

But it's forgivable, swords - if I spent all day on Instagram making fun of Trump and ignoring the latest Missouri numbers (nice, Dwight) I'd probably be calling other people delusional too. But then again, I'm not a dumb a$s.

Not sure if you're confusing me with someone else, as I don't instagram, tweet, etc., and I'm far from a dumb ass. I'm also not a fan of Hilary, nor democrat/republican. Registered independent, in reality anti-establishment. But if you don't think the left is creaming their collective pants at the thought of Trump winning the nomination then you're fooling yourself. The in-fighting among establishment, moderate, and right wingnut republicans is just icing on their cake.

[DwightShrute]

Donald Trump Says He Will Skip Fox News GOP Debate Because 'We've Had Enough'

http://www.people.com/article/donald-trump-skipping-fox-news-debate

good call imo. Nothing more to gain for either candidate. You can only ask the same questions so many times.

[jordanft19]

...

[mcdonae101]

Yes I understand that, but on the other side when Mitt Romney was running for president in 2012, he won many primaries by 50%+ against a race with the same amount of people (Winning a combined total of 52.13% of the vote) and lost the election in the end (his background in Bain Capital where he was making millions of dollars putting Americans out of work and sending their jobs to China, in 2004 while he was Governor of Mass., he signed an anti-assault rifle ban into law. Gun owners never forget or forgive such a large mistake) did not help his chances in the General. Not every Republican who has won the primary by 50%+ has won an election (Like if on the Dems side the candidate also wins by 50%+ or in a third party example in '96 when Bob Dole won over 50%, but lost the presidency to Bill Clinton) but pretty much every Republican (Nixon being the most recent exception in '68, but on the Dem side Eugene McCarthy had a similar looking scenario only winning 38.73% so it wasn't surprising) who didn't capture 50% of the primary votes lost the election big time. It shows a lot of conflict among Republican voters that do not want Trump as their nominee. Not a good sign at all. This is a $hit ton of writing and sounds confusing as hell by the way I write, so bear with me lol. Put it simply (If Republican presidential candidate wins primary 50%+ and Dem presidential candidate doesn't win 50% = Republican President (unless there is a mindf*ck third party scenario), (If Democratic presidential candidate wins primary 50%+ and Republican presidential candidate doesn't win 50% = Democratic President (unless there is a mindf*ck third party scenario), and (If both presidential candidates on the Dem and Republican side don't win 50% or win 50%+, then the more sane person in the eyes of the Americans wins)

Idk how that's relevant considering Hillary Clinton is in a race of 2 people, of course one of them will get 50+%. Let's see what trump does now that it's down to 3, maybe he can pass that marker, but heads up like Clinton is, he obviously would

[jtoler]

Headline: "Ohio Democrats ditch party to help Kasich capture Ohio"

It's misleading because Kasich would have still won very easily by almost exactly the same margin without any democrats ditching. It did not help him capture. He still would have won very very easily without it.

You have a nasty habit of reading or only recognizing half of a sentence without reading the point of the entire sentence. You prove this when you take an entire statement and bold a few words and then make claims only about those bolded words. I don't know if this is intentionally misleading on your part or if you really don't understand how to read and comprehend full sentences.

Its his lone deflection/avoidance "technique" does it over and over its a very sad thing to see, but then again your last assessment may be the truth of it all.

[brooks85]

Its his lone deflection/avoidance "technique" does it over and over its a very sad thing to see, but then again your last assessment may be the truth of it all.

jtoler your credibility, if you had any, has been gone for weeks now so you're not helping d2bets by offering support.

[StackinGreen]

If you believe this you're delusional.

I love it when idiots like this can't recognize a pattern over and over and over again. Usually it's because they don't want to believe it.

Trump is a nightmare matchup for Hillary.

You won't be posting in November because you'll probably be crying.

[CanuckG]

Nobody has any credibility when they can't post one single Trump wager. Brooksy pal why are you so fired up after being buried multiple times?

[brooks85]

Nobody has any credibility when they can't post one single Trump wager. Brooksy pal why are you so fired up after being buried multiple times?

one example


keep digging your hole canuck, you'll catch up with khicks,

[CanuckG]

I love it when idiots like this can't recognize a pattern over and over and over again. Usually it's because they don't want to believe it.

Trump is a nightmare matchup for Hillary.

You won't be posting in November because you'll probably be crying.

Bzzzz. Wrong.

[CanuckG]

one example


keep digging your hole canuck, you'll catch up with khicks,

Buried again brooksy.

[brooks85]

solid non-response!

but I already knew that is all you have.


lol btw nice thread you made the other day. Great work embarrassing yourself...

[CanuckG]

solid non-response!

but I already knew that is all you have.


lol btw nice thread you made the other day. Great work embarrassing yourself...

Which thread was that?

[Scorpion]

Ted Cruz kisses his daughter... it doesn't go well - BBC Newsnight

[TheMoneyShot]

If you believe this you're delusional.

^always a good sign to be on the other side of this clown



lol I bet they love your ability to quote urban dictionary too like a moron, the fact you didn't even know "low" could be used as a noun and how you can't understand the word "help."

Only an idiot would believe you're a lawyer, you work for one. You're not kidding anyone. And whoever that someone "is" is overpaying you from what you have shown. Intellectually you are garbage and nothing shows this better than your urban dictionary embarrassment along with the attempted coverup. You were buried on both.

And we didn't even touch on your "media has been a lovefest for trump" or your streak of failed predictions that were so clear to anyone else who isn't a sheep. Yeah I'm sure "your" clients are just thrilled their lawyer hired a stupid(not came calling. You actually fit the definition perfectly) person to work on the case.

Really not too many delusional GOPers left regarding the appeal of Trump; next up to get Trumped are overconfident Democrats.

But it's forgivable, swords - if I spent all day on Instagram making fun of Trump and ignoring the latest Missouri numbers (nice, Dwight) I'd probably be calling other people delusional too. But then again, I'm not a dumb a$s.

Brooks and Shea... don't pay any attention to Swords. All the guy uses... is delusional and clueless in every thread he posts in. Has no backbone in anything he preaches. Guy sits on the toilet taking a sh#$ while typing on his laptop.

[brooks85]

^oh I know, it escapes me what it was but swords and I went head to head a while back. Needless to say he didn't post much, if at all, in the subforum after that. He just randomly chimes in to quote me. I broke him.

Which thread was that?

lol the one where I had you upset enough to make a thread that you thought anyone would give a damn about.


Lets see how honest you are, what thread would that be?

[CanuckG]

lol the one where I had you upset enough to make a thread that you thought anyone would give a damn about.


Lets see how honest you are, what thread would that be then?

Strange. Looked like a few winners were posted in that thread. Try again brooksy!

[brooks85]

Strange. Looked like a few winners were posted in that thread. Try again brooksy!

lottery numbers for the next jackpot could have been posted in that thread and it still doesn't change the fact as to why you made it...