Climate Change

[brooks85]

here is chatgpt 3.0 lying to me before they put handcuffs on it in the 4.0 update.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is the Earth's climate warming?

Yes, the Earth's climate is warming. The scientific consensus is that the Earth's average surface temperature has increased by about 1.1 degrees Celsius (2.0 degrees Fahrenheit) since the late 19th century, and that most of the warming that has occurred since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities, primarily the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas. This conclusion is based on multiple lines of evidence, including direct temperature measurements, paleoclimate data, and computer models of the climate system.

The warming of the Earth's climate has led to a range of impacts, including melting glaciers and ice sheets, rising sea levels, more frequent and severe heat waves, more intense rainfall events, and increased frequency and intensity of some extreme weather events such as hurricanes and wildfires. Addressing the causes and impacts of climate change is a complex and pressing global challenge, and requires concerted action on a variety of fronts, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy, and adapting to the impacts of climate change that are already occurring.

But, a consensus is not a fact.

You are correct that a scientific consensus does not necessarily equate to an absolute fact. However, scientific consensus is based on the evaluation of a large body of scientific evidence from multiple sources, and is the most reliable conclusion that can be drawn from the available data. Scientific consensus is based on rigorous testing and replication of experiments, peer review of research findings, and the accumulation of evidence over time. While individual studies may produce conflicting results, a consensus emerges as the weight of evidence in support of a particular conclusion becomes overwhelming.

In the case of climate change, the scientific consensus that the Earth's climate is warming and that human activities are the primary cause is based on an extensive body of research conducted over many decades by thousands of scientists from around the world. This includes direct observations of temperature and other climate-related data, modeling of the climate system, and analysis of the geological and historical record. The scientific consensus on climate change is supported by numerous scientific organizations, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the National Academy of Sciences, and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, among others.

While there may be some ongoing debate and disagreement among scientists on certain aspects of climate change, the overwhelming weight of evidence supports the scientific consensus that the Earth's climate is warming and that human activities are the primary cause.

Do you know about the scandal Climategate 1.0 or Climategate 2.0?

Yes, I am aware of the Climategate controversy. Climategate refers to the publication of private email exchanges among climate scientists that were hacked and made public in 2009 and 2011. The first release, known as Climategate 1.0, involved emails from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia in the UK, while the second release, Climategate 2.0, involved additional emails from the same source.

The release of the emails generated controversy and led to allegations of scientific misconduct and manipulation of climate data by some climate scientists. However, multiple investigations by independent panels found no evidence of scientific misconduct or manipulation of data. The investigations concluded that the emails did not undermine the scientific consensus on climate change, and that the evidence for human-caused global warming was strong and robust.

The Climategate controversy did highlight some issues related to data transparency and the need for more open and transparent scientific communication. However, it did not change the overall scientific consensus on climate change, which remains that the Earth's climate is warming and that human activities are the primary cause.

But Climate gate proved that the consensus was formed off falsified data.

That is not an accurate representation of the conclusions of the investigations into the Climategate controversy. While the release of the hacked emails generated controversy and allegations of scientific misconduct, multiple independent investigations found no evidence of scientific misconduct or manipulation of data. The investigations concluded that the emails did not undermine the scientific consensus on climate change, and that the evidence for human-caused global warming was strong and robust.

The investigations did identify some issues related to data transparency and the need for more open and transparent scientific communication. However, they did not find evidence that the scientific consensus on climate change was based on falsified data.

It is important to note that the scientific consensus on climate change is based on a vast body of evidence from multiple sources, including direct observations of temperature and other climate-related data, modeling of the climate system, and analysis of the geological and historical record. While individual studies may produce conflicting results, the weight of evidence in support of the scientific consensus on climate change is overwhelming.

[DwightShrute]

So, nobody knows anything, and they all are just saying and making up what is best for them. Thats great.

