Thunder are very square

[Pride]

Then go on the Internet and look it up. Don't be a smart guy.

if you think bw caps games then you are sorely mistaken. all he does is fade public plays and hopes for the best.

[BernardMadoff]

Then go on the Internet and look it up. Don't be a smart guy.

Why would I need to do that when I know what it means, but the word handicapper is mishandled on this site daily, especially when nobody has evidence of such.

[SEKTAUR]

Had about 3k on Thunder total, glad they were able to pull this out.

3k LOL prove it

[Speedy88]

Why would I need to do that when I know what it means, but the word handicapper is mishandled on this site daily, especially when nobody has evidence of such.

Fair enough. I agree that the word gets thrown around a lot, so does the word square (that word used in the wrong way everyday in here).

[BernardMadoff]

3k LOL prove it

Never effing heard of ya pal.

[SEKTAUR]

Never effing heard of ya pal.

same here bud..... soooo no proof huh no surprise

[BernardMadoff]

same here bud..... soooo no proof huh no surprise

Shown proof many times, have no reason to lie. Whats so hard to believe.

[bleek88]

Bernard is a newb. He doesnt have $100. lol

[SpreadSniper]

Bernard is a newb. He doesnt have $100. lol

[SpreadSniper]

Bernard is a newb. He doesnt have $100. lol

[BigDofBA]

Bernard is a newb. He doesnt have $100. lol

I just want you to tell us where you got the Spurs -5 (-103) before the game yesterday.

[BernardMadoff]

Bernard is a newb. He doesnt have $100. lol

Says the guy who's only been betting a couple months and needs to make 10 threads a day for $100 bets.

[Speedy88]

I just want you to tell us where you got the Spurs -5 (-103) before the game yesterday.

I asked him and he refused to tell me. Why would anyone hide where they got their line from? Probably because he made it up.

Either way it cashed easy last night. But I'm pretty sure not one book ever had SA at -5, let alone at that low of juice. If there was a book that did have it at -5, it would have been juiced up at least to -110.

[BigDofBA]

Says the guy who's only been betting a couple months and needs to make 10 threads a day for $100 bets.

I've also seen him post bets like 25 minutes after the game has started.

[SpreadSniper]

I just want you to tell us where you got the Spurs -5 (-103) before the game yesterday.

Dont bother asking the guy questions... he's not intelligent enough to formulate a response.... all he can do is chuck out the squarest plays of the day into 50 different threads daily and say "Lets get it" like a fukkin moron....

[BigDofBA]

I asked him and he refused to tell me. Why would anyone hide where they got their line from? Probably because he made it up. Regardless Bleek still cashed, but Im pretty sure he air bets w/ made up lines. Just my opinion.

Exactly.

He will post his bets, well after the game starts. He will say how much he bet, how much he won, and bump his threads. Yet he won't answer where he got a line that never existed.

If you're going to give all of that info and bump your threads, why not say where you go the line at?

So he got a better line on the Spurs than any of us with less juice?? LOL. OK.

[BernardMadoff]

I've also seen him post bets like 25 minutes after the game has started.

Strange considering it seems he's always in front of the computer, guess he needs a team to jump out in a big lead before posting.

[Speedy88]

Exactly.

He will post his bets, well after the game starts. He will say how much he bet, how much he won, and bump his threads. Yet he won't answer where he got a line that never existed.

If you're going to give all of that info and bump your threads, why not say where you go the line at?

So he got a better line on the Spurs than any of us with less juice?? LOL. OK.

I know he made up the line. Why else would he refuse to tell us where he got SA -5 -103 from? There is literally no reason to hide where you get a line from. And I doubt the kid bets $100 or more a game. He is most like a $10-$20 capper.