Women and people with an IQ under 100..

[chilidog]

... should not be allowed to vote. That's all.

[sparkyasu]

Obese people who pig out on chili dogs should not be allowed to vote either

[chilidog]

Obese people who pig out on chili dogs should not be allowed to vote either

If these people that you speak of are female, or have an IQ less than 100, then I concur. However, I fail to recognize the correlation between dietary habits and sex/intellect.

[onetrickpony]

If these people that you speak of are female, or have an IQ less than 100, then I concur. However, I fail to recognize the correlation between dietary habits and sex/intellect.

fat ppl have lower iq's because they spend most of their time on food and nothing else, same goes for anorexic ppl so yes it does matter.

[chilidog]

fat ppl have lower iq's because they spend most of their time on food and nothing else, same goes for anorexic ppl so yes it does matter.

I was not aware of this, but a quick google search does validate this. It also says that religious people also statistically have lower IQs as well.

So, now my list of people who should not be allowed to vote are:

1. Women
2. People with an IQ under 100
3. Overweight people
4. Religious people

I have to loosen up the criteria though, because I have eliminated such a large portion of the general populace. Alright, religious people can vote (provided they are not female and have an IQ equal to or greater than 100). But if you take up more than one seat on an airplane, bus, train, or any other seat, then you should not be allowed to vote. You don't matter, and are just a waste on society.

[Wulfman14]

stupid thread.

[onetrickpony]

I was not aware of this, but a quick google search does validate this. It also says that religious people also statistically have lower IQs as well. So, now my list of people who should not be allowed to vote are: 1. Women 2. People with an IQ under 100 3. Overweight people 4. Religious people I have to loosen up the criteria though, because I have eliminated such a large portion of the general populace. Alright, religious people can vote (provided they are not female and have an IQ equal to or greater than 100). But if you take up more than one seat on an airplane, bus, train, or any other seat, then you should not be allowed to vote. You don't matter, and are just a waste on society.

how do we go about getting this law passed?

[chilidog]

stupid thread.

So which of the criteria do you fall under? Female, stupid, fat, or religious (or a combination of the 4)?

[chilidog]

how do we go about getting this law passed?

Sadly, I am outnumbered, and such a law will never get passed, because men have become too emasculated to do something about it.

[ngates815]

I've always wondered this....


Did 75% of black people vote for Obama? And out of that percentage(whatever it was) was it there first time ever voting?

[onetrickpony]

I've always wondered this.... Did 75% of black people vote for Obama? And out of that percentage(whatever it was) was it there first time ever voting?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=black+vote+for+obama

[robmpink]

CD, why do you come to this conclusion about females? Just curious.

[ngates815]

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=black+vote+for+obama

Thank you.

and shocking.

[chilidog]

CD, why do you come to this conclusion about females? Just curious.

Women think emotionally, instead of logically. We've all attempted to have arguments with women, and we know how that goes. Women don't know what they want; they just want what they can't have.

[BadNina]

Single huh? Only girls who hang with you are paid to? Gay?

[goofyre]

I'd take women over religious people. I doubt their logic all the time.

[Wulfman14]

So which of the criteria do you fall under? Female, stupid, fat, or religious (or a combination of the 4)?

i am a 30 year old guy you dumb queer. why you hating on these groups ? some fat chick left you and joined the church ?

[19th Hole]

... should not be allowed to vote. That's all.

Well...If you want to keep your
voting franchise then you had better start reading pal.
You know what books look like don't you?
Cuz' making statements like the one you posted
could not come from anyone with an I.Q over 79.

[The Madcap]

The reason women are allowed to vote is because educated women in the 1900's became self-aware enough to realize they didn't have to accept being second class citizens. They realized if they stopped putting out, well then they could get men to do whatever they wanted. Before long they had the right to vote. And so women should be allowed to vote, or eventually none of us are getting laid. What we need to do is find a way to make sure their vote doesn't count.

[Mikail]

Voting is pointless anyway. I have an abundant IQ I'm male and I wouldn't even consider wasting my time voting.

[The Madcap]

Well...If you want to keep your
voting franchise then you had better start reading pal.
You know what books look like don't you?
Cuz' making statements like the one you posted
could not come from anyone with an I.Q over 79.

