If Atlanta Hawks lose tonight and their next game (2/25/13) by more than 3 points to the spread in both games, then on 2/27/13, the will be a JM v1 (A) bet as well as a v3 (C) bet. Just thought I would throw that out there.
-
Comment -
You need to read my post again. I never put half of my BR on an "A" game. I waited until there were two B games going the same night and basically put 25% of my BR on one of those games and 25% on the other. Also, I only did this on "VERSION 1 GAMES ". If I had tried this on version 2 or version 3 games I would have surely lost my bankroll. Also, If you play this on "A" games I think the results will be disastrous.Comment -
Wanted to throw this out there early since public will be pounding this line and it is for sure to go up.
GSW (A) bet tomorrow. Its at -1 right now for my book and 74% consensus. Bogut is out, but he only plays like 5 games entire season so does not really matter. MIN is clearly no match and I am really confused about this line.
SAC (B) no line available.Comment -
Wallco NBA Chase 110
2012-13 System to date: 57-2 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: -5.30 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 1 (-1.30 units)
v1 Plays
(A) 32-28
(B) 15-12
(C) 7-5
(D) 3-2
Losses: HOU (-35.91 u), ORL (-26.39 u)
Games for (2/24/13)
#59 Philadelphia @ N.Y. Knicks (M/L) (B) (7:05 pm EST)
#61 Sacramento @ New Orleans (**) (A) (6:05 pm EST) **
** Denotes line not available at time of post
We will ALWAYS play the M/L on favorites and the point spread (-110) on dogs. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the play. There is no point buying in this system, with one exception, if your team is the favorite, and buying down to a (-½) point spread is cheaper than playing the M/L, then by all means, buy the points, otherwise, M/L on all favorites and point spread on dogs. All results will be based on this principle. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team, and who is the favorite on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines. I will try to update my post as often as I can throughout the day, if the lines change. However, it is the individual bettor’s responsibility to get the appropriate line if it differs from the line in my post.
System rules and backtest can be found in post #219.Comment -
Can anyone confirm if Sac is 7/5 B play? It should be unless the "worst road record" filter is correct.Comment -
Thanks!Comment -
Has someone the actual stats of the V2-3 system of the real john morrison system? V1 has actual a 34-1 serie.Last edited by bateeeman22; 02-24-13, 07:35 PM.Comment -
sacramento don't deserve a team! now you know why! bunch of scrubs.Comment -
@ wallco99, after your post 229, are you sure cause of that seasons below, that your system is a profitable system? Just to look to the season 2008-09 with - 51 units, I find that's really questionable.
2011-12(75-5) **Strike shortened season**
(A) 46-31
(B) 11-20
(C) 10-10
(D) 5-5
Total loss : -20.63 units
2008-09 (86-6) THE BAD SEASON.Three losses involving large M/L.
(A) 48-44
(B) 20-24
(C) 13-11
(D) 5-6 (four of these won on next bet, too risky to play).
Total loss : -51 units
If there's a loss in one season that wasn't happened in john morrisons system v1 still today, you should change something or better go back to the original v1. The goal in one system is to make continued profits and the first goal of that is not to make lost money, so there should be reviewed seasons with no loss. If you have a system that makes in a few seasons big lost units then there's always a danger. You have to keep in mind on a road series that not each visiting team can hold the -110 line also not after 4 games no matter against which team. At the moment you also have not a + unit in this season. Why don't you simple bet the v1 system of john morrison?
Last edited by bateeeman22; 02-24-13, 09:51 PM.Comment -
Why don't you try adding them ALL, and not just picking out two to prove some bogus point. 2010-11, for +85 units, alone outweighs the two seasons you quoted. So what's your point? Are you telling me that you have created some system which will win money EVERY season gauranteed, and for some reason you choose not to post it? Or are you new to sportsbetting, and read John Morrison's website and honestly believe that he has created a system that never loses, and feel that any system that may have a losing season somewhere along the way is automatically non-profitable. You are misguided. There is a very simple solution. If you don't like it, then don't play it. And YES I am sure it is profitable. My system is is no way related to JM system, you may be getting confused.Last edited by Wallco99; 02-24-13, 10:31 PM.Comment -
Wallco,
I am relatively new to this site, (any site for that matter) I just want to thank you for all of your efforts regarding both your NBA and NHL systems. Not sure why there are so many people trying to personally attack you, second guess, change or alter your system.
