Ryangene's Plays

[Ryangene]

Dang that Denver line has moved quite a bit...

[sunshine777]

What line do you have?

[sunshine777]

I'm going to just play 1 unit at the 16.5. It isn't my favorite play. I'm loving GB Money Line tonight. And Hopefully these Steelers can pull this one out of there asses

[sunshine777]

Dam system had another nice win tonight. I was light on it but still better than nothing. 1-0 today 118-48 total. Lets find another winner tomorrow.

[KennyM10]

I have a warning for anyone new reading this thread. Do not believe the posted record here, the system has been horrible! You can simply go back and check the listed plays marked "play" in bolded letters. I stopped following a few weeks ago after losing quite a bit of money.

Do yourself a favor go back through the pages and read all the comments and check the "plays" then run for cover!

I laughed so hard when I saw the new posted record. Go back from the start and try to find this running record.

[Dbear13]

Ok. So here is the record to date using Teamranking/Ryans. This is tracked from the beginning of this thread. 115-45 71% Here are the potential plays for today if 4 or more services are on a side. CBB Siena 45% NBA LA Lakers 50% Boston 23% San Antonio 45% New York 27% Utah 39% Chicago 27% So if any of these games have 4 or more services on there side it will be a play tonight. Thanks Ryan for doing hard work.

Sorry if I'm asking a dumb question...I've been out of the loop for a few weeks on Ryans thread (glad I found it moved here). You went back in the old post in the other thread to get your record of 115-45??? If you did thanks for taking the time. I'm going to track your picks and a home/away power ranking system to see if there are big bets to make instead a normal unit.

[sunshine777]

rinchungthuy3 He is the one that has been tracking the Ryans record using Teamranking system. I'm just keeping it alive as I think this is the best way to use the information that Ryan is providing. Right now the System is leaning towards the Chicago 50% and Patriots at 55%. Once Ryan is done with the updates the plays will be posted here.

[Ryangene]

I have a warning for anyone new reading this thread. Do not believe the posted record here, the system has been horrible! You can simply go back and check the listed plays marked "play" in bolded letters. I stopped following a few weeks ago after losing quite a bit of money.

Do yourself a favor go back through the pages and read all the comments and check the "plays" then run for cover!

I laughed so hard when I saw the new posted record. Go back from the start and try to find this running record.

Please tell everyone why anyone would benifit on this forum from lying?

Go back and track the records for yourself with what SunShine is posting and let me know what you come up with. Don't bet your life as you'd be gone!

[Ryangene]

Early Game had Chicago(5)
Chicago/Sea OVER(18)

NewEngland and Over are also going to end in the late game, know there wont be that big of switch on the # of cappers on each side.

[Dbear13]

rinchungthuy3 He is the one that has been tracking the Ryans record using Teamranking system. I'm just keeping it alive as I think this is the best way to use the information that Ryan is providing. Right now the System is leaning towards the Chicago 50% and Patriots at 55%. Once Ryan is done with the updates the plays will be posted here.

Thanks Sunshine!!!

[sunshine777]

Chicago -10 at 50% is the play System Play today. BOL

[Ryangene]

LaClippers (7) & MississippiSt(4) are the only others with more cappers on one side, not sure yet if they fit in the Efficiency system yet..

[sunshine777]

These don't fall into the system. We only play favorites for Clippers don't work. And Mississippi is 28% and we only play 33% or above. So Bears is what we have for the Morning. BOL

LaClippers (7) & MississippiSt(4) are the only others with more cappers on one side, not sure yet if they fit in the Efficiency system yet..

[sunshine777]

Patriots -9 at 55% is a system play. Lets keep the ball rolling today guys.

[Imgoinhungry]

Nice work boys. Took the Bears.

[Ryangene]

lets get em now with the Pats....

[Imgoinhungry]

Looking forward to picks for college hoops tomorrow. Quadruple header on ESPN. Pretty stoked. My CUSE plays Pitt.

[Ryangene]

Those who love to fade haven't been to happy in the last couple of days... 1-5 for you today.. IF you are doing the 4+ system.

[bauerranch]

Keep it up

[Ryangene]

For those Playing the 4+ SYSTEM, not the Efficiency system here are the stats updated with Sundays NFL included here..

for past 50 days....


When 4 Or more Services---- 195 wins / 181 Losses
When 5 Or more Services--151 wins / 137 losses
When 6 Or more Services--112 wins /93 losses
When 7 Or more Services-- 80 wins / 77 losses
When 8 Or more Services-- 64 wins / 62 losses
When 9 Or more Services--53 wins / 48 losses

[KennyM10]

lets get em now with the Pats....

Sorry you gentlemen lost but the jets whooped these boys! Nice relaxing day fo me.

[bauerranch]

Lets get some wins today!

[KennyM10]

For those Playing the 4+ SYSTEM, not the Efficiency system here are the stats updated with Sundays NFL included here..

for past 50 days....


