Minn +3.5 or NO -3.5?

[LT Profits]

LOL

Well he's better that NOTHING. Now they'll be totally one-dimensional.

[hakrjak]

Well, I think I've made my decision have now locked in:

NO -4
UNDER 47.5

Best of luck all,

- Hakrjak

[hakrjak]

p.s. -- Suzy just said on ESPN that Berrian is in NO struggling with Knee and Toe probs, but he is planning to play through the pain. Don't think he'll be much of a factor, especially playing hurt.

[Fishhead]

VIKINGS or no play.........

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/105045-like-share-forum.html

[Streamline]

arn't they playing in a dome

it was a failed attempt of sarcasm.. hinting to a tough call on this game..

[Robust]

i changed my mind hakrjak.. here is the reason as i posted on another thread:

i was leaning towards NO and under.. now i see the money being spent.

2008-10-06 MINNESOTA VIKINGS 47 47.0 17% 48% 76%
20:35 EST NEW ORLEANS SAINTS -3 -3.0 83% 52% 24%

notice how more betting is on NO, but the totals are way higher for Minn? well.. that means the sharps like the vikings.
Now this is what Nick Bogdanovich says in his weekly article:


MINNESOTA AT NEW ORLEANS: We haven't had many games on the magic number this week. New Orleans is a 3-point favorite...and this is obviously a game where any move off the number would generate significant sharp action. These look to be evenly matched teams. A line of 2.5 would bring in big money on the hosts...while a line of 3.5 would bring out the dog lovers. Right now, New Orleans has extra juice on the field goal. If the public bets that up to 3.5, you'll see a lot of sharps on the Vikings come Monday. The total has dropped from 47 to 46.5...which is a different way of betting the Vikings if you can't get more than a field goal. An Under bet is a Vikings bet in this matchup of styles.

seems these "in-the-know" people are going with Minn.

make that them + 1 riding their coatails..

Minn ML & Under

Robust

just an fyi as i said i would post if i changed my mind.

Robust

[Robust]

Well, I think I've made my decision have now locked in:

NO -4
UNDER 47.5

Best of luck all,

- Hakrjak

oooooooffff.. sorry i did not post sooner.. just saw you locked in.. i will wish you luck once more.. but this time, i am playing Minn, so luck to you means lose to me

Robust

[SlappyWhite]

i have NO -3

[bumppinee]

viking +4 game under

[Robust]

vikes and under lost.. no minus lost... damn!!!

so who won (without reading the entire thread as i am drunk )

Robust

[MJFtheGenius]

Brandon Lang and the other guys on his site are confident in that this line is a mistake....im very tempted...

a mistake????

its a billion dollar industry these oddsmakers don't make mistakes