The Stevo vs SBR case update - Can a poster post a tout pick on a forum?

**SBR_John** · 02-05-13, 10:06 PM

"objection your honor, prosecution is clearly badgering and trolling the witness, and this being a subforum proceeding and a weeknight with Shari91 on duty, the defense requests an infraction and 24 hr cool down"

LOL

**allabout the $$$** · 02-05-13, 10:42 PM

Originally posted by Louisvillekid1

one of the best posts ever,

was going to send you 500 points but not a pro,

fukkin lkidd still kicking us broke dikk fukks!!!!!!

**Louisvillekid1** · 02-05-13, 10:49 PM

Originally posted by allabout the $$$

fukkin lkidd still kicking us broke dikk fukks!!!!!!

haha

**sweep** · 02-06-13, 09:18 AM

Originally posted by Louisvillekid1

one of the best posts ever,

was going to send you 500 points but not a pro,

"Look at me! Look at me!" "Big timer, SBR PRO, Look at me"

Dont forget where you came from TBDF

**Chi_archie** · 02-06-13, 07:40 PM

wasn't justin7 working on this case?

**Boner_18** · 02-10-13, 10:39 AM

Classic Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) fail on the part of the defendant. The case doesn't even reach the merits of the intellectual property claims (Trademark, Copyright, etc.) and fails on what many people would term a technicallity.

Essentially every court has two tollgates, two barriers to entry - personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. In this case the court says EVEN IF all the facts were found in favor of defendant, even if all the facts were as alleged by Lang the court has no power to hear the case... He's in the wrong place. It's like being assaulted in NYC and then claiming to the Canadian Mounted Police that they must arrest the perp.

The rulling is further strengthened by inclusion of the §12(b)(6) claim whereby the court addresses the claims as insufficient EVEN AS PLED. It's like the court takes a sneak peek at the defendants claims and says there just isn't enough here, don't waste my time.

The whole thing is a total slam dunk for SBR and the additional defendant. Good work.

**sweep** · 02-10-13, 02:18 PM

Originally posted by Boner_18

Classic Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) fail on the part of the defendant. The case doesn't even reach the merits of the intellectual property claims (Trademark, Copyright, etc.) and fails on what many people would term a technicallity.

Essentially every court has two tollgates, two barriers to entry - personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. In this case the court says EVEN IF all the facts were found in favor of defendant, even if all the facts were as alleged by Lang the court has no power to hear the case... He's in the wrong place. It's like being assaulted in NYC and then claiming to the Canadian Mounted Police that they must arrest the perp.

The rulling is further strengthened by inclusion of the §12(b)(6) claim whereby the court addresses the claims as insufficient EVEN AS PLED. It's like the court takes a sneak peek at the defendants claims and says there just isn't enough here, don't waste my time.

The whole thing is a total slam dunk for SBR and the additional defendant. Good work.

Well done Boner

**The Kraken** · 02-10-13, 02:56 PM

Is boner SBR's attorney? Could you Imagine Boner in court, the guy would blow away the competition.

**Chi_archie** · 02-27-13, 10:58 PM

unfortunately we are about to lose Boner to marriage, Kraker

**pokergem** · 02-27-13, 11:14 PM

If people posting Langs picks dont have enough problems already

**Chi_archie** · 09-02-13, 09:55 PM

John any more news from the brandon lang lawsuite front?

**bigboydan** · 02-12-14, 12:39 PM

I'm starting to remember something about this.

**jjgold** · 02-12-14, 12:50 PM

You could do whatever you want
Touts have no legal course
They are frauds so they have no credibility

**manny24** · 02-12-14, 01:28 PM

never saw this before 2 thoughts

1. Archie is unfukkinreal

guy is all rooster to the knee

and 2. Boner seems like he would be RELENTLESS covering a lawsuite in court

**jjgold** · 02-12-14, 02:53 PM

I get free stock picks from a $400 a month service and share it with about 5 guys

Nothing they can do either

**mighty maron** · 02-12-14, 05:53 PM

Serious question:

If a person approaches a website and says this is my copyrighted or Intellectual property, do they then have the responsibility that specific entry that party mentioned...maybe

What the plaintiff does not have the right to do is to shift the burden to the site to police every thread for the rest of time to make sure that any future disseminated information from op is given out on purpose or accidently.

The burden to prove that any site did this with malice and was so willingly negligent as to actually award damages is an ocean that will never be crossed.

**manny24** · 02-12-14, 09:06 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

I get free stock picks from a $400 a month service and share it with about 5 guys

Nothing they can do either

**Chi_archie** · 02-12-14, 09:20 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

I'd love to be in the jury box for a case like this IF all legalise jargon was replaced with SBR nomenclature and you'd get nuggets like this

"Objection your honor, the defense has never fuking heard of the plaintiff"

"Your honor the defense would like to move to dismiss the case on the grounds that Stevo is an attention whore, broke dik loser, lives in his mother's basement and is known as an auto-fade"

"If it pleases the court, I'd like to approach the bench.....'your honor saloon this shit!"

