Last game: OKC at Memphis

t-wizzle · 03-07-11, 06:17 PM

Go on...

JOHON8 · 03-07-11, 06:21 PM

Stop thinking about previous games, think of this game in it's unique form. Yes those previous matches help you understand the match up but they have absolutely nothing to do with the line, don't get confused by this when you over think games.

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 06:23 PM

Originally posted by JOHON8

Stop thinking about previous games, think of this game in it's unique form. Yes those previous matches help you understand the match up but they have absolutely nothing to do with the line, don't get confused by this when you over think games.

They've been tightly contested games, but the line has been in OKC's favor all three times and consistent (+1, -6.5, -7.5) -- until tonight. I just find that interesting that's it -3 and not a PK.

hawley · 03-07-11, 06:28 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

They've been tightly contested games, but the line has been in OKC's favor all three times and consistent (+1, -6.5, -7.5) -- until tonight. I just find that interesting that's it -3 and not a PK.

The books have spoken

TechnicallyFoul · 03-07-11, 06:28 PM

I think the line is true. Take OKC on a 10 point teaser. I like 13 points.

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 06:32 PM

81% on OKC ML and 73% on +3.

Just sayin'....

Pauulzcappin · 03-07-11, 06:34 PM

And no Rudy Gay tonight for the Grizz.

vinny808 · 03-07-11, 06:38 PM

And no Geff Green/ Kristic plus Robinson and no Perkins. Plus Durant is not playing well due to injury. Its going to be a close one.

TechnicallyFoul · 03-07-11, 06:39 PM

Marc G., Zach R., Sam Y., O.J. M., Mike C., Tony A., Shane B., Darell A., all probable.

vyomguy · 03-07-11, 06:41 PM

okc played in OT yesterday...thats why.

TechnicallyFoul · 03-07-11, 06:46 PM

Plus Russel Westbrook ate too much for breakfast.

dynamite140 · 03-07-11, 06:54 PM

Oh dear public numbers and reverse line movement talk again

.

Didn't you say you are going to not look at these things anymore? Oh wait you did but yet you can't stop because you think EVERYTHING IS A TRAP AND RIGGED.

NBA_Brosuf · 03-07-11, 07:06 PM

The best play is the reverse of the reverse.

If you can only figure out what is the reverse in the first place.

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 10:23 PM

hawley · 03-07-11, 10:50 PM

Originally posted by hawley

The books have spoken

good work team

demens · 03-07-11, 10:57 PM

So much for being done with line movement.

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 10:59 PM

Originally posted by demens

So much for being done with line movement.

There was no line movement here -- at least none that I know of.

pacocn · 03-07-11, 11:00 PM

now we know why it was memphis -3

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 11:01 PM

Originally posted by pacocn

now we know why it was memphis -3

Yep.

dynamite140 · 03-07-11, 11:19 PM

Originally posted by demens

So much for being done with line movement.

Don't worry demens.

No Coincidences will always make a post that relates to either line movement or public percentages and TRAP lines even if he says he will stop

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 11:19 PM

Originally posted by dynamite140

Don't worry demens.

No Coincidences will always make a post that relates to either line movement or public percentages and TRAP lines even if he says he will stop

So I'm assuming this line made sense to you, based on what I posted?

If so, you were wrong.

hawley · 03-07-11, 11:20 PM

Originally posted by dynamite140

Oh dear public numbers and reverse line movement talk again

.

Didn't you say you are going to not look at these things anymore? Oh wait you did but yet you can't stop because you think EVERYTHING IS A TRAP AND RIGGED.

Nice call buddy

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 11:22 PM

Originally posted by dynamite140

Oh dear public numbers and reverse line movement talk again

.

Didn't you say you are going to not look at these things anymore? Oh wait you did but yet you can't stop because you think EVERYTHING IS A TRAP AND RIGGED.

Do you know the difference between line movement and what I posted here? Because if you don't, you need to just quit gambling now.

Dexter · 03-07-11, 11:24 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

There was no line movement here -- at least none that I know of.

i made this play solely based on RLM for this game.

the line opened at pinny at 2, went to 2.5 then hit 3 around 10am with public showing an 80% figure on okc.

dynamite140 · 03-07-11, 11:24 PM

Lets just make it simple.

All your posts are going to be involved one of these things

1. Line Movement
2. Public Percentages
3. Trap Lines
4. NBA Rigging Totals in the last 2 minutes of a game
5. Whining over a bad beat

Just quit it. Most posters agree that you are the poster that creates the most useless threads on the forum than anyone else in the nba forum. Everytime you lose, you cry and whine about it.

