-
Comment -
wrong. again. (heavy sigh)
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for Wednesday, August 26, 2015
--Nielsen TV Ratings Data: ©2015 The Nielsen Company. All Rights Reserved.Total Day P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN 1,409 299 535 CNN 586 208 311 MSNBC 443 86 184 CNBC 258 84 114 FBN 79 14 28 HLN 280 121 158 Primetime P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN 2,595 626 1,026 CNN 736 292 421 MSNBC 849 155 370 CNBC 545 206 197 FBN 44 5 20 HLN 358 136 170 Net Morning programs (6-9 AM) P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN FOX AND FRIENDS 899 175 383 CNN NEW DAY 324 110 171 MSNBC MORNING JOE 457 95 210 CNBC SQUAWK BOX 193 63 121 HLN MORNING EXPRESS W/ MEADE 260 81 152 Net 5PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN FIVE, THE 2,305 363 735 CNN SITUATION ROOM 769 244 374 MSNB MSNBC LIVE 440 70 143 CNBC FAST MONEY 224 35 112 HLN FORENSIC FILES 118 53 56 Net 6PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN SPECIAL RPT W/BRET BAIER 2,129 315 657 CNN SITUATION ROOM 699 287 382 MSNB POLITICS NATION 536 87 219 CNBC MAD MONEY 235 51 120 HLN FORENSIC FILES 195 102 103 Net 7PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN ON THE RECORD W/GRETA 1,771 352 619 CNN ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT 813 339 446 MSNB HARDBALL WITH C. MATTHEWS 790 112 308 CNBC CNBC SPECIAL REPORT 183 36 93 HLN FORENSIC FILES 220 76 73 Net 8PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN THE OREILLY FACTOR 3,120 634 1,110 CNN ANDERSON COOPER 360 851 353 480 MSNB ALL IN W/ CHRIS HAYES 706 136 317 CNBC SHARK TANK 491 143 138 HLN NANCY GRACE 345 114 150 Net 9PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN KELLY FILE, THE 2,705 678 1,101 CNN CNN TONIGHT 738 292 428 MSNB RACHEL MADDOW SHOW 1,059 187 454 CNBC SHARK TANK 801 316 316 HLN DR DREW 329 109 140 Net 10PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN HANNITY 1,957 565 865 CNN CNN TONIGHT 618 231 354 MSNB LAST WORD W/ L. ODONNELL 783 142 337 CNBC MAKE ME A MLLNRE INVENTOR 344 160 138 HLN FORENSIC FILES 399 186 219 Net 11PM P2+ (000s) 25-54 (000s) 35-64 (000s) FOXN THE OREILLY FACTOR 1,248 350 584 CNN ANDERSON COOPER 360 538 188 315 MSNB ALL IN W/ CHRIS HAYES 403 88 165 CNBC SHARK TANK 340 178 122 HLN FORENSIC FILES 454 176 209
P2+ = viewers over the age of 2-
(25-54) = Adults 25-54 viewing
(35-64) = Adults 35-64 viewing
Prime Time = 8-11pm
.
.
.
.
so who's brainwashed? LOL
Last edited by DwightShrute; 08-28-15, 08:28 PM. Reason: RK is brainwashed and his wonderful parents never spanked him enoughComment -
lol I knew he was wrong the moment I read it, you can never trust him with numbers. He just wings shit and hopes it sticks.
He said more people were on SSDI than Welfare... he wasn't that far off... only 11x more people on welfare lol!Comment -
how can you not like this guy?
Comment -
i meant a rich Republican. Buffett always had a lean left. He wasn't "one of them" When BUffet said the rich should pay more these asshats heard Fix news say "Warren is allowed to pay as much as he wants and nobody is stopping him" These assholes all bought that talking point helping to further their cause of sticking up for billionaires because they were being treated unfairly lol. These 40 thousand dollar a year Republicans who think some day they are gonna be as rich as Trump or Buffet. They are just ignorant simpleminded jerkoffs who flat out kill the country because they are to stupid to realize when they are being played. That is the big problem in this country. Really not the billionaires at all. They just found a huge group of simpletons to puppet around like clowns. Der gonna take away ur guns so vote for my billionaire interest. Der gonna kill babies on street corners so vote for my billionaire interest. Der are weapons of mass destruction so help us rob the country while sending ur kids to die like a good jackass would. Watch out for blackie and the rotten Mexicans they are coming to rob u blind. Vote for my billionaire interest. Those dirty unions. They are trying to make a wage to hurt my billionaire wage even thou budgets were surpluses when unions were strong (people who could actually buy something which in fact creates jobs). Help us rid of those dirty unions. Please help us u useless pieces of brainwashed shit.Last edited by Thor4140; 08-28-15, 11:31 PM.Comment -
lets go donaldComment -
Ok, my bad. It's O Reilly who has those numbers.
