John morrison 2010 mlb system

**JW Cash** · 06-07-10, 10:56 AM

Originally posted by LasVegasSystems

Any method that relies on any variant of a progressive betting scheme will ultimately self-destruct. The problem is betting a lot to win a little which is the opposite of proper risk/reward money management theory. When you lose a [c] bet or bets, you run the risk of gambler's ruin. It doesn't matter if Morrison or any other progressive schemer wins for 10 years without a loss. At some point it time, you will lose and lot and destroy your bankroll. Professional sports bettors (who bet a lot per unit) do not employ progressive betting. Many amateurs (who bet a little per unit) do. Logically, that should tell you a lot.

Thats BS

To make a blanket statement like that is ludicrous..........

I always use a modified 3 game chase that has less wagered on a C bet than
was wagered on the B Bet...so no mountain of loss on the C Bet

I average 16 -1 a month on my chases

The occassional loss I get , I simply recover with future chases

It works , always did work and always will....

And that is ALL I am gonna say on the subject Mr Las Vegas ....

**Cyril** · 06-07-10, 11:04 AM

Once we start a chase on the A game, then we don't stop it on the B or C games, regardless of the RPI difference. This is not written in the system pdf, but that is how it has been so far..

In this case, Oakland has exactly 0.015 lower RPI than LA Angels, so it is right on the border of official plays.
If the difference was 0.016 or higher then it would have been an unofficial play.

**Darkside Magick** · 06-07-10, 11:17 AM

Originally posted by LasVegasSystems

Any method that relies on any variant of a progressive betting scheme will ultimately self-destruct. The problem is betting a lot to win a little which is the opposite of proper risk/reward money management theory. When you lose a [c] bet or bets, you run the risk of gambler's ruin. It doesn't matter if Morrison or any other progressive schemer wins for 10 years without a loss. At some point it time, you will lose and lot and destroy your bankroll. Professional sports bettors (who bet a lot per unit) do not employ progressive betting. Many amateurs (who bet a little per unit) do. Logically, that should tell you a lot.

lmaooooooooooooooooooo

systems dont fail.... people fail.

**Darkside Magick** · 06-07-10, 11:20 AM

Originally posted by JW Cash

Thats BS

To make a blanket statement like that is ludicrous..........

I always use a modified 3 game chase that has less wagered on a C bet than
was wagered on the B Bet...so no mountain of loss on the C Bet

I average 16 -1 a month on my chases

The occassional loss I get , I simply recover with future chases

It works , always did work and always will....

And that is ALL I am gonna say on the subject Mr Las Vegas ....

so true jw... i double my bankroll easy with all my chases...yes i tweak my system to a point that even the c bet is basically a (a) bet. systems dont fail ...people fail!!!

**dukipl** · 06-07-10, 12:02 PM

So JM confirms, we got ourselves a pick. GL all!

**pollito** · 06-07-10, 12:29 PM

Originally posted by dvb02

Pollito, could you tell me the dates and teams for the last 2 V1 plays and the last V3 play. Thanks

v1.0
Cincinnati A May 10
Toronto A May 10
Baltimore B May 12
San Francisco LOST May 13
Chicago Cubs C May 16
Boston A May 24
Chicago WSox A May 24
Toronto A May 24
Boston A Jun 04
NY Mets A Jun 04

v3.0
Tampa Bay A May 15
Colorado B Jun 06

**jphil** · 06-07-10, 01:28 PM

Originally posted by Kev the Brit

Jphil, I also read rule #2 somewhere in his pdfs, and decided that he made a mistake, because of other statements and examples he has written. The principle is that the team that was swept (ie the one we bet on) must be good enough to win (on the ML or +RL if available) at least one game in the series. The official criteria is that the swept team's RPI, if not higher than, must not be more than, .015 less than their opponents.

So, you are correct to follow #1. JM could write better.

Regards
Kev

Thanx Kev for that confirmation! Greatly appreciated!

GL w/ TEX!!

**stevex** · 06-07-10, 01:35 PM

Just to get a little clarification, is Oakland an official play tonight?

**Kelloggs** · 06-07-10, 01:37 PM

Originally posted by Kelloggs

I made a schedule that I will update as the season progresses if anyone is interested http://www.sahlsa.dk/junk/jm_mlb_schedule_2010.xls

Added:
Flo-Nym 28/6
Sea-Laa 15/7

**stevex** · 06-07-10, 11:51 PM

Well, at least the A's lost by more than 1 run so JM couldn't count it as a win. Any way, moving on to tomorrow, we will have the B bet on the A's in the night game vs. the Halos. Over at Diamond I got Oakland at +1 1/2 -120 so make sure you guys get this in at your book because I'm sure that juice will climb before tomorrow nights game.

**dukipl** · 06-08-10, 03:13 AM

3 Plays for today (all official):

v1.[ML play] Milwaukee Brewers (bet A) vs. Chicago Cubs
v1.[RL play] Oakland Athletics (bet B) vs. LAA Angels
v3.[ML play] Texas Rangers (bet A) vs. Seattle Mariners

**darkdracos** · 06-08-10, 04:54 AM

Originally posted by dukipl

3 Plays for today (all official):

v1.[ML play] Milwaukee Brewers (bet A) vs. Chicago Cubs
v1.[RL play] Oakland Athletics (bet B) vs. LAA Angels
v3.[ML play] Texas Rangers (bet A) vs. Seattle Mariners

Hey all. Just found this forum but I've been following JM's systems all year on my own. It's good to find a place that I can double-check my plays, but I also have appreciated an explanation of the v2 and v3 plays. I'd skipped those and looks like I've missed a few good ones.

