POLL: Should Cory1111 be paid by EasyStreet?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • milwaukee mike
    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
    • 08-22-07
    • 26914

    #1
    POLL: Should Cory1111 be paid by EasyStreet?
    I won't get into all the particulars here, since there is quite a long thread for that here:

    Sports betting and handicapping forum: discuss picks, odds, and predictions for upcoming games and results on latest bets.


    In my humble opinion both parties are at fault - cory has been caught making untrue statements and has been banned by at least 1 online casino (northbet) in the past (ez says 21 other sportsbooks/casinos).

    And easystreet confiscated $46,000 of money before turning it over to a related party with a huge conflict of interest (rx) for mediation.

    There have been a lot of good points made for both sides, I think most of us can agree that Cory probably was a shot taker using bot software that has done the same thing numerous times in the past. So if that is true, should Cory be paid?
    71
    Yes, Cory should get the $46,000
    0%
    49
    Cory should get his $3,000 or so in deposits back and that's it
    0%
    11
    Cory should get nothing
    0%
    7
    Cory and EasyStreet should settle on $20,000-25,000
    0%
    4
  • VegasInsider
    SBR Posting Legend
    • 12-12-10
    • 14593

    #2
    Nope. He shouldn't be paid a dime.
    Comment
    • obamaismyuncle
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 12-31-08
      • 17801

      #3
      settle
      Comment
      • BatemanPatrickl
        SBR Posting Legend
        • 06-21-07
        • 18772

        #4
        Hasn't Cory had at least 30 accounts closed at other books for fraud?

        Give him the initial deposit back and that's it.
        Comment
        • obamaismyuncle
          SBR Posting Legend
          • 12-31-08
          • 17801

          #5
          Originally posted by BatemanPatrickl
          Hasn't Cory had at least 30 accounts closed at other books for fraud?

          Give him the initial deposit back and that's it.

          another lie by you, everything you say these days is a

          ok go ahead, show proof of what you say...yea I know I know you aren't gonna do that
          Comment
          • PoweRay
            Restricted User
            • 09-07-10
            • 417

            #6
            Originally posted by obamaismyuncle
            another lie by you, everything you say these days is a

            ok go ahead, show proof of what you say...yea I know I know you aren't gonna do that
            Wilheim posted across the street that Cory has had 34 accounts at 21 separate books closed for fraud.
            Comment
            • BatemanPatrickl
              SBR Posting Legend
              • 06-21-07
              • 18772

              #7
              Originally posted by PoweRay
              Wilheim posted across the street that Cory has had 34 accounts at 21 separate books closed for fraud.


              Anything to say now Obama? Do your research before you open your big mouth.
              Comment
              • PoweRay
                Restricted User
                • 09-07-10
                • 417

                #8
                Quote from Wilheim: Upon investigation we discovered he is connected directly to 34 different accounts all closed for fraudulent activity spread among 21 offshore books. There are possibly more but our investigation felt these were sufficient to show what type of player Cory1111 is. Many of you complain about the amount of documentation that books require now when you ask for withdrawals. Players like Cory1111 are part of why that is necessary.
                Comment
                • BatemanPatrickl
                  SBR Posting Legend
                  • 06-21-07
                  • 18772

                  #9
                  Obscammerismyuncle made to look stupid AGAIN.
                  Comment
                  • obamaismyuncle
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 12-31-08
                    • 17801

                    #10
                    Originally posted by BatemanPatrickl
                    Obscammerismyuncle made to look stupid AGAIN.
                    Comment
                    • pavyracer
                      SBR Aristocracy
                      • 04-12-07
                      • 82785

                      #11
                      This is a huge problem for online gambling. Back in the old days of pre-internet you couldn't pull crap like that. You will meet your bookie or go to the casino with cash play and if you win you get paid cash. Now with the anonymity of the internet a crook can create multiple fraudulent accounts and try to take advantage of the system before he gets caught and have his fraudulent winnings confiscated.
                      Comment
                      • BatemanPatrickl
                        SBR Posting Legend
                        • 06-21-07
                        • 18772

                        #12
                        Originally posted by obamaismyuncle
                        Exactly. NOTHING to say. You came into a situation without any knowledge and open your BIG MOUTH again. So add liar to snitch/fraud.
                        Comment
                        • milwaukee mike
                          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                          • 08-22-07
                          • 26914

                          #13
                          Originally posted by VegasInsider
                          Nope. He shouldn't be paid a dime.
                          vegasinsider, if that's the way you feel can you answer the poll?
                          Comment
                          • MBENZ
                            SBR Hall of Famer
                            • 01-07-07
                            • 5238

