Scott Carter from Justbet keeps calling claiming I owe him money

[bostonboss]

seems to me they need the money.....why would they settle for 80 percent and put it into his account? makes no sense

[BigDaddy]

also

Dwight

has your processor informed you that the charges have been reversed?

[MBENZ]

did they state they were reversed?

i am just asking.

Yeah I know what you're saying but from a common sense standpoint it must have been charged back.These guys didn't just pop out of the woodwork and I don't see them making a stink without justification.Couple that with the fact that this Scott is not your 5D Tony type at all.

[bostonboss]

how do you know that mbenz or do you work for justbet too?

[BigDaddy]

well i don't work for any book.

[bostonboss]

me either

[MBENZ]

how do you know that mbenz or do you work for justbet too?

Because I do a shitload of research before depositing at any book and it's not SBR rating that I use,it's people that are in the industry and have been there for years.I have dealt with Scott Carter dozens of times and he is a straight up guy,no way all this story is correct.

[bostonboss]

all opinion no facts

[Unchained]

Dwight so you don't mind getting screwed?

how does justbet have so many employee reps with post counts so high

do you guys work or post all day?

BD..... Schrute used to swear up and down he wasn't a JustBet employee.

Why he would lie and just not admit it back then no one knows.

Scott Carter aka Schrutie getting called out. hahahaha

[BigDaddy]

i just find it odd they have so many posts.

i guess i need to learn a few things.

so Scott is dwight?

he posts as scott carter elsewhere so i figured he would be scott carter here as well

[bostonboss]

maybe he has 3 accounts with SBR ha ha ha

[shari91]

kerrywoods - You do realise that many posters saw the two threads you started on 8/10: 1. "Has anyone ever charged back?" and 2. "Hypothetically if a book refuses to payout on winnings do you **********?" before I happened to see them and delete them but not before each thread received several replies?

I'm not passing judgement or implying you did **********. Just suggesting that posting those two threads on the same day and now being involved in a dispute a couple of weeks later where a book is stating you've charged back might be one reason why some posters are having difficulty believing you're 100% innocent here. Best of luck sorting it all out.

[DwightShrute]

BD..... Schrute used to swear up and down he wasn't a JustBet employee.

Why he would lie and just not admit it back then no one knows.

Scott Carter aka Schrutie getting called out. hahahaha

Simply not true Unchained. If you got that impression, my apologies. I do my own thing but also do contribute to Justbet. I tried to help a poster who noticed some incorrect wording on the site and another time and player Mudcat was given an incorrect bonus that differed from what he expected. I helped because it happened to be on days where Shark was off and Justbet wants fix things immediately when things don't go as planne. In life, things do go wrong sometimes. I rarely jump into to Justbet discussions because Shark79 is the man here and has been the person who guys know and respect.

[BigDaddy]

shari

that info was not needed but i understand why you posted it.

one question though

why would that type of thread get deleted?

i'm pretty sure i have seen threads like that in the past at forums.

[BigDaddy]

Scott

bottom line you work for justbet.

no matter how you spin it you have a interest in them.

nothing wrong with that.

[KEdge2k]

Something shady is afoot here.

[sharpcat]

kerrywoods - You do realise that many posters saw the two threads you started on 8/10: 1. "Has anyone ever charged back?" and 2. "Hypothetically if a book refuses to payout on winnings do you **********?" before I happened to see them and delete them but not before each thread received several replies?

I'm not passing judgement or implying you did **********. Just suggesting that posting those two threads on the same day and now being involved in a dispute a couple of weeks later where a book is stating you've charged back might be one reason why some posters are having difficulty believing you're 100% innocent here. Best of luck sorting it all out.

You can always count on Shari91 to put these clowns in check


Kerrywoods your a scumbag pay your debt.

[DwightShrute]

yes Bigdaddy I do. I wasnt trying to spin anything. Shark79 is the man here. He's a great guy with a business approach I admire and respect. he asked if I could help, so I did. I post about sports and politics mostly here and rarely dabble into any justbet discussion out of respect for Shark and SBR. Sbr is a great site filled with a lot a interesting characters. I love it. I am a sports nut and a political junkie, so being in the sports industry and being able to post on SBR is just perfect for me.

[kerrywoodwins20]

So after getting banned from posting for about an hour while scott carter spreads more lies on this thread, I've realized that SBR is obviously going to take the side of a book they sponsor.

100+ calls in 8 days from Scott Carter. You guys tell me if that is the act of a book that is respectable and professional.

You tell me. There is no money owed, Citi Bank has told me there was no ********** on their end and I sure as HELL did not initiate anything, and I actually just sent the money to Citi Bank to pay off the 1139 owed on my CC, 1000 of that went to this crummy operation.

