-
Comment -
Only bridge you're selling, is one to yourself ...you claimed to not be voting for either candidate and hate esablishment ...yet all your post are bashing trump ... Either rethink your strategy, or just admit you like the esablishment and working to give all your money to others, that aren't even from here...Comment -
Trump Illegally Soliciting Campaign Contributions From Foreign Officials
Someone should let Trump know it’s illegal for candidates for federal office to solicit foreign money, regardless of whether the donations ever materialize.
Terri Butler, a member of the Australian parliament member was surprised to receive fundraising solicitations from Trump at her official government email address, asking her to make a “generous contribution” to the Trump campaign.
Bob Blackman, a member of Britain’s House of Commons, who has also received fundraising requests from the Trump campaign, says “I did not sign up, these are sent unsolicited.”
Another member of the U.K. parliament, Peter Bottomley, has received three such solicitations. “Neither [Trump’s] sons nor anyone else has answered my questions about how they acquired my email nor why they were asking for financial support that I suppose to be illegal for [Trump] to accept,” he says,
In Iceland, Katrin Jakobsdottir, chair of the Left-Green Movement, a democratic socialist party, has “no idea” how she got on Trump’s fundraising list.
Comment -
oh, I see back to your desperate pysche lol
yeah ,that was funny when you said I was following trump then you had to eat your words when the facts were I've been saying what trump said years before he ran for president. Thanks for the extra part of clown show Alice lol
let me know what your desperate psyche comes up with next... wait let me guess.... lolComment -
WOW 5 lines of BS praising yourself, what a surprise. Ted Cruz said those things before you or Trump. Sheep Boy.
Enough of you Trump Clowns for today. So I leave with a song that would make Orwell proud. Even though your to oblivious to get the point. Must be your Sheep U education. LOL
Comment -
-
George Orwell warned of the tendency for dictatorial thinking within leftism, you didn't learn anything when you read Orwell.WOW 5 lines of BS praising yourself, what a surprise. Ted Cruz said those things before you or Trump. Sheep Boy.
Enough of you Trump Clowns for today. So I leave with a song that would make Orwell proud. Even though your to oblivious to get the point. Must be your Sheep U education. LOL
Comment -
LOL He would say there is no left anymore. Just center right & extreme right, which is what Stalin was if you know history. Have you even read Orwell, or do you just let Stefan Molyneux form your opinion of Orwell.
Nice word twist though. Stalin left wing LOL
“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.”Comment -
‘Big bucks & politics are why Russia is labeled US #1 threat again’
Published time: 9 Aug, 2016 16:40
Get short URL
US Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James. © Senior Master Sgt. Adrian Cadiz / AFP
Russia is doing nothing to provoke American officials to call it the biggest threat to the US. Russians are just responding to America’s provocative behavior of putting missiles in Eastern Europe, former US diplomat Jim Jatras told RT's Ed Schultz.
US Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James told Fox News that Russia is the number one threat to America and that it could pose an “existential threat”.
RT: Why do US authorities keep pointing the finger at Russia without providing any concrete details?
Jim Jatras: I think they are doing it for a number of reasons… Let’s look at Ms. James background. She was with SAIC [Science Applications International Corporation] – between the time she was with the Clinton Pentagon and the time now she is the Secretary of the Air Force.
Let’s face it; Eisenhower’s military industrial complex is on steroids. There is no money in fighting terrorism. Look, what is going on in Europe – in France, in Germany. What is NATO doing about that – not much. But if you’re building big budgets: you want new aircraft, you want to deploy missiles in Eastern Europe – that is where the big bucks are. I think that is part of it, and the other part of this is politics. We hear today about the 50 officials that came out against Trump and said he was reckless. Bill Kristol has found his perfect candidate now; there is fellow Evan McMullin who is former Goldman Sachs, former CIA… We have an apparatus here of global hegemony that is tight to a lot of money.
RT: Are you suggesting that Russia is being used as a tool to supply more funding to the Defense Department?
JJ: I think that is a huge part of it, but unfortunately that is not the only part of it. It also ties in too a much broader – as I say, deep state oligarchy that really controls the establishment of both parties for which Hillary Clinton is one face, Jeb Bush was the other face – they want the 1980’s back.
RT: What is Russia doing that would provoke the Air Force Secretary to say this?
JJ: They are not doing anything, they are responding to what from my point of view, as an American, as a conservative, I consider very provocative behavior – putting these missiles in Eastern Europe supposedly against the Iranian weapons that don’t exist and nobody is calling to be defended from. And the Russians are saying: “Look, we don’t know what you’re putting in those sites. That could be anything. And what, we’re supposed to rely on your word?” If they did that to us, in the neighboring country to us, how would we respond? Would we talk about putting our forces in the Baltic, in Black Sea within just a few dozen miles of major naval bases of the Russian Navy? How do we expect them to respond?
