gotta give credit to the cards........NOT
-
Comment -
I was out of that game, with Cubs it seems you have to pay for the winner.
Grapes...you know programming languages? I'd like to give some parameters to play with, but I'm not sure how to get them to you...lol.
I don't think PM's are exactly private around here. Same with Jmon, I would like him to run some stats so we can look at the difference between final stats and what is perceived in play.
After all, we can see something performed such and such percent of the time, but does that account for other factors surrounding each individual instance; these factors make up the context of each individual play.
The trick is to find the relevant context and then apply it to search results.
This is why so many static models get into the give and take of the markets, winning some and losing some...they fail to grasp the context of the plays.
Even concrete motivations can be quantified, if you look at the relevant factors.
When I always say track your plays and why you made them, this is partly what I mean.
Can you pick up what I'm putting down?
Comment -
Im sure damn near everyone has been offended one way or another by someone in this thread at some point
We all buddies here and mean no direct disrespect towards any of our fellow brothersComment -
Night...going to roll with Braves +103, Pitt -111 and Sea un 8
bol flyMEComment -
seems like locke always loses when i back him, rubby de la rosa stats improved this year.
Some new kid Zach Neal starting for As. Had 4+ ERA in 130innings 2015 AAA
4.4 k/9 in AAA this year for him, not a good signComment -
guess you could call that a winner, id call it a miracle escape. can do it all, java, c, c++, data retrieval, circuits, hardware description languages, got a dot-com sports stats website, automated scrapers, database programming.I was out of that game, with Cubs it seems you have to pay for the winner.
Grapes...you know programming languages? I'd like to give some parameters to play with, but I'm not sure how to get them to you...lol.
I don't think PM's are exactly private around here. Same with Jmon, I would like him to run some stats so we can look at the difference between final stats and what is perceived in play.
After all, we can see something performed such and such percent of the time, but does that account for other factors surrounding each individual instance; these factors make up the context of each individual play.
The trick is to find the relevant context and then apply it to search results.
This is why so many static models get into the give and take of the markets, winning some and losing some...they fail to grasp the context of the plays.
Even concrete motivations can be quantified, if you look at the relevant factors.
When I always say track your plays and why you made them, this is partly what I mean.
Can you pick up what I'm putting down?
@perfectgraper
Comment -
no way im laying that much on cavs, sharks line is getting more attractiveComment -
Comment -
Comment -
Comment -
Can we get some naked Russian women to do that too?Comment -
I'll probably have little cause to check into the thread later but enough is enough and here it is...
I hope he takes it well.Comment -
I have the Pirates winning this game this morning by about 3.5 runs in a high scoring game that comes to over 9.5 runs.
Pitt went down 1-0 and I have been buying them live since. I'm going to be maxed out soon on the live bets.
Comment -
Good call KVB. You can get Arizona +500 now for free money.Comment -
Comment -
Comment -
picks? no time to capComment -
For the NHL it's easy to get forecast with Pitt winning, no matter what you are using. I have Pitt winning the game by less than half of a goal with a 5.5 or so point total. Lesser performing and non predictive numbers vary and agree with the total for the most part but they do give Pitt a slightly better chance than I do.
With my numbers and looking at the marketplace I find value with Tampa Bay Lightning +188 over Pittsburgh Penguins.
Nice job on the Trivia CashFlow.
Good Luck.
Comment -
Funny Fidel! Can't remember that last time I won trivia too be honest. Third question burns me. Only one once since the smoken voodoo.Comment -
Took state too. Fukk me almighty.Comment
Have some shet going on work with a certain individual for months now and it just irritates the piss out of me. I definitely could have worded my rant better. 
