So I had this dispute with a book I don't want to name. They voided 5 different bet slips worth of 33k.
6 months ago I contacted IBAS to review the case. Today I received their answer. One statement by the book really takes the cake. They say that a comment in a betting forum caused the betting company damage that exceeds the sum of one of the betslips (worth of 4,290 EUR). Therefore they had to void it and won't change their decision
IBAS didn't want to comment on this, of course, because the argument as such is just obviously abstruse.
If you assume that every negative public review causes a provable and quantifiable damage to a company don't you think all the companies in this world would sue the composers of the negative reviews? No court on this planet would accept that a simple negative review which is based on facts and which intends to inform the public about an issue can be considered as a justiciable defamation. Otherwise the court rooms would be full of legal cases about negative reviews. The internet is full of negative reviews. But the court rooms are not. Why not?
Ridiculous.
6 months ago I contacted IBAS to review the case. Today I received their answer. One statement by the book really takes the cake. They say that a comment in a betting forum caused the betting company damage that exceeds the sum of one of the betslips (worth of 4,290 EUR). Therefore they had to void it and won't change their decision

IBAS didn't want to comment on this, of course, because the argument as such is just obviously abstruse.
If you assume that every negative public review causes a provable and quantifiable damage to a company don't you think all the companies in this world would sue the composers of the negative reviews? No court on this planet would accept that a simple negative review which is based on facts and which intends to inform the public about an issue can be considered as a justiciable defamation. Otherwise the court rooms would be full of legal cases about negative reviews. The internet is full of negative reviews. But the court rooms are not. Why not?
Ridiculous.
