Put up or shut up kvb!!!
Collapse
X
-
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#141Comment -
Auto DonkSBR Aristocracy
- 09-03-13
- 43558
#142Basically Khan told KVB that "Two Girls One Cup" was a bartending how-to video, and when KVB wanted to impress with his cocktail-making skills at the family cookout, imagine the horror on Grandma's face when she trudged into the kitchen and saw her precious grandson watching a depraved mud-wrestling match between two skanks without toilet access.
There was a very awkward silence at the dinner table that day and I believe KVB is still wrestling with the devastating aftermath. Grandma was thoroughly traumatized as well and refuses to have chocolate pudding in the house when KVB is around.
Khan has yet to issue an apology on the matter though KVB demands one if they are ever to repair their relationship.
it quickly came rushing back to me as that sphincter let it rip.....
those girls would be idea for that phenomenon that occurs when one encounters the Cosby's while tappin' ass, as discussed thoroughly in the sister thread to this one, with the title referencing fudge packing.....
Comment -
JMonSBR Hall of Famer
- 12-11-09
- 9800
#144I quander how many times the "little red triangle" right below the post number mark as been hit between the two. Or are they doing old school PMs to the mods?Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#145
Comment -
Auto DonkSBR Aristocracy
- 09-03-13
- 43558
#146well, to get to the bottom of it all, it seems to me, due to having been around and in a few trials over the years, the dispute seems to be whether the thread was a "winner," or "loser"..... and whether certain other statements were lies, or the truth
regarding the cfl thread, we all know from lookin' at JJ Gold's spreadsheets what a "loser" looks like.... looking at Dfish's results in the nba playoffs promo provides a pretty good example of what a "winner" is in sports betting....
there is this thing I've heard of, called "evidence".... that generally will prove or disprove one's claims....
as we tend to call threads losers or winners based on the w-l record of the plays set out in the thread, what does that evidence show, for starters? and, in particular, at the times relevant to the statements made that it was a "loser", was it in fact a loser? what is the evidence related to the performance of the thread?
"lies" have been alleged, some one throw out the evidence proving the lie, for example....
if the thread looked anything like my performance in the nba finals cappin' promo, for example, it would indeed be a "loser"....
regardless, I have no dog in the hunt; and wish you both well.... Peavy had a good thought about having a few cold ones or smoking a joint, and letting the dispute go.... seems like pretty sound advice....Comment -
Ghenghis KahnSBR Posting Legend
- 01-02-12
- 19734
#147well, to get to the bottom of it all, it seems to me, due to having been around and in a few trials over the years, the dispute seems to be whether the thread was a "winner," or "loser"..... and whether certain other statements were lies, or the truth
regarding the cfl thread, we all know from lookin' at JJ Gold's spreadsheets what a "loser" looks like.... looking at Dfish's results in the nba playoffs promo provides a pretty good example of what a "winner" is in sports betting....
there is this thing I've heard of, called "evidence".... that generally will prove or disprove one's claims....
as we tend to call threads losers or winners based on the w-l record of the plays set out in the thread, what does that evidence show, for starters? and, in particular, at the times relevant to the statements made that it was a "loser", was it in fact a loser? what is the evidence related to the performance of the thread?
"lies" have been alleged, some one throw out the evidence proving the lie, for example....
if the thread looked anything like my performance in the nba finals cappin' promo, for example, it would indeed be a "loser"....
regardless, I have no dog in the hunt; and wish you both well.... Peavy had a good thought about having a few cold ones or smoking a joint, and letting the dispute go.... seems like pretty sound advice....Comment -
Ghenghis KahnSBR Posting Legend
- 01-02-12
- 19734
#148hey, I'm just saying what my impression of KVB as a member is; I don't know enough about his theories, strategies, or analyses to know whether he's got major game or not....
But from what I can see, he's genuinely putting it out there in an effort to enlighten the masses here, and certainly has no ill intent or deception in mind.....
but as I'm not a serious sports bettor, I'm in no position to opine on whether his info is the Holy
Grail of betting strategies, or falls somewhere else on the spectrum of how to succeed as a sports bettor....
Seems to be a solid guy to me, trying to help....Comment -
Ghenghis KahnSBR Posting Legend
- 01-02-12
- 19734
#149another note, i will never touch cfl ever again, it's like being drunk and sleeping with a fat girl and regretting it for the rest of your life. you just feel dirty betting on that crap of a sport.Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#150well, to get to the bottom of it all, it seems to me, due to having been around and in a few trials over the years, the dispute seems to be whether the thread was a "winner," or "loser"..... and whether certain other statements were lies, or the truth
regarding the cfl thread, we all know from lookin' at JJ Gold's spreadsheets what a "loser" looks like.... looking at Dfish's results in the nba playoffs promo provides a pretty good example of what a "winner" is in sports betting....
there is this thing I've heard of, called "evidence".... that generally will prove or disprove one's claims....
as we tend to call threads losers or winners based on the w-l record of the plays set out in the thread, what does that evidence show, for starters? and, in particular, at the times relevant to the statements made that it was a "loser", was it in fact a loser? what is the evidence related to the performance of the thread?