The pandemic disagreements happened over weeks, then months, the climate debate has been going on for decades. We should have more and better data over that amount of time.

not saying everyone does. Are you saying power doesn't corrupt sometimes? How does one explain 34 trillion in debt and unconditionally listen to those same people who did it? How can someone watch CNN after they lied to your face for 3 years about Russian collusion? Yet, people still do. But an outsider who dared take on the establishment who continuously opposed them for their competence, their endless wars and so many other things, his the bad guy who must be stopped at any cost? Even if it means weaponizing the DOJ, 2 sham impeachments, and blatant election rigging with social media and the liberal establishment media? Shame on anyone who refuses to believe their own eyes and would rather believe the lies than to side with someone like Trump.

[brooks85]

You call someone an idiot that you don't know, or even know what their opinion is. That says a lot more about you than them.

You want even watch the first 5 mins of that video.

She teaches introduction to quantum mechanics. What do you do?


"of course not, it is already settled science that humans are not causing climate change."

you are completely wrong..

"You call someone an idiot that you don't know"

answer this.

What does knowing someone have to do with them being an idiot?


Answer carefully. I don't know you...

[jackpot269]

yes I did watch. I am not saying humans aren't contributing to climate change. There are also many scientists which will offer different opinions about climate change, and yes, they have an IQ at least 20 points higher than yours and probably 40.

Different topic but same argument. All those doctors during the pandemic who disagreed with what the "experts" were saying. They were ridiculed about all sorts of things such are natural immunity, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, masks, 5 feet danger 6 foot safe, spraying fruits and veggies with sanitizers, and so many more. They lost their jobs, had their medical licenses revoked or threatened to have the revoked if they went against the narrative. Are they dumb people? Or are they just a threat to all those politicians and drug companies who were gonna make billions? Dr. Malone who invented the mNRA vaccine said it didn't work. I guess you are much smarter.

You couldn't even call it the China virus or Wuhan virus or you were racist even thought every news outlet called it that at the beginning until they wouldn't anymore because the sitting president did. If you even suggested it came from a lab in Wuhan, you were banned from social media.

Many of these so called "experts" were just people in positions of power who didn't even take their own lock downs seriously by traveling and going to dinner indoors surrounded by people. Why do you suppose? The healthcare workers who worked in these hospitals who refused to take the jab and were fired because of it. Do you know more than them? Would you be at all surprised if in a few short years, more people will die from the jab then all those who died from covid? Some highly intelligent people who know a lot about it think so. I guess, like climate change, we will have to wait and see.

So, nobody knows anything, and they all are just saying and making up what is best for them. Thats great.

The pandemic disagreements happened over weeks, then months, the climate debate has been going on for decades. We should have more and better data over that amount of time.

[jackpot269]

of course not, it is already settled science that humans are not causing climate change.

" Her IQ is at least 20 points higher than yours and probably 40."

obviously not, she made that video and you watched it. She is an idiot or a grifter(more likely).

You call someone an idiot that you don't know, or even know what their opinion is. That says a lot more about you than them.

You want even watch the first 5 mins of that video.

She teaches introduction to quantum mechanics. What do you do?


"of course not, it is already settled science that humans are not causing climate change."

you are completely wrong..

[DwightShrute]

You didn't watch the video! Ill bet every dime I got and can get, that the physicist in that video knows a lot more about science than you. ill cash in all the equity in my house. Her IQ is at least 20 points higher than yours and probably 40.

yes I did watch. I am not saying humans aren't contributing to climate change. There are also many scientists which will offer different opinions about climate change, and yes, they have an IQ at least 20 points higher than yours and probably 40.

Different topic but same argument. All those doctors during the pandemic who disagreed with what the "experts" were saying. They were ridiculed about all sorts of things such are natural immunity, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, masks, 5 feet danger 6 foot safe, spraying fruits and veggies with sanitizers, and so many more. They lost their jobs, had their medical licenses revoked or threatened to have the revoked if they went against the narrative. Are they dumb people? Or are they just a threat to all those politicians and drug companies who were gonna make billions? Dr. Malone who invented the mNRA vaccine said it didn't work. I guess you are much smarter.

