John Morrison 2012-13 NBA Thread

[Brundle99]

I'm finished arguing about this matter , I've got better things to do, and im sure that many other people would appretiate getting back to the betting talk rather than reading arguments.

[stevex]

JM Traditional System

12/5/2012

V1

Current chase record W/OUT buying points: 12-1
Current chase record WITH buying 3 points: 12-1
Current series pending: 2

1. Golden State Warriors A Bet +1 @ Detroit Pistons (Risking 110 TO WIN 100)
Golden State Warriors A Bet (with buying 3 points) +4 @ Detroit Pistons

2. Denver Nuggets A Bet +2 @ Atlanta Hawks (Risking 110 TO WIN 100)
Denver Nuggets A Bet (with buying 3 points) +5 @ Atlanta Hawks

V2

Current chase record W/OUT buying point: 5-0
Current chase record WITH buying 3 points: 5-0
Current series pending: 0

V3

Current chase record W/OUT buying points: 13-1-3
Current chase record WITH buying 3 points: 18-0
Current series pending: 3

1. LA Lakers B Bet -5 @ Houston Rockets (Risking 150 TO WIN 136)

2. New York Knicks A Bet -7.5 @ Charlotte Bobcats (Risking 110 TO WIN 100)
New York Knicks A Bet (since its > -3) ML @ Charlotte Bobcats

3. Dallas Mavericks A Bet +8.5 @ LA Clippers (Risking 110 TO WIN 100)
Dallas Mavericks A Bet (with buying 3 points) +11.5 @ LA Clippers

[J.M. Disciple]

He only asked about the JM System, not your opinion.

Your missing the point, It's Yankeefan's first time betting the JM System and straight away you criticize the very system he wants to use.

Yankeefan never asked you about any other system, but you were quick to trash the one he was inquiring about.

As for BS posts, your sure are creating them yourself.

Notice how I did not refer him to myself. I didn't say read JMD, steve, wallco, and Limits post did i? Of course I bash the system when everyone in this forum does not follow the traditional rules. Directing him to a better path as fast as possible.

BTW I fixed your spelling for you

[Wilba]

Glad to see you here again Wilba! Welcome!

Hi Limit, thanks! I've been keeping an eye on the 7/5 performance with great interest.
With so much arguing in here it feels just like home haha

[J.M. Disciple]

Steve LAL does not play HOU today, that was yesterdays play. They are vs NOH today.

[Wilba]

JMD - in my defence you did say exactly the following at the start of your post: "Do not buy 3 points."

All my point was, was that: depending on which method this guy chooses to follow, buying points may (or may not!) in fact be the most profitable method. I just don't think that overarching statements like "do this" "do not do this" are the best way to give people help that's all.

[J.M. Disciple]

Wallco, it's okay. But instead of an apology, can you help me out with this, I just want to make sure I understand the system correctly!

1) Tonight in the chase -110 system, we are betting MONEYLINE on SAC because they are favorites?

2) According to the rules of the JM traditional system without buying points, are these the correct plays tonight?

Lakers (B)
Golden State (A)
Denver (A)
NY Knicks (A)
Dallas (A)


THANKS for your help!

You got it buddy. Page 4 post #107 has the excel file with all the plays for rest of the season.

[mrblonde]

Hi, does anyone have the results of John Morrison's nba, mlb, nhl & nfl systems over the past few years? From what ive read on here it sounds like only his NBA system is reliable. That true? Thanks

[J.M. Disciple]

JMD - in my defence you did say exactly the following at the start of your post: "Do not buy 3 points."

All my point was, was that: depending on which method this guy chooses to follow, buying points may (or may not!) in fact be the most profitable method. I just don't think that overarching statements like "do this" "do not do this" are the best way to give people help that's all.

agree, but some times I feel new people you need to be blunt with them and spoon feed them a little bit starting out. Other wise if you just give them the facts, they may not know what to do with them.

[Wallco99]

Worlds biggest over reaction, ever

I don't know about biggest, but it definitely was a pretty big misread.

[stevex]

Good catch JM. Swap out the Rockets for the Hornets tonight fellas.

