There is an extremely strong relationship between quality of health care and life expectancy rates, I don't know how you can possibly deny this. The purpose of having quality health care is to essentially better peoples' lives, and thus prolonging them. Increasing survivability rates among fatal diseases is perfectly correlated to life expectancy, right? I mean, if you survive an illness (because of receiving exceptional health care), you're going to live longer, right? What am I missing here? Are you using this RBI to being a quality hitter argument because it's convenient for what you're trying to prove? Sorry bud, but you're argument isn't making much sense here, and you're analogy is comparing apples and oranges.
I can't see how you can possibly deny that quality health care prolongs peoples' lives, and thus increases life expectancy. Taking into account that the US fails in the life expectancy charts, #36 in the world according to my posting, it's very hard to argue that the US has the best health care system in the world. In fact, the US is the ONLY INDUSTRIALIZED NATION IN THE WORLD WITHOUT A UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.
I call complete and utter BS on that study too. "if you leave out people who are victims of homicide or who die in automobile accidents, Americans live longer than people in any other Western country." Other countries experience homicides and car accidents as well. For this claim to have any credibility, the amount of homicides and car accidents as a proportion of the population would have to be so much more ridiculously higher than all other countries in order to have the ability to sway life expectancy statistics to that degree. In 2009, there were just over 15,000 murders in the US:
Are you telling me that if you take out these 15,000 murders (murders happen everywhere anyways) in a country of over 300,000,000 people, that would be enough to take the US from #36 in life expectancy to #1? I call BS on that. This sounds like some sort of Fox News propaganda to me. 15,000 people is 0.005% of the population, that is a minuscule number compared to the 300,000,000+ people living in the US. This just doesn't make any sense. If you're going to deny that there is any relationship between health care and life expectancy, this conversation is over.
Here's the problem with the US: there is a huge profit factor associated with the health care system. When you have money involved, corruption follows. That's why even if you have health insurance in the US, you can be denied coverage if you have one of these "pre existing conditions". I mean, you're paying for coverage with money out of your own pocket and they still deny you coverage? And this is happening in the so called world's greatest country? LOL. Getting denied medical coverage NEVER happens in all other industrialized Western nations, only in the US.
I can't see how you can possibly deny that quality health care prolongs peoples' lives, and thus increases life expectancy. Taking into account that the US fails in the life expectancy charts, #36 in the world according to my posting, it's very hard to argue that the US has the best health care system in the world. In fact, the US is the ONLY INDUSTRIALIZED NATION IN THE WORLD WITHOUT A UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.
I call complete and utter BS on that study too. "if you leave out people who are victims of homicide or who die in automobile accidents, Americans live longer than people in any other Western country." Other countries experience homicides and car accidents as well. For this claim to have any credibility, the amount of homicides and car accidents as a proportion of the population would have to be so much more ridiculously higher than all other countries in order to have the ability to sway life expectancy statistics to that degree. In 2009, there were just over 15,000 murders in the US:
Are you telling me that if you take out these 15,000 murders (murders happen everywhere anyways) in a country of over 300,000,000 people, that would be enough to take the US from #36 in life expectancy to #1? I call BS on that. This sounds like some sort of Fox News propaganda to me. 15,000 people is 0.005% of the population, that is a minuscule number compared to the 300,000,000+ people living in the US. This just doesn't make any sense. If you're going to deny that there is any relationship between health care and life expectancy, this conversation is over.
Here's the problem with the US: there is a huge profit factor associated with the health care system. When you have money involved, corruption follows. That's why even if you have health insurance in the US, you can be denied coverage if you have one of these "pre existing conditions". I mean, you're paying for coverage with money out of your own pocket and they still deny you coverage? And this is happening in the so called world's greatest country? LOL. Getting denied medical coverage NEVER happens in all other industrialized Western nations, only in the US.