Not that my thoughts mean much, just wanted you to know I appreciate you and your efforts.
ThanksComment -
If you look at all your last seasons there's only little profit with some sweat seasons. I dont need that! Why should I post the john morrison original v1 system, you can buy it yourself at his site. I use his system cause I have checked the last seasons and there's no loss after since season 2008-09 he has made stats. It looks like you haven't tested it but are pissed of his system. Ok, if you think your system is profitable don't wonder if you get 3 seasons a row -51 units. That wouldn't be nice for your bankroll.
Greetings
BatemanComment -
Aahh and now kings facing heat in our bet 2Comment -
According to JM's rules (its in his pdf) the Kings should not be a traditional play. They are the worst road team in their conference. Whether or not Stevex personally chooses to play or ignore the filter is his business. Those of us without the pdf should be informed of the filters, so that they, like Stevex, have a choice.Comment -
This is true. However, I suspect that when the 7/5 System was back-tested it would have been impossible to apply the filter using the archives. IMHO, regardless of whichever system picks the worst road team or picks the worst team ATS, that team should not have money put on them, period.Comment -
Wallco NBA Chase 110
2012-13 System to date: 59-2 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: -3.30 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 0
(2/24/13)
#59 N.Y. Knicks (M/L) (B) - Win
#61 New Orleans (M/L) (A) - Win
v1 Plays
(A) 33-28
(B) 16-12
(C) 7-5
(D) 3-2
Losses: HOU (-35.91 u), ORL (-26.39 u)
There are no system plays for (2/25/13)
We will ALWAYS play the M/L on favorites and the point spread (-110) on dogs. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the play. There is no point buying in this system, with one exception, if your team is the favorite, and buying down to a (-½) point spread is cheaper than playing the M/L, then by all means, buy the points, otherwise, M/L on all favorites and point spread on dogs. All results will be based on this principle. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team, and who is the favorite on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines. I will try to update my post as often as I can throughout the day, if the lines change. However, it is the individual bettor’s responsibility to get the appropriate line if it differs from the line in my post.
System rules and backtest can be found in post #219.Comment -
Apologies to all 7/5 followers, personal matters made me unavailable for posting the updates this past weekend. Luckily the only play that was missed was the Sacramento Bet 1 play, which unfortunately lost. If you missed the play, luck was on your side! Sacramento Bet 2 takes place tomorrow, 2/26.Comment -
Sac is not even the worst road ATS team in conference. That would be the Lakers. So even if the filter was relevant that does not apply to Sac. Unless the filter means worst SU road record.Comment -
At least +15,5 on our Bet 2 tonight, thoughts?Comment -
Wallco NBA Chase 110
2012-13 System to date: 59-2 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: -3.30 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 0
v1 Plays
(A) 33-28
(B) 16-12
(C) 7-5
(D) 3-2
Losses: HOU (-35.91 u), ORL (-26.39 u)
Games for (2/26/13):
#62 Charlotte (+15) @ L.A. Clippers (A) (10:35 pm EST)
#63 Minnesota @ Phoenix (M/L) (A) (9:05 pm EST)
We will ALWAYS play the M/L on favorites and the point spread (-110) on dogs. The team underlined and highlighted blue is the play. There is no point buying in this system, with one exception, if your team is the favorite, and buying down to a (-½) point spread is cheaper than playing the M/L, then by all means, buy the points, otherwise, M/L on all favorites and point spread on dogs. All results will be based on this principle. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team, and who is the favorite on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines. I will try to update my post as often as I can throughout the day, if the lines change. However, it is the individual bettor’s responsibility to get the appropriate line if it differs from the line in my post.
System rules and backtest can be found in post #219.Comment -
Let's go, got Minnesota +4.5 and Charlotte +18.5
Both A bets, v3 and v1 respectively
Comment -
i rather want the kings to win their bet
but a jackpot with all 3 winners would be appreciatedComment