RT: Recently Russia has made an alliance with the Iranians on a number of different fronts. There has also been somewhat of a laid out cooperation with China. How troublesome is this to the US?
JJ: I think it just shows a complete lack of strategic vision on part of the establishment of both parties. You would think it would be good strategic sense to be friendly with both Moscow and Beijing than they are with each other. If we had sat down and come up with a plan to try to drive them together, we could not be doing a better job.
RT: What is the resolution to this? We’ve got a lot of different hotbeds around the world right now. Shouldn’t there be a pretty critical analysis of President Obama’s foreign policy?
JJ: Absolutely. To my mind it is just simply George Bush lied, or George Bush with drones instead of renditions. It is the same policy. We should be looking about how to cooperate with countries where our national interest coincide, and not provoke conflict unnecessarily.
RT: Should the US be concerned about the modernization of the Russian military?
JJ: I think we should be in the sense that we should not be taking steps ourselves that are calculated to incentivize them to do that. In itself it doesn’t do that anymore than modernization of our military should be a threat to them if we were to keep it in a defensive posture, which increasingly we’re not doing.Comment -
You had your chance to make an admission, your reluctance is evidence of your true colors. You don't care about working people in America, you're a traitor, not only to America but even to the class of people you claim to be an advocate for.
You may try and backtrack now but it's too late. You're just another cultural marxist pining for the destruction of Western Civilization.Comment -
Its always about money & power. This bitch is full of shit. Russia is not a threat.‘Big bucks & politics are why Russia is labeled US #1 threat again’
Published time: 9 Aug, 2016 16:40
Get short URL
US Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James. © Senior Master Sgt. Adrian Cadiz / AFP
Russia is doing nothing to provoke American officials to call it the biggest threat to the US. Russians are just responding to America’s provocative behavior of putting missiles in Eastern Europe, former US diplomat Jim Jatras told RT's Ed Schultz.
US Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James told Fox News that Russia is the number one threat to America and that it could pose an “existential threat”.
RT: Why do US authorities keep pointing the finger at Russia without providing any concrete details?
Jim Jatras: I think they are doing it for a number of reasons… Let’s look at Ms. James background. She was with SAIC [Science Applications International Corporation] – between the time she was with the Clinton Pentagon and the time now she is the Secretary of the Air Force.
Let’s face it; Eisenhower’s military industrial complex is on steroids. There is no money in fighting terrorism. Look, what is going on in Europe – in France, in Germany. What is NATO doing about that – not much. But if you’re building big budgets: you want new aircraft, you want to deploy missiles in Eastern Europe – that is where the big bucks are. I think that is part of it, and the other part of this is politics. We hear today about the 50 officials that came out against Trump and said he was reckless. Bill Kristol has found his perfect candidate now; there is fellow Evan McMullin who is former Goldman Sachs, former CIA… We have an apparatus here of global hegemony that is tight to a lot of money.
RT: Are you suggesting that Russia is being used as a tool to supply more funding to the Defense Department?
JJ: I think that is a huge part of it, but unfortunately that is not the only part of it. It also ties in too a much broader – as I say, deep state oligarchy that really controls the establishment of both parties for which Hillary Clinton is one face, Jeb Bush was the other face – they want the 1980’s back.
RT: What is Russia doing that would provoke the Air Force Secretary to say this?
JJ: They are not doing anything, they are responding to what from my point of view, as an American, as a conservative, I consider very provocative behavior – putting these missiles in Eastern Europe supposedly against the Iranian weapons that don’t exist and nobody is calling to be defended from. And the Russians are saying: “Look, we don’t know what you’re putting in those sites. That could be anything. And what, we’re supposed to rely on your word?” If they did that to us, in the neighboring country to us, how would we respond? Would we talk about putting our forces in the Baltic, in Black Sea within just a few dozen miles of major naval bases of the Russian Navy? How do we expect them to respond?
RT: Recently Russia has made an alliance with the Iranians on a number of different fronts. There has also been somewhat of a laid out cooperation with China. How troublesome is this to the US?
JJ: I think it just shows a complete lack of strategic vision on part of the establishment of both parties. You would think it would be good strategic sense to be friendly with both Moscow and Beijing than they are with each other. If we had sat down and come up with a plan to try to drive them together, we could not be doing a better job.
RT: What is the resolution to this? We’ve got a lot of different hotbeds around the world right now. Shouldn’t there be a pretty critical analysis of President Obama’s foreign policy?
JJ: Absolutely. To my mind it is just simply George Bush lied, or George Bush with drones instead of renditions. It is the same policy. We should be looking about how to cooperate with countries where our national interest coincide, and not provoke conflict unnecessarily.
RT: Should the US be concerned about the modernization of the Russian military?
JJ: I think we should be in the sense that we should not be taking steps ourselves that are calculated to incentivize them to do that. In itself it doesn’t do that anymore than modernization of our military should be a threat to them if we were to keep it in a defensive posture, which increasingly we’re not doing.Comment -