According to the numbers less than fifteen percent of O’Reilly’s audience fell within the key 25-54 demographic, and the average age of O’Reilly audience was 72 years old.Comment -
The US is better off today than we've ever been. The elites in this country, primarily through racism, have divided this country down the political lines. There is still work to be done but extremists on both sides tend to see the sky as falling.
The reality is, the reason there aren't full fledged riots going on is because life is pretty fawking good in America right now.
That doesn't mean easy street, it doesn't mean we have things to work on like scrapping the tax, hiking taxes on corporations and the rich, more racial awareness, etc... But were better off today than any other point in history.
And don't give me the argument that rich people will leave if we hike taxes and they'll bring their businesses overseas with them, because they've been doing that for the better part of the last 3 decade anyways.
Big corps are always gonna look to increase profit margins. The number one way to this is to lower wages paid out. The easiest way to do this is to ship all your jobs to China and pay a little Chinese girl $3/day to do the same job as an American that would get paid 2-10 times more.
And yet we still have guys ardently defending corporations as job providers
as if they have your best interest at heart. You're only good them as long as there is regulation or you are your production level is so high that it justifies your wages conpared to the chinese girl.
Last edited by The Kraken; 08-29-15, 08:39 AM.Comment -
lol couldn't get past this joke
man this guy isn't very smart but I've already shown that many times.
Ok, my bad. It's O Reilly who has those numbers.
According to the numbers less than fifteen percent of O’Reilly’s audience fell within the key 25-54 demographic, and the average age of O’Reilly audience was 72 years old.
now if you were just this reasonable more often we wouldn't butt heads so much. I told ya before, all you have to do is be logical, not spew nonsense and we won't have a problem. So no more saying there is more people on ssdi than welfare, and no more saying slaves came here illegally(lol that is was fukn hilarious though, I'll give ya that. Got a bunch of laughs out of it).Last edited by brooks85; 08-29-15, 08:38 AM.Comment -
Brooks i know, you still think the world you grew up in was the best. Everyone does at some point, it's a childs mentality. The difference is, most of us eventually recognize it and adjust. You obviously haven't.Comment -
Kraken if he lives in rural Ohio as was suggested yesterday, then all of the jobs that were once there are gone and almost all people who live in these areas are completely defeated. Hell, even people who live in cities but once had these jobs or families had these jobs are like this. Bunch a negative Nancys.Comment -
Optimism and unity are awful. Reminds me so much of the late 70's. Obama can talk a good game, but he can't inspire a nation like Clinton and Reagan did. Those guys could work with their congresses even though they were on the other side of the political spectrum. All Obama can do is blame, whine, and cry. A true leader goes beyond that, and finds a way to communicate, and work things out. Obama just hardlines, and if Congress pushes the least bit, he cries to the public blaming all those mean Republicans. The funny thing is that the Republicans, as a whole, are a bunch of wusses. He wanted the fukking job as president. Get in there and be a damn leader instead of a finger pointer! Clinton worked with a tough, conservative Congress. Reagan worked with Tip O'Neil, enough said. I think its just a part of this era. Not as many people are willing to take personal responsibility any more. Its just so much easier, to blame someone else, and whine until you get what you want, or just be a victim. When the leader of the free world does it, then a lot of the minions think it is OK also.Comment -
again, you're just showing how truly ignorant you are just like last night when you made it very clear. It is a theme for you. I live right above one of the top 10 cities rated best for business in America and one of the richest counties in the country. Yes, it is terrible... lolLast edited by brooks85; 08-29-15, 10:58 AM.Comment -
Depends on what your definition of a leader is.
Most Repubs want a leader who doesn't take shit, makes hard line decisions on a whim and talks caveman. That's
why Trump is doing so well.