[BigDaddy]

scott do you gamble? if so you should become a SBR PRO and support the site that you love so much.

you can even use justbet as your book to turn pro i think.

just a suggestion

[kerrywoodwins20]

No comment on Shark, I'm sure he is a respectable guy. Shark is being forced to defend the behavior of his employee (Scott Carter) who went off the deep end and harassed me to death.

Thankfully, Shari re-enabled my posting ability so I could post the truth.

[AimingHigh]

kerrywoods - You do realise that many posters saw the two threads you started on 8/10: 1. "Has anyone ever charged back?" and 2. "Hypothetically if a book refuses to payout on winnings do you **********?" before I happened to see them and delete them but not before each thread received several replies?

I'm not passing judgement or implying you did **********. Just suggesting that posting those two threads on the same day and now being involved in a dispute a couple of weeks later where a book is stating you've charged back might be one reason why some posters are having difficulty believing you're 100% innocent here. Best of luck sorting it all out.

To conclude based on the thread so far:
Likelihood of Kerrywoods being a scammer: -2000

To those defending him, think about what he's doing to your options to deposit and get paid by books. I hope he gets blacklisted.

[kerrywoodwins20]

Its a shame, Scott Carter... if you weren't so busy harassing me and threatening me and calling me more than 100 times in the last 8 days, we could have talked about how we both like the show The Office.

[kerrywoodwins20]

To conclude based on the thread so far:
Likelihood of Kerrywoods being a scammer: -2000

To those defending him, think about what he's doing to your options to deposit and get paid by books. I hope he gets blacklisted.

I will post the necessary information to SBR to clear my name. The charges are still standing on my CC. The 100 + phone calls in 8 days DID happen, even though I requested I not be contacted dozens of times.

You just lost a lot of money playing a -2000 favorite that lost.

[shari91]

shari that info was not needed but i understand why you posted it. one question though why would that type of thread get deleted? i'm pretty sure i have seen threads like that in the past at forums.

There truly was no hidden meaning behind my post. I happened to see this thread in between looking at tennis lines and when I started to read through it, I saw a few guys giving kerry a hard time. And then when I kept seeing the words "charge back" I remembered deleting those two threads. Those threads had several posts and views before I managed to get to them so I was trying to give him an idea of why some guys may be automatically writing him off as a scammer. I prefer to reserve judgement on people until all the facts come out because I've been wrong in the past when I've jumped to conclusions one way or the other and felt foolish after. But I also understand that not everyone is like that.

And to answer your question as to why they get deleted: It's difficult enough as it is for Americans to get money to and from offshore books. Why would we want to provide a How to Stiff a Book and Potentially Mess Up Yet Another Processing Option manual?

[topgame85]

I think we all know what happened here at this point...... Kerry can clear his name easily but instead decided to discredit a book that he scammed....lets move on.....

[bostonboss]

let him post it....if he proves it his name is cleared

[BigDaddy]

topgame

that is the problem he might be guilty but no proof has been shown that he is.

i can't even get the question answered if the processor has informed justbet that the charges have been reversed yet.

[sharpcat]

I say Kerrywoods be banned from posting about JustBet until he can prove that he did not ********** on them. No reason to give a scam artist a platform to stand on and attempt to discredit a sponsor book who he ripped off.

[bostonboss]

that is the big question bigdaddy...doubt it will ever be answered.

[bostonboss]

sharpcat...........just bet hasnt proven their innocence either

[sharpcat]

topgame

that is the problem he might be guilty but no proof has been shown that he is.

i can't even get the question answered if the processor has informed justbet that the charges have been reversed yet.

Kerrywoods was the one that came in here crying foul, burden of proof is on him. If he wants sympathy for JustBet calling him to collect he needs to prove that he is innocent and that the calls are not justified.

[spankie]

So after getting banned from posting for about an hour while scott carter spreads more lies on this thread, I've realized that SBR is obviously going to take the side of a book they sponsor.

100+ calls in 8 days from Scott Carter. You guys tell me if that is the act of a book that is respectable and professional.

You tell me. There is no money owed, Citi Bank has told me there was no ********** on their end and I sure as HELL did not initiate anything, and I actually just sent the money to Citi Bank to pay off the 1139 owed on my CC, 1000 of that went to this crummy operation.

Right-o Scammer.

We get the picture.

[sharpcat]

sharpcat...........just bet hasnt proven their innocence either

Kerrywoods started the claim burden of proof is on him.

[bostonboss]

bottom line after seeing this i would never put any money into justbet..............innocent or guilty the way they handled this was unprofessional.