[J.M. Disciple]

Hi, does anyone have the results of John Morrison's nba, mlb, nhl & nfl systems over the past few years? From what ive read on here it sounds like only his NBA system is reliable. That true? Thanks

NHL and MLB are usually ok, but fell apart this past season. NBA is definitely most reliable. I suggest going to search and typing in JOhn morrison. There you will find the threads for each sport. Scroll through the beginning of each thread or end of each thread and you should find the records for each sport.

[mrblonde]

thanks bud

NHL and MLB are usually ok, but fell apart this past season. NBA is definitely most reliable. I suggest going to search and typing in JOhn morrison. There you will find the threads for each sport. Scroll through the beginning of each thread or end of each thread and you should find the records for each sport.

[Wallco99]

Wallco, it's okay. But instead of an apology, can you help me out with this, I just want to make sure I understand the system correctly!

1) Tonight in the chase -110 system, we are betting MONEYLINE on SAC because they are favorites?

2) According to the rules of the JM traditional system without buying points, are these the correct plays tonight?

Lakers (B)
Golden State (A)
Denver (A)
NY Knicks (A)
Dallas (A)


THANKS for your help!

1) That is correct.

2) That is correct.

[Wallco99]

Hi, does anyone have the results of John Morrison's nba, mlb, nhl & nfl systems over the past few years? From what ive read on here it sounds like only his NBA system is reliable. That true? Thanks

Is your name in reference to the character in the movie, Reservoir Dogs, or does it have some other meaning. That was a great movie.

[J.M. Disciple]

Is your name in reference to the character in the movie, Reservoir Dogs, or does it have some other meaning. That was a great movie.

Was that the movie where a cop kidnapped a child and trying to find the child for the family at the same time? Trying to save the child from a crack head family I guess.

[Wallco99]

Wallco NBA Chase 110
2012-13 System to date: 15-0 (fin. series)
System profit/loss: +15.00 units (fin. series)
Current open series: 0


v1 Plays
(A) 10-5
(B) 3-2
(C) 2-0
(D) 0-0


Games for (12/5/12):
#16 Toronto @ Sacramento (M/L) (A) (10:05 pm EST)


We will ALWAYS play the M/L on favorites and the point spread (-110) on dogs. There is no point buying in this system, with one exception, if your team is the favorite, and buying down to a (-½) point spread is cheaper than playing the M/L, then by all means, buy the points, otherwise, M/L on all favorites and point spread on dogs. All results will be based on this principle. All lines and standings are based on FINAL lines from ScoresandOdds.com/. If one of the teams we are playing switches from a favorite to a dog, after my initial post, make sure you get the appropriate line if it differs from what I have posted. The wins and losses will be based on who is the dog team, and who is the favorite on ScoresandOdds.com/ final lines. I will try to update my post as often as I can throughout the day, if the lines change. However, it is the individual bettor’s responsibility to get the appropriate line if it differs from the line in my post.
System rules and backtest can be found in post #219.

[J.M. Disciple]

Wallco as a personal preference did you continue the LAC series ATS or take a loss after B bet covered ML?

[Wallco99]

Was that the movie where a cop kidnapped a child and trying to find the child for the family at the same time? Trying to save the child from a crack head family I guess.

No, that was Ransom, the other one is better.

[Wallco99]

Wallco as a personal preference did you continue the LAC series ATS or take a loss after B bet covered ML?

If you are referring to the Chase 110 play, the system registered a win after the B bet, but against all system rules, I was playing it ATS and didn't win until my C bet. The best option for everyone for that series would have been to just skip it, the money line on the A bet was -1500, and no one in their right mind would have played that, I would hope.

[Brundle99]

Notice how I did not refer him to myself. I didn't say read JMD, steve, wallco, and Limits post did i? Of course I bash the system when everyone in this forum does not follow the traditional rules. Directing him to a better path as fast as possible.

BTW I fixed your spelling for you

Criticise - definition of Criticise by the Free Online Dictionary ...

<cite>www.thefreedictionary.com/Criticise</cite>
v. t., 1. To examine and judge as a critic; to pass literary or artistic judgment upon; as, to criticise an author; to criticise a picture.

------------------------------------------------------

enquire

You might enquire, or ask about, the difference between the words enquire and "inquire." Good question. The answer is, not much. They are the same word with different spellings. Typically the British prefer the "e" version, but both are correct.

I am from the U.K, and in this Country it is correct...you Moron.