Obama is a leader also. He has taken us where no man has gone before. He had the balls to give us healthcare,
lifted a 50 year embargo with Cuba, given gays the right to marry and initiated an Iran deal. Not only has the US
benefited, so has the world.
Sure he's blamed his predecessor and a do nothing congress. He's for progress. They stifle that. It has to be
frustrating for him, being ridiculed at every turn.
A leader has to have vision, a thought process and the balls to change. Both Obama and Trump have that.
Doing the same thing and expecting a different result is the definition of idiocy.Comment -
Health care would not have been passed unless he had the majority in Congress. Didn't take any leadership to do that. Supreme Court made the decision on gays and marriage. Anyone could have "initiated" an Iran deal. He doesn't look like too much of a leader on how Iran seems to have fleeced him. As far as Cuba goes, hey, we can get those cigars now legally.Comment -
-
Can someone please post that picture of the billionaire and the hick with the hick carrying the billionaires bags i believe.Comment -
You, like many other conservatives, just automatically discredit anything Obama does. It's instinctual at this point. No thought goes into it. Just anti- anything Obama related.
And that's certainly fine. But I will disagree with you on many points about Obama not being a great leader. Has he been the most effective president? Probably not. Part of that can be attributed to a Congress that wouldn't compromise with him. It happens. Sometimes, for whatever reasons, logical or illogical, people don't click. Obama hasn't clicked with a lot of people, particularly middle aged and older white, male Americans ie Congress. Those are just the facts. But he has been extremely effective nonetheless.
He has been an amazing leader for minorities. He has fought for their causes. He continues to bring to the forefront the struggles they face. We've had president after president ignore their struggles as if they don't have rights as well. The old saying "majority rules, minority rights" seems to have stopped after the "majority rules" for so many administrations.
He's also been an amazing leader for the underserved in our society, not just minorities. Great leaders have vision. The ACA was his vision, so yes, that is an example of his leadership. Conservative estimates show that over 16 million Americans went from uninsured to insured directly related to the ACA. That's incredible.
Great leaders don't always have to serve the establishment, or the middle aged/older white male. Remember, this is new territory for us. We've always been catered to by leaders that served our needs, looked just like us, that we can relate to. Obama is different, his effectiveness is measured differently and that makes a lot people mad.
Anyone could have initiated the Iran deal, but no one else did. Anyone could have given the order to take out OBL, but no one else did. Anyone could have fought for gay marriage equality, but no one else did. Here we are in 2015 and plenty of other leaders before Obama could have done these things, but no one else did. So yes, by all accounts, he has been unequivocally a great leader.Comment -
I don't believe people feel like they are better off, and if they do, a lot of that might feed into the "new normal" thinking that people had in the 70's. If people were so much more better off, there wouldn't be as much public assistance being shelled out. We wouldn't also hear the whining about begging the government to raise the minimum wage, and the class envy about 1%er's. Didn't have nearly as much of that in the 80's. Reagan got government out of the way, and Carter's term became a distant memory by the time Reagan was running for reelection.Comment -
We hear a lot more of everything these days KLC. You hear about CEO's make $25,000,000- $150,000,000 yearly, while the average employee working for them makes between $22,000-$50,000 yearly. You hear about how the 1% has sucked up all the wealth in this country since the crash in 2009. In fact, 95% of all income gains since the market crash have went to the top one percent of earners. If you aren't part of that class, why represent them at the polls? It's ludicrous man.
Like it or not, you're a hell of a lot closer to the reality many poor black Americans and illegal immigrants face, than you are to the top one percent of earners. You're in the same boat as 99% of America. We are all going to benefit greatly from having SS available to us, having medicare, etc.... We're all going to benefit from these "welfare programs", otherwise known as a defined contribution.
A good reality check is needed for the vast majority of white Americans. We're in the same boat as the poor black mamma raising 9 kids. We're no where near the boat of the elites. And that's just a hard reality for a majority to accept.
We always want to see ourselves as the rich white guy, so we identify with them, even though they don't represent us at all and their is no way to serve both sides concurrently. Yet when middle class white Americans go to the poll, they'll vote for the billionaire trump, or the hundred millionaire Clinton. Common people, wake up.Comment -
You say he has done a lot for black people, but what has he done? More of them are out of work since he took office last time I checked. The ACA was a liberal vision since Hillary in 1993. He just followed through with it. Again, it was easy to get passed because he had a super majority in Congress, and even then, he had a hard time getting it through, having to make special deals. He lost his majorities in Congress after that because he couldn't convince the American people it was the right thing to do. Also, how many people lost their health coverage after it was passed? How many people lost their full time jobs? How many people are going to lose a big chunk of their tax returns in the next year or two because they don't want health coverage?
