I guess you didn't even get to the part where it's explains the trustless system. Nobody holds your money/keys but you, nobody has ever has access to it but you.
While that could possibly be valid for some, it's pretty doubtful over enough time. You're implying holders and bettors are two distinct group - when in fact there is massive overlap. It's pretty safe to say these days that gamblers are one of the largest groups that benefits from the advantages that crypto brings. We've already had about roughly 1% of the entire wgr supply bet and we've hardly been going only a week now.
There is far more support among the community for lower fees than you're assuming, I can tell you this first-hand. Speak to some of them yourself if you don't believe me. Even strictly non-bettors could be swayed by the simple fact that lower fees could bring in an amount of extra volume that more than outweighs the lesser overall fee.
Also as bigtymer said earlier, with crypto there is always the possibility of a fork. Holders know this too, and as more networks start to launch it's reasonable to expect more and more downward pressure on fees.
Lower fees are less a matter of if, and more of a matter of when.
Regarding danshan, there is no sense in engaging much with a troll posing as a big bettor. He's already blew up on the two other guys posting above, optional and danwinkler. I also found this very recent quote in his own words quite enlightening - "I truly want to learn to be profitable in this game and so far I have had only success in bouncing round balls and nothing else. I hope that continues this year. best of luck and I am glad to contribute but I wont argue line value but I will argue anything else if you want!"
Maybe I could teach you to win at poker at least?
Once you start getting booted off of networks (or having to pay a higher commission) simply for winning, then maybe you'll start to understand some of the benefits that wgr is bringing to the table.
While that could possibly be valid for some, it's pretty doubtful over enough time. You're implying holders and bettors are two distinct group - when in fact there is massive overlap. It's pretty safe to say these days that gamblers are one of the largest groups that benefits from the advantages that crypto brings. We've already had about roughly 1% of the entire wgr supply bet and we've hardly been going only a week now.
There is far more support among the community for lower fees than you're assuming, I can tell you this first-hand. Speak to some of them yourself if you don't believe me. Even strictly non-bettors could be swayed by the simple fact that lower fees could bring in an amount of extra volume that more than outweighs the lesser overall fee.
Also as bigtymer said earlier, with crypto there is always the possibility of a fork. Holders know this too, and as more networks start to launch it's reasonable to expect more and more downward pressure on fees.
Lower fees are less a matter of if, and more of a matter of when.
Regarding danshan, there is no sense in engaging much with a troll posing as a big bettor. He's already blew up on the two other guys posting above, optional and danwinkler. I also found this very recent quote in his own words quite enlightening - "I truly want to learn to be profitable in this game and so far I have had only success in bouncing round balls and nothing else. I hope that continues this year. best of luck and I am glad to contribute but I wont argue line value but I will argue anything else if you want!"
Maybe I could teach you to win at poker at least?
Once you start getting booted off of networks (or having to pay a higher commission) simply for winning, then maybe you'll start to understand some of the benefits that wgr is bringing to the table.