I missed out on the Mariners last night as I don't quite trust the "unofficial" plays to risk my BR yet, but I'll be playing my second v3 since I found this forum. Good luck to us all.

**conper** · 06-08-10, 05:11 AM

So today we have
Oakland Athletics (bet B) vs. LAA Angels
How come he hasnt email us yet ?
He email us only final pick for NBA only 5 mins before .

**LasVegasSystems** · 06-08-10, 06:00 AM

Originally posted by JW Cash

Thats BS

To make a blanket statement like that is ludicrous..........

I always use a modified 3 game chase that has less wagered on a C bet than
was wagered on the B Bet...so no mountain of loss on the C Bet

I average 16 -1 a month on my chases

The occassional loss I get , I simply recover with future chases

It works , always did work and always will....

And that is ALL I am gonna say on the subject Mr Las Vegas ....

You are right- it is a blanket statement that is true as much as if you cut off your head you will die. Progressive bettors know nothing of statistics- generally the same people that think if heads comes up 1000 times in a row- it is more likely that tails will be seen on the next flip of the coin. Progressive bettors bet small and they do for a very logical reason.

**Jeripunk** · 06-08-10, 06:05 AM

terrible

**PsychicSports** · 06-08-10, 06:53 AM

You can still be smart even if you increase the risk. Losses definitely subtract several wins when you lose a chase, but if you win enough then you can make profit from a chase.

**CatPulp** · 06-08-10, 09:30 AM

Originally posted by JW Cash

Thats BS

To make a blanket statement like that is ludicrous.......... I always use a modified 3 game chase that has less wagered on a C bet than was wagered on the B Bet...so no mountain of loss on the C Bet I average 16 -1 a month on my chases The occassional loss I get , I simply recover with future chases It works , always did work and always will.... And that is ALL I am gonna say on the subject Mr Las Vegas ....

Would you mind sharing the details of your modified chase system so that we all don't get burned when the inevitable C bets do hit?

**NIK kID** · 06-08-10, 09:39 AM

i had that Texas is a (B) bet its that rigth??? And also baltimore is (A)???

**conper** · 06-08-10, 10:09 AM

nobody reply my thread
Again....

So today we have
Oakland Athletics (bet B) vs. LAA Angels
How come he hasnt email us yet ?
He email us only final pick for NBA only 5 hours before .

**chilidog** · 06-08-10, 10:13 AM

he did send an email, conper; he sent it at 2:41am this morning

**knugen** · 06-08-10, 10:14 AM

I got his email, oakland B bet
mileaukee A bet
Texas A bet version 3
Baltimore unofficial A bet

**dvb02** · 06-08-10, 10:21 AM

Does anyone have the complete list of all the official plays that have occurred this year and when the won/lost (a,b, or c)? I seem to be missing a few. Thanks

**BamaBill67** · 06-08-10, 10:42 AM

...

**stevex** · 06-08-10, 11:14 AM

It's funny because when you look at Weavers numbers against the A's he's done very well this year and has had 2 good starts against them this year. As for Oakland's pitcher Mazzaro, you can't say the same. Again though, you leave the handicapping skills out of this system.

**jphil** · 06-08-10, 12:55 PM

O.T.:

I just want to give you a heads up that there's going to be another
NBA bet that falls under betting criteria of the Sports Betting
Champ system today on June 8th. We enjoyed incredible success
throughout this NBA season with a perfect 62-0 record, but it's not
over yet! The NBA finals give us an opportunity to bank in one last
victory, and it's gonna be a big one!

The NBA system calls for you to make an [A] bet on the LA Lakers.
Make sure to bet on the point spread, and buy 3 points.

**venture** · 06-08-10, 01:02 PM

Morrison sent me an official play on the Lakers. I like this, I dont think any team in the 2-3-2 formate has won all 3 straight at home.

**Grecdogg** · 06-08-10, 01:22 PM

Originally posted by venture

Morrison sent me an official play on the Lakers. I like this, I dont think any team in the 2-3-2 formate has won all 3 straight at home.

So whats the play?

**dvb02** · 06-08-10, 01:27 PM

Originally posted by Grecdogg

So whats the play?

Lakers and buy 3 pts

**Grecdogg** · 06-08-10, 01:31 PM

Originally posted by dvb02

Lakers and buy 3 pts

How do you know? I asked Venture

**BettingWorld** · 06-08-10, 01:42 PM

Boston for churs

**jphil** · 06-08-10, 01:43 PM

post 1216 is jm's e-mail.

**Grecdogg** · 06-08-10, 01:46 PM

Originally posted by dvb02

Lakers and buy 3 pts

its at +3 right now for the Lakers, so your saying buy 3 to make it +6?

**venture** · 06-08-10, 01:51 PM

Originally posted by Grecdogg

How do you know? I asked Venture

Take the lakers buy 3 points.

**venture** · 06-08-10, 01:59 PM

Sorry jphil i did not see your post, did not mean to post same thing.

I dont see Boston taking the series at home, no way LA losses 4 in a row, that being said im going to chase LA ML THIS IS NOT MORRISONS SYSTEM

**pollito** · 06-08-10, 03:35 PM

Originally posted by dvb02

Does anyone have the complete list of all the official plays that have occurred this year and when the won/lost (a,b, or c)? I seem to be missing a few. Thanks

See post number 1197...