Hawley, No Coincidences says he is done looking at line movement. No way that can be possible

dynamite140 · 03-07-11, 11:27 PM

Originally posted by Dexter

i made this play solely based on RLM for this game.

the line opened at pinny at 2, went to 2.5 then hit 3 around 10am with public showing an 80% figure on okc.

NO Coincidences is in denial as usual. He always says there is no line movement he is aware of and yes the line went from -2 to -3.

demens · 03-07-11, 11:28 PM

So there was no line movement according to NC (there was but its irrelevant) yet he still made a thread talking about......lines.

And yes, the line did make sense.

Dexter · 03-07-11, 11:29 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Line was Memphis +1 in January. Grizz won by 5. Four days later, OKC won by 9 at home. In February, Memphis won at OKC in OT. Now they're back in Memphis, and the Grizz are -3?

im confused....memphis was +1 last time at home, won outright. they lost as dogs at okc, then they won as dogs in okc.

Originally posted by No coincidences

They've been tightly contested games, but the line has been in OKC's favor all three times and consistent (+1, -6.5, -7.5) -- until tonight. I just find that interesting that's it -3 and not a PK.

okc is 39-22, memphis is 35-29....

if memphis already won by 5 last home game vs okc (by the way, i think focusing on what the line was last game is a waste...live in the now) why would they be a PK this time?

dynamite140 · 03-07-11, 11:31 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

81% on OKC ML and 73% on +3.

Just sayin'....

LOL using public percentages once again. Either this or Trap or line movement. Do you know anything about sports? All you do is look at the line movements.

Demens, i think No Coincidences thinks EVERYTHING is a TRAP.

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 11:32 PM

Originally posted by dynamite140

Lets just make it simple.

All your posts are going to be involved one of these things

1. Line Movement
2. Public Percentages
3. Trap Lines
4. NBA Rigging Totals in the last 2 minutes of a game
5. Whining over a bad beat

Just quit it. Most posters agree that you are the poster that creates the most useless threads on the forum than anyone else in the nba forum. Everytime you lose, you cry and whine about it.

Hawley, No Coincidences says he is done looking at line movement. No way that can be possible

Let's make it even more simple: did the play win?

dynamite140 · 03-07-11, 11:34 PM

Dexter, No Coincidences is nothing more than someone who look at lines and look for traps. Either this or taking huge ugly underdogs. He has no knowledge whatsoever about sports. Someone mentioned to me that this is his first year of gambling so he doesn't know anything. He just has LEANS of who he likes and 100 percent those leans is based on line movement or taking big underdogs.

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 11:34 PM

Originally posted by Dexter

im confused....memphis was +1 last time at home, won outright. they lost as dogs at okc, then they won as dogs in okc.

okc is 39-22, memphis is 35-29....

if memphis already won by 5 last home game vs okc (by the way, i think focusing on what the line was last game is a waste...live in the now) why would they be a PK this time?

They've all been tight games. The first three lines were consistent. I figured if Memphis was +1 at home last time and won outright, they'd be a point better -- or maybe 2 points better, making them either a PK or -1. IMHO, going from +1 to -3 is a significant enough change that it merited noting.

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 11:37 PM

Originally posted by dynamite140

Dexter, No Coincidences is nothing more than someone who look at lines and look for traps. Either this or taking huge ugly underdogs. He has no knowledge whatsoever about sports. Someone mentioned to me that this is his first year of gambling so he doesn't know anything. He just has LEANS of who he likes and 100 percent those leans is based on line movement or taking big underdogs.

I played the Hornets tonight. I posted five plays on Sunday and went 4-1. I'm sorry you tailed me once and lost big, but lose the hard-on dude. If you don't like my plays or leans, fade them. If you don't like my posts, ignore them. Simple instructions that you just can't seem to follow.

I guess if I weren't around for you to stalk, you'd simply be posting about being a losing gambler (a thread you started recently). I guess at least with me around, it gives you an identity.

No coincidences · 03-07-11, 11:38 PM

Originally posted by dynamite140

LOL using public percentages once again. Either this or Trap or line movement. Do you know anything about sports? All you do is look at the line movements.

Demens, i think No Coincidences thinks EVERYTHING is a TRAP.

You seem to not understand the difference between identifying a "trap" and identifying the right side of a play. Where did I say anything about "trap" in this thread?