                            #14
                            Wil said.So now that cokkgobbler is the last word.
                            Comment
                            • HedgeHog
                              SBR Posting Legend
                              • 09-11-07
                              • 10128

                              #15
                              None of the above would be my option. EZ should pay Cory's winnings to Books that he swindled. Paying the first 15k to Northbet would be a start.
                              Comment
                              • milwaukee mike
                                BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                • 08-22-07
                                • 26914

                                #16
                                Originally posted by HedgeHog
                                None of the above would be my option. EZ should pay Cory's winnings to Books that he swindled. Paying the first 15k to Northbet would be a start.
                                That would still fall under the category: Cory should get nothing
                                Comment
                                • milwaukee mike
                                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                  • 08-22-07
                                  • 26914

                                  #17
                                  interesting - so far, even though we are all PLAYERS, only 5 out of 15 voters have said cory should be paid in full.
                                  Comment
                                  • milwaukee mike
                                    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                    • 08-22-07
                                    • 26914

                                    #18
                                    yes is now winning even though cory seems to be getting more and more nasty - discussing people's wives and daughters in a most inappropriate manner.
                                    Comment
                                    • mighty maron
                                      SBR MVP
                                      • 04-20-09
                                      • 4215

                                      #19
                                      If the site finds a reason to strip and not pay the prize, and the forums accept it....what would happen the next time a site doesnt/cant/wont pay? Come up with a semi-plausible reason/scenario and come up with solution that requires the winner to go to a foreign country.

                                      The site took his money...if there was no ********** and the code of the casino software was not tampered with; he should get paid. Am I correct in saying that even with perfect play that the house holds the edge. If it does..short term blips should be paid....the house always gets it back if they can survive the short term.
                                      Comment
                                      • MBENZ
                                        SBR Hall of Famer
                                        • 01-07-07
                                        • 5238

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by mighty maron
                                        If the site finds a reason to strip and not pay the prize, and the forums accept it....what would happen the next time a site doesnt/cant/wont pay? Come up with a semi-plausible reason/scenario and come up with solution that requires the winner to go to a foreign country.

                                        The site took his money...if there was no ********** and the code of the casino software was not tampered with; he should get paid. Am I correct in saying that even with perfect play that the house holds the edge. If it does..short term blips should be paid....the house always gets it back if they can survive the short term.
                                        Exactly,if one less than stellar book does it,the rest will follow suit including writing rules in the sportsbook end to cover their ass down the road.Bad part is RX has and always will cover for these BS books,wrong arb in this case.
                                        Comment
                                        • milwaukee mike
                                          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                          • 08-22-07
                                          • 26914

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by mighty maron
                                          If the site finds a reason to strip and not pay the prize, and the forums accept it....what would happen the next time a site doesnt/cant/wont pay? Come up with a semi-plausible reason/scenario and come up with solution that requires the winner to go to a foreign country.

                                          The site took his money...if there was no ********** and the code of the casino software was not tampered with; he should get paid. Am I correct in saying that even with perfect play that the house holds the edge. If it does..short term blips should be paid....the house always gets it back if they can survive the short term.
                                          the house doesn't hold the edge if they give a 100% bonus that is intended for recreational players, and that bonus gets abused by people making 10 deposits in a week and using bot software playing all night, which is explicitly disallowed.

                                          allow me to play devil's advocate and ask this - if the site pays and then no websites give those of us that play fair any bonuses then who has benefitted other than a scammer?
                                          Comment
                                          • mighty maron
                                            SBR MVP
                                            • 04-20-09
                                            • 4215

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by milwaukee mike
                                            the house doesn't hold the edge if they give a 100% bonus that is intended for recreational players, and that bonus gets abused by people making 10 deposits in a week and using bot software playing all night, which is explicitly disallowed.

                                            allow me to play devil's advocate and ask this - if the site pays and then no websites give those of us that play fair any bonuses then who has benefitted other than a scammer?
                                            The site should not give 100 percent bonuses on those games that can be beat like this. It was there choice for putting the bonus there.

                                            Im actually very surprised that the software allowed this. Sure an occasional royal but the cynic in me thought that algos would have been written in to just not allow it.

                                            I used to think it was unfair of casinos banning those who counted cards in blackjack also.
                                            Comment
                                            • milwaukee mike
                                              BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                              • 08-22-07
                                              • 26914

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by mighty maron
                                              The site should not give 100 percent bonuses on those games that can be beat like this. It was there choice for putting the bonus there.

                                              Im actually very surprised that the software allowed this. Sure an occasional royal but the cynic in me thought that algos would have been written in to just not allow it.

