John Morrison 2011 MLB

[G's pks]

Wallco the odds changed though...and the pitchers changed...that is why when you wrote official it would have been based on the bet that was placed at that time...I would say you either call it a win (which I do not see how) or call it a game B. Why have an unofficial play? Just causes more confusion...this is part of what went wrong in atari's thread... He kept listing all those leans...all those plays...and never any odds...to keep it clean I would say a win or a cancellation...that is all I am saying...GL...nothing else...

[GGPLAYER]

GG play of the day...... Philly -1.5 (Hamels) over SF (Cain) +141 Pinnacle

[Wallco99]

Wallco the odds changed though...and the pitchers changed...that is why when you wrote official it would have been based on the bet that was placed at that time...I would say you either call it a win (which I do not see how) or call it a game B. Why have an unofficial play? Just causes more confusion...this is part of what went wrong in atari's thread... He kept listing all those leans...all those plays...and never any odds...to keep it clean I would say a win or a cancellation...that is all I am saying...GL...nothing else...

You are right, I have removed that play. The only reason why was people asked me to do that the last time it happened. But after reviewing what you and Alex said, how can I make it official when I don't know if a team will cover twice in the same series. I didn't like it back then, and I really don't like it now. It is causing confusion, and that is what I was afraid of when it happened in June. If people want to chase it they can do it on their own. The play (when no odds or pitchers are listed) says "Play the Phils -1 1/2, regardless of pitcher or lines, and if need be, buy the alternate line at -1 1/2). It is not that I am leaving out information. But had I said Philadelphia (-1 1/2) (+190), this would be saying that if the line goes to +125 because of a pitching change don't play it. That would be incorrect, because it is a play regarless of pitchers. I can see why in your system it is important. Had the line been different, or you based your play off of another pitcher, then you may not play that game any more. I am not trying to start another argument, but just because a pertinent piece of data is placed next to your bets, doesn't mean it has the same importance in this system. I can see your point if for some reason I would have changed the pick based on a new pitcher, but the pick won't change once marked official, unless I screw up as I did once before.

[19th Hole]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 16-1 (v1)
(A) 11-6
(B) 3-3
(C) 2-1
V2 plays 5-4
V3 system 3-1
Unofficial series 20-0

*Unofficial*
(7/25/2011) San Diego (.479) @ Philadelphia (.538) R/L (D) Win

Next Plays
(7/29/2011) Kansas City @ Cleveland
(7/29/2011) Boston @ Chicago White Sox
(7/29/2011) Chicago Cubs @ St Louis
(7/29/2011) Florida @ Atlanta

Upcoming Plays
(8/01/2011) St Louis @ Milwaukee
(8/01/2011) San Diego v LA Dodgers
(8/02/2011) Kansas City v Baltimore

Notes: Just an update everyone. There are 2 possible sweeps today and maybe a couple more tomorrow. I will post my complete personal list later this week. Hope everyone is having a good week. GL all

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~
Thank you Hagball for keeping to the thread title.

[G's pks]

Exactly Wallco..why even bother if it is not offical...stick to the offical plays anything non official or leans will get you in trouble...part of the reason I have never discussed my leans for record keeping purpose... Either they are plays or not...GL..

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 157-11 (v2: 15-1)
System profit/loss: +28.98 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +8.71 units (142-11) (fin. series)
Current open series: 2 (-4.0 units)

(7/27/11):
#164 Chicago Cubs (M/L) (B) - Loss
#170 St. Louis (-1½) v2 (A) - Loss

(A) 86-84
(B) 39-44
(C) 20-23
(D) 12-11


Games for (7/28/11):
#164 Chicago Cubs (M/L) @ Milwaukee (C) *Official* (2:10 pm EDT)
#170 Houston @ St. Louis (-1½) v2 (B) *Official* (8:15 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The v1 plays may change to the other team by game time. The v2 plays will not change teams, but may change (M/L) or (R/L), the team will usually remain the same. Once Official, nothing will change. We have to be careful when playing a game that qualifies for both v1 and v2, because if a team should switch, we may be playing both sides later in the series, or we could even start out on both sides. The system will count all games as wins/losses, how you play them is your discretion. If not otherwise marked, the play will be v1.

