Garnett is OUT

**kobefanatic** · 04-10-10, 06:40 PM

Originally posted by HoulihansTX

Garnett is OUT

Garnett is OUT

I really think this may be a good thing, and a better back-up gets some playing time.

Anyone notice the "Lack of Line Movement?"

Books saying he is irrelevant, and I agree

damn i wished he played and got kicked in the balls by jennings

**dennisback** · 04-10-10, 06:41 PM

lol what u talking about lack of movement ?? moved 2 points ! bos were PK 1h ago, now +2 everywhere

**Wilforth** · 04-10-10, 06:43 PM

Originally posted by HoulihansTX

Garnett is OUT

Garnett is OUT

I really think this may be a good thing, and a better back-up gets some playing time.

Anyone notice the "Lack of Line Movement?"

Books saying he is irrelevant, and I agree

There's a 2-point line movement.

**HoulihansTX** · 04-10-10, 06:43 PM

Originally posted by dennisback

lol what u talking about lack of movement ?? moved 2 points ! bos were PK 1h ago, now +2 everywhere

Boston opened up as 1.5 Dogs. So being a two point dogs is fairly insignificant.

**Wilforth** · 04-10-10, 06:44 PM

Originally posted by HoulihansTX

Boston opened up as 1.5 Dogs. So being a two point dogs is fairly insignificant.

Line was already at PK.

**HoulihansTX** · 04-10-10, 06:47 PM

Originally posted by Wilforth

Line was already at PK.

For Boston to open as 1.5 dogs in the minds of the books, with Garnett. Then for him to be ruled out, and the line is only .5 difference from the opener is telling IMO.

**Wilforth** · 04-10-10, 06:50 PM

Originally posted by HoulihansTX

For Boston to open as 1.5 dogs in the minds of the books, with Garnett. Then for him to be ruled out, and the line is only .5 difference from the opener is telling IMO.

I get your point.

**kobefanatic** · 04-10-10, 06:50 PM

Originally posted by HoulihansTX

For Boston to open as 1.5 dogs in the minds of the books, with Garnett. Then for him to be ruled out, and the line is only .5 difference from the opener is telling IMO.

KG= washed up

**dennisback** · 04-10-10, 06:50 PM

so what its still a 2-point movement which is quite a lot.

**HoulihansTX** · 04-10-10, 06:54 PM

Alright I did not explain my self well in the OP, but I think you guys get my point.

Anyway. I think this is a good time to pull the trigger on Boston +2. Someone has to step up for Boston, an Garnett wasnt getting the job done.

**lakerboy** · 04-10-10, 07:14 PM

Cant bet on Boston- ILLEGAL

**kobefanatic** · 04-10-10, 07:16 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Cant bet on Boston- ILLEGAL

**HoulihansTX** · 04-10-10, 09:05 PM

Originally posted by HoulihansTX

I think this is a good time to pull the trigger on Boston +2. Someone has to step up for Boston, an Garnett wasnt getting the job done.

Really glad Boston is looking good, when I didnt take my own advice.

**WillC** · 04-11-10, 02:02 AM

My Bucks team will struggle to win more than a game in the playoffs.

No Bogut cripples our interior game and D. We are essentially a jump shooting team now.
Take out the best player in any playoff team and they will struggle. Big shame as the healthy Bucks would take the Celtics to 7 games imo. (Bogut avg 25+pts 15+reb 2+blk against Boston this season)

**Durrrr** · 04-11-10, 02:13 AM

bucks rely on Bogut sooo much. Comaprable to cavs losing James.