                                              I used to think it was unfair of casinos banning those who counted cards in blackjack also.
                                              wow so you think the casinos should cheat against the player? and they shouldn't give out nice promos to attract business?


                                              what kind of player are you? you think the house should cheat against you, and you don't want nice bonuses?

                                              it's most certainly unfair of a casino to NOT PAY someone who counted cards at blackjack, but it's not unfair to ban someone who is going to steal from you on a continual basis.
                                              Comment
                                              • mighty maron
                                                SBR MVP
                                                • 04-20-09
                                                • 4215

                                                #24
                                                what I am saying is that its the casnios fault that they offer the big bonuses and keep the odds reasonable....they complain when someone gets lucky short term and have no right to.

                                                I am really surprised that the software didnt do something fishy after the same player hit the 2nd royal. I believe that most casino software would have some sort of safety feature to bring the short term back in. A safety valve...a cheat in the code.

                                                I dont think the casinos should cheat but it surprises me that the software did not stop this. I think most software is rigged to a certain point.
                                                Comment
                                                • milwaukee mike
                                                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                  • 08-22-07
                                                  • 26914

                                                  #25
                                                  do you think most software is rigged at ALL books, or just some of the more dubious ones like ez?

                                                  i have seen more than my share of fishy things at online casinos but i have no clue whether or not the programs are legit.
                                                  Comment
                                                  • FourLengthsClear
                                                    SBR MVP
                                                    • 12-29-10
                                                    • 3808

                                                    #26
                                                    The book, the player and the adjudicator will all come out of this case looking like scum.
                                                    Comment
                                                    • Smoke
                                                      SBR Aristocracy
                                                      • 10-09-09
                                                      • 48111

                                                      #27
                                                      I was in favor of Cory getting his 46k until I read what wilheim over at the rx said. Cory is a known stiff with fraudulent accounts. He's part of the reason the books require all those documents with CC deposits. He admitted to doing ********** at other books. I say give him his deposit back, that is all.
                                                      Comment
                                                      • KGambler
                                                        SBR MVP
                                                        • 07-09-09
                                                        • 2404

                                                        #28
                                                        I think we should create a new poll now that theRX and easystreetsports.com have been so thoroughly exposed.
                                                        Comment
                                                        • milwaukee mike
                                                          BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                                                          • 08-22-07
                                                          • 26914

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by KGambler
                                                          I think we should create a new poll now that theRX and easystreetsports.com have been so thoroughly exposed.
                                                          i think this poll is sufficient, shows a huge majority believing cory should be paid in full.
                                                          Comment
                                                          • TexansFan
                                                            SBR MVP
                                                            • 09-06-06
                                                            • 3365

                                                            #30
                                                            Easystreets has proved nothing. Wait, they have proved they are a thieving, scamming, pos book. What's happened in the past with cory has nothing to do with this dispute.

                                                            They never had any intention of paying. Why in the hell should a player have to fly to CR and submit to a polygraph?

                                                            Scamming piece of crap book.
                                                            Comment
                                                            • STAY STRONG
                                                              SBR MVP
                                                              • 03-07-10
                                                              • 2498

                                                              #31
                                                              F*ck that scammer book Easystreet. Stay away from that shady book.
                                                              Comment
                                                              • flyingillini
                                                                SBR Aristocracy
                                                                • 12-06-06
                                                                • 41219

                                                                #32
                                                                I wonder how many people from SBR would be willing to send in a deposit to Easy Street now?
                                                                המוסד‎
                                                                המוסד למודיעין ולתפקידים מיוחדים‎
                                                                Comment
                                                                • RealSlimShady
                                                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                                                  • 12-24-07
                                                                  • 6249

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Bad precedent being set here. Book used fine print of "no bots" to confiscate money without complete proof. I can see how bad books will start using "no professional/syndicate play" clauses to do the same with sports wagering profits.
                                                                  Comment
                                                                  • TexansFan
                                                                    SBR MVP
                                                                    • 09-06-06
                                                                    • 3365

                                                                    #34
                                                                    Originally posted by Smoke
                                                                    I was in favor of Cory getting his 46k until I read what wilheim over at the rx said. Cory is a known stiff with fraudulent accounts. He's part of the reason the books require all those documents with CC deposits. He admitted to doing ********** at other books. I say give him his deposit back, that is all.
                                                                    If you believe anything Wil said you need a brain scan to see if it's functioning. Wil was always going to favor his paid sponsor, always.

                                                                    Whatever cory has done in the past has absolutely nothing to do with Easystreets. A book requiring a player to take a polygraph to get paid is asinine.
                                                                    Comment
                                                                    SBR Contests
                                                                    Collapse
                                                                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                                    Collapse
                                                                    Working...