You couldn't even call it the China virus or Wuhan virus or you were racist even thought every news outlet called it that at the beginning until they wouldn't anymore because the sitting president did. If you even suggested it came from a lab in Wuhan, you were banned from social media.

Many of these so called "experts" were just people in positions of power who didn't even take their own lock downs seriously by traveling and going to dinner indoors surrounded by people. Why do you suppose? The healthcare workers who worked in these hospitals who refused to take the jab and were fired because of it. Do you know more than them? Would you be at all surprised if in a few short years, more people will die from the jab then all those who died from covid? Some highly intelligent people who know a lot about it think so. I guess, like climate change, we will have to wait and see.

"Follow the money" exists for a reason. Case after case throughout history has shown this to be true and there were always those who wouldn't believe it initially.

[brooks85]

You didn't watch the video! Ill bet every dime I got and can get, that the physicist in that video knows a lot more about science than you. ill cash in all the equity in my house. Her IQ is at least 20 points higher than yours and probably 40.

of course not, it is already settled science that humans are not causing climate change.

" Her IQ is at least 20 points higher than yours and probably 40."

obviously not, she made that video and you watched it. She is an idiot or a grifter(more likely).

[jackpot269]

and do you give any credence to those scientists that disagree?

Before you answer.

We have all said at one time or an other, that when they do studies on a subject, its nice to see who actually funded the study. I bet you have at one time or another. Coffee is great for you, funded by coffee growers. Milk is great source of iron, funded by the dairy association. Etc Etc. Heck, doctors used to promote a certain brand of cigarettes at one time. Oxycontin was prescribed to millions of people by doctors when they knew it was addictive worse than heroin. Some climate scientists said that if you want government funding to study the migration of the brown squirrel, you won't get a dime, but if you want government funding to study the migration of the brown squirrel as it pertains to climate change, you will get your funding.

Now you can answer.

First, did you watch the video?

I'm willing to listen to their reasoning and science that leads them there. Why do these experts, from both sides not have a public debate and put all the cards on the table?
So they can say, why they believe the way they do, and what the science is to back up their claim. The ones that think humans have nothing to do with climate change are in the minority. If scientists have no integrity, then we are in big trouble when it comes to Politicians, car salesman, real estate salesman, and reality tv stars. The world has come way to far the last 150 years for most scientist to on the take for just money.

I agree about looking at where funding comes from. Its like when big Tabacco said Tabacco was not addictive but was habit forming, they did the studies themselves.

[DwightShrute]

You didn't watch the video! Ill bet every dime I got and can get, that the physicist in that video knows a lot more about science than you. ill cash in all the equity in my house. Her IQ is at least 20 points higher than yours and probably 40.

and do you give any credence to those scientists that disagree?

Before you answer.

We have all said at one time or an other, that when they do studies on a subject, its nice to see who actually funded the study. I bet you have at one time or another. Coffee is great for you, funded by coffee growers. Milk is great source of iron, funded by the dairy association. Etc Etc. Heck, doctors used to promote a certain brand of cigarettes at one time. Oxycontin was prescribed to millions of people by doctors when they knew it was addictive worse than heroin. Some climate scientists said that if you want government funding to study the migration of the brown squirrel, you won't get a dime, but if you want government funding to study the migration of the brown squirrel as it pertains to climate change, you will get your funding.

Now you can answer.

[jackpot269]

humans are not causing climate change, anyone who understands science knows this which is why it is easy to fool sheep like ewe.

Also, I got chatgpt to lie to me about climate change before they put the handcuffs on it.

You didn't watch the video! Ill bet every dime I got and can get, that the physicist in that video knows a lot more about science than you. ill cash in all the equity in my house. Her IQ is at least 20 points higher than yours and probably 40.