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 16-1 (v1)
(A) 11-6
(B) 3-3
(C) 2-1
V2 plays 5-4
V3 system 3-1
Unofficial series 20-0

Next Plays
(7/29/2011) Kansas City @ Cleveland
(7/29/2011) Boston @ Chicago White Sox
(7/29/2011) Chicago Cubs @ St Louis
(7/29/2011) Florida @ Atlanta

Upcoming Plays
(8/01/2011) St Louis @ Milwaukee
(8/01/2011) San Diego v LA Dodgers
(8/02/2011) Kansas City v Baltimore

Notes: There were no sweeps yesterday. There are 5 possible sweeps today. We've got 4 system bets starting tomorrow and only one of them will be official. On the upcoming plays all 3 of them look to be official plays at this point. Finally it starts to get busy from here on out. Back in the morning. GL all

[hagball52]

Morning Wallco, made it back to back even with the long time lapse. GL today.

[G's pks]

Wallco...see I was right also for another reason on the Phillies play...they did lose..GL today...I see those damn cubs are giving you a hard time...they are always a pain...last year anytime I would post them as a pick people would scream!

[Bugs Bunny]

pinnacle is down?

[shermanator]

working fine for me

[teecee]

system is a making a nice rebound. good to see, wallco. g/l.

[adidas-b 88]

There was a sweep today that has a rematch in August. Chicago cubs vs Milwaukee Brews... Starting on 8-26

[adidas-b 88]

Here are upcoming series that has rematches in August if swept.

1. Kansas city royals vs cleveland inds 7-29 (3)

2. Baltimore vs Ny Yanks 7-29 (4)

3. Florida marlins vs Atlanta brave 7-29 (3)

4. Houston Astros vs Milwaukee brews 7-29 (3)

5. Chicago cubs vs st Louis cards 7-29 (3)

6. Tampa bay rays vs seattle mariners 7-29 (3)

7. Arizona diamond vs la dodgers 7-29 (3)

[hagball52]

Wallco, interested to see how you're going to post that Cubs - Cards play. It's also a Morrison system play.

[Andy3568]

Wallco, interested to see how you're going to post that Cubs - Cards play. It's also a Morrison system play.

This may be a complicated game for people following both JM and Wallco. Wallco has the potential to end up on both sides, and JM is a potential Cubs bet... maybe unofficial.

[Wallco99]

This may be a complicated game for people following both JM and Wallco. Wallco has the potential to end up on both sides, and JM is a potential Cubs bet... maybe unofficial.

This is not the case. Picks will be up shortly. I usually scan the series before they start. If potential C or D bets will clash I try to make mention of that before the A bets. No worries here.

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 157-11 (v2: 15-1)
System profit/loss: +28.98 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +8.71 units (142-11) (fin. series)
Current open series: 2 (-10.0 units)

(7/28/11):
#164 Chicago Cubs (M/L) (C) - Loss
#170 St. Louis (-1½) v2 (B) - Loss

(A) 86-84
(B) 39-45
(C) 20-24
(D) 12-11


Games for (7/29/11):
#164 Chicago Cubs (M/L) @ St. Louis (D) *Official* (8:15 pm EDT)
#170 Houston @ Milwaukee (-1½) v2 (C) *Official* (8:10 pm EDT)
#171 N.Y, Mets (-1½) @ Washington v2 (A) (7:05 pm EDT)
#172 Florida (M/L) @ Atlanta v2 (A) *Official* (7:35 pm EDT)


** Do not place any wagers on teams unless the word “Official” appears next to the game. All lines and standings are based on final lines from ScoresandOdds.com. Some of the unofficial plays may change to the other team by game time. Official plays will not change. Keep checking for updated posts until all games are marked “official”. If your book is offering (+1½) on the (-1½) plays above, buy the alternate line for (-1½) on the team I have listed at (-1½), not the other team. NEVER PLAY (+1½) LINE ON ANY GAME IN THIS SYSTEM.
System backtest can be found in post #3446.