"The Prosecution would like to submit the following into evidence as exhibit B to support the theory that counsel is ghosting and was previously known by the name Ipickwinnersallday"

"Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury, if this line of questioning doesn't lead somewhere and help the prosecution win, I won't post until 2014"

"repeat after me, I swear to pay back my betpoints loan 6 points a day, the whole 6 points a day and nothing less than half my winnings on my big lock wager this weekend so help me Yisman"

"objection your honor, prosecution is clearly badgering and trolling the witness, and this being a subforum proceeding and a weeknight with Shari91 on duty, the defense requests an infraction and 24 hr cool down"

almost 75k posts here among this account and my ghosts and I think this was the only good one I ever made.

it was actually Loshak using my account though after I lost a password bet to him

**michdude** · 02-12-14, 09:29 PM

Brandon Lang does not have a case nor does Stevo these touts don't have any case at all

**benjy** · 02-12-14, 09:44 PM

I can't believe that I missed this. Should have been stickied; JJ's moronic threads make PT roll over too quickly.

**jjgold** · 02-12-14, 10:55 PM

Originally posted by benjy

I can't believe that I missed this. Should have been stickied; JJ's moronic threads make PT roll over too quickly.

Huh??? I guess your too dumb to read SBR, I do not even start a lot of threads little kid and many gambling related

Run along to Mommy this site is for real men

**SBR_John** · 02-12-14, 11:15 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

John any more news from the brandon lang lawsuite front?

What was not dismissed will probably go to trial late this year or early next. It's a frivolous suit, we expect to prevail.

**bigboydan** · 02-12-14, 11:20 PM

Originally posted by SBR_John

What was not dismissed will probably go to trial late this year or early next. It's a frivolous suit, we expect to prevail.

I can see that as well as this happening

**Chi_archie** · 02-12-14, 11:21 PM

if it goes to trial can we send

BigBoyDan, TTWarrior, Wulfman, and BigDeem to represent SBR as the dream team?

**Chi_archie** · 02-12-14, 11:23 PM

Judge: "Let me repeat for the 3rd time.... the defense CANNOT plead...Insane, fat, Mad, and Asian"

**bigboydan** · 02-12-14, 11:28 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

if it goes to trial can we send

BigBoyDan, TTWarrior, Wulfman, and BigDeem to represent SBR as the dream team?

But you said I was and I quote "BBD=Jerkoff" sir.

It's NOT my fault Deuce rated out himself and everyone and refuses to do his job now is it?

**bigboydan** · 02-13-14, 12:33 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

if it goes to trial can we send

BigBoyDan, TTWarrior, Wulfman, and BigDeem to represent SBR as the dream team?

Well if Steve Corino is "Mr. Wrestling 3" (and he is) then I would 100% agree I am deserving of the spot now don't you sir?

**BigDeem5** · 02-13-14, 12:36 PM

I wouldn't represent SBR for all the pizza points in the world..

**Swinging Johnson** · 02-13-14, 12:45 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

almost 75k posts here among this account and my ghosts and I think this was the only good one I ever made.

it was actually Loshak using my account though after I lost a password bet to him

Archie you have had many shining moments but this one is a true gem. You have my profound admiration.

**bigboydan** · 02-13-14, 12:49 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

almost 75k posts here among this account and my ghosts and I think this was the only good one I ever made.

it was actually Loshak using my account though after I lost a password bet to him

One thing for sure is that Ipickwinnersallday is Smoke (jeff/Sean)

:

**broadway6** · 02-13-14, 04:13 PM

Originally posted by Chi_archie

I'd love to be in the jury box for a case like this IF all legalise jargon was replaced with SBR nomenclature and you'd get nuggets like this

"Objection your honor, the defense has never fuking heard of the plaintiff"

"Your honor the defense would like to move to dismiss the case on the grounds that Stevo is an attention whore, broke dik loser, lives in his mother's basement and is known as an auto-fade"

"If it pleases the court, I'd like to approach the bench.....'your honor saloon this shit!"

"The Prosecution would like to submit the following into evidence as exhibit B to support the theory that counsel is ghosting and was previously known by the name Ipickwinnersallday"

"Ladies and Gentleman of the Jury, if this line of questioning doesn't lead somewhere and help the prosecution win, I won't post until 2014"

"repeat after me, I swear to pay back my betpoints loan 6 points a day, the whole 6 points a day and nothing less than half my winnings on my big lock wager this weekend so help me Yisman"

"objection your honor, prosecution is clearly badgering and trolling the witness, and this being a subforum proceeding and a weeknight with Shari91 on duty, the defense requests an infraction and 24 hr cool down"

one of the best posts in the history of SBR

**broadway6** · 02-13-14, 04:15 PM

Originally posted by jjgold

I get free stock picks from a $400 a month service and share it with about 5 guys

Nothing they can do either

then why can't service form guys not put how many units a play is?

**Mitchell88** · 02-13-14, 06:33 PM

Gambling God should be banned just for being a liar douche. He is such a tout fraud get rid of that piece of trash. Look at his post such a liar fraud.

**Adonis70** · 02-13-14, 10:31 PM

Can I ask a stupid question? I know, I know, no question is stupid... well 2 questions...

1. Is this the first of its kind in terms of a tout/service going after a site for posting paid picks, in this case SBR?

and secondly...

2. What if SBR never even offered their "Service Plays" section?
Would there even be a lawsuit? Wouldn't one would think, or at least the legal team for SBR prepare for something like this by offering the "Service Plays" section...

Is it really worth it? and What's the benefit?

**Robber** · 02-14-14, 01:38 AM

Originally posted by BigDeem5

I wouldn't represent SBR for all the pizza points in the world..

Except you were begging sbr for pizza pts

You won't even graduate law school let alone pass the bar and you want to represent sbr in court