Should the NBA reduce the number of games for a season from 82 to 58 ?

[d2bets]

74.

[BestPlay2day]

They should shorten the season to 58 games, but the greedy players and owners would never allow it since salaries and revenue will be reduced. With less games players don't need to skip games on a back to back. This would improve the quality of the games and maybe I'll go back to see Wolves games again.

[flyingillini]

Make it longer 96

[TheMoneyShot]

They should shorten the season to 58 games, but the greedy players and owners would never allow it since salaries and revenue will be reduced. With less games players don't need to skip games on a back to back. This would improve the quality of the games and maybe I'll go back to see Wolves games again.

Correct... owners will never shorten it. You're going to get basketball Mid October - June one way or another.

[play4win]

these lazy bastards getting paid more for playing less. also for bettors less money to bet on. get that bum commissioner out of office. nba went all hell when he became a commissioner

[2daBank]

They should shorten the season to 58 games, but the greedy players and owners would never allow it since salaries and revenue will be reduced. With less games players don't need to skip games on a back to back. This would improve the quality of the games and maybe I'll go back to see Wolves games again.

The mistake you all making is assuming just cause there less games players won’t skip games. I don’t buy it, you shorten season to 58 most these pussies will play about 40.

[lakerboy]

No they shouldn’t, some of us like it way more than nba or nfl and it would suck if the season was almost over. Part of the reason winning a championship is hard is because it hard to sustain success for 162 games.

Tell that to the red Sox lol