When 4 Or more Services---- 195 wins / 181 Losses at -110 you would be at +195 - (-199.1) or -4.1
When 5 Or more Services--151 wins / 137 losses at -110 you would add 13.7 units in losses +151 -(-150.7) so you would be +.3
When 6 Or more Services--112 wins /93 losses at -110 you would be at +112 (-102.3) or +9.7
When 7 Or more Services-- 80 wins / 77 losses -110 you would be at +80 (-84.7) or -4.7
When 8 Or more Services-- 64 wins / 62 losses at -110 you would be at +64 (-68.2) or -4.2
When 9 Or more Services--53 wins / 48 losses at -110 you would be +53 -(52.8) or +.2

If you are playing -110 this would not put you in positive money...even if through all the confusion of one of you saying play the other saying do not play and then when they win it counts either way and if it losses you do not mention. So next you add/subtract and even if you include all these plays you would be down

On the whole at -110 at best you are down!


Your total based on these plays is -2.8 units based on -110 being factored in. Just so you are aware when you keep printing these records. Have a good day and punch the numbers into a calculator you would still be in the red.

[Ryangene]

You hit it on the head Kenny IF YOU ARE PLAYING -110... If you also look over the past records I use closing line and not lines when the plays are picked. I guess if you are going to take and dig through the trash look at the times i counted a loss instead of a win.

17 Times the bet lost by .5 or 1... Users could have easily won or pushed on those bets that I counted losses. Prime example is the National Championship game. If users have more then 1 book out there there records are 100% not going to match with mine is they will for sure have more wins.

So again if you are going to do a job don't do it half @$$ed do it the right way.

[KennyM10]

All your bets are based on -110, we are not talking about the point spreads, two completely different things here, obviously math is not your strong point carry on.

[BWest]

All your bets are based on -110, we are not talking about the point spreads, two completely different things here, obviously math is not your strong point carry on.

Kenny, Just say "I don't like you Ryan" and leave it at that. The guy spends alot of time and effort on these posts and doesn't get paid for it. His work helps people learn about handicapping. If you know all about 'capping thats great! Some people use these forums for what they are intended for......exchange of info and ideas. You think Ryan's ideas are flawed. We get it, thanks for your opinion.

[Ryangene]

Ya Bwest there will be haters, people like this are what ruin it for others.

Kenny you were saying the record above WOULD show a loss of -4.1 correct? I simply wrote that 17 times I counted games as LOSSES when they could have been pushes, or even wins for people so the record above is on the side of the sportsbooks.

obviously reading is not your strong point carry on.

[demens]

Ya Bwest there will be haters, people like this are what ruin it for others.

Kenny you were saying the record above WOULD show a loss of -4.1 correct? I simply wrote that 17 times I counted games as LOSSES when they could have been pushes, or even wins for people so the record above is on the side of the sportsbooks.

obviously reading is not your strong point carry on.

Honestly bro, even with the 17 or whatever extra wins pushes i dont see how you can defend a +14x record with almost 1300!!!!! plays. Thats not a good record buddy.

The record as you have it is hitting 52.3%. Thats bad. With the extra wins it be around 53.2% and thats a HUGE sample size to go on. This wont get you anywhere flat betting.

I know this is a lot of work, but the system needs some major adjustments cause this record sucks. The teamranking sys seems to be really good although the plays it spits out look horrible to the eye. I'm very sceptical about those results staying consistent.

You should eliminate some of these services, have like a top 10 or top 20 for each sport and take unit size into consideration. I like the idea of going with the majority but you might as well be asking 30 random people their picks and go off that with the way you have it set up now.

[Ryangene]

I am keeping track of the over all 4+ records to see what it does, if you notice we have SS doing the team rankings as a filter to us to see if this is long term or not.

I guess we could just go without all of the negative junk. If someone wants to take off cappers, if someone wants to try eliminate all the free plays, if someone wants make up the tons of services each day feel free. I'm just trying to do it as a service and help others. However seem like a majority of people still seem to complain.

[Ryangene]

Dallas (8) NBA
GoldenState (4)
Orlando(5)

Kansas(4).. watch closer to game time make sure a play.
UConn(12)
KansasSt (4)
Pittsburgh(11)

[sunshine777]

Ok everyone. Yesterday went 1-1 for an overall record of 119-49 using the Teamranking Filter. Today we only have 1 play.

Dallas -4.5 (33%) BOL

[Dbear13]

Ok everyone. Yesterday went 1-1 for an overall record of 119-49 using the Teamranking Filter. Today we only have 1 play. Dallas -4.5 (33%) BOL

I had Golden State at 47% did I figure it out wrong? It had 17 of the 26 arrows

[sunshine777]

Yeah there is 36 different stats. So for it to qualify for NBA you need a minimum of 22 arrows in the teams direction. For CBB you need atleast 24 in the teams direction. So Dallas the only play today and they got killed. So we look to play another day tomorrow. Ryan thanks for all your hard work it is appreciated.

I had Golden State at 47% did I figure it out wrong? It had 17 of the 26 arrows

[ponyshowdown]

thanx ryan. i wish angry people would stick to their own system and stay out of threads when they have nothing nice to say

[demens]

thanx ryan. i wish angry people would stick to their own system and stay out of threads when they have nothing nice to say

Some people try to give constructive criticism but it falls on deaf ears. This system is not a good one, but it can be. It sucks that someone puts in some much time working on it but its not producing anything useful.