The v1 plays may change to the other team by game time. The v2 plays will not change teams, but may change (M/L) or (R/L), the team will usually remain the same. Once Official, nothing will change. We have to be careful when playing a game that qualifies for both v1 and v2, because if a team should switch, we may be playing both sides later in the series, or we could even start out on both sides. The system will count all games as wins/losses, how you play them is your discretion. If not otherwise marked, the play will be v1.

[hagball52]

Has my JM MLB post been removed ?

[cleonhr]

Didnt see your post at all Hagball.... Can you repeat it?

[hagball52]

Didnt see your post at all Hagball.... Can you repeat it?

Not now I'm at work posting from my phone. I put everything up there earlier this morning evevn the complete list of upcoming plays. Looks like it's been removed. I won't be able to find out what happened until tonight. If someone would re-post. Would be appreciated.

[Wallco99]

Not now I'm at work posting from my phone. I put everything up there earlier this morning evevn the complete list of upcoming plays. Looks like it's been removed. I won't be able to find out what happened until tonight. If someone would re-post. Would be appreciated.

I didn't see it either. This crap happened to me once, I thought maybe I forgot to hit "post quick reply", maybe you did that.

[cleonhr]

Does anybody have a official mail from JM for today plays?

I just need the link.... Thanks in advance

[alexknyc]

I got an email notification of Hagball's post in chilidog's thread but it wasn't there when I checked. Happened in another thread as well and now I'm not getting emails from SBR. Thought it was just me, but apparently not.

[GGPLAYER]

I already bet Bos, Fla and ChiC. Debating KC. That is weird about Hangballs post.

[G's pks]

guys I do not follow morrison but maybe at covers or rx?

[quetu4]

Not now I'm at work posting from my phone. I put everything up there earlier this morning evevn the complete list of upcoming plays. Looks like it's been removed. I won't be able to find out what happened until tonight. If someone would re-post. Would be appreciated.

Did not see the post ... here´s JM email and plays:

Congrats on cashing on the D bet with San Diego a few days ago!
We are now a PERFECT 16-0 on the official bets so far this season,
and a remarkable 20-1 on the unofficial ones! Betting along on my
MLB system is literally free money flowing to your account!
Let's go pick up some more wins!

John Morrison's Sports Betting Champ Official System Pick(s)

7/29 Boston [A]
Chicago White Sox
------------------------------------------------

Unofficial System Picks (Don't meet the RPI requirement)

7/29 Chicago Cubs [A]
St Louis
7/29 Kansas City [A]
Cleveland
7/29 Florida [A]
Atlanta
Note: Unofficial because RPI rating filter requirement is not met.

[cleonhr]

Oh, I played on all 4, Boston M/L, and other 3 on R/L

[Andy3568]

Has my JM MLB post been removed ?

It's the strangest thing. It was here, but Wallco's post was not. I could see Wallco's response to me as #7336 on my phone, but #7336 was different on my computer. It's almost like the thread separated into two threads, and one showed up on one device and the other showed up on the other device. Now the thread with your post had disappeared.

I would repost it.

[Wallco99]

It's the strangest thing. It was here, but Wallco's post was not. I could see Wallco's response to me as #7336 on my phone, but #7336 was different on my computer. It's almost like the thread separated into two threads, and one showed up on one device and the other showed up on the other device. Now the thread with your post had disappeared.

I would repost it.

Maybe we posted at the same exact mili-second and the computer was launched into a state of confusion and disarray, thus alternating whose post was here and whose wasn't.

[GGPLAYER]

How do you double post when your the same person

[hagball52]

I didn't se todaye it either. This crap happened to me once, I thought maybe I forgot to hit "post quick reply", maybe you did that.

I know it was up there cause I went back and edited it. I'll find out tonight. GL

[Wallco99]

How do you double post when your the same person

It's hard, but I/we finally acheived it!

[Want2Win]

I Saw it originally when you posted it Hag with the records as well

[Bugs Bunny]

thanks again to wallco and hagball for the updates!!!