Ever think there is a reason why other leaders never "negotiated" with Iran? OBL eventually would have been caught. In the 21st century, you can't hide forever. I'll give him credit that it happened on his watch, but any leader in the free world after 9/11 would love to have been the man to take him down. Again, it doesn't matter how much he "fought" for gay marriage, because that was ultimately the Supreme Court's decision. That is, of course, you are implying that he stiff armed the court.Comment -
This is simply not true.
In 1993 Clinton’s administration proposed a bill for health care reform. It was similar to today’s ACA, only big insurance fought what they saw as too much regulation on their premiums.
A solution to require people to purchase insurance by law, with other regulations, was essentially a plan designed by the Heritage Foundation.
That’s a right wing think tank, if you didn’t know.
The ACA enacted during Obama’s administration is basically the same as the program designed by the Heritage Foundation in the 1990’s.
Healthcare reform has been on the table for years and Obama and a vision truly has little to do with it. He’s just the sitting president while it was enacted.
It seems giving credit to Obama and his vision for ACA is yet another act of low information voters.
For campaign purposes, it would be in the best interest of the Democratic Party to continue to cite successes with the Healthcare Act and give the sitting president all the credit.
Comment -
I hate to tell you my friend, pretty much anyone you vote for is going to represent the rich guy no matter who you vote for. That's why Trump resonates with so many people. He is exposing the elephant in the room, and that's what makes him so popular, and teflonish. No one else can truly bring up politicians being bought off unless they are a 1%er themselves. Perot did the same thing in 1992, and might have pulled it off if it wasn't for the NAACP fiasco. I'm open to the possibility of an outsider from inside Washington running things. Just glad I have another 6 months before I have to choose.Comment -
Clinton may have had his own vision for health care reform, as did Mit Romney, but it wasn't this vision. Maybe similar, but this is certainly Obamas vision. Point taken though and thank you for the correction, there were others before Obama that have fought for healthcare reform, and this goes for all levels of government.
But, Clinton wasn't unable to get it passed. Obama was. I tend to give a lot more credit to the sitting president that got it done than you might. When 9/11 happened on Bushs watch, that was his burden to carry. ACA is Obamas to own, good or bad. If it fails, everyone will blame Obama, not anyone before him that attempted their own version of reform.
Much like the head coach of a program, if it happens on their watch, good or bad, the credit and blame sits with them.
Comment -
I disagree, but I understand. I would probably vote for Trump over Hilary, not 100% sure but I think I would. But I don't believe it's true no candidates would represent us. Bernie Sanders is one of the poorest presidential candidates in some time. His entire platform is fighting big corporations and building the middle class.
There's certainly debate to be had on whether or not he could be effective in doing so, but I believe he would represent me and my needs better than any other candidate.
Comment -
Most PEOPLE want a leader. Whatever form it comes in. For me, he can be a dem or rep. Obama has failed in the leadership department. Huge.
He didn't give the right for gays to marry. The Supreme Court did. Obama was against gay marriage but evolved just in time for the 2012 election.
He had to bribe democrat senators to get enough votes to pass the Obamacare to begin with and then everyone else could actually read it lol. Great leader huh? No a real leader would have worked with both sides to come up with a healthcare plan that the other side isn't always threatening to repeal. He's had 7 years to do that. Massive failure.
The Embargo with Cuba hasn't been lifted as of yet. But I agree, that is probably his biggest accomplishment when it's official. And it will happen. His legacy. Because of Cuba, he might now go down as the worst president in US history. He might be the 2nd or 3rd worst only.Last edited by DwightShrute; 08-29-15, 12:24 PM.Comment -
"Bribing" senators is what leadership is all about. Every great president has done it.
You're obviously correct about the SC giving gays the right to marry. I had mentioned in another post that obama fought for gay marriage equality, that's ehat I should've said.
Obama did put two of those justices in power to make that decision. Again, another sign of leadership. Put smart, good people in power around you to make you look good. No one can do anything alone. Even Jordan had Pippen and PJComment