[brooks85]

A Physicist Was Asked, “How Do We Know Climate Change Is Caused by Humans?” She Went To ChatGPT For Answers

humans are not causing climate change, anyone who understands science knows this which is why it is easy to fool sheep like ewe.


Also, I got chatgpt to lie to me about climate change before they put the handcuffs on it.

[jackpot269]

A Physicist Was Asked, “How Do We Know Climate Change Is Caused by Humans?” She Went To ChatGPT For Answers

[b1slickguy]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The WEF and Klaus Schwab are now raising the alarm about coffee producing too much CO2.<br><br>They want to take your coffee next. <br>�� <a href="https://t.co/0M4pk6LLVE">pic.twitter.com/0M4pk6LLVE</a></p>&mdash; Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) <a href="https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1749868403966308858?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >January 23, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[b1slickguy]

[b1slickguy]

No way!
It wasn't climate change that caused the massive fires in Canada last year?
They almost had me.


Man, 22, charged in connection with largest wildfire in N.S. history

https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/man-22-c...tory-1.6731499

[DwightShrute]

[DwightShrute]

2023 smashes record for world’s hottest year by huge margin




[COLOR=var(--standfirst-text)]Rapid reduction in fossil fuel burning urgently needed to preserve liveable conditions, say scientists, as climate damage deepens

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/09/2023-record-world-hottest-climate-fossil-fuel?utm_term=659da7b9e24d2b3fbd2f9df606fc662f&utm_campaign=MorningMailAUS&utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&CMP=morningmailau_email

[/COLOR]

2 days ago — Icy winter weather blanketed the U.S. on Saturday as a wave of Arctic storms threatened to break low-temperature records in the heartland

1 day ago — Record-breaking cold weather continued to overwhelm the U.S. on Sunday and is likely to last into midweek, according to meteorologists. The bone
12 hours ago — An arctic cold outbreak is forecast to deliver record-breaking, frigid air to parts of the country, including the Deep South through ...

9 hours ago — Dangerous freezing air from the Arctic continued sweeping across the US on Monday, prolonging a bitter cold blast that has set record-low

On the morning of December 23rd, an extreme arctic moved through the region, leading to record temperatures and wind chills in the

1 day ago — A record-breaking Arctic cold snap is sweeping across much of the U.S. ... Saturday brought record-breaking cold to much of the northern Plains ...
1 day ago — Icy winter weather is blanketing US as a wave of Arctic storms threatens to break low-temperature records in the heartland and spread cold

Freezing US winter storms threaten to break low-temperature records

Washington in New Hampshire recorded a ridiculously cold -108.2-degree wind chill, setting the national record. The temperature was -47 degrees, with a wind speed of 89 mph. The temperature later "warmed" to -45 degrees with a wind gust of 115 mph.

Dec 30, 2023

2 days ago — Billings, Montana, was hit with "brutally cold" temperatures with a drop to negative 25 degrees around midnight, breaking a daily record low set

49 minutes ago — About 79% of the U.S. to see below-freezing temperatures: Over 140 daily cold records could be broken Monday and Tuesday from Oregon to
2023 is a Year of Record Cold Temperatures

World's coldest air in 2023 was just recorded, and it's on

Jan 16, 2023 — An astonishing -62.4°C was recorded in Tongulakh, Siberia on January 14th. In addition to becoming Earth's coldest temperature recorded in 2023

Arctic Cold Outbreak To Smash Records


Brutal arctic blast expands its reach as the South deals with

2 hours ago — Nearly 80% of US to see below freezing temperatures: Over 140 daily cold records could be broken Monday and Tuesday from Oregon to ..

[Hareeba!]

2023 smashes record for world’s hottest year by huge margin




[COLOR=var(--standfirst-text)]Rapid reduction in fossil fuel burning urgently needed to preserve liveable conditions, say scientists, as climate damage deepens

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/09/2023-record-world-hottest-climate-fossil-fuel?utm_term=659da7b9e24d2b3fbd2f9df606fc662f&utm_campaign=MorningMailAUS&utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&CMP=morningmailau_email

2023 was the hottest year on record. But Trump's team has a plan to make things hotter: reversing Biden's climate initiatives, firing climate scientists, and blocking the gov't from even studying the climate crisis, let alone fighting it.