[Wallco99]

Good stuff!

[Brundle99]

[Mrscofield25]

Criticise - definition of Criticise by the Free Online Dictionary ...

<cite>www.thefreedictionary.com/Criticise</cite>
v. t., 1. To examine and judge as a critic; to pass literary or artistic judgment upon; as, to criticise an author; to criticise a picture.

------------------------------------------------------

enquire

You might enquire, or ask about, the difference between the words enquire and "inquire." Good question. The answer is, not much. They are the same word with different spellings. Typically the British prefer the "e" version, but both are correct.

I am from the U.K, and in this Country it is correct...you Moron.

Always good to learn something. I'm Danish and sometimes I have problems with "sometimes" and "to" and "too". Is sometimes 1 or 2 words, like some times? And does it matter if I say to or too? Depends on what the sentence or situation is, I believe...?

[hagball52]

Criticise - definition of Criticise by the Free Online Dictionary ...

<CITE>www.thefreedictionary.com/Criticise</CITE>
v. t., 1. To examine and judge as a critic; to pass literary or artistic judgment upon; as, to criticise an author; to criticise a picture.

------------------------------------------------------

enquire

You might enquire, or ask about, the difference between the words enquire and "inquire." Good question. The answer is, not much. They are the same word with different spellings. Typically the British prefer the "e" version, but both are correct.

I am from the U.K, and in this Country it is correct...you Moron.

Yeah kinda like flamable and inflamable. Boy was that a tough lesson!

[Wallco99]

Always good to learn something. I'm Danish and sometimes I have problems with "sometimes" and "to" and "too". Is sometimes 1 or 2 words, like some times? And does it matter if I say to or too? Depends on what the sentence or situation is, I believe...?

But you are still MUCH better with the language than several of the Americans are in this thread.

[Mrscofield25]

But you are still MUCH better with the language than several of the Americans are in this thread.

Thanks Wallco.

[clamchowder]

JM Traditional System

12/5/2012

V1

Current chase record W/OUT buying points: 12-1
Current chase record WITH buying 3 points: 12-1
Current series pending: 2

1. Golden State Warriors A Bet +1 @ Detroit Pistons (Risking 110 TO WIN 100)
Golden State Warriors A Bet (with buying 3 points) +4 @ Detroit Pistons

2. Denver Nuggets A Bet +2 @ Atlanta Hawks (Risking 110 TO WIN 100)
Denver Nuggets A Bet (with buying 3 points) +5 @ Atlanta Hawks

V2

Current chase record W/OUT buying point: 5-0
Current chase record WITH buying 3 points: 5-0
Current series pending: 0

V3

Current chase record W/OUT buying points: 13-1-3
Current chase record WITH buying 3 points: 18-0
Current series pending: 3

1. LA Lakers B Bet -5 @ Houston Rockets (Risking 150 TO WIN 136)

2. New York Knicks A Bet -7.5 @ Charlotte Bobcats (Risking 110 TO WIN 100)
New York Knicks A Bet (since its > -3) ML @ Charlotte Bobcats

3. Dallas Mavericks A Bet +8.5 @ LA Clippers (Risking 110 TO WIN 100)
Dallas Mavericks A Bet (with buying 3 points) +11.5 @ LA Clippers

Lakers still playing the Rockets?

[BuckeyeKaptn]

Lakers still playing the Rockets?

Read post #1096

[clamchowder]

Read post #1096

sorry my bad.

[BuckeyeKaptn]

Okay, what's the post # for 7/5? Cause the way I THOUGHT, LaL should had been a play tonight. Actually, the posts for ALL systems so I can put it on my excel sheet for reference. TANK youverymuch!!!

NP, Clam...easier than typing it all out. BTW...New England or Manhattan?

[Wallco99]

Okay, what's the post # for 7/5? Cause the way I THOUGHT, LaL should had been a play tonight. Actually, the posts for ALL systems so I can put it on my excel sheet for reference. TANK youverymuch!!!

NP, Clam...easier than typing it all out. BTW...New England or Manhattan?

#50

[yankeefan1024]

Wallco nice win tonight! Made a unit!

[knugen]

finaly some 7/5 plays tonight, lets make 14 nice units tonight

[Brundle99]

Yeah kinda like flamable and inflamable. Boy was that a tough lesson!