"lies" have been alleged, some one throw out the evidence proving the lie, for example....
if the thread looked anything like my performance in the nba finals cappin' promo, for example, it would indeed be a "loser"....
regardless, I have no dog in the hunt; and wish you both well.... Peavy had a good thought about having a few cold ones or smoking a joint, and letting the dispute go.... seems like pretty sound advice....
Here is the first half of the season...
Comment -
Ghenghis KahnSBR Posting Legend
- 01-02-12
- 19734
#151please read the thread for a good laugh. the guy loses and says he has a 7-2 record while i was posting. i think i won three straight bets in a row just fading the guy. can't make this shit up.Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#152The thread started 1-0 and never fell behind.
Every play is tracked by spreadsheet, in the order they were posted.
I mentioned a quarterly review each time and have a basic one here. I have listed the plays posted in this thread from weeks 3, 4 and 5.
I have broken this down into the all bold plays I’ve listed as well as just the first buy point for each game. On the left is my record per game. If you just entered the market once on my play then that would be an issue.
You can see the results per $100 bet for each bold play and each issue.
There is also a crude review of the closing line and whether it was beat…something I wasn’t concerned with too much these weeks and doesn’t account for prices.
Finally you can see whether I, or the models being worked with, predicted the line movement. While I didn’t always get the best line, there were no unpredictable movements on these plays.
For the 12 games, the early season models being used were 10-2 ATS and 5-7 against the moneylines (which means little without the prices). The models were 5-5 against the Totals, with 2 games right on the spread.
Notice that a bettor betting on each game fared slightly better than the bettor picking up each bold play.Issue $100 Bet Closing Beat the Predict Record Play Result Per Bold Per Issue Price Closer? Movement? 1-0 9-Jul Ott/Edm OVER 45.5 (-108) W 92.59 92.59 45.5 = Y 1-0-1 10-Jul BC -3 (-105) P 0 0 -3 = Y 2-0-1 17-Jul Edm -145 W 68.97 68.97 -150 + Y 3-0-1 BC/SSK UNDER 51.5 (-103) W 97.09 97.09 52 - Y 3-1-1 24-Jul Cal/Ott Under 47.5 (-110) L -100 -100 46.5 - Y Cal/Ott Under 47 (-110) L -100 3-2-1 BC -3 (+102) L -100 -100 -2 - Y BC -2.5 (-115) L -100 BC -2 (-108) L -100 4-2-1 Cal/Ott 2nd UNDER 24 (-110) W 90.91 90.91 24 = Y 5-2-1 25-Jul Win/Edm UNDER 50.5 (-102) W 98.04 98.04 50.5 = Y Win/Edm UNDER 51 (-112) W 89.29 6-2-1 Win TT UNDER 22.5 (-110) W 90.91 90.91 22.5 7-2-1 26-Jul Hamilton +1 (-101) W 99.01 99.01 1.5 - Y Hamilton +2 (-105) W 95.24 Hamilton +1.5 (+102) W 102 7-2-1 424.05 437.52
Looking back I can see one too many BC bets, or this condition would be different.
The win-loss record per issue was 7-2-1; one of those wins is against a money line.
Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#153So we all know Kahn has been lying about KVB all along, now it's time to come clean as to why.
Hard to believe jealousy would cause you to go so overboard, but that's what I keep hearing and reading.
Are you going to man up or just keep hurling insults and telling lies?Comment -
BigLoadOfCurrySBR Rookie
- 05-28-16
- 14
#154This thread beats any movie in the cinema for entertainment value.Comment -
Ghenghis KahnSBR Posting Legend
- 01-02-12
- 19734
#155kvb is one crazy mother fukker. even the posters that like him thinks his crazy now.
honestly, i was pissed off for his stalking but i actually feel sorry for the guy.
mental illness is no joke...Comment -
KVBSBR Aristocracy
- 05-29-14
- 74817
#156
I love this stalking projection. You stalked Kahn, I just forced you to fess up like a little kid.
You were stubborn, so it took time, but not anymore.Comment -
Ghenghis KahnSBR Posting Legend
- 01-02-12
- 19734
#157Comment -
Auto DonkSBR Aristocracy
- 09-03-13
- 43558
#161well, it's a shoe-in for one of those "AVN Awards".... think that stands for Adult Video News Awards......
tho candidly, there are only one or two entries in the "Best Shit Pushing Scene Involving Middle-Aged Degenerate Gamblers"...... and I've heard the other entry, involving Bobby ScamEagle Waves, is very, very weak, depicting Waves "paying for" his gov't subsidized internet by letting the bill collector bend him over on his worn out front porch with numerous missing floor boards, such that Waves actually falls through the porch floor and down to the dangerous pit of discarded heroin needles that street druggies have flung under his porch to avoid getting busted when the cops roll by.....Comment -
LeahMicheleRestricted User
- 12-30-11
- 857
#162
Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code