Do they have another planet to live on?

[DwightShrute]

[Hareeba!]

2023 smashes record for world’s hottest year by huge margin


[COLOR=var(--standfirst-text)]Rapid reduction in fossil fuel burning urgently needed to preserve liveable conditions, say scientists, as climate damage deepens

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/09/2023-record-world-hottest-climate-fossil-fuel?utm_term=659da7b9e24d2b3fbd2f9df606fc662f&utm_campaign=MorningMailAUS&utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&CMP=morningmailau_email

[/COLOR]

[Hareeba!]

Records were made to be broken. When they were broken 100 years ago, they were just as major. It's just Nature.

"2023 is a whole different ball game in terms of the massive margin by which these records have been broken."

just nature?
where's nature been for the past 11,000 years?

[slewfan]

Records were made to be broken. When they were broken 100 years ago, they were just as major. It's just Nature.

In the meantime, freedom rings out once again..


GREEN GRAB

Federal court delivers fatal blow to California city pushing natural gas ban

[Hareeba!]

David Reay, executive director of the Edinburgh Climate Change Institute at the University of Edinburgh, told CNN:


“We have become all too used to climate records falling like dominoes in recent years.
But 2023 is a whole different ball game in terms of the massive margin by which these records have been broken.”

[DwightShrute]

Many Earth 'scientists' agree that the climate is getting hotter... as long as that grant money continues to stream in.

funny how people seem to always remind us who is paying for the study when it comes to all sorts of things such as whether eggs or coffee or butter or wine is good for you but never question it when it comes to the climate.

[slewfan]

Many Earth 'scientists' agree that the climate is getting hotter... as long as that grant money continues to stream in.

[DwightShrute]

[b1slickguy]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Al Gore claims that if we don&#39;t address the climate, we will lose our capacity for &#39;self-governance.&#39;<br><br>Reality check:<br><br>Surrendering to the green agenda means LOSING our sovereignty. <a href="https://t.co/kAN1AaV4DY">pic.twitter.com/kAN1AaV4DY</a></p>&mdash; Daniel Turner (@DanielTurnerPTF) <a href="https://twitter.com/DanielTurnerPTF/status/1739675467412619772?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 26, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[slewfan]

RUNNING ON EMPTY

Maine forced to stop and think about EV mandate vote after widespread power outage


This is definitely the result of TDS by the Democrats forcibly rushing people into buying these beasts.

[slewfan]

• Al Gore is probably the first climate change billionaire since initiating the global warming hoax with his An Inconvenient Truth film. Although he is not the only charlatan who’s grown wealthier by scamming municipalities to invest in useless alternate energy sources like eagle-killing wind turbines. Soon, brain dead academic disciples were shoving this lie down the throats of public-school students. The very idea that humans need to save the billions year-old planet by going green is beyond dumb. The fact is that the levels of carbon dioxide that we’ve been told is so deadly is actually way lower than what the planet requires for life. Carbon dioxide is necessary for plant life which will convert it to oxygen which the planet needs. Do your homework and buy Fake Catastrophes and Threats of Doomby a real scientist, Patrick Moore. You will be amazed at how many lies we’ve swallowed as gospel.

[slewfan]

[b1slickguy]

[DwightShrute]

do your part.

[DwightShrute]

wanna bet he voted democrat, he uses pronouns and owns at least one Che Guevara t-shirt?

[b1slickguy]

[DwightShrute]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Can’t fix stupid <a href="https://t.co/7gVnfs4XLx">pic.twitter.com/7gVnfs4XLx</a></p>&mdash; Clown World ™ �� (@ClownWorld_) <a href="https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/status/1731693163738186019?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >December 4, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>