Are you saying women aren't emotional sacks of shit who have no clue what they are talking about?

I love women. I stick up for them all the time. But when it comes to the government, those who actually have the ability to logistically deduce why it is they stand for what they stand for beyond an emotional feeling equates to roughly .01%. And that's probably a generous estimate.

And I don't say that out of anger or spite or misogyny. I say it out of disappointment. Because I refuse to marry any woman who can't explain to me why she feels what she feels. And in my travels very few can. In my entire life I've personally known about three. That's it. Two were married and the other was fat. So no dice for me. I have hope I will meet another before I die. But I'm not holding my breath.

[chacker]

Chilidog, who has more of a right to vote of these two people. Both people are non-religious males of an appropriate weight. Person 1 has an IQ of 110 but knows nothing of politics or the issues. Person 2 has an IQ of 95, which is only just below average, and is a political science teacher whose hobbies also revolve around political science. My point is basically that just because a person has a higher IQ than another doesn't mean they know more about politics.

[gryfyn1]

What we need to do is find a way to make sure their vote doesn't count.

Based on the choices people generally choose from it seems like no one's vote counts.

[wtt0315]

that would knock out the entire board

[hustla]

I was not aware of this, but a quick google search does validate this. It also says that religious people also statistically have lower IQs as well.

So, now my list of people who should not be allowed to vote are:

1. Women
2. People with an IQ under 100
3. Overweight people
4. Religious people

I have to loosen up the criteria though, because I have eliminated such a large portion of the general populace. Alright, religious people can vote (provided they are not female and have an IQ equal to or greater than 100). But if you take up more than one seat on an airplane, bus, train, or any other seat, then you should not be allowed to vote. You don't matter, and are just a waste on society.

5. Unemployed people

[HeeeHAWWWW]

Sounds like an excellent idea to me.

[EmpireMaker]

religious people are the worst voters they vote on one issue not whether the candidate will be a good leader (do a good job)

[chilidog]

When the United States was founded, only white, male, property-owners were allowed to vote. The Founding Fathers felt that only property-owners would take this right of citizenship seriously since they owned a literal stake in the young nation. To them, it was self-evident that only those with a stake in society should have a voice in determining who would govern that society. They believed that, since government was established to protect property and personal freedom, those involved in choosing that government should have some of each.

[JerseyLove]

Very true I agree with this statement

[chilidog]

Single huh? Only girls who hang with you are paid to? Gay?

See, you prove my point exactly. You have let your emotions cloud your cognitive thinking ability.

[chilidog]

i am a 30 year old guy you dumb queer. why you hating on these groups ? some fat chick left you and joined the church ?

Being a 30 year old man only precludes you from the female group. There are still the fat, stupid, or religious criteria as well.

[chilidog]

Well...If you want to keep your
voting franchise then you had better start reading pal.
You know what books look like don't you?
Cuz' making statements like the one you posted
could not come from anyone with an I.Q over 79.

I'm guessing that you don't meet my criteria?

[chilidog]

What we need to do is find a way to make sure their vote doesn't count.

Are you saying women aren't emotional sacks of shit who have no clue what they are talking about?

I love women. I stick up for them all the time. But when it comes to the government, those who actually have the ability to logistically deduce why it is they stand for what they stand for beyond an emotional feeling equates to roughly .01%. And that's probably a generous estimate.

And I don't say that out of anger or spite or misogyny. I say it out of disappointment. Because I refuse to marry any woman who can't explain to me why she feels what she feels. And in my travels very few can. In my entire life I've personally known about three. That's it. Two were married and the other was fat. So no dice for me. I have hope I will meet another before I die. But I'm not holding my breath.

I like this guy; he gets it.

[str]

Politicians will say anything to get your vote.

Politicians will grandstand to get your vote.

It is all an act.

It's not what they tell you or what you can see that is the problem, it's what they do not tell you and you do not see that is.

[mighty maron]

Women think emotionally, instead of logically. We've all attempted to have arguments with women, and we know how that goes. Women don't know what they want; they just want what they can't have.

Gamblers generally do not think logically as there is rare if no circumstances in which you can beat the house....